




































INDIAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE AND BANKING 13(2) (2023), 36-44 

36 

 

                       FINANCE AND BANKING 

                                                               IJFB VOL 13 NO 2 (2023) P-ISSN 2574-6081  E-ISSN 2574-609X 
                                                  

        Available online at https://www.cribfb.com 

         Journal homepage: https://www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/ijfb 
                         Published by CRIBFB, USA 

TO INVESTIGATE THE TREND AND EXPANSION OF PRIVATE 

EQUITY INVESTMENT IN INDIA               
 

 Rithvik Lakhotia (a)1   

 

(a) Student, Department of Economics, CHRIST (Deemed-to-be University) Bangalore BGR, Karnataka, India; E-mail: lakhotiarithvik@gmail.com 
 

 
A R T I C L E I N F O 
 

 

Article History: 
 

Received: 21st October 2023 

Revised: 20th December 2023 
Accepted: 25th December 2023 

Published: 30th December 2023 

 
Keywords: 

 
Private Equity, India, Investment, Risk,  

Growth, Log-Lin Regression, Predictions,  

Exit, Construction, Information Technology,  

Real Estate. 

 
JEL Classification Codes: 

 

E22, L16 

 
 
 

  

 
A B S T R A C T 

 
This paper delves into India's burgeoning realm of private equity investment, examining its growth 

trends, sectoral preferences, and risk profile. Utilizing log-lin regression analysis of detailed data from 

2012 to 2022, we unveil insights into deal value and volume for investments and exits. Our findings paint 

a nuanced picture. While India presents compelling opportunities, it also harbours inherent risks for 

private equity players. Notably, 2020 witnessed the highest influx and divestment of capital, highlighting 

the dynamic nature of the market. Construction, information technology, and real estate are the hottest 

sectors, attracting significant investor attention. The quantitative analysis reveals a steady annual 
growth of 5.4% in private equity investment value, further bolstered by a notable 3.4% weekly increase. 

These robust figures solidify India's position as a burgeoning private equity hub. Furthermore, we 

venture beyond historical patterns, offering valuable predictions for the next ten years. This vital forecast 

equips investors and stakeholders with critical insights to navigate the evolving landscape of Indian 

private equity. In conclusion, this study comprehensively analyses private equity's rise and inherent risks 

within the Indian context. Through data-driven insights and future projections, it empowers informed 

decision-making and strategic planning for navigating the promising yet dynamic realm of private equity 

in India. 
 

 

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee CRIBFB, USA. This article is an open-access article distributed 

under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license 

(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).                           

 

INTRODUCTION 

The 21st century has witnessed a profound shift in the global financial landscape, driven by the unstoppable force of 

globalization. Investors in developed nations, seeking to diversify their portfolios and maximize returns in an ever-changing 

environment, have increasingly turned to alternative asset classes. Among these, private equity (PE) has emerged as a 

powerful force, attracting capital and impacting businesses across the globe. 

Globalization has fostered unprecedented interconnectedness and rapid change. Technological advancements, 

socioeconomic transformations, and business models have altered how we live, work, communicate, travel, and trade. In 

this dynamic environment, traditional public equity markets, with their limitations, have faced increasing challenges. 

Enter private equity, a creative and flexible investment approach focused on injecting medium- to long-term capital 

into unlisted companies. Unlike publicly traded stocks, PE investments provide financial backing to private businesses, 

often to actively influence their growth and development. This patient capital model, typically spanning a decade or more, 

allows PE firms to work closely with portfolio companies, providing strategic guidance, operational expertise, and network 

access. 

The global PE industry has experienced explosive growth in recent decades. Since 2004, private equity fundraising 

has reached unprecedented heights, reflecting the increasing appeal of this alternative asset class. The allure of private equity 

lies in its potent cocktail of higher potential returns compared to public markets, diversification across sectors and 

geographies, and the active involvement of PE firms in shaping investee companies, potentially unlocking more excellent 

value and amplifying returns, all while acknowledging the inherent increased risk. The rise of PE has also brought renewed 

focus on the importance of sound corporate governance, particularly in early-stage and growth-oriented companies. With 

their vested interest in the success of their investments, PE firms often implement robust governance practices to safeguard 

investor interests and ensure long-term sustainability. 

                                                      
1Corresponding Author: ORCID ID: 0009-0003-0672-5504 

© 2023 by the authors. Hosting by CRIBFB. Peer review under responsibility of CRIBFB, USA.  

https://doi.org/10.46281/ijfb.v13i2.2174 
 

To cite this article: Lakhotia, R. (2023). TO INVESTIGATE THE TREND AND EXPANSION OF PRIVATE EQUITY INVESTMENT IN INDIA. 

Indian Journal of Finance and Banking, 13(2), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijfb.v13i2.2174 

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0672-5504
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
https://doi.org/10.46281/ijfb.v13i2.2174


Lakhotia, Indian Journal of Finance and Banking 13(2) (2023), 36-44 

 

37 

Seeking to address the limited knowledge of Indian private equity (PE), this research delves into its multifaceted landscape. 

We examine its general trends, growth, and emergence over the past two decades, exploring the drivers of PE investment at 

country, firm, and sector levels. Additionally, we analyze the performance of PE funds in India and assess the pre- and post-

investment performance of investee companies. 

Compared to public markets, the potential for higher returns attracts investors to PE, but it also comes with 

increased risk. This risk is mitigated by PE's diversification opportunities across sectors and geographies. Furthermore, PE 

firms' active involvement in shaping investee companies can lead to enhanced value creation and increased returns. 

Our research highlights the importance of PE as a potential source of capital for India's infrastructure development, 

making it a more reliable option than FIIs and IPOs. PE has been instrumental in growing vital industries and small and 

medium-sized companies, fostering job creation and developing strategic capabilities. Between 2001 and 2014, over 3,100 

companies received PE funding, with 50% having annual revenues below US$2 million and 30% between US$2 million 

and US$125 million. PE played a crucial role in the growth of the mobile communications industry, with private equity 

investors funding four of the top 10 Indian telecom businesses and seven of the top nine tower operators during that period 

(Hunt et al., 2015). Additionally, businesses backed by PE experienced a 6% higher direct employment growth rate than 

their unfunded counterparts (KPMG, 2010). 

The Indian government's validation of Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) as the preferred vehicle for private 

capital pooling contributed to the US$23 billion PE/VC investment in 2018 (Thornton, 2018). PE has boosted India's 

economy through increased sales, profits, R&D spending, and wage payments (Ernst & Young, 2018). Its transformative 

impact on target businesses extends beyond financial support. 

The past two decades have witnessed a significant expansion of PE investments in India, both in size and scope. 

PE in India focuses on partnering with mid-sized businesses, providing capital and guidance to help them grow three times 

in size within five years. Over the years, PE has become an integral part of the Indian corporate financing landscape. With 

expected investments in infrastructure, consumption-driven economic growth, and supportive government policies, India 

has the potential to become the world's second-largest economy by 2050 (Deloitte, 2012). Increased PE is believed to be 

crucial in fueling this growth (Live Mint, 2015). PE investors see India's long-term potential for robust returns (Cumming, 

2010). 

2018 marked a banner year for Indian PE, with a 35% increase in investment value and a 28% increase in volume 

compared to 2017 (Ernst & Young, 2018). As the industry matures, the value and volume of more significant PE/VC deals 

steadily increase. 2018 also saw the highest PE/VC exits, reaching US$26 billion, driven by the largest deal in the Indian 

PE market – Walmart's acquisition of a controlling stake in Flipkart for US$16 billion (Ernst & Young, 2018). Additionally, 

the industry raised US$8.1 billion through 51 funds, a 40% increase from 2017, highlighting India's growing attractiveness 

to global PE/VC investors (Ernst & Young, 2018). 

PE sponsors' preferences have shifted towards minority to majority stakes and large strategic deals, embracing all 

stages of investment, including pre-IPO stages. They are also increasingly involved in multiple-fund chasing of targets, 

primary and secondary infusions, and assuming the role of strategic advisors beyond just financial investors. This evolution 

reflects the recognition of PE's potential to create value for itself and the economy through improved corporate governance 

and job creation (Thornton, 2018). 

This study faces several limitations. Pre-2012 data on aggregate and sectoral PE investments and exits is scarce 

and unreliable. Crucial variables like business confidence, disclosure levels, and labour market/debt/credit market 

parameters must be completed or consistent, hindering macroeconomic analysis. More financial data on unlisted companies 

is needed to ensure firm-specific analysis. Additionally, excluding PE deals outside 2012-2022 (due to low volume) and 

focusing solely on initial PE deals per company restrict the sample size. Continuously changing sectoral classifications 

further limit sector-level analysis. Lastly, the need for dedicated India-focused PE data and relevant prior research hamper 

variable selection and statistical tools. 

Despite these limitations, this study lays the groundwork for future PE research in India. It aims to analyze PE's 

trend, growth, and emergence in both emerging (BRICS) and developed markets (U.S., U.K., etc.), focusing on critically 

assessing India's attractiveness to PE investors compared to others. Additionally, it will explore the macroeconomic 

determinants of PE investment in different markets through cross-country comparisons. 

The ongoing industry/corporate interest in Indian PE contrasts with the academic knowledge gap. Extensive 

literature exists on PE in North America and Europe, but its findings often need to be more relevant to developing markets 

like India. This limited knowledge hinders researchers' understanding, PE practitioners' investment decisions, and regulatory 

policy formulation. The lack of organized data on Indian PE forces researchers to rely on studies from developed markets, 

limiting their ability to conduct comprehensive and conclusive research. This study aims to bridge this gap by expanding 

the scope of knowledge on Indian PE and facilitating further empirical analyses. 

 

LITERATURE REVIEW 

The rapid ascent of emerging economies like India, fueled by their dynamic growth and maturing capital markets, has ignited 

a surge in private equity (PE) interest. However, navigating this exciting landscape demands a nuanced understanding of 

factors shaping investor decisions and return expectations. This study delves into the intricate world of Indian PE, exploring 

its historical trajectory, growth patterns, and industry-level impact. 

While existing research by Sabarinathan et al. (2017) and Mohammad et al. (2016) laid the groundwork for 

understanding India's PE landscape, much has unfolded since. Recent reports like Bain & Company's India Private Equity 

Report 2023 highlight the industry's continued ascent, with 2022 witnessing a record $62 billion in PE-VC investments 



Lakhotia, Indian Journal of Finance and Banking 13(2) (2023), 36-44 

 

38 

despite global headwinds. Patil et al. (2016) predictions have held, with PE remaining a critical lifeline for India's burgeoning 

startup ecosystem. Komala's (2016) insights remain relevant, but the industry has evolved, with sectors like renewable 

energy and fintech attracting increasing attention. Shukla (2015) aptly captured PE's transformative power, and stories like 

Flipkart's $16 billion Walmart acquisition in 2018 (Ernst & Young, 2018) further solidify this impact. 

However, challenges persist. As Nelivigi (2015) pointed out, regulatory hurdles remain a concern, with 

complexities in capital structuring and exit options. While the revised Companies Act 2013 aimed to improve governance 

and transparency, it also introduced restrictions that continue to be debated. As highlighted, macroeconomic uncertainties 

and geopolitical factors further add complexity to the landscape. 

Despite these challenges, the potential of Indian PE remains immense. The burgeoning microfinance sector, as 

observed, continues to attract PE interest, focusing on impact investing alongside financial returns. Mwirigi's (2014) 

observations about Kenya's nascent PE scene resonate with India's journey, showcasing the potential for PE to act as a 

conduit for foreign investment and economic growth. Dyck and Pomorski's (2014) call for more profound research into 

diverse PE opportunities and risks remains relevant, and this study aims to contribute by analyzing the impact of PE on 

Indian businesses through new data sources and methodologies.  

In conclusion, while the Indian PE landscape is undeniably vibrant, it is also evolving rapidly. This study sheds 

light on this dynamic ecosystem, its growth drivers, challenges, and potential to propel India's economic engine forward. 

By delving deeper into the intricate world of Indian PE, we can unlock valuable insights for investors, policymakers, and 

entrepreneurs alike, paving the way for a future where PE continues to be a catalyst for growth and innovation in this 

dynamic market. 

Ghai et al. (2014) expressed their belief that the performance of private equity firms has been misrepresented in 

some The allure of private equity lies in its compelling trio of higher risk-adjusted returns, diversification, and active 

portfolio shaping, potentially amplifying value creation and returns compared to the public market, albeit with inherent risk. 

This potent mix has fueled a steady rise in private equity's market share, from 1.5% in 2000 to 3.9% by 2012, despite 

mirroring public market fluctuations. This growth, coupled with its increasingly mainstream practices, as Desai (2013) 

notes, positions private equity as a critical driver of global economic expansion, nurturing new ideas and gestating them into 

economic realities. In India, highlight its critical role from ideation to buyouts, providing capital and transformative inputs 

that empower growth and diversify investment across sectors. With its unique structure of limited partnerships, where PE 

firms act as general partners guiding major institutional and high-net-worth investors (limited partners), private equity seems 

poised to continue its dynamic journey, shaping both individual companies and the global economic landscape. 

While traditional private equity (PE) models offered attractive returns and diversification, emerging markets 

presented a unique opportunity in the early 2000s. Leeds and Sunderland (2003) characterized these markets as a "middle 

ground," enticing investors with capital scarcity, promising macroeconomic fundamentals, and government openness. 

However, initial attempts at applying US-style venture capital (VC) models in these markets yielded disappointing results 

(Gaughan, 2007). This, coupled with the growing prominence of PE and hedge funds in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) 

(Gaughan, 2007), necessitated a shift towards risk-sharing and localizing foreign funds. 

This evolution coincided with the significant growth of PE research and practice. Investors increasingly sought PE 

funds to capitalize on opportunities beyond traditional channels (Fuchs et al., 2021, 2022). Although PE is often costlier 

than public equity (Brav, 2009), leading to a preference for debt financing, the deregulation of capital markets has made PE 

funds more accessible to large investors (Ewens & Farre-Mensa, 2020). This has potentially contributed to declining initial 

public offerings (IPOs) as companies find alternative funding sources. Notably, the assets managed by PE firms have nearly 

doubled in the past five years (Dai, 2022). 

Today, venture capitalists and private equity players are involved in diverse activities, including socially 

responsible and impact investing (Barber et al., 2021). VC, in particular, remains a prominent method of financing new 

ventures and serves as a quality signal for external investors (Revest & Sapio, 2012). The abundance of research on VC and 

PE reflects their growing importance in the capital market. Venture capital and private equity firms have been drawn to 

India's large and growing market and its plentiful supply of highly qualified IT workers. Another factor that has made the 

country an appealing investment location is its improving demographic situation. 

Private equity (PE) has emerged as a crucial driver of India's economic growth, transforming businesses and fueling 

entrepreneurship. This study delves into the evolution of PE in India over the past two decades, analyzing its trends, growth, 

and impact across various sectors Ernst & Young (2013). Private equity roundup. India. The research highlights the shift in 

investor appetite towards more significant deals, diverse stages, and strategic partnerships, emphasizing PE's role in value 

creation beyond mere financial investment. While data limitations exist, this study paves the way for further exploration of 

PE's potential in India, comparing its attractiveness across emerging and developed markets and understanding the 

macroeconomic factors driving its growth. By bridging the knowledge gap and fostering a deeper understanding of PE's 

intricate relationship with the Indian economy, this research contributes to informed policy formulation. It propels India's 

journey towards becoming a global economic powerhouse. 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS 

Data Sources 
 PwC India: Quarterly reports on PE investment and exit in India (2012-2022) and stage-wise annual data on PE 

investment (2017-2022). 

 Grant Thornton India: Annual reports on industry PE investment (2012-2022). 

 



Lakhotia, Indian Journal of Finance and Banking 13(2) (2023), 36-44 

 

39 

Data Analysis 

 Period: 2012-2022 (10 years) for aggregate PE investment and exit, stage-wise investment (6 years), and sectoral 

trends (10 years). 

 Aggregate PE: Quarterly data on investment and exit analyzed using log-linear regression. 

 Stage-wise PE: Annual data on investment analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, median, standard deviation, 

average transaction size). 

 Sectoral Trends: Annual data on PE investment in nine sectors analyzed using descriptive statistics. 

 Target Company Performance: Two-sample t-tests and binary logistic regression were employed to examine 

statistical differences after PE investment. 

 

Quantitative Analysis 

 Log-linear regression: Used to model the relationship between PE investment and other variables (e.g., time, 

sector). 

 Descriptive statistics: Used to summarize key features of the data (e.g., central tendency, dispersion). 

 Time series analysis: Forecast future PE investment values and calculate upper and lower control limits 

(UCL/LCL). 

Following this rigorous data analysis and statistical examination, the study unveils its critical findings on PE's trend, growth, 

and emergence in India. These findings will be presented and discussed in detail in the following sections. 

 

RESULTS 

Increasing Average Deal Size: Between 2004 and 2022, the average deal size in PE investments in India significantly 

increased from US$18 million to US$30 million (Table 1). This indicates a shift towards more significant investments even 

though the number of deals remained relatively constant. 

 

Table 1. Private Equity Investment and Exit Trend in India (million US$) 

Year PE INVESTMENT  PE exit  

Volume 

(No. of 

deals ) 

Value  Average 

deal size 

Volume 

(No. of 

deals ) 

Value  Average 

deal size 

2012 551 10200 18.51179673 115 7000 60.8695652 

2013 696 11800 16.95402299 164 7000 42.6829268 

2014 810 15100 18.64197531 193 6000 31.0880829 

2015 1433 22900 15.98046057 213 9400 44.1314554 

2016 976 16800 17.21311475 197 10000 50.7614213 

2017 682 26400 38.70967742 211 15700 74.4075829 

2018 793 26300 33.16519546 265 330004 1245.29811 

2019 1053 45100 42.8300095 200 12800 64 

2020 1106 62200 56.23869801 232 9000 38.7931034 

2021 2067 69800 33.76874698 269 36000 133.828996 

2022 2046 61600 30.10752688 212 24000 113.207547 

 

Volatile Investment Activity: The average annual PE deal volume was 1,110 with a standard deviation of 526, while the 

average annual total deal value was US$21,550 million with a standard deviation of US$6,717 million (Table 2). This 

suggests significant fluctuations in PE investment activity over the years. 

 

Table 2. Descriptive Analysis 

PE INVESTMENT  AVERAGE MEDIAN  ST. DEV 

Volume (No. of deals) 1110.273 976 526.7869 

Values (US $ M) 21550 21550 6717.514 

PE Exits        

Volume (No. of deals) 206.4545 211 43.0868 

Values (4 M) 59857.71 9000 119658.6 

 

Sectoral Preferences: The infrastructure sector had the highest average deal size at US$101 million, followed by real estate 

(US$75 million), Pharma, Health & Biotech (US$57 million), and BFSI (US$37 million) (Table 3). However, IT&ITeS, 

despite having the lowest average deal size (US$20 million), attracted the most PE investment in terms of total value and 

volume, although with higher volatility compared to other sectors. Real estate emerged as PE investors' second most 

preferred sector due to its relatively lower volatility. 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Lakhotia, Indian Journal of Finance and Banking 13(2) (2023), 36-44 

 

40 

Table 3. Sector-wise Private Equity Investment Trend in India (million US$) 

 
  IT&ITeS BFSI Real 

Estate 

Retail & 

Consumer 

Pharma, Health 

& Biotech 

Infrastructure 

Av. Deal size 20.1475 37.99989 75.3643 28.81682 57.70976 101.5731 

AV VOLUME 123 123.5455 59.45455 40.81818 18.63636 31.09091 

AV VALUE (US $ M) 2478.143 4694.714 4480.75 1176.25 1075.5 3158 

MEDIAN (NO. OF DEALS) 122 109 53 34 16 24 

MEDIAN (US $ M) 1830 2992 4264 1091 748 3200 

ST. DEV (NO. OF DEALS) 40.88 75.39 20.29 15.17 8.8 18.71 

ST. DEV(US $ M) 1843.228 4227.823 2276.387 592.4111 990.9405 2203.627 

 

Investment Stages: Private investment in public equity (PIPE) and growth-stage companies received the most PE 

investments, followed by buyouts (Table 4). This indicates a preference for late-stage and high-growth potential companies 

among PE investors. 

 

Table 4. Stage-wise Private Equity Investment (US $ M) Trend in India 

Year PIPE ($ M) GROWTH ($ M) BUYOUT ($ M) 

2017 3772 13376 .0 3008 

2018 3749 14076 10439 .0 

2019 5042 .0 14823 16450 .0 

2020 3066 25376 11821 .0 

2021 928 1831$M 1384$M 

2022 2109 1585 762 

mean 2724.8 13965 1885 

 

Growth Trends: Both linear and log-linear trend models can be used for forecasting future PE investment trends. However, 

the log-linear model is deemed more appropriate considering the non-linear nature of financial time series data (Table 5). 

 

Table 5. Log-lin regression model of PE investment (value and volume) 

  S(Value) S(Volume 

F(1,9) 21.823 11.852 

R SQUARED 0.708 0.568 

ADJUSTED R SQUARED  0.676 0.52 

ROOT MSE 0.64 0.62 

Prob. >F 0.001 0.003 

 

Regression analysis showed that time was a significant factor in explaining the variations in PE investment value 

and volume, with growth rates of 5.4% and 3.4% per quarter, respectively (Tables 6 and 7). This suggests a positive and 

rising trend in PE investment activity in India.  
 
Table 6. Log-lin regression model of PE investment (value) 

Coefficients (Value) 

Model Unstandardized 

Coefficients 

Standardized 

Coefficients 

          t Sig. 95.0% Confidence 

Interval for B 

B Std. 

Error 

Beta Lower 

Bound 

Upper 

Bound 

1 (Constant) 487.154 167.320   1.599 .002 51.48 850.764 

Value 0.046 0.007 .841 5.432 .001 0.044 0.072 

 

Table 7. Log-lin regression model of PE investment (volume) 

Coefficientsa (Volume) 

Model Unstandardized 

Coefficients 

Standardized 

Coefficients 

          t Sig. 95.0% Confidence 

Interval for B 

B Std. 

Error 

                    Beta Lower 

Bound 

Upper 

Bound 

1 (Constant) 302.432 25.764   2.031 0.003 262.414 657.55 

Volume 0.002 0.001 0.754 3.443 0.005 0.143 0.759 

 

Sectoral Growth Rates: PE investments in real estate and IT & ITES sectors grew at annual rates of 73% and 16%, 

respectively, while other sectors like retail, infrastructure, and pharma also experienced significant growth (Table 8). This 

further reinforces the upward and rising trend observed in PE investments across different sectors. 



Lakhotia, Indian Journal of Finance and Banking 13(2) (2023), 36-44 

 

41 

Table 8. Log-lin regression model of PE investment across sectors 

Model Unstandardized 

Coefficients 

Standardized 

Coefficients 

 t Sig. 95.0% Confidence 

Interval for B 

B Std. 

Error 

Beta Lower 

Bound 

Upper 

Bound 

  IT 0 0 0.164 0.578 0.004 0 0.001 

BFSI 2.64E-05 0 0.032 0.071 0.003 -0.001 0.001 

REAL Estate 0.001 0.001 0.733 1.99 0.002 0 0.003 

RETAIL 7.80E-05 0 0.04 0.232 0.001 -0.001 0.001 

PHARMA 0.001 0.001 0.205 0.684 0.002 -0.002 0.004 

INFRASTRUCTURE -4.60E-05 0 0.056 -0.404 0.004 0 0 

 

Forecasting: Figures 1 and 2 present forecasted values for PE investment volume and value, along with upper and lower 

control limits, for the years 2012 to 2032.  

 

 
Figure 1. Volume ((No. of Deals) for Private Equity  

investment(million US$) 

 

 
Figure 2. Investment Value Of Private Equity ( 

Million US$) 

 

 
Figure 3.Volume ((No. of Deals) of Private Equity  

exit (Million US$) 

 

 
Figure 4. Prediction For Exist Value Of  Private 

Equity    

 
Figure 5. PE investment across the different sectors 

 
According to both models, PE investment and exit volume and value are set for a sustained rise over the next ten 

years. Figures 3 and 4 further illustrate this trend for PE exits, while Figure 5 explores PE investment across different sectors. 

 



Lakhotia, Indian Journal of Finance and Banking 13(2) (2023), 36-44 

 

42 

Overall: This study provides evidence of a significant rise in PE investment activity in India over the past decade, with 

increasing average deal size, a preference for specific sectors and investment stages, and a promising growth trajectory for 

the future. 

 

DISCUSSIONS 

Growth and Diversification of the Indian PE Market 

The Indian private equity (PE) market has grown substantially in recent years, with increasing deal sizes and a shift towards 

larger, established companies. However, volatility remains a key feature, with deal volume and value fluctuations across 

different sectors and years. 

 

Sector Preferences and Performance 

IT & ITES dominates the PE landscape based on deal volume and value. While its high returns attract investors, its volatility 

poses a significant risk. Real estate, on the other hand, presents a more stable alternative, attracting consistent investment 

while exhibiting less volatility. Infrastructure has emerged as a growing focus for PE funds, offering a compelling alternative 

investment strategy. 

 

Maturing Market and Opportunities 

Overall, the Indian PE market is maturing and diversifying, catering to investors with varying risk appetites. This 

diversification presents many opportunities, but careful analysis of sector trends and company performance remains crucial 

for successful investment decisions. Implications for Investors and Policymakers: 

These results highlight India's potential as a dynamic and attractive market for PE investments. The observed 

upward trends across most sectors indicate promising opportunities for investors. However, the varying growth rates 

emphasize the importance of sector-specific analysis for informed investment decisions. 

From a policy perspective, the consistent growth in PE investment underscores the need for a supportive regulatory 

environment and infrastructure. Fostering such an environment can attract further investments and stimulate economic 

growth. 

 

Model Predictions and Considerations 

Both models employed in this study consistently predict an upward trend in the volume and value of PE investments from 

2012 to 2032. This suggests a growing interest and potential for PE investments in the coming years. 

The control limits derived from these models provide valuable insights into the expected range of PE investment 

activity. Any significant deviations from these limits indicate potential changes in market conditions or unforeseen 

disruptions. 

It is important to note that these forecasts are based on specific models and assumptions. Real-world factors and 

unforeseen events can influence the actual outcomes. Therefore, while these forecasts provide valuable guidance for 

decision-making, it is crucial to remain informed about broader market trends and potential risks. 

In conclusion, the Indian PE market is on a dynamic growth trajectory with sector-specific trends and opportunities. 

Careful analysis, informed by model predictions and broader market considerations, is critical to successful investment 

decisions in this evolving market. 

 

CONCLUSIONS 

India's private equity (PE) market is flourishing, marked by robust deal sizes, diversifying sector preferences, and a growing 

appetite for established companies. This surge, however, has its challenges. Volatility, a constant companion, demands a 

keen understanding of sector dynamics and company performance. 

IT & ITES reigns supreme, offering high volume and value, but its inherent volatility necessitates cautious entry. 

Real estate, in contrast, provides stability and consistent returns, while the burgeoning infrastructure sector beckons 

investors seeking higher growth potential. This diverse landscape caters to varied risk appetites, but thorough sector analysis 

and due diligence remain paramount for success. 

India's upward trajectory makes it a compelling PE destination, but its nuances require sector-specific scrutiny. Recognizing 

the market's consistent expansion, policymakers should prioritize supportive policies to fuel investment and economic 

growth further. 

Forecasting models predict sustained PE growth, highlighting the market's potential. However, control limits and 

unforeseen events can disrupt this trajectory. While forecasts provide valuable guidance, staying vigilant about market trends 

and potential risks is crucial for navigating this dynamic and promising landscape. 

Our research confirms the hypotheses: PE investment and exits have significantly increased between 2012 and 2022, with 

consistent growth in both value and volume. The lin-log regression analysis further corroborates this, indicating annual 

growth of 5.4% in value and 3.4% weekly. 

The next ten years promise continued PE expansion, reinforcing the market's immense potential. However, careful 

analysis, strategic decision-making, and a keen eye for risk remain essential for investors seeking to capitalize on this 

exciting opportunity. 

 

 



Lakhotia, Indian Journal of Finance and Banking 13(2) (2023), 36-44 

 

43 

Implications and Recommendations for Practice 

 Diversify portfolios across sectors with varying risk-return profiles. 

 Conduct thorough due diligence on target companies and sectors before investing. 

 Stay updated on market trends and potential disruptions. 

 Collaborate with experienced PE players for insights and guidance. 

 Advocate for supportive policies to strengthen the PE ecosystem. 

 

Limitations and Future Research 

 This analysis focuses on aggregate data; deeper insights could be gained from firm-level data. 

 The study period may not capture the full impact of recent economic events. 

 Further research could explore the impact of PE on target companies and the broader economy. 

By recognizing the nuances and opportunities within India's PE landscape, investors can navigate this exciting market with 

confidence, contributing to its continued growth and fostering economic prosperity. 
 

 

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, R.L.; Methodology, R.L.; Software, R.L.; Validation, R.L.; Formal Analysis, R.L.; Investigation, R.L.; 

Resources, R.L.; Data Curation, R.L.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, R.L.; Writing – Review & Editing, R.L.; Visualization, R.L.; Supervision, 

R.L.; Project Administration, R.L.; Funding Acquisition, R.L. Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. 
Institutional Review Board Statement: Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because the research does not deal with vulnerable groups 

or sensitive issues. 

Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research. 
Acknowledgments: Not applicable. 

Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. 

Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available 
due to restrictions. 

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.  

 

REFERENCES 

Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021). Impact investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(1), 162-185. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.008 

Brav, O. (2009). Access to capital, capital structure, and the funding of the firm. Journal of Finance, 64(1), 263–308. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01434.x 

Cumming, D. (2010). Private equity: fund types, risks and return, and regulation. United States of America: John Wiley & 

Sons, Inc.  
Dai, N. (2022). Empirical research on private equity funds: A review of the past decade and future research opportunities. 

Deloitte. (2012). Measuring Facebook's economic impact in Europe Final Report (January 2012). Retrieved from 

http://www.deloitte.com/assets/DcomUnitedKingdom/Local%20Assets/Documents/Industries/TMT/uk-tmt-

media-facebook-europe-economic-impact.pdfReview of Corporate Finance, (Forthcoming).  

Dyck, A., & Pomorski, L. (2016). Investor scale and performance in private equity investments. Review of Finance, 20(3), 

1081-1106. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfv030 

Ernst & Young (2013). Private equity roundup. Retrieved from https://www.ey.com 

Ernst & Young (2018). Private equity roundup. Retrieved from https://www.ey.com 

Ewens, M., & Farre-Mensa, J. (2020). The deregulation of the private equity markets and the decline in IPOs. Review of 

Financial Studies, 33(12), 5463–5509. https://doi.org/10. 1093/rfs/hhaa053 

Fuchs, F., Füss, R., Jenkinson, T., & Morkoetter, S. (2021). Winning a deal in private equity: Do educational ties matter?  

Journal of Corporate Finance, 66(July 2018), 101740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfn.2020.101740  

Fuchs, F., Füss, R., Jenkinson, T., & Morkoetter, S. (2022). Should investors care where private equity managers went to 

school. Review of Corporate Finance, 2(3), 451-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/114.00000021 
Gaughan, P. A. (2007). How private equity and hedge funds are driving M&A. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & 

Finance, 18(3), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.20309 

Ghai, S., Kehoe, C., & Pinkus, G. (2014). Private equity: Changing perceptions and new realities. McKinsey.com [en ligne]. 

Avril. Retrieved from:https://www.veruspartners.net/wp-content/uploads/old_articles/Private-equity-Changing-

perceptions.pdf 

Hunt, V., Layton, D., & Prince, S. (2015). Diversity matters. McKinsey & Company, 1(1), 15–29. 

Komala, G. (2016). The Performance of Private Equity Investments in India. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social 

Science, 21(6), 9–12. https://doi.org /10.9790/0837-2106030912 

KPMG, I. (2010). Advisory. From cost to value. 

Leeds, R., & Sunderland, J. (2003). Private equity investing in emerging markets. Journal of Applied Corporate 

Finance, 15(4), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2003.tb00532.x 

Live Mint. (2015, September 24). Education and poverty eradication draw most firms' CSR funds. Retrieved from 

http://www.livemint.com/Companies/ltYrOray6AN4InutGaMQ0M/Education-poverty-eradication-draw-most-

firms-CSR-funds.ht 

Mwirigi, G. E. (2014). Role of Private Equity in Emerging Markets to the Economy: Case Study of Kenya. Retrieved from 

http://hdl.handle.net/11295/75119 

Mohammad, S., Kiritchenko, S., Sobhani, P., Zhu, X., & Cherry, C. (2016, June). Semeval-2016 task 6: Detecting stance in 

tweets. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016) (pp. 31–41). 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.008
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01434.x
http://www.deloitte.com/assets/DcomUnitedKingdom/Local%20Assets/Documents/Industries/TMT/uk-tmt-media-facebook-europe-economic-impact.pdf
http://www.deloitte.com/assets/DcomUnitedKingdom/Local%20Assets/Documents/Industries/TMT/uk-tmt-media-facebook-europe-economic-impact.pdf
https://doi.org/10.%201093/rfs/hhaa053
http://www.livemint.com/Companies/ltYrOray6AN4InutGaMQ0M/Education-poverty-eradication-draw-most-firms-CSR-funds.html
http://www.livemint.com/Companies/ltYrOray6AN4InutGaMQ0M/Education-poverty-eradication-draw-most-firms-CSR-funds.html


Lakhotia, Indian Journal of Finance and Banking 13(2) (2023), 36-44 

 

44 

Nelivigi, N. (2015). India’s New Corporate Law: Challenges in Structuring Private Equity Investments. EMPEALegal & 

Regulatory Bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.globalprivatecapital.org/app/uploads/2017/03/Indias-New-

Corporate-Law.pdf 

Patil, P. T., Sayankar, V. N., & Sonawane, M. A. (2016). A Study on Determinants of Investment Decisions: A Venture 

Capitalist’s Perspective. The International Journal of Business & Management. 

http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3474809 

Revest, V., & Sapio, A. (2012). Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: What do we know? Small Business 

Economics, 39, 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9291-6 

Sabarinathan, G., Muralidhar, A., & Shetty, A. (2017). Venture capital and private equity investing in India: an exploratory 

study. Retrieved from https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/123456789/7735 

Thornton, G. (2018). An instinct for growth. IFRS News, Special Edition, A revised Conceptual Framework Financial 

Reporting. Search in. 

 
 

Publisher’s Note: CRIBFB stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. 

 

 

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee CRIBFB, USA. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons 
Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 

 

Indian Journal of Finance and Banking (P-ISSN 2574-6081 E-ISSN 2574-609X) by CRIBFB is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 
International License. 

https://www.globalprivatecapital.org/app/uploads/2017/03/Indias-New-Corporate-Law.pdf
https://www.globalprivatecapital.org/app/uploads/2017/03/Indias-New-Corporate-Law.pdf
https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3474809
https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/123456789/7735
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

