id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
ihlr-26410	McGhee, Marcus Alan	Health & Justice: How Misconduct Commissions Revived COVID Protocols Through Judicial Discipline	2022	12	.pdf	application/pdf	5079	306	57	They found that Magistrate Rivers failed to avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety and failed to cooperate with other judges and court officials in the administration of court business.90 With this decision the Supreme Court made it clear that allowing your feelings to override your responsibilities as a judge would not be tolerated. HOW MISCONDUCT COMMISSIONS REVIVED COVID PROTOCOLS THROUGH JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE MARCUS ALAN MCGHEE* I. NATURE OF THE PROBLEM The Model Code of Judicial Conduct is a set of standards for the ethical conduct of judges.1 These rules are promulgated, not as an exhaustive guide, but as guidance to assist judges in maintaining the highest standard of judicial and personal conduct.2 When there are violations of these ethical norms, these rules also provide a basis for regulating judicial conduct through disciplinary agencies.3 This Article seeks to answer the question of whether a judge’s impartiality can reasonably be questioned if they decide not to participate in or discourage healthcare directives articulated by the executive branch and other health care organizations during a global pandemic.	cache/ihlr-26410.pdf	txt/ihlr-26410.txt