id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
iiclr-17569	Burt, Sarah D.	Pension Protection? A Comparative Analysis of Pension Reform in the United States and the United Kingdom	2008	44	.pdf	application/pdf	21587	1384	64	do,335 is a more prudent way to generate revenue for that agency than by allowing Congress to determine the revenue, as the United States' PPA 2006 does for the PBGC.336 However, allowing the United Kingdom's PPF to determine how much revenue it needs to generate,337 then collecting different designated amounts from each pension scheme is more complicated and likely more costly than charging a flat rate per participant.338 Finally, both the United States' PPA 2006 and the United Kingdom's PA 2004 do assess a risk based premium, so that pension plans that are more likely to terminate, and thus be taken over by the appropriate agency, are paying a higher premium than pension plans that pose less risk of being taken over.339 Finally, while the United States' PBGC was created to protect pension income for pension plan participants, the United Kingdom's PA 2004 has broken up this function into two different agencies. Finally, it should not matter what specifically caused the loss, as the most important factor is that pension plan participant benefits are insured.	cache/iiclr-17569.pdf	txt/iiclr-17569.txt