id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
iiclr-17687	Bogen, David S.	Telling the Truth and Paying for it: A Comparison of Two Cases-Restrictions on Political Speech in Australia and Commercial Speech in the United Statestates	1996	20	.pdf	application/pdf	8507	486	60	He said that the State failed to meet its burden to show that the regulation would advance its interest in promoting temperance by significantly reducing alcohol consumption.6 Citing alternatives such as higher taxes and direct regulation of sales as well as educational campaigns, he added that the State could not satisfy the requirement that the restriction on speech be no more extensive than necessary.6 9 Stevens concluded that the State failed to establish a reasonable fit between its abridgment of speech and its temperance goal even under the less than strict standard that generally applies in commercial speech cases.7 Telling the Truth and Paying For It: A Comparison of Two Cases - Restrictions on Political Speech in Australia and Commercial Speech in the United States TELLING THE TRUTH AND PAYING FOR IT: A COMPARISON OF TWO CASES-RESTRICTIONS ON POLITICAL SPEECH IN AUSTRALIA AND COMMERCIAL SPEECH IN THE UNITED STATES David S. Bogen* Two cases decided last year appear to provide a stark contrast in philosophy toward the basic human right of freedom of speech.	cache/iiclr-17687.pdf	txt/iiclr-17687.txt