id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
iiclr-21729	Greer, Carol J.	International Personality Rights and Holographic Portrayals	2017	29	.pdf	application/pdf	13087	673	56	INTERNATIONAL PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HOLOGRAPHIC PORTRAYALS CAROL J. GREER* I. INTRODUCTION Americans see privacy as a protection of liberty, while Europeans see it as a protection of dignity.1 When considering personality rights in the United States, the only consistent conclusion is that it is not clear.2 Personality rights in the United States (“U.S.”) are protected by a “patchwork” of publicity and privacy torts, which overlap.3 Free speech is complicated by progressive technology, media sharing and converting, and the prevalent access to the internet, defeating the protection of the right of personality in the U.S. by increasing holes in the human rights of dignity, self-determination, and privacy.4 This Note identifies the lack of coverage for the right of personality for U.S. citizens and boldly proposes a partial constraint on the esteemed First Amendment. See Ardia, supra note 4 (“the Internet, after all, is available to anyone who wishes to connect to the network, and even the smallest blog or most esoteric discussion forum has the potential to reach hundreds of millions of people throughout the world.”); The group of claims listed here is not inclusive and will be referred to as right of personality claims, personality torts, or right of personality state claims, among other variations; however, personality rights are http://doi.org/10.18060/7909.0052 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043 248 INDIANA INT’L & COMP.	cache/iiclr-21729.pdf	txt/iiclr-21729.txt