id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-12138	Kochert, Andrea N.	The Admission of Hearsay Through Rule 106: And Now You Know the Rest of the Story	2013	29	.pdf	application/pdf	14413	855	65	Part II examines five arguments for a trumping function under Rule 106: a textual, functional, and legislative analysis, as well as a focus on the exclusion of confusing or misleading evidence under Rule 403 and on the admission of evidence against a criminal defendant under Rule 801(d)(2). Wilkerson, 84 F.3d at 696 (holding the judge did not abuse discretion in omitting exculpatory portions of defendant’s confession, despite admitting the inculpatory portions under Rule 801(d)(2), in part, because hearsay may not come in under Rule 106).	cache/inlawrev-12138.pdf	txt/inlawrev-12138.txt