id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-18011	Rompala, Joseph P.	Survey of Indiana Administrative Law	2012	26	.pdf	application/pdf	11619	672	61	[Vol. 45:933 (1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; or (5) unsupported by substantial evidence.3 These enumerated reasons for overturning agency actions set forth the standard of review courts are to apply in reviewing agency decisions and are well established.4 However, in reviewing agency actions under the individual bases for relief, portions of an agency’s decision are subject to greater or lesser deference from courts. In that case, the Indiana Supreme Court was confronted with assessing whether the Indiana High School Athletic Association’s (IHSAA) decision that a student-athlete had transferred schools for “primarily athletic reasons” was subject to reversal.127 The court began its analysis by noting that “Indiana courts have reviewed the IHSAA’s regulation of student-athletes in a manner analogous to the review of administrative agencies;” they “do not review IHSAA decisions de novo and do not substitute their judgment for the association’s.”128	cache/inlawrev-18011.pdf	txt/inlawrev-18011.txt