id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-18014	Burke, Daniel K.; Mulroony, Amanda L.B.	Recent Developments in Indiana Civil Procedure	2012	32	.pdf	application/pdf	14429	766	62	[Vol. 45:1011 Farno also argued that the trial court should not have considered the Indiana Securities Commissioner’s or the receiver’s actions in its superiority analysis on the grounds that “[n]o Indiana court has ever before held that actions brought by other parties are superior to a class action to adjudicate the controversy between class members and defendants, much less other actions relating to different claims, different damages, different defendants. The supreme court found Songer to require trial courts to engage in a multi-pronged inquiry to determine whether a suit is essentially equitable. . . .	cache/inlawrev-18014.pdf	txt/inlawrev-18014.txt