id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-18019	Rudis, Kathleen E.	Recent Developments in Family and Matrimonial Law	2012	43	.pdf	application/pdf	18536	1149	64	If part one, the requirement of a legitimate and good faith reason, posed an inordinately high bar for a relocating parent to meet, it could too often prevent trial courts from reaching part two and appropriately deciding the dispute based upon the best interests of the affected child.279 Thus, the court of appeals concluded that the mother had advanced legitimate, good faith reasons for the proposed relocation.280 Nevertheless, after a detailed review of the factors affecting the children were they to remain in Indiana or relocate to Tennessee, the court of appeals concluded that “the evidence supported the trial court’s conclusion that relocation . . On appeal, the husband challenged the income averaging technique used by the trial court to calculate his income for child support purposes.152 The husband argued that his income at the time of the final hearing was very low due to his relocation to Nevada, and that the trial court’s income averaging technique amounted to an unfair imputation of income.153 The Indiana Court of Appeals rejected the husband’s argument, first noting that income averaging is a recognized child support income calculation method, especially for the self- employed.154 The court also noted that, because the husband failed to present detailed documentation of his income, he cannot assign error to the method used by the trial court.155 The husband also alleged trial court error for including the monies used to fund the college account in the marital estate.156	cache/inlawrev-18019.pdf	txt/inlawrev-18019.txt