id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-18354	Teagarden, Danielle M	Brewing Tension: The Constitutionality of Indiana's Sunday Beer-Carryout Laws	2015	28	.pdf	application/pdf	12796	774	62	Indeed, in early post-Prohibition decisions, the Court seemed to reach back to pre-Prohibition jurisprudence and use Section 2 to divest alcohol of its interstate character, upholding discriminatory state laws that would otherwise be struck down under the Commerce Clause.85 At one time, alcohol was viewed as fully excepted from the Commerce Clause.274 Later, discriminatory state beverage laws were upheld if they advanced a state’s core Twenty-first Amendment concerns, as indicated in Bacchus.275 In 2005, the Supreme Court changed course.276 In Granholm, the Court protected a state’s ability to sell or not sell alcohol, while limiting its ability to enact discriminatory regulation.277 Granholm’s interpretation of the Twenty-first Amendment’s interaction with the Commerce Clause gives states the ability to sell alcohol through an evenhanded three-tier distribution system, which addresses Twenty-first Amendment concerns, despite any discrimination that inheres in the system.278 In the wake of Granholm, the Seventh Circuit has applied Granholm’s nondiscrimination principle in its Baude and Lebamoff decisions, but has noted the lack of a fully articulated analytical approach for laws that are not facially discriminatory yet have a discriminatory effect.279	cache/inlawrev-18354.pdf	txt/inlawrev-18354.txt