id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-18359	Brandon, Caitlin	How a Grocery Store Grounded Air Jordan and Why Jordan Should Succeed in the Rematch: Redefining Commercial Speech for the Modern Era	2015	21	.pdf	application/pdf	10322	500	60	I:\28962 Indiana Law Rev 47-2\47masthead.wpd Indiana Law Review Volume 47 2014 Number 2 NOTES HOW A GROCERY STORE GROUNDED AIR JORDAN AND WHY JORDAN SHOULD SUCCEED IN THE REMATCH: REDEFINING COMMERCIAL SPEECH FOR THE MODERN ERA* CAITLIN BRANDON** INTRODUCTION “Commercial speech is like obscenity. . . The court held the page was not commercial speech because it did not propose a commercial transaction, the page was not an advertisement, the page did not refer to a specific product, and the store having an economic motivation did not necessarily render the page commercial speech.10 This Note explores the distinction between commercial and noncommercial speech under the First Amendment, critiques the application of the commercial speech test by the court in Jordan v. Jewel, and, finally, proposes an original test for classifying speech as commercial or noncommercial that is more appropriate for modern society.	cache/inlawrev-18359.pdf	txt/inlawrev-18359.txt