id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-18972	Zarrow, Jason M.; Milliken, William H.	The Retroactivity of Substantive Rules to Cases on Collateral Review and the AEDPA, with a Special Focus on Miller v. Alabama	2015	64	.pdf	application/pdf	33442	1657	56	And the Court itself has only rarely applied the principle that substantive rules are retroactively applicable on collateral review.22 A likely reason for the lack of focus on the substantive component of Teague is the fact that the Court’s retroactivity jurisprudence was a response to the Warren Court’s “rights revolution,” which, by and large, promulgated new rules of criminal procedure, not new substantive rules of criminal law. Recall that the Court has stated since Teague that Teague’s “exception” to nonretroactivity for new substantive rules is not really an “exception” at all.372 Instead, substantive rules are simply “not subject to the bar”—that is, they apply to all convictions, period, no matter when the conviction became final.373 If substantive rules are not subject to the Teague bar on retroactive application of new rules, they logically would not be subject to § 2254(d)(1)’s	cache/inlawrev-18972.pdf	txt/inlawrev-18972.txt