id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-18976	Vissing, Jacob	Preserving Liberty While Increasing Safety: Why Indiana Should Outlaw Sobriety Checkpoints	2015	26	.pdf	application/pdf	10823	593	57	App. 1994); Commonwealth v. Tarbert, 535 A.2d 1035 (Pa. 1987); State v. Tilton, 561 N.W.2d 660 (S.D. 1997) (discusses in dicta the constitutionality of sobriety checkpoints); State v. Downey, 945 S.W.2d 102 (Tenn. 1997); State v. Martin, 496 A.2d 442 (Vt. 1985); Lowe v. Commonwealth, 337 S.E.2d 273 (Va. 1985); Carte v. Cline, 460 S.E.2d 48 (W. Va. 1995); see also Sobriety Checkpoint Laws, GOVERNORS HIGHWAY SAFETY ASSOCIATION (Jan. 2015) http://www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/laws/checkpoint_laws.html, archived at http://perma.cc/6DCS-PXCK (listing sobriety checkpoint laws by state; South Carolina does not have a statute or court case expressly addressing sobriety checkpoints). 23. Instead, the courts chose to cast aside long-standing privacy protections and concerns, in favor of treating all motorists as suspects under the veil of public safety.210 B. Maximizing Enforcement and Deterrent Value Despite the shortcomings and dangers of sobriety checkpoints and the controversy surrounding their use, law enforcement officers and policy makers can borrow ideas from sobriety checkpoint programs to make less intrusive tactics more effective.	cache/inlawrev-18976.pdf	txt/inlawrev-18976.txt