id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-20653	Dutton, Yvonne M.	Recent Developments in Indiana Evidence Law: October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014	2015	24	.pdf	application/pdf	10254	638	65	’”243 Further, although Indiana courts had not yet addressed a Confrontation Clause challenge in the return of service context, other courts have concluded that a defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights are not violated when such documents are admitted into evidence.244 Finding these cases instructive, the court concluded that the primary purpose of the return 232. ’”263 This type of circumstantial evidence, the court said, was what other courts facing similar issues had found sufficient to authenticate email and text messages.264 Here, too, the court of appeals found that there was sufficient circumstantial evidence to authenticate the text and email messages and link them to the defendant.265 Specifically, witness testimony showed that meetings with the defendant were arranged by text and 255.	cache/inlawrev-20653.pdf	txt/inlawrev-20653.txt