id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-2112	Seidman, Marshall J.	Evidence—Civil	1974	16	.pdf	application/pdf	7307	357	60	The court enumerated a test for harmless error : assuming similar trial court circumstances, except the reversal of the evidentiary ruling, would the result have been different? H. Conclusion The past year demonstrated a slow but visible advance by the appellate courts of Indiana toward allowing trial judges greater discretion in evidentiary matters ; a refusal to overturn even errone- ous evidentiary decisions unless such evidence compelled a result different from that which would have been reached had the erro- 43300 N.E.2d 889 (Ind. Ct. Even if evidence is erroneously admitted, the appellate courts pre- sume that trial judges, because of their experience, would ade- quately consider the propriety and weight of all of the evidence and would not rely on the erroneously admitted evidence in making their findings of fact and in drawing their conclusions of law.	cache/inlawrev-2112.pdf	txt/inlawrev-2112.txt