id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-21435	DeBoer, Michael J.	Justice Brent E. Dickson, State Constitutional Interpretation, and the Religion Provisions of the Indiana Constitution	2017	27	.pdf	application/pdf	13330	708	56	Justice Theodore R. Boehm interpreted and applied an array of Indiana constitutional provisions, including article 1, sections 9 and 12 (recognizing a right to speak, write, and print freely and a right to remedy by due course of law, respectively) in Cantrell v. Morris, 849 N.E.2d 488 (Ind. 2006), article 1, section 11 (recognizing a right against unreasonable searches and seizures) in Edwards v. State, 759 N.E.2d 626 (Ind. 2001), article 1, sections 12 and 23 (recognizing a right to open courts and a right to remedy and prohibiting the Indiana General Assembly from granting unequal privileges and immunities, respectively) in McIntosh v. Melroe Co., 729 N.E.2d 972 (Ind. 2000), article 1, section 12 (recognizing a right to remedy by due course of law) in Sanchez v. State, 749 N.E.2d 509 (Ind. 2001), and article 4, sections 22 and 23 (prohibiting the Indiana General Assembly from enacting special legislation and requiring it to make general laws when general laws can be made applicable) in Municipal City of South Bend v. Kimsey, 781 N.E.2d 683 (Ind. 2003). Second, the court weighs the relevance of the Northwest72 Ordinance of 1787 and other state constitutions, especially any language and history that illuminate the meaning of Indiana constitutional provisions.	cache/inlawrev-21435.pdf	txt/inlawrev-21435.txt