id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-21436	Paredieck, Roger; Davis, Karen; Smith, Maggie	Justice Dickson's Civil Tort Law Jurisprudence	2017	23	.pdf	application/pdf	9957	652	64	O n this basis, the court held Indiana Code section 34-20-3-2 unconstitutional.100 Because the asbestos statute of limitations was held to be unconstitutional and did not govern these claims, the M yers majority held all asbestos plaintiffs now fall under the statute of repose provision in Indiana Code section 34-20-3-1.101 Justice Dickson referred back to Ott and Covalt to analyze the applicability of the statute of repose for the plaintiffs in M yers. Justice Dickson strove to ensure that the Indiana Constitution was given its own significance apart from the U.S. Constitution, while taking care to delineate the role of the court from the role of the legislature.	cache/inlawrev-21436.pdf	txt/inlawrev-21436.txt