id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-21500	Chapman, Tabatha Halleck	What Should a Showing of Intent or Purpose Require in a Case of Corporate Accessory Liability for Child Slavery Under the Alien Tort Statute?	2017	25	.pdf	application/pdf	12021	620	62	Specifically, the defendant’s petition203 for writ of certiorari states “the consequences of leaving the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in place are severe,” and that: [b]y vastly expanding the scope of ATS liability, the decision below means that any company doing business in (or with) a country with a blemished human-rights record is subject to an ATS aiding-and-abetting suit. The plaintiffs alleged some of the GNPOC’s activities— building all-88 weather roads, upgrading air strips, and creating buffer zones around GNPO C facilities— aided and abetted the Government of Sudan in committing genocide, torture, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.89 The Second Circuit held the “mens rea standard for aiding and abetting liability in ATS actions [was] purpose” and that Talisman’s knowledge of the90 Sudanese Government activities did not rise to the purpose standard as there was 79.	cache/inlawrev-21500.pdf	txt/inlawrev-21500.txt