id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-21600	Seidler, Rena; Ryznar, Margaret	Recent Developments in Indiana Family Law: October 2015 to September 2016	2017	9	.pdf	application/pdf	4025	279	66	Based on this evidence, the61 appellate court found that the children were not CHINS.62 Similarly, the Indiana Supreme Court reversed the decision of both the trial and appellate courts terminating a father’s parental rights because the trial court’s findings did not support that termination was in the child’s best interests. At the time this matter26 arose, the child was eleven and the parents had shared custody since her birth.27 The appellate court agreed with the trial court’s consideration of the child’s wishes to stay with her father, finding that the trial court was not clearly erroneous in determining that it was not in the child’s best interest to relocate and in awarding sole legal custody to the father.28 V. C HILD SUPPORT There were several child support cases of note decided during the survey period.	cache/inlawrev-21600.pdf	txt/inlawrev-21600.txt