id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-22866	Chinn, Scott; Pulliam, Daniel E.	Emerging Federal Reliance -- Continued State Constitutional Minimalism: Indiana State Constitutional Law Summaries -- 2016-2017	2018	21	.pdf	application/pdf	8976	586	68	The suspects in the house had no known criminal history and the officers were after what they believed were ten grams of cocaine and marijuana.129 The court rejected the State’s request to adopt the inevitable discovery exception as a matter of Indiana constitutional law because the Indiana Supreme 116. A scuffle ensued that resulted in multiple stun gun attempts to subdue Brown and caused non-life threatening injuries.105 Brown was charged with felony battery on a public safety officer and disarming a public safety officer, and after a bench trial, was convicted of battery and acquitted of disarming.106 At sentencing, the judge sentenced Brown to a misdemeanor one-year term suspended to probation.107 On appeal, Brown argued that under the totality of the circumstances, the search was unreasonable under the Indiana Constitution.108 Under Litchfield v. State,109 Indiana courts determine the reasonableness of a search under article 1, section 11 by looking at (1) the degree of concern, suspicion, or knowledge regarding the occurrence of a violence; (2) the degree of the search method’s intrusion on the citizen’s ordinary activities; and (3) the extent of law enforcement needs.110 The court concluded that the officers’ intrusion into Brown’s privacy was justified by the immediate and urgent need to protect themselves and the public from a man the officers reasonably believed was armed and dangerous.111	cache/inlawrev-22866.pdf	txt/inlawrev-22866.txt