id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-2404	Bayh, Birch	Congressional Response to Zurcher v. Stanford Daily	1980	28	.pdf	application/pdf	12747	620	61	First, it is argued that search war- rant powers are not abused and the number of third party searches is extremely low; therefore, it is foolish to pass legislation which would purport to solve a problem which does not exist. If law enforcement authorities resort to third party searches only rarely (and it is my position that it is only since Warden v. Hayden^^ that searches of third parties have become a significant possibility) and if the number of cases which would be affected by the bill is relatively insignificant, it is a fair question to ask why district at- torneys and the Department of Justice have registered such strong opposition to third party protections under S. 1790.*^ They will reply that it is because a subpoena-first rule will create serious obstacles to effective law enforcement.	cache/inlawrev-2404.pdf	txt/inlawrev-2404.txt