id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-2499	Millard, David B.	Intentionally and Negligently Inflicted Emotional Distress: Toward a Coherent Reconciliation	1982	22	.pdf	application/pdf	9553	398	52	RATIONALIZATION AND RECONCILIATION Requiring intentional misconduct, resultant physical injuries, contemporaneous physical impact, placement in the zone of danger, or foreseeability of emotional distress injuries does not guarantee that emotional distress has occurred. Thus, barriers to recovery resulting from the impact rule, the zone of danger rule, and the foreseeability test, which the courts have erected in negli- gent infliction of emotional distress cases, fail to meet the fears and concerns for which they were imposed.®^	cache/inlawrev-2499.pdf	txt/inlawrev-2499.txt