id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-2591	Wilkins, Lawrence P.	The Indiana Comparative Fault Act At First (Lingering) Glance	1984	176	.pdf	application/pdf	74825	3226	59	(a) Is the adoption of comparative fault to be considered a total merger of the assumption of risk defenses with fault defenses by either: (i) somehow translating the nonfault aspects of the defenses into fault for comparative purposes, or (ii) abolishing all nonfault senses of the defenses? (b) Or, are the nonfault aspects of the defenses to remain intact and outside the comparative system as complete bars to plaintiffs' action? It is much easier to describe such an outcome in the abstract than actually to try to bring it about, of course, but it is entirely plausible that both injured parties can recover fully, commensurate with comparative fault principles.	cache/inlawrev-2591.pdf	txt/inlawrev-2591.txt