id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-26094	Hadley, Vivek R.	Survey of Indiana Administrative Law	2022	17	.pdf	application/pdf	7528	466	65	On review, we do not reweigh the evidence.65 Reviewing the applicable statutes, the panel found that Indiana Code section 9- 30-10-4(b) defines a habitual violator as “[a] person who has accumulated at least three (3) judgments within a ten (10) year period for any of the following violations, singularly or in combination, and not arising out of the same incident. Accordingly, the trial court granted Sims’s request and set an expiration date of December 11, 2028.17 Following that order, the BMV—represented by the Attorney General—filed an appearance and submitted a motion to correct error.18 The BMV noted Indiana Code section 9-30-16-3(c), which, during the relevant time, limited the duration of an SDP to two and one-half years.19 The trial court deferred to the BMV’s position and amended its previous order.20 Sims found this inappropriate; he noted Indiana Code section 9-30-16-3(b), which says that “[a] prosecuting attorney shall appear on behalf of the bureau to respond to a petition filed under this subsection.	cache/inlawrev-26094.pdf	txt/inlawrev-26094.txt