id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-26432	Amberger, William I.	Between Scylla and Charybdis: The Courts, the Constitution, and COVID-19	2022	25	.pdf	application/pdf	10970	706	58	After analyzing the judiciary’s approach to constitutional rights during public health emergencies, a few things become clearer. Many important constitutional rights have their own tests and standards, but most share three common traits: 1) the government has the burden of proving that the end in question is more than rational—it must be important or compelling; 2) the end must be substantially and directly advanced by the means; and 3) the means chosen must be narrowly tailored to the end so that infringements on the liberty are minimized as much as possible.34 These principles provide a useful background for analyzing judicial review of constitutional rights in public health emergencies.	cache/inlawrev-26432.pdf	txt/inlawrev-26432.txt