id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-2791	Norman, Douglas K.	Dissenting Shareholders' Rights Under the New Indiana Business Corporation Act: Jurisprudential Interpretations of the Exclusivity Provision	1988	24	.pdf	application/pdf	11054	605	61	^'°See, e.g., Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co., 367 Mass. 578, 328 N.E.2d 505 (1975) (selective purchase of stock a per se breach of duty); In re Kemp & Beatley, Inc., 64 N.Y.2d 63, 473 N.E.2d 1173, 484 N.Y.S.2d 799 (1984) (reasonable expectations of minority shareholder are best means to determine oppressive conduct of majority); Mei- selman v. Meiselman, 309 N.C. 279, 307 S.E.2d 551 (1983) (entire history of the participants' relationship may be viewed to determine reasonable expectations). It will then examine the exclusivity provision in light of the theories utilized by Indiana courts under the previous law, and the theories employed by courts from other jurisdictions.	cache/inlawrev-2791.pdf	txt/inlawrev-2791.txt