id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-2861	Cross Jr., Leland B.; Haney, Douglas Craig	Survey of Recent Developments in Indiana Labor Law	1990	24	.pdf	application/pdf	9192	552	62	Unemployment Compensation A. Due Process and Equal Protection of Law During the survey period, Indiana courts continued to review un- employment compensation decisions with an eye toward the overall due process and equal protection rights afforded the parties affected by such decisions. Keeping these state goals in mind, the court concluded that Winder had lost her full-time job through no fault of her own and had only quit her part-time job with the expectation that she would still be able to maintain stable employment by working at her full- time job.^^ As Winder had never voluntarily become unemployed and would have been entitled to unemployment compensation if she had never held her part-time job, the court reasoned that to deny her unemployment benefits solely because she had held two jobs, instead of one, bore no rational relationship to the goals of the Indiana Employment Security Act'^ and denied Winder equal protection of law.^' For this reason, the court reversed the Review Board and found Winder eligible for unemployment benefits.^^ B. Unemployment Compensation During Periods of Labor Unrest During the survey period, Indiana courts refused to expand the circumstances under which employees can be found ineligible for un- employment benefits during periods of labor unrest, and limited the circumstances under which picketline misconduct can be used as grounds for just cause discharge.	cache/inlawrev-2861.pdf	txt/inlawrev-2861.txt