id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-29040	Sullivan, Jr., Frank	Banking, Business, and Contract Law	2025	46	.pdf	application/pdf	20806	1290	65	CONTRACT LAW A. A Major Construction Contract Dispute: Delay Clause; Unjust Enrichment; and Mechanics’ Liens B. A Student’s Contract with a University C. Four Cases on the Sale and Financing of Real Estate D. Three Insurance Contract Cases E. Prejudgment Interest F. Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Agreements G. Arbitration Clauses: Supreme Court Decision H. Arbitration Clauses: Court of Appeals Decisions I. Forum Selection Clauses V. CONCLUSION This Article surveys banking, business, and contract law decisions of the Indiana Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”) and Indiana Court of Appeals ————————————————————————————— * Professor of Practice, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, and Indiana University Bicentennial Professor. For this reason, the Court held that the statute did not preclude Nemeth from being a member and that genuine issues of material fact remained as to whether he was.210 The Court of Appeals then turned to the question of unjust enrichment and the related issues of Nemeth’s alleged misconduct in allegedly withholding information about his brokerage commission.211 Indiana courts have a well- established methodology for analyzing whether a case in which both equitable and common law claims are asserted are to be tried entirely to the court, or whether the common law claims are to be tried separately by jury.212 The trial court utilized that analysis in its decision that Nemeth was not entitled to a jury ————————————————————————————— 205.	cache/inlawrev-29040.pdf	txt/inlawrev-29040.txt