id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-3010	Blum, Karen M.	Qualified Immunity: A User's Manual	1993	40	.pdf	application/pdf	21289	976	57	[Vol. 26:187 Siegert clearly changes the approach most courts were taking in qualified immunity cases and mandates resolution of the constitutional question. See, e.g., Act Up!/Portland v. Bagley, 971 F.2d 298, 301-02 (9th Cir. 1992) ([TJhe court is obliged to make every effort to develop the record to the extent necessary to make the determination at [the summary judgment] stage.); Mee v. Ortega, 967 F.2d 423, 430 & n.5 (10th Cir. 1992) (holding that factual disputes on the record required more development before a ruling on qualified immunity would be appropriate) (If, at any point before trial, it appears to the district court that, as a matter of law, a reasonable parole officer could have believed [plaintiff's] continued incarceration lawful, summary judgment would be appropriate.); Workman v. Jordan, 958 F.2d 332, 336 (10th Cir. 1992) (holding that a court may allow limited discovery to develop or clarify facts needed to rule on qualified immunity claim and defer decision on qualified immunity); Howell v. Evans, 922 F.2d 712, 717-18 (11th Cir. 1991)	cache/inlawrev-3010.pdf	txt/inlawrev-3010.txt