id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-3301	Miller, Gary L.; Schumm, Joel M.	Recent Developments in Indiana Criminal Law and Procedure	1998	34	.pdf	application/pdf	16052	1002	67	Because the bailiff and court reporter have no obligation to protect a defendant's interest and their presence is not a substitute for a defendant's own presence, the court of appeals reversed the conviction.^^^ In Anglin v. State^^^ the court of appeals held that the trial court failed to follow the proper procedure in responding to notes from the jury during deliberations, but there was no prejudice to the defendant.^^^ The court responded to two separate notes from the jury by sending a written response to the jury room without first returning the defendant and his counsel into the courtroom.^^^ The proper procedure, however, is for the judge to notify the parties so they may be present in court before the judge communicates with the jury, and the judge should inform the parties of his proposed response. ''^ D. Speedy Trial The Indiana Supreme Court and court of appeals considered a defendant's right to a speedy trial in two different contexts.	cache/inlawrev-3301.pdf	txt/inlawrev-3301.txt