id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-3561	Schumm, Joel M.	Recent Developments in Indiana Criminal Law and Procedure	2002	22	.pdf	application/pdf	10260	581	60	'^^ Justice Sullivan, joined by Justice Rucker, concurred in the result, reasoning that the principles underlying Terry remain sufficiently viable that we must adhere to this well-settled precedent, but nevertheless reached the same result because the erroneous reftisal of the intoxication instruction was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. '^' F. Jury Instructions on Flightfrom Crime Scene Sorting though a decade of wishy-washy pronouncements on flight instructions, the supreme court in Dill v. State^^^ finally resolved long-standing confusion by holding that it is per se erroneous for trial courts to give an instruction that flight and other actions calculated to hide a crime, though not proof of guilt, are evidence of consciousness of guilt and are circumstances which may be considered by [the jury] along with other evidence. The court declined to adopt a categorical rule limiting retrials to a specific number but instead held that trial courts are in the best position to weigh the relevant factors and that abuse ofdiscretion is the appropriate standard for appellate review ofthe 137.	cache/inlawrev-3561.pdf	txt/inlawrev-3561.txt