id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-3617	Papa, Jeff	Recent Developments in Indiana Evidence Law	2003	34	.pdf	application/pdf	15811	942	66	that trial courts are generally within their discretion to permit hair comparison analysis. 191 The court further noted that trial courts must assess the scientific validity of the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony, whether such reasoning or methodology can properly be applied to the facts in issue, and that such knowledge admitted under Rule 702 is required to be more than unsupported speculation or a subjective belief.	cache/inlawrev-3617.pdf	txt/inlawrev-3617.txt