id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-3664	Giles, Cassandra A.	Shaking Price Waterhouse: Suggestions for a More Workable Approach to Title VIII Mixed Motive Disparate Treatment Discrimination Claims	2004	30	.pdf	application/pdf	14595	743	57	'^' However, like the Civil Rights Act of 1991, this case is only binding precedent for Title VII employment discrimination cases, and does not change the courts' application ofthe direct evidence requirement for Title VIII cases, thus leaving courts deciding Title VIII mixed motive housing discrimination cases in the morass of direct evidence and determining when a mixed motive instruction should be given to the jury. IV. The Ninth Circuit's decision in Costa raises interesting questions not only regarding how Price Waterhouse should apply to Title VII jurisprudence, but also how it should apply to Title VIII mixed motive cases.	cache/inlawrev-3664.pdf	txt/inlawrev-3664.txt