id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-3695	Sandstrom Simard, Linda	Meeting Expectations: Two Profiles for Specific Jurisdiction	2005	42	.pdf	application/pdf	22289	826	43	Product Liability Hypothetical.—Applying the similarity of contacts test to this hypothetical, again one must start from the premise that Company would be subject to specific jurisdiction in Pennsylvania because the cause of action arose from Company's efforts to serve the Pennsylvania market. D. Similarity Test Possibly the most lenient standard of relatedness that has been suggested to date is a similarity of contacts test which compares a defendant's contacts in one forum with its contacts in a different forum.	cache/inlawrev-3695.pdf	txt/inlawrev-3695.txt