id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-3729	Alberts, Joseph R.	Survey of Recent Developments in Indiana Product	2005	50	.pdf	application/pdf	25780	1339	61	[I]n an action based on an alleged design defect in the product or based on an alleged failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions regarding the use of the product, the party making the claim must establish that the manufacturer or seller failed to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances in designing the product or in providing the warnings or instructions.^^ Indiana courts and commentators routinely have recognized that the post- 1995 IPLA imposes a negligence standard in design and warnings cases, while retaining strict liability (liability despite the exercise ofall reasonable care) for manufacturing defect cases.^^ With respect to the theory of inadvertent unlatch, the trial court observed that there are no reported publications, no reported experiments or testing demonstrating that inadvertent unlatch as claimed by Lytic occurs in the real world.''' After an excellent discussion about the gatekeeping function performed by Indiana courts under Rule 702 ofthe Indiana Rules ofEvidence,^'^	cache/inlawrev-3729.pdf	txt/inlawrev-3729.txt