id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-4053	Burke, Daniel K.	Recent Developments in Indiana Civil Procedure	2010	26	.pdf	application/pdf	10750	712	65	[Vol. 43:639 argued that a fact issue existed because there was a conflict between Kleinmaier's earlier letter concerning environmental clean-up expenses and his later deposition testimony where he denied having actual knowledge of the contamination when he wrote the letter.^^^ The court analogized CS's efforts to a sham affidavit situation, in which courts routinely reject affidavits conflicting with prior deposition testimony in an effort to create a fact issue sufficient to avoid summary judgment.^^^ Although the factual situation was somewhat different here, the court concluded that the same concept should apply.^'^'* Accordingly, the court concluded that Kleinmaier's subsequent deposition testimony should be disregarded and therefore no fact issue existed.^^^ K. Relieffrom Judgment In Heartland Resources, Inc. v. Bedel,^^^ Heartland Resources, Inc. (Heartland) appealed the trial court's entry of default judgment against it and in favor of Ambrose and Catherine Bedel.^*^ Heartland and the Bedels entered into a contract whereby the Bedels agreed to invest in Heartland's gas well ventures in Louisiana.^^^ Courts shall limit their requests for funds to those which are reasonably necessary for the operation of the court or court-related functions.	cache/inlawrev-4053.pdf	txt/inlawrev-4053.txt