id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-4061	Alberts, Joseph R.; Petersen, James; Thornburg, Roberts B.	Survey of Recent Developments in Indiana Product Liability Law	2010	46	.pdf	application/pdf	22789	1348	67	The defendants sought to remove the case to federal court, arguing that the plaintiffs fraudulentlyjoined Rowland to defeat diversity.^* They argued that the plaintiff could not maintain product liability claim against Rowland because Rowland was neither a manufacturer nor a seller of the pain pump.^^ The court found that the plaintiffs properly joined Rowland because Rowland could be considered a manufacturer under Indiana Code section 34-6-2-77(a)( 1 ), which defines a manufacturer as a seller who has actual knowledge of a defect in a product. LEXIS 20138, at *27-37 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 5, 2003) (holding that homeowner who spread ashes from lumber treated with chromium copper arsenate on his garden could not pursue product liability claim because his use of the lumber was not, legally speaking, foreseeable, intended, or expected).	cache/inlawrev-4061.pdf	txt/inlawrev-4061.txt