id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
inlawrev-4123	Thomas, Seth M.; Calhoon, Victoria; Smith, Freedom S.N.; Andres, Jennifer; Krahulik, Angela	2009-2010 Environmental Law Survey	2011	42	.pdf	application/pdf	18771	1154	63	[Vol. 44:1165 granted partial summaryjudgment on these grounds, the insurers appealed.^^^ The court of appeals acknowledged that Indiana courts have traditionally followed Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws when confronted with a choice oflaw issue.^^^ The Restatement uses a multi-factor test to decide a choice of law issue.^^^ With regard to contract cases, [t]he rights and duties of the parties ... are determined by the local law of the state which, with respect to that issue, has the most significant relationship to the transaction and the parties. ^^^ Despite the prior precedent, the court ofappeals reasoned that Indiana courts did not explicitly reject the site-specific approach that some states have applied to multi-state contract cases.^^^ The court reasoned that if it applied a site-specific approach, the parties [will] know in advance which law will apply, the insurer can quantify its risk, the insured will know it has coverage, and the court need not concern itself with the [Restatement' s] . . .	cache/inlawrev-4123.pdf	txt/inlawrev-4123.txt