Indonesian Journal of Instructional Media and Model Volume 3, Issue 1 (2021), pp. 26-37 | p-ISSN: 2686-0708, e-ISSN: 2686-0112 http://journal.univetbantara.ac.id/index.php/ijimm 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 26 Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning Hengki Wijaya1, I Putu Ayub Darmawan2, Suzana Claudia Setiana3, Helaluddin Helaluddin4, Ivan Th. J. Weismann5 1, 3, 5 Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Jaffray Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia 2Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Simpson Ungaran, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia 4Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Indonesia Email: 1hengkilily1988@gmail.com*, 2putuayub.simpson@gmail.com, 3claudi.setiana@gmail.com, 4helaluddin@uinbanten.ac.id, 5ivanweismann@yahoo.com *Coresponding Author Article history: received Pebruary 21, 2021; accepted April 15, 2021; published April 24, 2021 A B S T R A C T In the last few decades, the main issue of education is the efforts and solutions in improving the quality of teaching and learning. In this case, the teacher's steps are to conduct classroom action research, which is a form of a bottom-up approach in improving the quality of education. This action research introduces active reconnecting learning strategies for increasing student interest and learning activities. The results showed that this strategy was proven to improve student learning outcomes, interests, and activeness. Student learning interest increased from 59.35 to 65.5 in cycle 1 and 80.5 in cycle 2. Likewise, students' learning activeness observations increased with the highest percentage on one indicator from 25% (pre-cycle) to 80% and 90% (cycles 1 and 2). Student learning outcomes have also increased from 60 in the pre-cycle phase to 74.25 (cycle 1). Furthermore, it rose again to 80 in cycle 2. Keywords: Active Reconnecting; Classroom Action Research; Student Interest; Learning Strategy Copyright © 2021 The Author(s) This is an open-access article under the CC BY-SA license. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the main focus of education throughout the world is how to improve the quality of education. There is a lot of emphasis from power holders/policymakers about the quality, standards, and performance of efficient and effective students at all educational institutions (Khan, 2018). The emphasis is increasingly apparent when several world institutions regularly release the level of education ranking of countries, one of which is the PISA (Program for International Student Assessment). This situation causes countries to improve and improve their education quality to be the best at the world level. Furthermore, improving teaching and learning quality is one of the most popular agendas in every educational institution. However, it must be realized that it is challenging to identify the determinants of the quality of learning because it deals with various aspects that cannot be separated (Helaluddin, 2018; Tefbana et al., 2021). Many aspects must be involved to improve the quality of learning, including educators, government policies, and students as the main subjects in education (Herwandi & Kaharuddin, 2020). Entering the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0, students, as the main subject of education, need to receive special treatment, especially the Z generation and the alpha generation, which have different characteristics from the previous generation (Tafonao et al., 2020; Helaluddin et al., 2020). http://journal.univetbantara.ac.id/index.php/ijimm http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 mailto:5ivanweismann@yahoo.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 27 Nowadays, improving the quality of learning has to start with various approaches, one recommended by experts in the bottom-up approach (Kember, 2000). This approach is student- centered and is focused on developing teacher professionalism. The change in attitude aims to strengthen the responsibility to commit to learning for teachers and student participation in the classroom (Day, 1999). One example of the bottom-up approach is Classroom Action Research (CAR). CAR is one form of research that is another form of qualitative research (Creswell, 2015). This type of analysis provides opportunities and flexibility for teachers to overcome various problems that occur in the classroom. Through CAR, teachers can innovate to use multiple methods and ways to improve their learning (Helaluddin & Wijaya, 2019). Thus, CAR plays an essential role in helping teachers and students achieve the expected learning goals. On the other hand, one way to improve learning in the classroom is to arouse students’ interest in learning material. An interesting indicator is a driving force for individuals involved in drawing attention to the object they like (Bayoe, Kouwagam & Tanyit, 2019; Febriyona, Supartini & Pangemanan, 2019; Sukendar, Endroyo & Sudarman, 2018). Mangal (2007) also stated the same thing, which calls interest the main force that drives the whole machine from the learning process. In other words, someone interested will tend to be more focused and more comfortable understanding the teacher's learning material. With great interest will affect student activities, especially their interest in learning (Saswandi, 2014). The interest contains two aspects: cognitive and emotional (Meke, Jailani, Wutsqa & Alfi, 2019). Cognitive issues include the knowledge and response of information about a particular object or activity as a form of caring for someone. Emotional aspects consist of events in participating and one’s experiences that are accompanied by certain feelings. The particular taste in question is a sense of pleasure that leads to contributions with high ability and desire to carry out a learning activity (Fathurrohman & Sulistirini, 2012). Interest will arise based on responses where students are aware of their interest in an object or event. Next, students begin to find out and want to be actively involved in certain activities (Harackiewicz & Hulleman, 2010). In the field of learning, students’ interest in learning can be seen in students’ tendency to pay attention, be interested, and actively participate in the learning (Elliot, 2000; Ormrod, 2003). Interest factor has a vital role in education (Asgari, Ketabi & Amirian, 2019). It is shown by some research on student interests that are focused on two types, namely situational interests and individual interests (Hidi & Baird, 1988; Renninger, 2000; Schraw & Lehman, 2001). Some studies examine the relationship between interest and performance, which states that interest is correlated with student academic performance (Hidi & Berndorff, 2002; Harackiewicz, Judith, & Hulleman, 2010). Furthermore, several studies also identified that interest influences intrinsic motivation (Weber, 2003), extrinsic motivation (Sahiu & Wijaya, 2017), learning level (Harackiewicz, Barron, Taver, Carter & Elliot, 2000), and academic achievement (Rotgans & Schmidt, 2011). In addition to students' interests, the aspect that determines learning success is the factor of student activity in class. Student activity is an essential indicator that learning has attracted students' attention and feel comfortable during the learning process (Turyanto, 2020). In generating interest and activeness, the teacher must be able to choose an appropriate learning strategy. In this situation, a teacher must avoid using conventional learning methods such as the lecture method and taking notes from the beginning to the end of class time. Thus, teachers can choose to use active reconnecting learning strategies. Active learning with reconnecting strategies is a learning model that makes students active from the start through activities that build group work and make them think about the subject matter. Reconnecting is used to return students' attention after not doing these activities (Maryanti, 2011). The reconnecting strategy is one type of active learning strategy. This strategy is a learning strategy that aims to help students recall their memory about the subject matter before the learning session ends (Dzulfikri & Joko 2013). Another definition states that active learning http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 28 reconnecting is a learning strategy that utilizes the seconds of learning to remember the material that has been taught (Silberman, 2014). In this strategy, the teacher invites students to form groups and try not to forget the material that has been delivered quickly. Silbermen (2014) gives many steps for implementing the reconnecting active learning strategy. The teacher 1) provides a list of topics that have been discussed; explains to students that the teacher wants to know what has been forgotten from the material; tries to keep the atmosphere relaxed so that students don’t feel threatened by the activity; 2) asks students to remember things about the topics discussed and things that are still remembered; asks questions such as a) what does this topic refer to?; b) why is this topic important?; c) who can give an example of what is learned in this topic?; d) what values do you get from this topic?; e) what learning experiences did each topic bring?; 3) continues to ask questions chronologically until all the material has been discussed (or done for sufficient time); 4) makes concluding statements desired by the teacher, which can serve as keyword reminders for students when discussing the content. In this strategy, the teacher tries to redirect students’ attention to the subject matter after not doing these activities for a while using various methods or learning media (Hanum, 2009; Zaini, 2007). Hooker (2019) uses stories with images from the internet, which can reconnect students’ memories with previous learning material. This strategy is considered to have advantages as follows: 1) students are easier to remember and understand the material again, 2) hone student intelligence through teacher guidance, and 3) create an active learning atmosphere and arouse enthusiasm for learning (Sholikhah, 2017). There are several stages in this strategy, namely: a) conveying learning objectives and providing motivation, b) presenting information, c) organizing students into groups, d) guiding student groups to work and study, e) evaluation, and f) give awards (Trianto, 2009; Wijaya & Arismunandar, 2018). Based on this description, the application of active reconnecting learning strategies in the subject of Religious Education is essential to learn and apply. The lack of references and literature reviews of this strategy's use is the primary basis for researchers to carry out this research. This condition certainly creates a gap between the willingness of teachers to innovate and the limited available references. Based on this background, the problem formulation: 1) How can reconnecting learning strategies increase students’ interest and active learning? 2) Does the active reconnecting learning strategy support the achievement of maximum learning outcomes for students?. METHOD Research Design This study adopted phenomenology as a research design. The purpose of research studies based on phenomenology was to depict participants’ experiences regarding a phenomenon (Creswell, 2007). This design was chosen as the research aimed at revealing the classroom teachers' problems in classrooms where students are coming from different cultural backgrounds. This research is classroom action research (CAR). Many studies use this design, especially in education and learning (Jefferson, 2014; Marrow, 1977). This research focuses on existing problems and becomes a challenge for teachers to solve in the classroom (Ary, Jacobs & Sorensen, 2010; Fraenkel & Wallen, 2009). In other words, the purpose of CAR is to find solutions to problems in the classroom in the learning process for teachers and students (Creswell, 2015; Hendricks, 2009). Besides, CAR aims to explore the effects of specific changes in the design of learning activities in the classroom and improve the quality of learning (Fernandez, 2017; Hine, 2013; Udeani, Atagana & Esiobu, 2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 29 Study Group This study was conducted at GKLB1 Elementary School in Luwuk, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. The number of participants in this study was 20 people (12 women and 8 men) who took Christianity in class V. The number of participants was not too much because some students at the elementary school were of different faiths. Some considerations that became the basis for researchers choosing research locations include student learning outcomes in religious education subjects at the school are still low, lack of interest and student activity in the class, and institutions researchers have a close cooperative relationship in education. Data Collection This study uses several data collection techniques, namely, observation, questionnaire, and test results. Some researchers also widely use these techniques as one of the primary sources of CAR that they do (Kumaraswamy, 2019; Supriyadi et al., 2020; Supriyadi & Julia, 2019; Taqi & Al-Nouh, 2014). Researchers and teachers worked together to design learning using the active reconnecting learning strategy based on the pre-cycle stage results. Also, the researchers conducted an analysis and concluded the results in this pre-cycle phase. Thus, it was decided that the researcher should continue the learning treatment to cycle 1. Observation One of the techniques used in this research is the observation technique using an instrument in an observation sheet. Observation sheets are used and developed to process data about student participation/activeness in the learning process. Observation sheets were designed containing various factors that represent student involvement and interaction (Kasa, 2016). There are three aspects observed in this observation sheet: student activities in learning (taking notes or paying attention to lessons), interactions with classmates, and interactions with teachers. This observation sheet was developed from several observation sheets used by several researchers (Kasa, 2016; Kumaraswamy, 2019; Taqi & Al-Nouh, 2014). This observation sheet consists of four value choices: good, medium, low, and no values. Questionnaire At the end of the first and second cycles, researchers and teachers also gave questionnaires to students about their perceptions of the learning process that has taken place. The questionnaire contained 20 questions designed to solicit information about their interest in learning Religious Education. After being validated, this questionnaire was given to 20 students in the first cycle and second cycles. The questionnaire was used to gather data about students' interest in learning Christian Religious Education subjects. This questionnaire consists of 20 questions with indicators about student interests that include aspects of student attention, feelings of pleasure, and student activities in learning (Blanco & Garrote, 2007; Meke et al., 2019; Woolfolk, 2007). Test This test aimed to determine student learning outcomes, and researchers used a test technique with multiple-choice questions. The questions were designed by class teachers in collaboration with researchers based on Christian religious education subject matter with the theme of learning “The Meaning of Salvation” and “Jesus the Savior.” Researchers conduct three tests to measure student achievement. Test 1 was given to students after completing the pre- cyle stage, test 2 at the end of cycle 1 (posttest 1), and test 3 at the end of cycle 2 (posttest 2). The three tests were carried out for 60 minutes with a similar pattern of questions as many as 20 item questions. Before use, this multiple-choice test is tested to determine its reliability http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 30 value. This test's reliability is 0.92, which consists of two parts of the test: ten questions for the material on the meaning of salvation and ten questions for the material on Jesus, the Savior. Data Analysis In this research, the data collected was then analyzed quantitatively & qualitatively. Quantitative analysis is used to analyze data from questionnaires, learning outcomes tests, and observation sheets of the phases of the pre-cycle, cycle 1, and cycle 2. Furthermore, qualitative analysis is used in the pre-cycle step from data collected by direct observation. The observation technique used here is observation using a checklist sheet. For example, if students actively ask questions, a checkmark is given. The total number of checklists is calculated as a percentage using this numeric formula. Data from the observations (using a checklist) that have been collected were then analyzed quantitatively using the following formula: Percentage = 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑊ℎ𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑂𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 x 100% Also, the data from the questionnaire that had been collected were analyzed quantitatively. This average score is used to determine the questionnaire results (5 Likert scales), whether it is categorized as very low, low, moderate, high, or very high. The details of this formula have been described in the research results section. The following are the formulas used in measuring student learning interest in each research cycle (Pasaribu et al., 2017). Interval Distance (i) = 𝐻𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒−𝐿𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 Average score = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 x 100% The level of student interest in learning is then classified into the assessor level from calculating the mean score. With the results obtained, the level of interest in learning can determine whether the entry criteria are high, moderate, low, and very low. These categories are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Result Category of Students’ Interest No Score Category 1 0%-19.99% Very low 2 20%-39.99% Low 3 40%-59.99% Moderate 4 60%-79.99% High 5 80%-100% Very high Finally, data on learning outcomes through the pretest in the pre-cycle phase and posttest in the cycle-1 and cycle-2 phase were also analyzed quantitatively using the following formula (Sinaga, 2016): Average value = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑇𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 As for the criteria used in determining student learning success, researchers use a range of values listed in Table 2 (Munandar, 2009). Table 2. Five-Point Benchmark Reference Assessment No Percentage Criteria 1 91%-100% Very high 2 71%-90% High 3 51%-70% Moderate 4 31%-50% Low 5 10%-30% Very Low http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 31 Research Procedure Pre-Cycle Before carrying out classroom action research, researchers first conducted a preliminary study called a pre-cycle study. This stage aims to identify the problems that occur in the learning process in class. The pre-cycle class was held for 180 minutes with two meetings, each meeting held for 90 minutes. Researchers and teachers provided two materials on Christian religious education subjects using conventional methods. In this phase, researchers used questionnaires to measure perceptions of interest, checklist observation sheets to measure student activity, and test 1 to measure student learning outcomes. The pre-cycle phase is carried out to obtain an overview of the problems that occur in the classroom. In other words, researchers make observations to identify existing problems and then formulate solutions that will be done. Cycle 1 Like the pre-cycle stage, cycle one is also carried out for 180 minutes in two meetings. At this stage, the teacher implements Christian religious education learning by using the reconnecting active learning strategy. During learning activities, the researcher observes (observes) the level of interaction or student participation. Cycles 2 The Planning Stage: At the end of cycle 1, it was seen that there was an increase in students' learning activeness and interest in learning Christian Religious Education subjects. However, there were still some students who were not active and showed their interest in cycle 1. For this reason, researchers and classroom teachers work together to prepare cycle 2. FINDINGS Presentation of the main findings in this study, which included observations at the pre- cycle stage, measurement of student interest and activity, and analysis of learning outcomes, is presented systematically. Pre-Cycle Stage Observation At this stage, the researcher found several facts in class V of Luwuk GKLB 1 Elementary School that did not respond (not active) on Christian Religious Education subjects. These results were obtained through direct observation by researchers during the learning process in the pre- cycle phase. Some indications that support this statement are 1) some students look bored and sleepy, 2) some students are more interested in talking/chatting with their friends, 3) students’ attention and focus are more on other objects, 4) no one gives feedback during learning (asking or answering teacher questions) and others, 5) the following are the results of observations using the observation checklist that was done in the pre-cycle phase. It is shown in Table 3. Table 3. The Results of Observations of Student Activity Pre-Cycle Stage No Rating Indicator Activity Level (Percentage) Category 1 Students are actively involved in learning (taking notes & paying attention to the material) 20% Very Low 2 Students interact with colleagues (discuss content) 25% Very Low 3 Students interact with the teacher (asking and answering questions) 10% Very Low http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 32 Based on Table 3, information is obtained that the level of student learning interest in the three main criteria is still classified as very low. In the first criterion, only 20% or four students are active in learning, such as taking notes and paying attention to the material. Likewise, in the second and third criteria, 25% of students (5 students) actively interact with peers, and only 10% (2 students) actively ask teachers about the material delivered in class. The calculations in table 3 are obtained through the number of students divided by the total students. Questionnaire Another problem found in the pre-cycle phase is the lack of student interest in the subject. Based on the questionnaire results distributed to students, the results obtained indicate that their interest was still minimal in classroom learning. The questionnaire analysis results at the pre-cycle stage showed a total of 1.187 with 20 student participants. The total score of 1.187 was based on the formula for calculating the “average score.” Thus, the average value for student interest in learning at this stage is 59.35% and belongs to the moderate category. The percentage value is 59.35% based on table 4, "Result Category of Students' Interest." Table 4. The results of the student interest & activeness questionnaire in the pre-cycle phase Fase Average score Category Pre-cycle 59.35% Moderate Responses to reviewer comments: the percentage in the questionnaire is obtained using the formula that has been included in the research methods section, namely the total score/number of students X 100%. Test In addition to giving questionnaires about interests and observing student learning activities, researchers and teachers also provide preliminary tests at the end of pre-cycle learning. Of the 20 students, only 4 met the Minimum Completeness Criteria (MCC), while 16 other students scored below the MCC. From the pre-cycle research stage results, it was stated that the majority of students in class V Elementary School 1 GKLB Luwuk were still relatively low with an average grade of 60 (look Tab. 5). Thus, the average value was still below The Minimum Completeness Criteria (MCC) of 65. Table 5. The results of the pre-cycle phase learning test Criteria Score Total students % Average Didn’t reach MCC 0-64 16 80% 60 Reach MCC 65-100 4 20% Cycle 1 and 2 Observation Table 6. Results of Observations of Learning Activeness in Cycles 1 and 2 Rating Indicator Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Students are actively involved in learning (taking notes & paying attention to the material) 75% 85% Students interact with colleagues (discuss content) 80% 90% Students interact with the teacher (asking and answering questions) 70% 80% Based on Table 6, it can be seen that there is an increase in student activity in learning in Cycle 1 towards Cycle 2. Teacher evaluation in Cycle 1 is that the teacher as a facilitator http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 33 motivates active students by providing opportunities for students to discuss in groups and ask questions to the teacher. The teacher also asks students who have never asked questions. The teacher gives positive appreciation to students who ask and answer questions. Learning activities are not dominated only by teachers but also directed at the student center learning approach. Questionnaire Table 7. Results of the Interest Questionnaire in Cycles 1 and 2 Cycle Average Score Category Cycle 1 65.5 High Cycle 2 80.5 Very high As seen from the questionnaire analysis results in Table 7, student interest in learning has increased compared to the questionnaire results in the pre-cycle phase. In cycle 1, the total value on the student questionnaire was 1,310, with the number of students 20 people so that the average value of the survey was 65.5. For the next cycle, the questionnaire's total score is 1,610 and is averaged to 80.5 (very high category). It reflected that learning with an active reconnecting learning strategy has increased student interest and active learning. Test At the end of cycles 1 and 2, the teacher also performs learning outcomes using a multiple- choice test type. This test is intended to obtain information about their abilities during the learning process. It is shown in Table 8: Table 8. Learning Test Results in Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 Cycle Criteria Score Total students % Average Cycle 1 Didn’t Reach MCC 0-64 3 15% 74.25 Reached MCC 65-100 17 85% Cycle 2 Didn’t Reach MCC 0-64 - 0% 80 Reached MCC 65-100 20 100% In cycle 1 that shown in Table 8, it was obtained that three students only achieved scores below 65, and 17 other students managed to achieve grades 65 and above. That is, 15% of students who have not yet completed MCC (Minimum completeness criteria) grades and 85% of students should exceed categories above MCC. Thus, the class’s average value in cycle 1 is 74.25 and has passed the MCC value set at 65. In conclusion, there has been a significant increase in cycle one from the previous pre-cycle phase, so that it can be said that cycle one has succeeded well. The description of the value of learning outcomes in cycle 2 can be seen in Table 10. Table 8 shown improved learning outcomes also occurred in the second cycle of research and classroom action. None of the fifth-grade students of Elementary School GKLB received a grade below the MCC from the learning test results. That is, all students have scored 65 and above. Thus, the average value of the class in cycle 2 is 80. Compared to the previous cycle, there has been an increase in the average amount of 5.75 points. DISCUSSION Teachers generally carry out classroom action research as class managers who aim to provide solutions to existing problems in the field. In other words, the teacher offers special treatment using strategies, methods, or learning techniques appropriate to the material being http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 34 taught. This research seeks to increase students’ interest and active learning through active reconnecting learning strategies. There have been several previous studies relating to teacher efforts to increase interest, activity, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and academic achievement or influence among these aspects (Hidi & Baird, 1988; Renninger, 2000; Rotgans & Schmidt, 2011; Sahiu & Wijaya, 2017; Schraw & Lehman, 2001). In addition to student learning, activeness, interest, and learning outcomes are still relatively low. The average value of learning interest of 59.35 is already classified into medium but does not meet the desired standard. Likewise, with learning outcomes, the grade average grade of 60 is still below the MCC (Minimum Completeness Criteria). It proves that the selection and use of inappropriate learning strategies impact student learning outcomes (Helaluddin, 2016). The level of interest and active learning also significantly influence student learning outcomes (Lee, Chao & Chen, 2011). Furthermore, in cycles 1 and 2 phases, there have been significant changes in the Christian Religious Education subjects’ learning process. This learning activity has been packaged with actions that can generate reciprocal responses between students and their peers. Also, students and their teachers. Several researchers have also conducted studies on active reconnecting learning strategies. This strategy can positively influence learning outcomes (Dzulfikri & Joko, 2013; Maryanti, 2011). One of the advantages of actively reconnecting learning strategies is the learning conditions created with fun activities. Fun learning is a condition that must be created by the teacher so that students feel comfortable and do not feel burdened during the learning process. Fun learning can be applied by inserting interesting stories, educating humor, and providing motivation. Fun learning can also be done by presenting the material with the help of attractive visual media. Researchers give engaging optical media as one of the learning strategies following the character of the digital natives (students of this age) (Bilgic, Dogan & Seferoglu, 2016; Uygarer, Uzunboylu & Ozdamli, 2016). Some of these activities aim to break the learning atmosphere to increase interest and active learning for students (Sriprakash, 2009; Wei, Hug, Lee & Chen, 2011). This study has limitations in processing data that does not use statistical data analysis. The study sample was limited to two cycles and one research site, the Luwuk GKLB Elementary School. Further research can review the application of active reconnecting learning strategies to improve learning achievement in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains or on the effectiveness of learning to see from the other side. CONCLUSION This class action research was carried out to increase students’ interest and active learning in Christian Religious Education subjects by implementing a proactive reconnecting learning strategy. The increase in student interest and learning activity was higher in the second cycle phase based on observations, questionnaires, and student test results. This study indicates that the active reconnecting learning strategy can improve learning outcomes, namely asking, activeness, and student learning outcomes. Based on a learning design that prioritizes classroom activities that are more attractive, fun and provide space for students to dialogue and discuss with their peers. This study's results can be recommended to teachers and educators to implement active reconnecting learning strategies in the classroom. http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 35 REFERENCES Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Wadworth. Asgari, M., Ketabi, S., & Amirian, Z. (2019). Interest-based Language Teaching: Enhancing students’ Interest and Achievement in L2 Reading. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(1), 61– 75. Bayoe, Y. V., Kouwagam, M. L., & Tanyit, P. (2019). Metode Pembelajaran melalui Film Superbook dan Minat Belajar Firman Tuhan pada Anak Usia 6-8 Tahun. Jurnal Jaffray, 17(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.25278/jj7iil.327 Bilgic, H. G., Dogan, D., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2016). Digital natives in Online Learning Environments: New Bottle Old Wine- The Design of Online Learning Environments for Today’s Generation. In M. Pinheiro & D. Simoes (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Engaging Digital Natives in Higher Education Settings (pp. 192–221). Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0039- 1.ch009 Blanco, L. J., & Garrote, M. (2007). Difficulties in Learning Inequalities in Students of The First Year of Pre- university Education in Spain. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75401 Creswell, John W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approach. Sage. Creswell, J.W. (2015). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Inc. Day, C. (1999). Developing Teachers: The Challenge of Life Long Learning. ASCD Publication. Dzulfikri, M. (2013). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Aktif dengan Strategi Reconnecting. Journal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 2. Elliot, S. N. (2000). Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning. The Mc Graw-Hill Company. Fathurrohman, M., & Sulistirini, S. (2012). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Teras. Febriyona, C., Supartini, T., & Pangemanan, L. (2019). Metode Pembelajaran dengan Media Lagu untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Firman Tuhan. Jurnal Jaffray, 17(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.25278/jj71.326 Fernandez, F. B. (2017). Action Research in the Physics Classroom: The Impact of Authentic, Inquiry Based Learning or Instruction on the Learning of Thermal Physics. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3(2–20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0014-z Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill. Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K. E., Taver, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and Long-term Consequences of Achievement: Predicting Continued and Performance Overtime. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316 Harackiewicz, Judith M., & Hulleman, C. S. (2010). The Importance of Interest: The Role of Achievement Goals and Task Values in Promoting the Development of Interest. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00207.x Helaluddin, H., & Wijaya, H. (2019). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Sebuah Tinjauan Teori & Praktik. Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Jaffray. Helaluddin, H. (2016). Penerapan Strategi Catalisting dalam Menulis Paragraf Prosesual. Jurnal Dialektika, 3(2), 216–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/dialektika.v3i2.5185 Helaluddin, H. (2018). Restrukturisasi Pendidikan Berbasis Budaya: Penerapan Teori Esensialisme di Indonesia. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(2). Helaluddin, H., Syawal, S., Nurmadiah, N., & Zulfah, Z. (2020). Perception & Expectation of University Students as Generation Z: A Qualitative Study about Learning Scenario. Proceeding of The 4th International Conference on Teacher Education and Professional Development (IncoTEPD 2019) , Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 13-14 November 2019 Hendricks, C. (2009). Improving schools through action research: A comprehensive guide for educators. Pearson. Herwandi, H. & Kaharuddin, A. (2020). Exploration of The Influence of Learning ELPSA (Experiences, Language, Pictures, Symbols, and Applications) on The Understanding of Mathematical Concepts. Indonesian Journal of Instructional Media and Model, 2(2), 113-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 36 Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for Increasing Text-based Interest and Students’ Recall of Expository Texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465–483. Hine, G. S. C. (2013). The Importance of Action Research in Teacher Education Programs. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 151–163. Jefferson, R. N. (2014). Action Research: Theory and Aplication. New Review of Academic Libranship, 20(2), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1080113614533.2014.921536 Kasa, Y. (2016). Improving Student’s participation in The Classroom in Chemistry Freshman Students at Assosa University: An Experimental Action Research. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 1(1), 5–10. Kember, D. (2000). action Learning and action Research: Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning. Kogan Page. Khan, N. M. A. (2018). Reflective Practice through Action Research: A Case of Functional Skills Teaching In an Adult Educational Setting. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 5(4), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v5n4p26 Kumaraswamy, S. (2019). Promotion of Students Participation and Academic Achievement in Large Classes: An Action Research Report. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12224a Lee, Y., Chao, C., & Chen, C. (2011). The Influences of Interest in Learning and Learning Hours on Learning Outcomes OF Vocational College Students in Taiwan: Using a Teacher’s Instructional Attitude as the Moderator. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 13(3), 140–153. Mangal, S. K. (2007). Essentials of Educational Phsychology. Prentice Hall. Marrow, A. J. (1977). The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin. Stirling Teacher College. Maryanti, S. (2011). Upaya Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Matematika melalui Pembelajaran Aktif dengan Strategi Reconnecting Siswa Kelas VIII Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri Padang Mutung. UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau. Meke, K. D. P., Jailani, J., Wutsqa, D. U., & Alfi, H. D. (2019). Problem based learning using manipulative materials to improve student interest of mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032099 Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Rineka Cipta. Ormrod, J. E. (2003). Educational Psychology Developing Learner. Pearson. Pasaribu, D. S., Hendri, M., & Susanti, N. (2017). Upaya Meningkatkan Minat dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick pada Materi Listrik Dinamis di Kelas X Sman 10 Muaro Jambi. Jurnal EduFisika, 2(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.22437/edufisika.v2i01.4043 Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual Interest and its Implication for Understanding Intrinsic Motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance. Academic. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational Interest and Academic Achievement in The Active- learning Classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learningstruc.2009.11.09 Sahiu, S., & Wijaya, H. (2017). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Ekstrinsik terhadap Hasil Belajar Psikomotorik pada Mata Pelajaran Agama Kristen Kelas V di SD Zion Makassar. Jurnal Jaffray, 15(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.25278/jj71.v15i2.262 Saswandi, T. (2014). Teaching Style and Students’ Interest in Learning English. Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Jambi Seri Humaniora, 17(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.16526/j.cnki.11-4762/tp.2014.11.051 Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational Interest: A Review of The Literature and Directions for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 23–25. Silberman, M. L. (2014). Active Learning: 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Nuansa Cendekia. Sinaga, D. (2016). Penerapan model student teams achievement division untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan kreativitas belajar ekonomi. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35(3), 357–364. Sriprakash, A. (2009). “Joyful Learning” in Rural Indian Primary Schools: An Analysis of Social Control in The Context of Child-centred Discourse. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 39(5). Sukendar, B., Endroyo, B., & Sudarman, S. (2018). Interest Student to be Produvtive Teachers Reviewed from Learning Achievement of Building Practices, Learning Achievement of Learning Practices and http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 Wijaya, H. et al. | Active Reconnecting Learning Strategies to Increase Student Interest and Active Learning 10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 | 37 Learning Motivation. Journal of Vocational and Career Education, 3(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.15294/jvce,v31l.14006 Supriyadi, T., & Julia, J. (2019). The Problem of Students in Reading the Quran: A Reflective-critical Treatment through Action Research. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12121a Supriyadi, T., Julia, J., Aeni, A. N., & Sumarna, E. (2020). Action Research in Hadith Literacy: A Reflection of Hadith Learning in the Digital Age. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), Article 5. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2169 Tafonao, T., Saputra, S., Suryaningwidi, R. (2020). Learning Media and Technology: Generation Z and Alpha. Indonesian Journal of Instructional Media and Model, 2(2), 89-100. Taqi, H. A., & Al-Nouh, N. A. (2014). Effect of Group Work on EFL Students’ Attitudes and Learning in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n2p52 Tefbana, I. I., Hana, S. R., Supartini, T., & Wijaya, H. (2021). Kompetensi Guru Sekolah Minggu Terhadap Keefektifan Mengajar Anak: Suatu Studi Kuantitatif Di Jemaat GPdI El-Shaddai Makassar. Didache: Journal of Christian Education, 1(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.46445/djce.v1i2.360 Trianto, T. (2009). Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik: Konsep, Landasan Teoritis-praktis dan Implementasinya. prestasi Pustaka Publisher. Turyanto, J. (2020). Peningkatan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Siswa melalui Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Guided Note Taking Bervariasi pada Mata Pelajaran PKn. Indonesian Journal of Instructional Media and Model, 2(1), 59-77. Udeani, U. N., Atagana, H. I., & Esiobu, G. O. (2016). The Implementation of Action Research for the Improvement of Biology Teaching and Learning in Senior Secondary Schools in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(7), 57–69. Uygarer, R., Uzunboylu, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2016). A Piece of Qualitative Study about Digital Natives. Anthropologist, 24(2), 623–629. Weber, K. (2003). The Relationship of Interest to Internal and External Motivation. Communication Research Reports, 20, 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090309388837 Wei, C. W., Hug, I. C., Lee, L., & Chen, N. S. (2011). A Joyful Classroom Learning system with Robot Learning Companion for Children to Learn Mathematics Multiplication. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2). Wijaya, H., & Arismunandar, A. (2018). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbasis Media Sosial. Jurnal Jaffray, 16(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.25278/jj71.v16i2.302 Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational Psychology. Pearson Education Limited, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290 http://dx.doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v3i1.1290