Microsoft Word - 5. Astalini.doc Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 207 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Astalini1, Darmaji2, Dwi Agus Kurniawan3, Mashelin Wulandari4 1-4Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia DOI: 10.23917/ijolae.v3i3.14830 Received: June 12nd, 2021. Revised: August 8th, 2021. Accepted: August 11st, 2021 Available Online: August 18th, 2021. Published Regularly: September 1st, 2021 Abstract This study aims to determine student perceptions of the physics-mathematical e-module based on gender differences. This type of research is quantitative research. This research targets the students of the physics education study program at the Jambi University class of 2019, consisting of classes A, B, and C with a research sample of 120 people using simple random sampling. Data analysis was carried out descriptively and used normality, homogeneity, and ANOVA tests. The results of the Anova test showed that there were differences in perceptions based on gender, with a significance of 0.018 for females and 0.025 for males, which means that there are differences in student perceptions. Furthermore, this difference can be seen in the LSD follow-up test where there are two classes for the female gender, which have significant differences in perception in class A and class C with a significance of 0.044 and classes B and C with a significance 0.011 for the female gender. Meanwhile, in the male gender, only classes B and C have a significant difference with a significance value of 0.07. However, overall, students gave a good perception of this e-module so that this e-module can be used in learning mathematics and physics on partial differential material. Keywords: e-module, gender, mathematical physics, students perception Corresponding Author: Dwi Agus Kurniawan, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia Email: dwiagus.k@unja.ac.id 1. Introduction Technology and education are two things that cannot be separated. One of the undeniable challenges in the 21st century is preparing human resources (HR) who can communicate and master science (Malik, 2019; Yamtinah, Roemintoyo, & Kartikasari 2020; Silwana et al., 2021). These challenges include developing literacy in information and communication technology (ICT), criti- cal thinking skills, problem-solving skills, and collaboration skills that will be useful in the field of education (Suarsana & Mahayukti, 2013; Hadinugrahaningsih, Rahmawati, & Ridwan, 2017; Hermansyah, 2020; van Laar et al., 2020). Education aims to educate the nation's life, prepare students to become people who can contribute and have a positive impact on society now and in the future (Desstya, Novitasari, Razak, & Sudrajat, 2017; Kurniawan, Astalini, Darma- ji, & Melsayanti, 2019; Mafudiansyah, Sari, & Arsyad, 2020; Syahmani et al., 2021). So that to achieve these goals, we need learning media in the form of teaching materials that can make it easier for students to understand a learning material. Teaching materials are the most crucial part of the continuity of the teaching and learning process. Teaching materials are an alternative to support learning activities ex- pected to provide a concrete picture of the material (Widodo, Darhim, & Ikhwanudin, 2018; Adisti, 2021; Hardiana & Aisah, Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/ijolae Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 208 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender 2021). Teaching materials can be in the form of a set of tools for learning that teachers use to provide material to students (Syafrijal & Desyandri, 2019; Faisal, Hotimah, Nurhae- dah, AP, & Khaerunnisa, 2020; Rismaning- tyas, Slamet, Kurniawati, & Pranoto, 2019). However, the problem that often arises in the teaching and learning process in schools is that the material for each book is different, and the material contained in the book is not under the characteristics of students (Sukerni, 2014; Henriksen, Richardson, & Mehta, 2017). So this needs to be overcome through innovations such as using electronic modules or e-modules. E-Module is one of the teaching materi- als that utilize technology as an innovation. BecauseModules following current deve- lopments are electronic-based modules or commonly known as e-modules (Putra, Ira- wan, & Pradnyana, 2017; Istikomah, Purwo- ko, & Nugraheni, 2020; Ustafiano & Pur- wanto, 2020). E-module is an abbreviation of the electronic module, which is an electro- nic-based module (Nalarita & Listiawan, 2018; Ramadhani & Fitri, 2020; Sofyan, Angereini, Muazzomi, & Larasati, 2020). This e-module is in the form of independent learning materials that are structured in order to achieve learning objectives (Afriyanti, Suyatna, & Viyanti, 2021; Ilmi, Arnawa, Yerizon, & Bakar, 2021; Ninawati, Burhendi, & Wulandari, 2021). The advan- tages of this e-module are that students are more interested in learning and are not bored with the usual teaching materials in unders- tanding complicated and mathematical mate- rials such as mathematical physics. Mathematics physics is a combination of physics and mathematics and is a compul- sory subject for physics education students at Jambi University. The topics discussed are related to advanced courses such as mecha- nics, modern physics, etc., which contain a description of the problem and how to solve it (Saputri, Fadilah, & Wahyudi, 2016; Cape, 2018; Bustami, Ngadimin, & Farhan, 2020). However, in the physics education study program at the Jambi University, we rely on the book Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences by Mary L. Boas, which uses English, so it is pretty difficult for stu- dents (Ellianawati & Wahyuni, 2012; Rifa- nan, 2018; Wilujeng & Permatasari, 2019). In comparison, the use of teaching materials such as e-modules serves as a tool to package learning materials and concepts well as well as to improve the quality of learning (Pathoni, Jufrida, Saoutri, & Sari, 2017; Jazuli, Azizah, & Meita, 2018; Darmaji, Astalini, & Kurniawan, 2019). Especially at this time, in the era of the Covid-19 pande- mic. The Covid-19 pandemic or coronavirus disease 2019 has become a severe problem and has spread to various sectors of life, such as education (Daniel, 2020; Dogar et al., 2020; Jena, 2020). This causes learning to be done with writing and requires updates such as images, animations, and videos (Jena, 2020; Setiawan et al., 2020). This is also needed in learning mathematical physics, so this mathematical physics e-module was cre- ated with the help of 3D Pageflip Professio- nal software that can improve the quality of this e-module. The quality of a product, namely e- modules, can be seen by measuring the per- ceptions of students. Perception is a person's perspective through a process of the five senses processed and then concluded to un- derstand information (Qiong, 2017; Yodha, 2019; Yunita & Maisarah, 2020). This per- ception is used to see how students perceive an object or product, either in the form of a design or as a whole (Pathoni et al., 2017; Yunita & Maisarah, 2020; Hernanto, Atmojo, & Ardiansyah, 2021). This percep- Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 209 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender tion is carried out to determine how students view the e-module of mathematical physics on partial differential material using 3d page flip professional software. 3d pageflip pro- fessional software is an application used to create flipbooks or e-books, e-papers, and e- magazines, published in various formats (Bakri, Siahaan, & Permana, 2016; Apriyan- to, Yusnelti, & Asrial, 2019; Syahrial, Arial, Kurniawan, & Piyana, 2019). In addition, this perception will also see how students' perceptions are based on gen- der in each class, where gender differences are differences in characteristics, traits, and ways of thinking between men and women (Desiningrum, 2015; Anggoro, 2016; Rizkiyah, Susanto, & Nugroho, 2016). Gen- der belongs to a social category that refers to an individual's social, cultural, and biological meaning and identity (Vinlandari & Gunawan, 2020; Yuliani, 2019). This gender is divided into men and women, where wo- men's ways of thinking are more apparent, and their emotions are more organized than men who are more realistic or use their minds more. (Anggoro, 2016; Xu & Waniganayake, 2018; Umaroh & Pujiastuti, 2020). This gender difference can be a factor in the differences in student perceptions. Based on some of the descriptions above, then researchers are interested in con- ducting this research to answer the following questions: (1) How are the students' perceptions of the Regular A, B, and C classes on the physics-mathematical e-module on gender-based differential material; and (2) What are the diffe- rences in student perceptions based on gender differences in grades A, B, and C to the physics- mathematical e-module on gender-based diffe- rential material. 2. Method The type of research used is quantitative research with descriptive statistical type. Quantitative research will produce data in the form of numbers about phenomena that are then analyzed using statistical data (Winarsunu, 2017; Sulfemi, 2018; Febriantini & Prayogo, 2020; Thambu et al., 2021). This type of research is conducted to describe or overview a phenomenon in a systematic and objective Malener based on facts in the field (Astalini et al., 2019; Prasko, Sutomo, & Santoso, 2016; Isnawati, Jalinus, & Risfendra, 2020). In addition, this quantitative descriptive study was used to see student perceptions where. This data ca- me from a questionnaire, where students gave their assessment of the object under study. (Pathoni et al., 2017; Darmaji, Kurniawan, et al., 2019; Febriantini & Prayogo, 2020; Wulandari, Wirayuda, Aldila, & Wulandari, 2020). The quantitative data in this study were obtained from a stu- dent perception questionnaire. The data collection instrument in this study was using a student perception questi- onnaire. A questionnaire or questionnaire is an evaluation tool that contains questions or statements that respondents will fill out to obtain information for quantitative data (Riany, Fajar, & LukMale, 2016; Irwansyah, Lubab Farida, & Ramdhani, 2017). This per- ception questionnaire uses a Likert scale of 4. The Likert scale itself is a scale developed by Likert and used to systematically measure things (Joshi, Kale, Chandel, & Pal, 2015; Maryuliana, Subroto, & Haviana, 2016; Beune et al., 2018). The Likert scale (1-4) is designed to measure the perception of a per- son or group of people where a score of 1 to 4 indicates that 4 = very good, 3 = good, 2 = not good, and 1 = very bad (Darmaji, Kurniawan, et al., 2019; Pranatawijaya & Priscilla, 2019; Supandi & Gymnastics, 2020). The student perception questionnaire instrument can be seen in the following table. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 210 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Table 1. Student Perception Questionnaire Variable Indicator Items Display 1. Text clarity 1 2. Clarity of images, animations, videos, and simulations 2,3,4 3. Draw pictures, animations, videos, and simulations 5 Theory 1. Presentation of material 6.7 2. Clarity of sentences 8.9 3. The suitability of the sample with the material 10 4. Suitability of images, animations, videos, and simulations 11 Benefits 1. Ease of learning 12.13 2. Interest in using e-modules 14 3. Increased learning motivation 15 The student perception questionnaire grid in table 1 consists of 3 variables, namely the appearance of the e-module, the material of the e-module, and the benefits of the e- module, with ten indicators and 15 positive statements. The range of scores is shown in the following table. Table 2. Perception Questionnaire Quantitative Criteria Score Range Range Criteria 48,76 – 60,00 Very good 37,51 – 48,75 Good 26,26 – 37,50 Not good 15,00 – 26,25 Very Not Good The range of students' perception questi- onnaire scores in table 2 consists of 4 ranges and 4 criteria. The population in this study was the 2019 Jambi University physics education students who had contracted the mathematics physics course one as the research popula- tion. The population is everything studied and has specific characteristics important in research (Asiamah, Mensah, & Oteng- Abayie, 2017; Nasution, 2017; Jaya, 2019). At the same time, the sample represents the population but is considered to represent the data as a whole (Otzen & Maleterola, 2017; Duli, 2019; Sunaryono, 2019). The sample used in this study were 120 students from the Regular class A, B, and C consisting of 45 male students and 75 female students. The sampling technique in this study used simple random sampling. Simple ran- dom sampling is a sampling technique carri- ed out randomly in the Management of the questionnaire (Purwanto, 2018; Maharani, Maupa & Aswan, 2020; Owusu-Fordjour, Koomson, & Hanson, 2020). In the simple random sampling technique, each population element has an equal chance, and members of the population are considered homogene- ous (Ethics, 2017; Yazid, 2017; Arieska, 2018). The perception of this sample will be the object of research. The data analysis technique used in this research is descriptive analysis and inferenti- al analysis. The first is descriptive data ana- lysis presented in a frequency distribution in the form of numbers such as mean, mode, median, standard deviation, minimum value, and maximum value (Winarsunu, 2017; Odhier et al., 2019). The second is inferential statistical data analysis which is carried out Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 211 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender with the ANOVA test to determine whether or not there are differences in perceptions in the three classes (Zhu, Srivastava, Ibrahim, Patro, & Love, 2019; Masni, Ralmugiz, & RukMale, 2020; Sherliwati, 2021). However, before the ANOVA test is carried out, the assumption test consists of normality and homogeneity tests (W. Kurniawan, Darmaji, Astalini, Kurniawan, & Hidayat, 2019; Huda et al., 2020; Widiyono, 2021). According to Kurniawan et al. (2019) and Widiyono, the prerequisite or assump- tion test includes two tests: normality and homogeneity tests, while hypothesis testing consists of ANOVA tests. a. Normality Test The normality test was conducted to see whether the independent and dependent vari- ables were normal or not, or in other words, whether the data used were normally distri- buted or not. Expected or not, the data can be seen from the significance value. The guide- line for decision making is if the significant value is < 0.05, the data is not normal, and vice versa. On the other hand, if the signifi- cance value is > 0.05, the data is normal. The normality test was carried out with the help of SPSS by looking at the significance re- sults of Kolmogorov Smirnov. b. Homogeneity Test After the data is declared to be normally distributed, then the homogeneity test is then carried out. Finally, a homogeneity test is carried out to see the level of homogeneity of data. This homogeneity test was carried out using SPSS where the significant value on Levene's Test for Equality of Variance with the condition sig > with a level of = 0.05 or, in other words, the significance was more significant than 0.05. c. Hypothesis Testing After the data is declared to meet the re- quirements of the assumption test, then the hypothesis test can then be carried out. This hypothesis test is done by ANOVA test. The test was carried out with a significance level of 5% or 0.05. Decision making on this hypothesis test is based on the following criteria: 1. Ho is accepted, and Ha has rejected if the value of Sig > 0.05 means that there is no significant difference between students' perceptions of gen- der in classes A, B, and C. 2. Ho is rejected, and Ha has accepted if the value of Sig < 0.05 means a signi- ficant difference between students' perceptions in classes A, B, and C. The research process carried out can be seen in the following flow chart Figure 1. Research Flow Chart 3. Result and Discussion This research was conducted by distrib- uting perception questionnaires to students of physics education class A, class B, and class C class 2019 via Google Form. The ques- tionnaire used a 4-point Likert scale. The data that has been collected was analyzed descriptively using SPSS to see how students Identification of problems Creating e- modules Spread the questionnaire Student Per- ception Conclusion Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 212 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender perceive in classes A, B, and C. Perception is a person's perspective on an object he ob- serves (Yodha, Abidin, & Adi, 2019; Anggoro, 2016). This perception can also be influenced by gender, where gender is the difference in the nature and way of thinking between men and women (Rizkiyah, Susanto, & Nugroho, 2016). This perception can be known by per- forming statistical and inferential data analy- sis. As for statistically, the data obtained can be seen in Table 3 below. Table 3. Description of Students' Perceptions in Class A on the Mathematics Physics E-Module Interval Category F (%) mean median Mode Min Max Gender 15.00 – 26.25 Very Not Good 0 0 47.96 47.00 42.00 42.00 58.00 female 26.25 – 37.50 Not good 0 0 37.51 – 48.75 Good 15 62.5 48.76 – 60.00 Very good 9 37.5 15.00 – 26.25 Very Not Good 0 0 44.94 45.50 48.00 37.00 52.00 Male 26.25 – 37.50 Not good 2 12.5 37.51 – 48.75 Good 11 68.8 48.76 – 60.00 Very good 3 18.8 Table 3 provides descriptive information on students' perceptions of the physics- mathematics e-module for class A consisting of 40 students divided into 24 female stu- dents and 16 male students. For female stu- dents, 62.5% or 15 people said this e-module was good, and 37.5% or 9 people said this e- module was very good. Thus, the average value (mean) of perception is 47.96 with a median of 47, mode 42, a minimum value of 42, and a maximum of 58. As for male stu- dents, 12.5% or 2 people stated that this e- module is not good 68.8% or 11 people said it was good, and 18.8% or 3 people said it was very good. Meanwhile, the average sta- tistic is 44.94, the median is 45.50, the mode is 48.00, the minimum value is 37, and the maximum value is 52. Based on these results, both female and male students in class A have a more domi- nant perception in the good category, but the average perception of female students is higher. So that this mathematical physics e- module can be used as a learning medium. Furthermore, it can be done to test the de- scription of the perception results of students in class B based on gender. These results can be seen in Table 4. Table 4. Description of students’ Perception in class B on the Mathematics Physics E-Module Interval Category F (%) mean median Mode Min Max Gender 15.00 – 26.25 Very Not Good 0 0 48.91 49.00 54.00 38.00 57.00 female 26.25 – 37.50 Not good 0 0 37.51 – 48.75 Good 11 50 48.76 – 60.00 Very good 11 50 Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 213 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Interval Category F (%) mean median Mode Min Max Gender 15.00 – 26.25 Very Not Good 0 0 42.83 43.00 43.00 36.00 54.00 Male 26.25 – 37.50 Not good 3 16.7 37.51 – 48.75 Good 14 77.8 48.76 – 60.00 Very good 1 5.6 Table 4 provides information on studen- ts' perceptions of the physics-mathematics e- module for class B, consisting of 40 students divided into 22 female students and 18 male students. For female students, it was found that 50% (11 people) said this e-module was good, and another 50% (11 people) said this e-module was very good. Meanwhile, in the perception of men, 16.7% (3 people) said this e-module was not good, 77.8% (14 peo- ple) said it was good, and 5.6% (1 person) said it was very good. So based on the results of this perception, it can be seen that the do- minant students stated that this e-module was good to use, but based on gender, female students had a higher average perception. After conducting descriptive tests in class A and B, descriptive tests in class C can be carried out to obtain information on student perceptions in class C. The results can be seen in Table 5. Table 5. Description of Students’ Perception in Class C on the Mathematics Physics E-module Interval Category F (%) mean median Mode Min Max Gender 15.00 – 26.25 Very Not Good 0 0 44.80 43.00 40.00 36.00 54.00 female 26.25 – 37.50 Not good 1 4 37.51 – 48.75 Good 18 72 48.76 – 60.00 Very good 6 24 15.00 – 26.25 Very Not Good 0 0 47.67 46.00 45.00 40.00 57.00 Male 26.25 – 37.50 Not good 0 0 37.51 – 48.75 Good 9 60 48.76 – 60.00 Very good 6 40 Table 5 provides information on studen- ts' perceptions of the physics-mathematics e- module for class C, which comprises 40 stu- dents divided into 25 female students and 15 male students. Based on table 5 above, 4% of female students (1 person) said this e-module was not good, 72% (18 people) said this e- module was good, and 24% (6 people) said it was very good. Meanwhile, 60% of male students (9 people) stated that this e-module was good, and 40% (6 people) stated that this e-module was very good. Thus, based on the descriptive results of Class C, the dominant students gave a good perception of the e- module. However, male students have a higher average perception. Based on the results of the descriptive tests in classes A, B, and C in table 3, table 4, and table 5, it can be seen that there are differences in perceptions based on gender, namely between male and female students. This gender difference is one of the factors that give different perceptions between male and female students. This is because women Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 214 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender are considered to have a more transparent and more efficient way of thinking so that the information obtained is processed and analyzed as well as possible, compared to men who are more realistic and use their minds (Umaroh & Pujiastuti, 2020). This is what causes perceptions between students based on gender can be different because there are differences in the way they receive information about an object. After the data were analyzed descripti- vely, the data were analyzed using inferential statistics to determine the differences in per- ceptions of each gender in classes A, B, and C, which consisted of testing assumptions and hypotheses. This assumption test con- sists of a normality test and a homogeneity test (Widiyono, 2021). The results for the assumption test can be seen in the following table. Table 6. Normality Test by Gender Gender Class Sig Distribute Female A 0.091 Normal B 0.073 Normal C 0.162 Normal Male A 0.462 Normal B 0.387 Normal C 0.390 Normal Table 6 provides information on the dis- tribution of data in classes A, B, and C by gender. In the normality test, the data is normally distributed when the sig value > 0.05. This significance value is seen from the results table Kolmogorov-Smirnov (Christidamayani & Kristanto, 2020). Based on the table, the female gender in classes A, B, and C, the significance values are 0.091, 0.073, and 0.162, respectively. This shows that the data is normally distributed on the female gender. On the other hand, the signi- ficance values for the male gender in classes A, B, and C are 0.462, 0.387, 0.390, respec- tively. This means that the perception data of students with male gender is also normally distributed. After the data is declared to be normally distributed, the homogeneity test is carried out as the second assumption test. The re- sults of the homogeneity test can be seen in the following table. Table 7. Test For Homogeneity by Gender Gender Levene Statistics df1 df2 Sig. female 1.075 2 68 0.347 Male 0.556 2 46 0.577 Table 7 provides information on the ho- mogeneity of the data by gender. In this ho- mogeneous test, the data is said to be homo- geneous or have similarities if the significant value obtained is greater than 0.05. Based on the table, it is known that the significance value for the female gender is 0.347, and for the male gender, the significance value is 0.577. This shows that sig > 0.05, which means the data is homogeneous. After the data is declared normal and homogeneous, the hypothesis can be tested using the ANOVA test. The results of the ANOVA test can be seen in the following table. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 215 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Table 8. ANOVA Test by Gender Gender ANOVA Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig Female Between Groups 221.815 2 110,908 3.838 0.018 Within Groups 1964,777 68 28,894 Total 2186,592 70 Male Between Groups 191.229 2 95.615 3.981 0.025 Within Groups 1104.771 68 24.017 Total 1296,000 70 Table 8 presents the results of the ANOVA test conducted using SPSS. For the female gender, the value of sig < 0.05 is 0.018. So Ho is rejected, and Ha is accepted, meaning that the average perception of fema- le gender in classes A, B, and C has differen- ces. As for the male gender, the significance value is also smaller than 0.05. So Ho is re- jected, and Ha is accepted, meaning that in the male gender, there is also a difference in the average perception between boys in gra- des A, B, and C on the e-module of mathe- matics physics on partial differential materi- al. After the ANOVA test was carried out to see whether or not there were differences in the class, it could also be seen which class had different perceptions through an advan- ced test or post hoc test. The post hoc test is a further test after it is known that there is a difference in the ANOVA test(Setyawati, Endrawati, Health, & Mulia, 2019). The post hoc test used in this study was the LSD test to find out the differences in more detail. This LSD test will provide detailed informa- tion about the differences in perceptions between groups(Noviyanto et al., 2020). The results of this test can be seen in the fol- lowing table. Table 9. LSD Post Post Hoc Test Results Class (I) Class (J) Mean Difference (IJ) Sig Gender A B -.951 0.551 Female C 3,158* 0.044 B A .951 0.551 C 4.109* 0.011 C A -3,158* 0.044 B -4,109* 0.011 A B 2.104 .218 Male C -2,729 .128 B A -2.104 .218 C -4,833* .007 C A 2,729 .128 B 4,833* .007 Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 216 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Table 9 shows that almost all classes ha- ve significant differences in the female gen- der. However, those who meet the require- ments with sig < 0.05 are class A and class C with a significance of 0.044 and classes B and C with a significance level of 0.011. So it can be concluded that classes B and C have a very significant difference in the female gender. Meanwhile, when viewed from the male gender, only classes B and C have a significant difference with a significance value of 0.07. This means a significant diffe- rence in class A and C in male students, whi- le the other classes are not. Based on the research results, it turns out that gender does affect the differences in perceptions that occur, where the gender of women shows a more dominant difference than men. In line with previous research, which stated that Biological factors cause this difference in perception in the brain be- cause women use their emotions more often or are more realistic than men, and women have verbal superiority in their brains. (Dilla, Hidayat, & Rohaeti, 2018; Darsini, Fahrurrozi, & Cahyono, 2019). However, overall, the students stated that the mathema- tics physics e-module on this partial differen- tial material was good. Furthermore, the existence of this e-module is expected to improve student learning outcomes because this e-module has been designed as well as possible so that the process of understanding the material becomes more interesting for students. The e-module is a form of a print mod- ule developed into electronics (Sugihartini dan Jayanta, 2017). The advantages of this electronic module can make it easier for stu- dents to obtain information and be used without dependence on place and time so that it is more effective and efficient (Fausih & Danang, 2015; Darmaji, Kurniawan, et al., 2019). In addition, technology-based modules can help make learning more inter- active and innovative, increasing student motivation (Subali & Handayani, 2012; Williamson et al., 2019). As in mathematics physics learning, understanding mathemati- cal concepts is needed so that students can solve problems and train reasoning and logi- cal thinking skills (Juliani et al., 2021). So that learning like this is needed now, wherein the Covid-19 era learning is more often done online. The learning carried out during this pan- demic is a challenge in education to create innovative learning because learning that changes suddenly makes learning less than optimal (Yadav, 2020). This will undoubted- ly affect the learning process if it is allowed to continue. So to address this, one thing that can be done is to provide e-modules. The e- module used in this study is the physics- mathematical e-module developed using the 3D Pageflip Professional application. This e- module is carried out as a learning media innovation that can help students understand mathematics physics learning. This research needs to be done because this perception can have an impact on future learning. For example, the implications of this perception result can make students un- derstand the partial differential material and make students pass this course. Meanwhile, in the long term, this perception can help provide an overview of student understand- ing to help prepare students to become good teachers in the future, especially in mathe- matics and physics courses. However, this research is limited to looking at students' perceptions of the e-modules made. It is hoped that further researchers can examine these students' perceptions in the broader field, such as HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills), critical thinking, and others. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 217 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender 4. Conclusion Based on the research results on student perceptions of the physics-mathematical e- module, it can be concluded that gender is one of the factors that influence differences in perceptions between female and male stu- dents. This can be seen in the ANOVA test, which shows a significance value of 0.018 for the female gender and 0.025 for the male gender. This shows that sig < 0.05, which means there are differences in student per- ceptions. Furthermore, this difference can be seen in the LSD follow-up test where two classes for the female gender have significant differences, namely class A and C and class B and C. Meanwhile, for the male gender, there is the only difference between class B and class C. 5. References Afriyanti, M., Suyatna, A., & Viyanti. (2021). Design of e-modules to stimulate HOTS on static fluid materials with the STEM approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1788(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1788/1/012032 Anggoro, B. S. (2016). Analisis Persepsi Siswa SMP terhadap Pembelajaran Matematika ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender dan Disposisi Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v7i2.30 Apriyanto, C., Yusnelti, & Asrial. (2019). Pengembangan E-LKPD Berpendekatan Saintifik Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit. Journal of The Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry, 11(1), 38–42. Arieska, P. K. dan N. H. (2018). Pemilihan Teknik Sampling Berdasarkan Perhitungan Efisiensi Relatif. Jurnal Statistika, 6(2), 166–171. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/stat istik/article/view/4322/4001 Asiamah, N., Mensah, H. K., & Oteng- Abayie, E. F. (2017). General, target, and accessible population: Demystifying the concepts for adequate sampling. Qualitative Report, 22(6), 1607–1621. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160- 3715/2017.2674 Astalini, Darmaji, Kurniawan, D. A., Sumaryanti, Perdana, R., & Susbiyanto. (2019). Relationship Between Students Interests and Attitudes in Physical Subject. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 5(3), 202–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/e st.v5i3.9309 Bakri, F., Siahaan, B. Z., & Permana, A. H. (2016). Rancangan Website Pembelajaran Terintegrasi dengan Modul Digital Fisika Menggunakan 3D PageFlip Professional. JPPPF - Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(Fitri 2015), 113–118. Beune, I. M., Bloomfield, F. H., Ganzevoort, W., Embleton, N. D., Rozance, P. J., van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A. G., Wynia, K., & Gordijn, S. J. (2018). Consensus Based Definition of Growth Restriction in the Newborn. Journal of Pediatrics, 196(1), 71-76.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.0 59 Bustami, Ngadimin, & Farhan, A. (2020). The Difficulty Factors of Students to Understand Mathematics Physics 1 at Physics Education Department FKIP Unsyiah. Asian Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24815/ajse.v2i1.14725 Christidamayani, A. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2020). The Effects of Problem Posing Learning Model on Students’ Learning Achievement and Motivation. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 2(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v2i2.998 1 Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1– 2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020- Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 218 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender 09464-3 Darmaji, Astalini, & Kurniawan, D. A. (2019). E-Module Based Problem Solving in Basic Physics Practicum for Science Process Skills. IJOE, 15(15), 4– 17. Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, W., Anwar, K., & Lumbantoruan, A. (2019a). Students’ perceptions of electronic’s module in physics practicum. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(2), 288– 294. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i2. 13005 Darmaji, Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, Kurniawan, W., Anwar, K., & Lumbantoruan, A. (2019b). Students’ perceptions of electronic’s module in physics practicum. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(2), 288– 294. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i2. 13005 Darsini, Fahrurrozi, & Cahyono, E. A. (2019). Pengetahuan. Jurnal Keperawatan, 12(1), 95–107. Desiningrum, D. R. (2015). Kesejahteraan Psikologis Lansia Janda/Duda Ditinjau dari Persepsi Terhadap Dukungan Sosial dan Gender. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 13(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpu.13.2.102- 201 Desstya, A., Novitasari, I. I., Razak, A. F., & Sudrajat, K. S. (2017). Refleksi Pendidikan IPA Sekolah Dasar di Indonesia (Relevansi Model Pendidikan Paulo Freire dengan Pendidikan IPA di Sekolah Dasar). Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 1–11. Dewa, E., Mukin, M. U. J., & Pandango, O. (2020). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Daring Berbantuan Laboratorium Virtual Terhadap Minat dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Fisika Egidius. Jurnal Riset Teknologi Dan Inovasi Pendidikan (JARTIKA), 3(2), 351–359. Dilla, S. C., Hidayat, W., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2018). Faktor Gender dan Resiliensi dalam Pencapaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 2(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.31331/medives.v2i1.5 53 Dogar, A. A., Shah, I., Ali, S. W., & Ijaz, A. (2020). Constraints to Online Teaching in Institutes of Higher Education during Pandemic COVID-19: A Case Study of CUI, Abbottabad Pakistan. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(2Sup1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.2sup1/ 285 Duli, N. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Deepublish. Ellianawati, & Wahyuni, S. (2012). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Matematika Berbasis Self Regulated Learning Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Belajar Mandiri. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8(1), 33– 40. Etikan, I. (2017). Sampling and Sampling Methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00 149 Faisal, M., Hotimah, Nurhaedah, AP, N., & Khaerunnisa. (2020). Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Mengembangkan Bahan Ajar Digital di Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan, 10(3), 266–270. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/index.php/pubpend Fausih, M., & Danang, T. (2015). Pengembangan Media E-Modul Mata Pelajaran Produktif Pokok Bahasan “Instalasi Jaringan LAN (Local Area Network)’ untuk Siswa Kelas XI Jurusan Teknik Komputer Jaringan di SMK Negeri 1 Labang Bangkalan Madura. Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(3), 1–9. Febriantini, W. A., & Prayogo, J. A. (2020). Teacher ’ s Perception toward the Use of English for Communication Science Book. In Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 219 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Penelitian, dan Pengembangan (Vol. 5, Issue 9). Hadinugrahaningsih, T., Rahmawati, Y., & Ridwan, A. (2017). Developing 21st century skills in chemistry classrooms: Opportunities and challenges of STEAM integration. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(August). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995107 Hardiana, M. T. A. N., & Aisah, S. (2021). Pengembangan Modul Mata Kuliah Berbicara Berbasis Metode Jigsaw. JPE (Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama), 8(1), 107–114. Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26(March), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001 Hermansyah. (2020). Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Stem Berbantuan ICT dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Abad 21. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 129–132. Hernanto, M. D., Atmojo, I. R. W., & Ardiansyah, R. (2021). Persepsi orang tua peserta didik kelas IV SD terhadap platform pembelajaran dalam jaringan ( daring ) IPA selama masa sindemi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia UNS, 7(1), 34–39. Huda, S., Yasin, M., Fitri, A., Syazali, M., Supriadi, N., Umam, R., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Numerical Ability Analysis: The Impact of the Two Stay-Two Stray Learning Model on the Sequence and Series Topic in Islamic Boarding School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1467/1/012002 Ilmi, R., Arnawa, I. M., Yerizon, & Bakar, N. N. (2021). Development of an Android-Based for Math E-Module by using Adobe Flash Professional CS6 for Grade X Students of Senior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1742(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1742/1/012026 Irwansyah, F. S., Lubab, I., Farida, I., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2017). Designing Interactive Electronic Module in Chemistry Lessons. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE), 895(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/895/1/012009 Isnawati, I., Jalinus, N., & Risfendra, R. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pedagogi Guru SMK yang sedang Mengambil Pendidikan Profesi Guru dengan Metode Deskriptif Kuantitatif dan Metode Kualitatif. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 20(1), 37– 44. https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v20i1.6 52 Istikomah, Purwoko, R. Y., & Nugraheni, P. (2020). Pengembangan E-Modul Matematika Berbasis Realistik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 63–71. https://ejournal.stkipbbm.ac.id/index.ph p/mtk/article/view/490 Jaya, I. (2019). Penerapan Statistik untuk Penelitian Pendidikan (pertama). Prenadamedia Group. Jazuli, M., Azizah, L. F., & Meita, N. M. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Elektronik Berbasis Android Sebagai Media Interaktif. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v7i2.22 Jena, D. P. K. (2020). Research Article Impact of Pandemic Covid-19 Covid. International Journal of Current Research, 12(7), 12582–12586. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert Scale : Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14 975 Juliani, A., Mustadi, A., & Lisnawati, I. (2021). “Make A Match Model” for Improving the Understanding of Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 220 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Concepts and Student Learning Results. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.102 69 Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., & Melsayanti, R. (2019). Students ’ attitude towards natural sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(3), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.1639 5 Kurniawan, W., Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Hidayat, M. (2019). Multimedia physics practicum reflective material based on problem solving for science process skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(4), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.2025 8 Mafudiansyah, Sari, S. S., & Arsyad, M. (2020). Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMA Negeri 3 Makassar. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF), 16(1), 8–19. Maharani, Maupa, H., & Aswan, A. (2020). Knowledge Management And Entrepreneurship Aspects Of Performance Through Competitive Advantage Of Smes In Makassar. Hasanuddin Journal of Applied Business and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 9. Malik, A. (2019). Creating Competitive Advantage through Source Basic Capital Strategic Humanity in the Industrial Age 4 . 0. International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science, 4(1), 209–215. Maryuliana, Subroto, I. M. I., & Haviana, S. F. C. (2016). Sistem Informasi Angket Pengukuran Skala Kebutuhan Materi Pembelajaran Tambahan Sebagai Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan Di Sekolah Menengah Atas Menggunakan Skala Likert. Jurnal Transistor Elektro Dan Informatika, 1(2), 1–12. Masni, E. D., Ralmugiz, U., & Rukman, N. K. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran dan Komunikasi Statistik Mahasiswa Melalui Pembelajaran Statistik Inferensial Berbasis Proyek dengan Meninjau Gaya Kognitif Mahasiswa. Pedagogy, 5(2), 12–26. Nalarita, Y., & Listiawan, T. (2018). Pengembangan E-Modul Kontekstual Interaktif Berbasis Web pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia Senyawa Hidrokarbon. Multitek Indonesia, 12(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.24269/mtkind.v12i2.1 125 Nasution, L. M. (2017). Statistik Deskriptif. Jurnal Hikmah, 14(21), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01626a006 Ninawati, M., Burhendi, F. C. A., & Wulandari. (2021). Pengembangan E- Modul Berbasis Software iSpring Suite 9. Jurnal Educatio, 7(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i1.8 30 Noviyanto, F., Nuriyah, S., & Susilo, H. (2020). Uji Aktivitas Antibakteri Sediaan Sabun Cair Ekstrak Daun Mengkudu (Morinda citrifolia L.) Terhadap Staphylococcus aureus. Journal Syifa Sciences and Clinical Research, 2(2), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.37311/jsscr.v2i2.7016 Odhier, P. O., Ajowi, J. O., & Mwebi, B. (2019). Investigation on Contributions of Principals on School Machinery and Equipment Management in Secondary Schools in Kenya. International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, 6(5), 73–88. Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717- 95022017000100037 Owusu-Fordjour, C., Koomson, C. K., & Hanson, D. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 on Learning-The Perspective of the Ghanaian Student. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(3), 88– 101. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 221 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3753586 Pathoni, H., Jufrida, Saoutri, I., & Sari, W. (2017). Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap E- Modul Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Fisika Atom dan Inti. Jurnal EKsakta Pendidikan (JEP), 1(1), 55–62. Pranatawijaya, V. H., & Priskila, R. (2019). Pengembangan Aplikasi Kuesioner Survey Berbasis Web Menggunakan Skala Likert dan Guttman. Jurnal Sains Dan Informatika, 5(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.34128/jsi.v5i2.185 Prasko, Sutomo, B., & Santoso, B. (2016). Penyuluhan Metode Audio Visual dan Demonstrasi terhadap Pengetahuan Menyikat Gigi pada Anak Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kesehatan Gigi, 03(2), 1– 5. Putra, K. W. B., Irawan, I. M. A., & Pradnyana, G. A. (2017). Pengembangan E-Modul Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning pada Mata Pelajaran “Sistem Komputer” untuk Siswa Kelas X Multimedia SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 14(1), 40–49. Qiong, O. (2017). A Brief Introduction to Perception. Studies in Literature and Language, 15(4), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.3968/10055 Ramadhani, R., & Fitri, Y. (2020). Validitas E-Modul Matematika Berbasis EPUB3 Menggunakan Analisis Rasch Model. Jurnal Gantang, 5(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v5i2.2535 Ramdahan, R. (2020). perbedaan Tingkat Minat Membaca Siswa Kelas VIII A dan VIII D. Jurnal Pendidika, 5(2), 8–12. Riany, J., Fajar, M., & Lukman, M. P. (2016). Penerapan Deep Sentiment Analysis pada Angket Penilaian Terbuka Menggunakan K-Nearest Neighbor. Jurnal Sisfo, 6(1), 147–156. Rifanan, A. (2018). Strategi Manajemen Kelas Pada Proses Belajar Mengajar Bahasa Inggris di SD Muhammadiyah Boarding School Prambanan- Sleman. Acamedica: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 1–13. Rismaningtyas, A., Slamet, A., Kurniawati, Y., & Pranoto, S. (2019). Implementation of Contextual Based Teaching Materials on Various Work Themes of Primary School Students. Journal of Primary Education, 8(4), 110–119. Rizkiyah, E., Susanto, N., & Nugroho, S. (2016). Perbedaan Persepsi Risiko Ditinjau Dari Gender Pada Kegiatan Pendakian Gunung. Industrial Engineering Online Journal, 5(4). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/i eoj/article/view/14115 Saputri, D. F., Fadilah, S., & Wahyudi, W. (2016). Efektivitas Penggunaan Buku Ajar Fisika Matematika Berbasis Inkuiri dalam Perkuliahan Fisika Matematika. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.02202 Setiawan, B., Juniarso, T., Fanani, A., & Iasha, V. (2020). Pembelajaran Online Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pemahanan Konsep Fisika Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 11(02), 230–236. Setyawati, E. R., Endrawati, S., Kesehatan, P., & Mulia, B. (2019). Uji Efek Tonikum Ekstrak Etanol Rimpang Temu Kunci ( Boesenbergia pandurata ( Roxb ) Schlecht ) Terhadap Mencit Jantan Galur Swiss. IJMS-Indonesian Journal on Medical Science, 6(2), 52–56. Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749–752. www.allresearchjournal.com Sickle, J. Van. (2016). Discrepancies between student perception and achievement of learning outcomes in a flipped classroom. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i2.19 216 Silwana, A., Subanji, S., Manyunu, M., & Rashahan, A. A. (2021). Students’ Responses Leveling in Solving Mathematical Problem Based on SOLO Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 222 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Taxonomy Viewed from Multiple Intelligences. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.105 28 Sofyan, H., Anggereini, E., Muazzomi, N., & Larasati, N. (2020). Developing an Electronic Module of Local Wisdom Based on the Area Learning Model at Kindergarten Jambi City. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(2), 216–231. Suarsana, I. M., & Mahayukti, G. A. (2013). Pengembangan E-Modul Berorientasi Pemecahan Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika (JANAPATI), 2(2), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v2i3.98 00 Subali, B., & Handayani, L. (2012). Pengembangan Cd Pembelajaran Lagu Anak Untuk Menumbuhkan Pemahaman Sains Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8(1), 26– 32. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v8i1.1991 Sugihartini, N., & Jayanta, N. L. (2017). Pengembangan E-Modul Mata Kuliah Strategi Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 14(2), 221–230. Sukerni, P. (2014). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Pendidikan Ipa Kelas Iv Semester I Sd No. 4 Kaliuntu Dengan Model Dick and Carey. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 3(1), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi- undiksha.v3i1.2920 Sunaryono. (2019). Aplikasi Statistika. UB Press. Supandi, M., & Senam, S. (2020). Development of science learning media- based local wisdom Batui to improve critical thinking ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 52(3), 163–171. http://pkim.pps.uny.ac.id/sites/pkim.pps. uny.ac.id/files/1 18149-36636-1-PB.pdf Suprianto, A., Ahmadi, F., & Suminar, T. (2019). The Development of Mathematics Mobile Learning Media to Improve Students’ Autonomous and Learning Outcomes. Journal of Primary Education, 8(1), 84–91. Syafrijal, & Desyandri. (2019). Deveopment Of Integrated Thematic Teaching Materials With Project Based Learning Models In Class IV of Primary School. International Journal of Educational Dynamics/IJEDS, 1(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/ij eds.v1i2.110 Syahmani, S., Hafizah, E., Sauqina, S., Adnan, M. Bin, & Ibrahim, M. H. (2021). STEAM Approach to Improve Environmental Education Innovation and Literacy in Waste Management: Bibliometric Research. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i2.127 82 Syahrial, Arial, Kurniawan, D. A., & Piyana, S. O. (2019). E-Modul Etnokontruktivisme: Implementasi Pada Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Ditinjau Dari Persepsi, Minat Dan Motivasi. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 21(1), 165–177. Tanjung, Y. I. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Teknik Polya terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Aktivitas Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Matematika II. Jurnal Ikatan Alumni Fisika Universitas Negeri Medan, 4(2), 1–26. Thambu, N., Prayitno, H. J., & Zakaria, G. A. N. (2021). Incorporating Active Learning into Moral Education to Develop Multiple Intelligences: A Qualitative Approach. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.100 64 Umaroh, U., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa dalam Mengerjakan Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 223 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Soal PISA Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 05(02), 40–53. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jpm r/article/view/11408 Ustafiano, B., & Purwanto, W. (2020). Evaluation of Electric and Electronic Handout in Automotive Engineering by Using Formative Evaluation Process. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 5(1), 31–38. van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900 176 Vinlandari, A., & Gunawan, I. (2020). Peran Tari Dalam Perspektif Gender Dan Budaya. Equalita: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak, 2(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.24235/equalita.v2i2.71 36 Widiyono, A. (2021). Penerapan ZD SOft Screen Recorder terhadap Hasil Belajar Materi PAP & PAN di Era New Normal. Kopen, 3(1), 269–280. Widodo, S. A., Darhim, D., & Ikhwanudin, T. (2018). Improving mathematical problem solving skills through visual media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/948/1/012004 Williamson, B., Potter, J., & Eynon, R. (2019). New research problems and agendas in learning , media, and technology : the editors ' wishlist. 9884(May). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019. 1614953 Wilujeng, I., & Permatasari, I. (2019). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Fisika Matematika Berbasis Kajian Kritis Materi Fisika Sekolah dan Integrasi Nilai- Nilai Karakter. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Integrasinya, 2(2), 1–12. Winarsunu, T. (2017). Statistik dalam Penelitian Psikologi dan Pendidikan (Pertama). Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Wulandari, M., Wirayuda, R. P., Aldila, F., & Wulandari, R. (2020). Description of students’ Integrated Science Process Skills on Friction Material on a Flat Field. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 8(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v8i2.3206 Xu, Y., & Waniganayake, M. (2018). An exploratory study of gender and male teachers in early childhood education and care centers in China Yuwei. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(4), 2– 33. Yadav, D. B. (2020). Psychological and Social Effect of Pandemic Covid-19 on Education System. Globus Journal OfProgressive Education A Refereed Research Journal, 11(2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.46360/globus.xxxxxxx x Yamtinah, S., Roemintoyo, & Kartikasari, A. (2020). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Berbasis Sains Teknologi Masyarakat. Jurnal Kependidikan, 4(1), 1–14. http://marefateadyan.nashriyat.ir/node/1 50 Yodha, S. A., Abidin, Z., & Adi, E. P. (2019). Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Pelaksanaan E-Learning dalam Mata Kuliah Manajemen Sistem Informasi Mahasiswa Jurusan Teknologi Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang. JKTP Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 2(3), 181–187. Yuliani, K. S. (2019). Pengaruh Orientasi Etika, Tingkat Pengetahuan dan Gender terhadap Persepsi Mahasiswa Mengenai Perilaku Tidak Etis Akuntan. Jurnal Sains, Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 1(1), 180–220. Yunita, W., & Maisarah, I. (2020). Students ’ Perception On Learning Language At The Graduate Program Of English Education Amids The Covid 19 Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)| p-ISSN 2655-920x, e-ISSN 2656-2804 Vol. 3 (3) (2021) 207-224 224 Male or Female, who is better? Students' Perceptions of Mathematics Physics E-Module Based on Gender Pandemic. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(2), 107–120. Zhu, A., Srivastava, A., Ibrahim, J. G., Patro, R., & Love, M. I. (2019). Nonparametric expression analysis using inferential replicate counts. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(18), e105. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz622