I:-.JFORMAL LOGIC
XII.3, Fall 1990
An Informal Logic Bibliography
HANS ·V. HANSEl'! University of Windsor
Introduction
In this bibliography I have tried to bring
together and build on the work of others.
In particular I have included material from
(i) the bibliographies prepared by R. H.
Johnson and J. A. Blair for the three Inter-
national Symposia on Informal Logic, (ii)
Johnson and Blair (l980a), and (iii) Johnson
and Blair (l985b). I have also incorporated
material from (iv) Schmidt (1 986b) and (v)
Jensen (1989). I thank: these authors for per-
mission to borrow from their work.
Current research in informal logic is in-
formed by work in argumentation theory,
rhetoric, speech communication, and
critical thinking. I have included entries
from these fields which I think will be of
interest to informal logicians. In adding to the
earlier bibliographies I have followed the
journals which take an interest in these matters
and tried to keep abreast of new publications.
It has been possible to verify by direct
examination only about 85 % of the entries.
The bibliography contains well over 900
entries. Not all ofthem have been indexed.
Many of the entries touch on a variety of
topics of interest to informal logicians but
no entry has been indexed more than once.
The index, like the bibliography itself. is
therefore not claimed to be exhaustive.
However,. it is hoped that the index will prove
useful for those with specific interests.
Infonnal Logic expects to publish an up-
date to this bibliography in a future volume.
We welcome corrections and suggestions.
I have had considerable help with this
prqject. Michael F. Schmidt corrected several
errors in an earlier version; J. Anthony Blair
helped with the verification and the index
as well as providing invaluable advice;
Robert C. Pinto gave expert assistance with
the computer programme. I am grateful for
the help so freely given.
In the interest of saving space the follow-
ing abbreviations are used.
Arg. = Argumentation
IL = Informal Logic
ILN Informal Logic Newsletter
JAFA = Journal of the American Forensic
Association
P&R = Philosophy and Rhetoric
TP = Teaching Philosophy
Q. = Quarterly I = Journal
Bibliography
Abate, Charles J. (1979). Fallaciousness and
invalidity. P&R 12. 262-66.
Acock, Malcolm (1985). Informal Logic Examples
and Exercises. Belmont. CA: Wadsworth,
Adler. Jonathan (1982). Why be charitable'? ILN
4:2, 15-16.
Adler. Jonathan (1984), Abstraction is uncooper-
ative, I of the Theory of Social Behaviour 14,
165-81.
___ (1987a). Alternatives, writing and the
formulation of a thesis. IL 9, 57-70.
___ (l987bj, Form, content and superstition,
Teaching Thinking and Problem-Solving 9,
1-10.
___ (I 987c). On resistance to critical think-
ing. In D, N. Perkins, J, Lockheed and J.
Bishop (eds.), Thinking: The Second Interna-
tional Conference (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum), 247-60.
156 Adler
Adler, Jonathan (1989), Epistemics and the total
evidence requirement. Philosophia 19, 227-42.
____ (1990a). Conservatism and tacit con-
firmation. Mind 99, 1-14.
___ (l990b). Double standards, equality,
and the right reference class. J. of Applied
Philosophy 7, 215-27.
Allen, Derek (1988). Inferential soundness. IL 10,
57-65.
____ (1990). Trudy Govier's Problems in
Argument Analysis and Evaluation. IL 12,43-62.
Anderson, Jerry M. and Paul J. Dovre (eds.)
(1968). Readings in Argumentation. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
Anderson, Ray Lynn and David C. Mortensen
(1967). Logic and marketplace argumentation.
Quarterly J. of Speech 53, 143-51.
Angell, Richard B. (1964). Reasoning and Logic.
:-Jew York, NY: Appleton Century Crofts.
Annis, David B. (1974). Techniques of Critical
Reasoning. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
and Linda Annis (1979). Does
philosophy improve critical thinking? TP 3,
145-52.
Annis. Linda and David B. Annis (1984). McPeck
on critical thinking: A reply. IL 6, 42-44.
Apostel, Leo (1971). Assertion logic and the theory
of argumentation. P&R 4. 92-110.
____ (1979). What is the force of an argu-
ment? Revue International de Philosophie 33,
99-109.
(1982). Toward a general theory of
argumentation. In Barth and Martens (1982),
93-122.
Apotheloz. Denis (1987). Logical and non-logical
foundations of argumentation. In van Eemeren.
Grootendorst et al. (l987 c), 407 -17.
Arnold. Carroll C. (1986). Implications of
Perelman's theory of argumentation. In James
Golden and Joseph J. Pilotta (eds.), Practical
Reasoning in Human Affairs: Studies in Honor
of Chafm Perelman (Dordrecht: Reidel).
____ (1987). Johnstone's 'wedge' and the
theory of rhetoric. P&R 20, 118-128.
Aune, Bruce (1986). Formal logic and practical
reasoning. Theory and Decision 20, 301-20.
Barth
Bach. Kent (1984). Default reasoning: Jumping to
conclusions and knowing when to think twice.
Pacitlc Philosophical Quarterly 65, 37-58.
Bailin, Sharon (1987). Critical and creative think-
ing. IL 9, 23-30.
____ (1987). Moral and aesthetic argumen-
tation. In van Eeemeren and Grootendorst
(l987b), 178-86.
____ (1988). Achieving Extraordinary Ends:
An Essay in Creativity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
___ (1989) Belief, doubt and critical thinking:
Reconciling the contrarie~. Philosophy of
Education: Proceedings 45, 315-19.
Balthrop, V. William (1980). Argument as
linguistic opportunity: A search for form and
function. In Jack Rhodes and Sara Newell
(eds.), Proceedings of the Summer Conference
on Argumentation (Salt Lake City: SCA/AFA).
Bandman, Elsie L. and Bertram Bandman ( 1988).
Critical Thinking in Nursing. Norwalk. CT:
Appleton and Lange.
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (1964). More on the fallacy
of composition. Afind 73, 125-6.
Barker, Evelyn M. (1981). Everyday Reasoning.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
____ (1989). Beardsley's theory of analogy.
IL 11, 185-94.
Barker, John A. (1976). The fallacy of begging the
question. Dialogue 15,241-55.
Barker, Stephen F. (1974). The Elements of Logic
(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. 1st edi-
tion 1965.
(1989). Reasoning by analogy in
Hume's Dialogues. IL 11, 173-84.
Barry. Vincent E. (1983). Good Reason for Writing.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
____ and Joel Rudinow (1990). Invitation to
Critical Thinking. New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston. 1st edition 1984.
Barry, Vincent E. and Douglas J. Soccio (1980).
Practical Logic (3rd ed.). New York: Holt,
Rineharr and Winston. I st edition 1976.
Barth, E. M. (1985a). A new field of empirical
logic: Bioprograms, logemes and logics as in-
stitutions. Synthese 63, 375-88.
___ (I985b). Philosophical logic in the :-lether-
lands after 1940. Ruch Filozoficzny 42, 175-205.
___ (1985c). Two-phase epistemology and
models of dialogue logic. Philosophica 35, 69-88.
Barth
Barth, E. M. (1987). Logic to some purpose:
Theses against the deductive-nomological
paradigm in the science of logic. In van
Eemeren, Grootendorst, et al. (l987a), 33-45.
____ (1990). In the service of human society:
Formal, informal or anti-logical? The phi-
losophy of the logician E. W. Beth. IL 12, 1-10.
___ and Erik C. W. Krabbe (1982). From
Axiom to Dialogue: A PhiIosohical Study of
Logics and Argumentation. Berlin: Walter de
Gruyter.
Barth, E. M. and J. L. Martins (}977). Argumentum
ad hominem: From chaos to formal dialectic.
Logiquc et Analyse 20, 76-96.
___ -(982). Argumentation: Approaches to
Theory Formation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Basu, Dilip K. (1986). A question of begging. IL
8, 19-26.
Bator, Paul G. (1988). The 'good reasons' move-
ment: A confounding of dialectic and rhetoric?
P&R 21. 38-47.
Battersby, Mark E. (1989). Critical thinking as
applied epistemology. IL II, 91-99.
Beardsley, Monroe C. (1950). Practical Logic.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
____ (1975). Thinking Straight: Principles
of Reasoning for Readers and Writers (4th ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 2nd edi-
tion 1956.
(1981). Logic and rhetoric. TP 4,
249-60.
Belnap, Nuel D, Ir. (1981). Logica Docens and
relevance. TP 4,419-27.
Bendegem, Jean Paul van (1985). Dialogue logic
and problem solving. Philosophica 25, 113-34.
Benoit, Pamela J. (1983). Extended arguments in
children's discourse. lAFA 20, 72-89.
___ (1989). Relationship arguments: An
interactionist elaboration of speech acts. Arg.
3, 423-37.
Benoit, William L. (1987). Argumentation and
credibility appeals in persuasion. Southern
Speech Communication 1. 52, 181-97.
____ and Vincent F. Follert (1986). Graduate
courses in argumentation theory. Comnlllnica-
lion Education 35, 61-66.
Bcrg, Jonathan (1987). interpreting arguments. IL
9, 13-20. See also 9.2&3, Errata, 152.
Blair 157
Bernstein, David (1990). A problem solving
interpretation of argument analysis. IL 12,79-85.
Berriman, William (1980), Review of Giere's
Understanding Scientific Reasoning, ILN 2:2,
15-17.
Beyer. Barry K. (1987). Practical Strategies forthe
Teaching of Thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bickenbach, Jerome E. (1979). Justifying deduc-
tion. Dialogue 18, 500-16.
___ (1982). The diversity of proof. ILN 4:2,
7-12.
___ (1990). The 'artificial reason' of the
law. IL 12, 23-32.
Billig, Michael (1987) Arguing and Thinking: A
Rhecorical Approach to Social Psychology.
Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
Binker, A. J. A. and Marla Charbonneau (1983).
Piagetian insights and teaching critical think-
ing. ILN 5:2, 10-15.
Binkley, Robert W. (1980). Can the ability to
reason well be taught? in Blair and Johnson
(1980),79-92.
____ (1981). A system ofrational appraisal.
ILN 4: L 7-10.
Biro, J. I. (1977). Rescuing 'begging the question'.
Metaphilosophy 8, 257-71.
___ (1984). Knowability, believability and
begging the question: A reply to Sanford.
Metaphilosophy 15, 239-247.
____ (1987). A sketch of an epistemic theory
of fallacies. In van Eemeren, Grootendorst et
al. (l987b), 65-73.
Black, Max (1949). Vagueness: An exercise in
logical analysis. In Language and Philosophy
(Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), chap!. 2.
___ (1955). Critical Thinking. New York:
Prentice-Hall. I st edition 1946.
____ (1963). Reasoning with loose concepts.
Dialogue 2, 1-12.
Blair, J. Anthony (1984). Teaching argument in
critical thinking. The Community College
Humanities Review 5, 19-30.
____ (1985). Some challenges for critical
thinking. In Hoaglund (1985), 69-82.
(1986a). Comments on Frans van
Eemeren: 'Dialectical analysis as a normative
reconstruction of argumcntative discourse'.
Text 6. 17-24.
158 Blair
Blair, J. Anthony (l986b). The Keegstra affair: A
test case for critical thinking. The History and
Social Science Teacher 21, 158-64.
(1987a). Recent developments in
critical thinking in anglophone North America.
Thinking 7,2-11.
____ (l987b). Argumentation, inquiry and
speech act theory. In van Eemeren, Grooten-
dorst et al. (1987a), 189-99.
____ {I 987c). Critical thinking perspectives:
Recent developments in anglophone North
America. Thinking 7, 2-6.
____ (I 987d). Everyday argumentation from
an informal logic perspective. In Wenzel
(1987a). 177-83.
____ (1988a). Argumentation and informal
fallacies. In Venant Cauchy (ed.), Philosophie
et Culture. 5 (Montreal: Editions Montmoren-
cy),381-84.
____ (l988b). Current issues in informal
logic and critical thinking. In A. Fisher (1988a),
15-29.
____ (1988c). Teaching informal logic using
LogicaJ Self-Defense. In Fisher (1988a), 60-64.
, ___ (1988d). What is bias') In Govier
(I988c). 93-103.
(\989). Premise relevance. In Maier
(1989), 67-84.
____ (1990). Fallacies in everyday argument.
In Trapp et al. (1990), 121-33.
Blair, J. Anthony and Ralph H. Johnson (eds.)
(1980). Informal Logic: The First International
Symposium. Inverness, CA: Edgepress.
__ .. __ (1987 a). Argumentation as dialectical.
Arg. 1. 41-56.
____ (1987b). The current state of informal
logic and critical thinking. IL 9, 147-51.
____ (1989). Informal logic: A thematic
account. In Maimon (1989),93-110.
Blythin, Evan (1979). Arguers as lovers: A dialec-
tical perspective. P&R 12, 176-86.
Bomstad, Linda and Perry Weddle (1989). North
American perspectives on teaching critical
thinking: A general bibliography. Arg. 3.237-42.
Bouchard. Guy (1981). L'antimodele platonicien
de la nouvelle rhetorique. Canadian J. of
Philosophy 11. 693-711.
Brockriede
Bowles, George (1989a). Favorable relevance and
arguments. IL 11, 11-17.
(1989b). Professor Kasachkoff on
explaining and justifying. IL 11, 107-10.
____ (1990). Propositional relevance.IL 12,
65-77.
Boylan. Michael (1988). The Process of Argument.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Braaten, Jane (1987). Rational consensual pro-
cedure: Argumentation or weighted inquiry.
Synthese 71,347-54.
Bradie, Michael and Kenneth Sayre (eds.) (1981).
Reasons and Decision. 3. Bowling Green:
Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy.
Brandon, E. P. (1983). Argument Analysis.
Kingston, Jamaica: University of West Indies.
__ ~ (1986). Ellipsis. IL 8, 93-103.
____ (\987). Deductive reasoning ability,
error, and education. In van Eemeren and
Grootendorst et a1. (1987c), 155-61.
Brinton, Alan (1981). Logic and the liberal arts
curriculum. Liberal Education 67, 254-60.
_____ ~_ (1985). A rhetorical view of the ad
hominem. Australasian J. of Philosophy 63.
50-63.
____ (1986). Ethotic arguments. History of
Philosophy Q. 3, 245-58.
____ (1987). Ethotetic arguments: Some uses.
In van Eemeren, Grootendorst et al. (J987c),
246-54.
___ (1988a). Appeal to the angry emotions.
IL 10,77-87.
____ (l988b). Pathos and the 'appeal to emo-
tion': An Aristotelian analysis. History of
Philosophy Q. 5,207-19.
Broad, C. D. (1950). Some common fallacies in
political thinking. Philosophy 25, 99-113.
Brockriede, Wayne (1960). Toulmin on argument:
An examination and aplication. Quarterly 1. of
Speech 46, 44-53.
____ (1972). Arguers as lovers. P&R 5,
1-11.
____ (1975). Where is argument? JAFA. 11.
179-82.
____ (1977). Characteristics of arguments
and arguing. JAFA 13, 129-32.
Brockriede
Brockriede, Wayne (1985). Constructs, experience
and argument. Quarterly J. of Speech 71,
151-63.
Brod, Harry (1982). Logic as politics. TP 5,
211-19.
Brown, Robert (1970). The burden of proof.
American Philosphical Q. 7, 74-82.
Brown, William R. (1987). The holographic view
of argument. Arg. 1, 89-102.
___ (1989). Two traditions of analogy. IL
11, 161-172.
Browne, M. Neil and Stuart M. Keeley (1986).
Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical
Thinking (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall. 1st edition 1981.
Broyles, James E. (1975). The fallacies of com-
position and division. P&R 8, 108-13.
Bruner, Michael S. (1983). Argument from a
pragmatic perspective. JAFA 20, 90-97.
Brutian, Georg (1984). Argumentation. Yerevan.
Burbidge, John (1990). Within Reason: A Guide
to Non-Deductive Reasoning. Peterborough,
Ont.: Broadview.
Burke, Michael (1985). Unstated premises. IL 7,
107-18.
Burke, Richard J. (1984). A rhetorical conception
of rationality. IL 6, 17-25.
Burleson, Brant R. (1979). On the analysis and
criticisms of arguments: Some theoretical and
methodological consideratons. JAFA 15, 137-47.
Campbell, Stephen K. (1974). Flaws and Fallacies
in Statistical Thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Capaldi, Nicholas (1973). The Art of Deception.
Buffalo: Prometheus Books. Published by D.
W. Brown, .r\ew York. 1971.
Carey, Stephen H. (1988). Upsetters. IL 10,97-103.
Carlson, Laurie (1983). Dialogue Games: An
Approach to Discourse Analysis. Dordrecht:
Reidel.
Carney, James D. and Richard K. Scheer (1980).
Fundamentals of Logic (3rd ed.) . .r\ew York:
Macmillan. 15t edition 1964.
Carroll, Robert T. (1983). A comment on fallacies
and argument analysis. ILN 5:2, 22-23.
Copi 159
Carson, A. S. (1980). Review of Scriven's Reason-
ing. ILN 2:2, 17-19.
Castaneda, Hector .r\eri (1960). On a proposed
revolution in logic. Philosophy of Science 27,
279-92.
Cederblom, Jerry and David Paulsen (1988). Making
reasonable decisions as an amateur in a world
of experts. In Govier (1988c), 138-49.
___ (1991). Critical Reasoning (3rd ed.).
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co. 1st
edition 1982.
Chaffee, John (1985). Thinking Critically. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin.
Champaud, Christian and Dominique Bassano
(1987). Argumentation and child development:
A general bibliography. Arg. 1, 201-07.
Church, Russell T. (1979). A bibliography of
argumentation and debate for 1975-76. JAFA
15, 228-43.
and David C. Buckley (1983).
Argumentation and debating propositions of
value: A bibliography. JAFA 19, 239-50.
Cizek, F. (1974). The problem of fallacies. Teorie
A Metoda 6, 101-15.
Clemens, [}dvid (1985). Technoethics. IL 7,163-65.
Cohen, L. Jonathan (1982). Are people programmed
to commit fallacies? J. for the Theory of Social
Behaviour 12, 251-74.
Cohen, Maurice (1977). Contextual analysis: An
approach to the study of philosophic arguments.
Metaphilosophy 8, 3-20.
Cole, Richard (1965). A note on informal fallacies.
Mind 74, 432-33.
Colwell, Gary (1989). God, the Bible and circulari-
ty. IL 11,61-73.
Conklin, Forrest (1968). A bibliography of argu-
mentation and debate for 1967. JAFA 5, 85-94.
___ (1970). A bibliography of argumenta-
tion and debate for 1969. JAFA 7, 134-58,
___ (1971). A bibliography of argumenta-
tion and debate for 1970. JAFA 8, 81-104.
Conley, Thomas M. (1984). The enthymeme in
perspective. Quarterly J. of Speech 70,168-87.
Cooley. J. C. (\959). On Mr. Toulmin's revolu-
tion in logic. J. of Philosophy 56,297-319.
Copi, Irving M. (1986). Informal Logic. New
York: Macmillan.
160 Copi
Copi, Irving M. and Carl Cohen (1990).
Introduction to Logic (8th. ed.). New York:
Macmillan. 1st edition 1953.
Corcoran, John (1989). Argumentations and logic.
Arg. 3, 17-43.
Corgan, Verna C. (1987). Perelman's universal au-
dience as critical tool. JAFA 23, 147-57.
Corliss, Richard (1972). A theory of contextual
implication. P&R 5, 215-30.
Costa, Arthur and Lawrence F. Lowery (1989).
Techniques for Teaching Thinking. Pacific
Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.
Couch, Dan (1981). Improving reasoning skills.
Thinking 3, 38-9.
Covey, Preston (1981 a). Formal logic and
philosophic analysis. TP 4, 277-302.
___ (198Ib). Logic and liberal learning:
Some salient issues. TP 4, 207-30.
Cowan, Joseph L. (1964). The Uses of
Argument-an apology for logic. Mind 73,27-45.
___ (1969). The gambler's fallacy. Philosophy
and Phenomenological Research 30, 238-51.
Cox, J. Robert, Malcolm Sillars and Gregg B.
Walker (eds.) (1985). Argument and Social
Practice: Proceedings of the Fourth SCA!.4FA
Conference on Argumentation. Annandale,
VA: Speech Communication Association.
Cox, J. Robert and Charles Willard (eds.) (1982).
Advances in Argumentation Theory and
Research. Carbondale: Southern Illinois
University Press.
Crable, Richard E. (l976a) Argumentation as
Communication: Reasoning With Receivers.
Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Crable. Richard E. (1976b). Models of argumenta-
tion and judicial judgment. JAf:4 12, 113-20.
Cragan, John F. and Craig W. Cutbirth (1984).
A revisionist perspective on political ad
hominem argument: A case study. Central
States Speech J. 35, 228-237.
Crimmel, Henry H. (1980). Logic as a liberal art.
Liberal Education 66, 377-81.
____ . (1981). A reply to Professor Brinton.
Liberal Education 67, 261-62.
Crossley. David J. and Peter A. Wilson (1979).
How to Argue: An Introduction to Logical
Thinking. New York: Random House.
Eemeren
Cureton, Robert D. (1973). A bibliography for
argumentation and debate for 1973. JAFA 13.
197-206.
d' Angelo, Edward (1974). The concept of critical
thinking. Revolutionary World 9, 49-55.
Darner, T. Edward (1987). Attacking Faulty
Reasoning (2nd ed.). Belmont. CA:
Wadsworth. 1st edition 1980.
Damme, F. van (1984). Towards more natural
dialogue logics as a more natural dialogue
system. Logique et analyse 116, 409-19.
Davson-Galle, Peter (1989) Interpreting arguments
and judging issues. IL 11, 41-45.
Dayton, Eric B. (1981). Persuasive arguments and
disagreements of principle. Canadian 1. of
Philosophy 11, 741-49.
Dewey, John (1982). Logic: The Theory of
Inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and
Winston. Reproduction of 1938 edition publish-
ed by Irivington, NY.
Dolan, John M. (1988). Consent as a commodity.
IL 10, 177-94. Review of Herman and Chom-
sky's Manufacturing Consent.
Donn, Mike (1990) Help in finding missing
premises. TP 13, 159-64.
Doss, Seale (1985). Three steps towards a theory
of informal logic. IL 7, 127-135.
(1987). Elementary Logic for
Philosophy Students. Ripon. WI: Ripon
College Press.
____ (1989). Who needs a theory of informal
logic? IL 11, 111-18.
Eemeren, Frans H. van (1986). Dialectical analysis
as normative reconstruction of argumentative
discourse. Text 6, 1-16.
____ (1987a). Argumentation studies' five
estates. In Wenzel et al. (1987a), 9-24.
____ (l987b). For reasons sake: Maximal
argumentative analysis of discourse. In van
Eemeren, Grootendorst, et al. (1987a), 201-15.
___ (1988). Argumentation analysis: A
Dutch counter-balance. In Fisher (1988a), 39-53.
Eemeren. Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst
(1982a). The speech acts of arguing and con-
vincing in externalized discussions. J. of
Pragmatics 6. 1-24.
____ (l982b). Unexpressed premises: Part
1. JAFA 19,97-106.
Eemeren
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst
(1983). Unexpressed premises: Part II. JAFA
19,215-25.
____ (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative
Discussion. Dordrecht: Foris.
____ (1987a). Fallacies in pragma-dialectical
per"pective. Arg. 1,283-301.
(l987b). Teaching argumentation
analysis and critical thinking in the Netherlands.
IL 9, 57-69.
(1988a). Rationale for a pragma-
dialectical perspective. Arg. 2, 271-91.
___ (l988b). Rules for argumentation in
dialogues. Arg. 2, 499-510.
____ (1989a). A pragma-dialectical perspec-
tive on norms. In Maier (1989), 97-112.
___ (l989b). A transition stage in the theory
of fallacies. J. of Pragmatics 13, 99-109.
____ (l989c). Speech act conditions as tools
for reconstructing argumentative discourse.
Arg. 3, 367-83.
____ (I989d). Writing argumentative texts.
From analysis to presentation: A pragma-
dialectical appoach. In Gronbeck 1987, 324-30.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst. 1.
Anthony Blair and Charles Willard (1987a).
Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline.
Dordrecht: Foris.
_. __ (l987b). Argumentation: Analysis and
Practices. Dordrecht: Foris.
____ (1987c). Argumentation: Perspectives
and Approaches. Dordrecht: Foris.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst and
Bert Meuffels (1989). The skill of identifying
argumentation. JAFA 25. 239-45.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst and
Tjark Kruiger (1984). The Study of Argumen-
tation. New York: Irvington.
____ (1987). Handbook of Argumentation
Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Back-
grounds and Modem Studies. Dordrecht: Foris.
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Tjark Kruiger (1987).
Identitying argument schemes. In van Eemeren,
Grootendorst et al. (1987e), 70-81
Ehninger, Douglas (1970). Argument as method:
Its nature, its limitations, and its uses. Com-
munication Studies 37. 101-10.
Ennis 161
___ (1974). Influence. Belief, and Argument,
An Introduction to Reponsible Persuasion.
Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.
(1980). Toward a taxonomy of
prescriptive discourse. In Eugene White (ed.),
Rhetoric in Transition (University Park, PA:
Stage University Press).
Eisenberg, Ann R. (1987). Learning to argue with
parents and peers. Arg. 1, 113-25.
Engel, S. Morris (1980). AnaJyzing Informal
Fallacies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
___ (1984). The Language Trap, or How
to Defend Yourself Against the Tyranny of
Words. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(1985). With Good Reason: An
Introduction to Informal Fallacies (3rd ed.).
New York: St. Martin's. 1st edition 1976.
(I 986a). Explaining equivocation.
l'vfetaphilosophy 17, 192-99.
____ (1986b). Fallacy, wit and madness.
P&R 19, 224-241.
(l986c). Wittgenstein's theory of
fallacy. IL 8, 67-80.
Engelbretsen, George (1973). Review of
Hamblin's Fal1acies. Dialogue 12. 151-54.
_. __ (1984). Freeman on induction!
deduction. IL 6, 26-27.
Ennis, Robert H. (1958). An appraisal of the
Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. 1. of
Educational Research 52. 155-58.
____ (1962). A concept of critical thinking.
Harvard Educational Review 32, 81-111.
(1964). Operational definitions.
American Educational Research 1. I, 183-20 I.
___ (1969a). Logic in Teaching. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HaIL
___ (1969b). Ordinary Logic. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Available from Il-
linois Critical Thinking Project.
(1974). The believability of people.
Educational Forum 39. 347-54.
__ -(979). A conception of rational thinking.
Philosophy of Education: Proceedings 35. 3-30.
(1980). Eight fallacies in Bloom's
taxonomy. Philosophy of Education: Pro-
ceedings 36. 269-73.
162 Ennis
Ennis, Robert H. (1981a). A conception of
deductive logic competence. TP 4. 337-85.
____ ._ (I981b). Logic and critical thinking.
Philosophy of Education: Proceedings 37, 228-32.
___ (l98Ic). Rational thinking and educational
practice. In Jonas F. Soltis (ed.), Philosophy
and Education 80th Yearbook, NSSE (Chicago:
University of Chicago Press), 143-83.
___ ._ (1982). Identifying implicit assump-
tions. Synthese 51, 61·86.
____ (1984). Problems in testing informal
logic/critical thinkingireasoning. IL 6, 3-9.
____ (1985). A concept of critical thinking.
In Hoaglund (1985), 13·40.
___ (l987a). A bibliography on testing in
critical thinking. CT News 6: I, 7.
___ (l987b). A taxonomy of critical thinking
dispositions and abilities. In J. Baron and R. L.
Sternberg (eds.), Teaching Thinking Skills:
Theory and Practice (New York: W. H. Freeman).
___ (l987c). Testing teachers' competence,
including their critical thinking abilities.
Philosophy of F.4ucation: Proceedings 43, 413-20.
____ (I989a). Critical thinking and subject
specificity. Educational Researcher 18. 4-10.
____ (l989b) The rationality of rationality:
Why think critically? Philosophy of Education:
Proceedings 45. 402-05.
Evra. James van (1985). Logic, the liberal science.
TP 8, 285-94.
Facione, Peter A. (1976). Counterexamples and
where they lead. Philosophy and Phenomeno-
logical Research 36, 523-30.
___ (1984) Toward a theorv of CT. Liberal
Education 70, 253-61.
____ (1986) Testing college level CT. Liberal
Education 72. 221-31.
___ (1987). Teaching about fallacies. TP 10,
211-17.
(1989) Assessing inference skills.
Newark, DE: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educa-
tional Tests, Measurement and Evaluation.
____ (1990a) Critical thinking: A statement
of expert consensus for purposes of educational
assessment and instruction. Newark, DE: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and
Evaluation.
(l990b). Thirty great ways to
mess up a ciritical thinking test. IL 12, 106-12.
Finocchiaro
___ and Donald Scherer (1978). Logic and
Logical Thinking. New York: McGraw Hill.
Fahnestock, Jeanne and Marie Secor (1982). A
Rhetoric of Argument. New York: Random
House.
Fair, Frank (1973). The fallacy of many questions:
Or how to stop beating your wife. Southwestern
J. of Philosophy 4, 89-92,
Farrell, Thomas B. (1977). Validity and rationality:
The rhetorical constitutents of argumentative
form. JAFA 13, 142-49.
Fearnside, W. Ward (1980). About Thinking.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
and William B. Holther (1959).
Fallacy: The Counterfeit of Argument.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Feteris, Eveline T. (1990). Conditions and rules
for rational discusssion in a legal process: A
pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation
and Advocacy 26, 108-17.
Feuer. Lewis S. (1983). The genetic fallacy re-
examined. In Paul Kurtz (ed.), Sidney Hook:
Philosopher of Democracy and Humanism
(Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books), 227-246.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (1974). The concept of
ad hominem argument in Galileo and Locke.
PhIlosophical Forum 5, 394-404.
(l979a). The Logical Structure of
Galileo's Dialogue: A case study in applied
logic. Logique et Analyse 22. 159-80.
____ (1979b). The psychological explanation
of reasoning: Logical and methodological prob-
lems. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9, 277-9\.
___ (1980). Galileo and the Art of Reasoning:
Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific
Method. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
____ (1981). Fallacies and the evaluation of
reasoning. American Philosophical Q. 18, 13-22.
___ (1984). Informal logic and the theory
of reasoning. IL 6, 3-8.
____ (l987a). An historical approach to the
study of argumentation. In van Eemeren,
Grootendorst, et al. (l987a), 81-91.
____ (l987b). Six types of fallaciousness:
Toward a realistic theory of logical criticism.
Arg. I, 263-82.
____ (l988a). A multi-dimensional COurse in
critical thinking. CT News 7:2, 1,4-6.
Finocchiaro
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (l988b). Dialectic and
argument in philosophy: A case study of Hegel's
Phenomenological preface. Arg. 2, 175-90.
____ (1988c). Empiricism, judgment and
argument: Toward an informal logic of science.
Arg. 2, 313-35.
Fischer, David H. (1970). Historians' Fallacies:
Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. New
York: Harper and Row.
Fisher, Alec (1986). Informal logic at the Univer-
sity of East Anglia. CT News 4:4, I & 4.
____ (1987). Using assertability conditions
to extract and evaluate arguments. In van
Eemeren, Grootendorst, et aI. (I987b), 25-33.
___ (ed.) (1988a). Critical Thinking: Pro-
ceedings of the First British Conference on In-
formal Logic and Critical Thinking. Norwich:
University of East Anglia.
___ (1988b). The Logic of Real Arguments.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
____ (1989). Suppositions in argumentation.
Arg. 3,401-13.
Fisher, Walter R. (1978). Toward a logic of good
reasons. Quarterly 1. of Speech 64, 376-84.
(1987). Technical logic, rhetorical
logic, and narrative rationality. Arg. 1,3-21.
___ (1980). Rationality and the logic of
good reasons. P&R 13, 121-30.
Flesch, Rudolf (l951). The Art of Clear Thinking.
New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Flew, Antony (1977). Thinking Straight. Buffalo,
NY: Prometheus Books. Published by Fontana,
Great Britain, 1975, as Thinking About Thinking.
Fogelin, Robert J. (1983). Charitable reconstruc-
tion and logical neutrality. ILN 4:3, 2-5.
_____ (1985). The logic of deep disagree-
ments. IL 7, 1-8.
____ (1987). Understanding Arguments. An
Introduction to Informal Logic (3rd ed.). San
Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, Johanovich. 1st
edition 1978.
____ (1989). A brief treatise in epistemic
economics. CT News 7:5, 1,5-6.
and Timothy J. Duggan (1987).
Fallacies. Arg. I, 255-62.
Fohr, Samuel D. (1980a). The deductive-inductive
distinction. ILN 2:2, 5-8.
____ (1980b). Deductive-inductive: Reply to
criticisms. ILN 3: L 5-10.
Gasser 163
Follert, Vincent (1981). Risk analysis: Its applica-
tion to argumentation and decision-making.
lAFA 18,99-108.
Follman, John (1987). Teaching critical thinking!
thinking-Promises! Promises! IL 9, 131-40.
Foss, Sonja K, Karen A. Foss and Robert Trapp
(1985). Contemporary Perspectives on
Rhetoric. Prospect Heights. IL: Waveland Press.
Freeman, David Hugh (1967). Logic: The Art of
Reasoning. New York: David McKay.
Freeman, James B. (1983). Logical form, prob-
ability interpretations, and the inductive-
deductive distinction. ILN 5:2. 2-10.
___ . (1984). Reply to Englebretsen. IL 6,
34-40.
____ (1985). Dialectical situations and argu-
ment analysis. IL 7. 151-62.
(1987). Review of Handbook of
Argumentation Theory bY'van Eemeren et al.
IL 9, 49-51.
___ (1988). Thinking Logieally: Basic Con-
cepts for Reasoning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
____ (1989) The human image system and
thinking critically in the strong sense. IL II.
19-40.
___ (1990). Walton's Informal Logic: A Hand-
book for Critical Argumentation. IL 12,
87-105.
Fuller. Steve and Charles A. Willard (1987). In
defense of relativism: Rescuing incommen-
surability from the self-excepting fallacy. In van
Eemeren. Grootendorst et al. (1987c), 313-20.
Furlong, John (1987). Rationality, cognitive
science, and the theory of argumentation. In van
Eemeren, Grootendorstetal. (1987c), 357-63.
Galle, Peter (1981). Another note on the' surprise
test' puzzle. ILN 3:3, 21-22.
Garver, Eugene (1978). Rhetoric and essentially
contested arguments. P&R II, 156-72.
___ (1985). Teaching critical thinking as a
discipline. IL 7, 166-68.
____ (1987). Arguing over incommensurable
values. In van Eemeren and Grootendorst
(l987b), 163-69.
Gasser, James (1987). Argumentation in proof. In
van Eemeren, Grootendorst et al. (1987c),
321-26.
164 Gauker
Gauker, Christopher (1986). The principle of
charity. Synthese 69, 1-25.
Geach, Peter (1976). Reason and Argument.
Oxford: Basil BlackwelL
Gelber, Hester Goodenough (1987). The fallacy
of accident and the dictum de omni. Vivarium
25, 110-45.
Gensier, Harry 1. (1989). Logic: Analysing and
Appraising Arguments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice- HalL
George, Rolf (1983a). A postscript on fallacies.
1. of Philosophical Logic 12, 319-25.
(1983b). Bolzano's consequence,
relevance, and enthymemes. 1. of Philosophical
Logic 12, 299-318.
Gerber, D. (1974). On argumentum ad hominem.
The Personalist 55, 23-29.
___ (1977). Reply to Woods and Walton's
'Ad hominem, contra Gerber'. The Personalist
58, 145-46.
Gibbs, Leonard (1985). Teaching critical thinking
at the university level. IL 7, 137-49.
Giere, Ronald N. (1979). Understanding Scientific
Reasoning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and
Winston,
Gilbert, Michael A. (1979). How to Win an Argu-
ment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Girle. Roderic A. (1988). Reasoning with both
formal and informal logic. IL 10,51-54.
Golden, James 1.. (1987). Douglas Ehninger's
philosophy of argument. In McKerrow 1982,
23-40.
____ and Josina M. Makau (1982). Perspec-
tives on judicial reasoning. In McKerrow
(1982), 157-77.
Goldman, Alan (1987). The force of precedent on
legal, moral and empirical reasoning. Synthese
71. 323-346.
Goldstein, Laurence (1988). Logic and reasoning.
Erkenntnis 28, 297-320.
Good, L J. (1959). A classification of fallacious
arguments and interpretations. Methodos 11.
147-59.
Goode, Terry M. and John Wettersten (1982).
How do we learn from arguments? Toward an
account. Canadian J. of Philosophy 12,673-89.
Govier
Goodnight, G. Thomas (1989). Toward a social
theory of argument. Argument and Advocacy
26. 60-70.
Goodwin. Paul D. and Joseph W. Wenzel (1979).
Proverbs and practical reasoning: A study
in socio-Iogie. Quarterly J. of Speech 65.
289-302.
Gordon, Donald R. (1966). Language, Logic and
the Mass Media. Toronto: HolL Rinehart and
Winston.
Goudge, T. A. (1961). The genetic fallacy.
Synthese 13, 41-48.
Gough, James and Christopher Tindale (1985).
'Hidden' or 'missing' premises. IL 7,99-106.
Goulding, Daniel J. (1965). Aristotle's concept of
the enthymeme. JAFA 2, 104-08.
Govier, Trudy (l980a). Review of Wellman's
Challenge and Response. ILN 2:2, 10-15.
____ (1980b). Assessing arguments: What
range of standards? ILN 3: 1, 2-4.
____ (l980c). More on deductive and induc-
tive arguments. ILN 2:3, 7-8.
____ (1981a). Rigour and reality. Queen's
Quarterly 88, 525-35.
____ (l981b). Uncharitable thoughts about
charity. ILN 4: 1, 5-6.
____ (l981c). Worries about tu quoque as
a fallacy. ILN 3:3, 2-4,
___ (1982a). What's wrong with slippery
slope arguments? Canadian J. of Philosophy 12,
303-16.
(1982b). Who says there are no
fallacies? ILN 5: 1, 2-10.
____ (1983a), Ad hominem: Revising the
textbooks. TP 6. 13-24.
____ (l983b). Critical review of McPeck's:
Critical Thinking and Education. Dialogue 22,
170-75.
___ (l983c). On Adler on charity. ILN 4:3,
10-11.
__ -(985). Logical analogies. IL 7,27-33.
____ (l987a). Beyond induction and deduc-
tion. In van Eemeren. Grootendorst, et al.
(1987a), 57-64,
Govier
Govier, Trudy (l987b). Problems in Argument
Analysis and Evaluation. Dordrecht: Fods.
____ (1988a). A Practical Study of Argument
(2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 1st edi-
tion 1985.
____ (l988b). A practical study of argument.
In A. Fisher (1988a). 54-59.
____ (I988c). Selected Issues in Logic and
Communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
_. ___ (1988d). Tu quoque, credibility and
argument. ISSA Newsletter 3, 2-13.
____ (1988e). Ways of teaching reasoning
directly. In A. Fisher (l988a), 30-38.
(I 989a) . Analogies and missing
premises. IL 11, 141-52.
____ (l989b). Critical thinking as argument
analysis') Arg. 3, 115-26.
Grable. Richard E. (1976). Argumentation as
Communication: Reasoning with Receivers.
Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Gratton. Claude (1990). Review of Perelman's
Rhetorique. IL 12. 117-20.
Grennan, Wayne (1984). Argument Evaluation.
Lanham, MD: Cniversity Press of America.
___ (1986). A 'logical audit' scheme for
two-premisc arguments. IL 8, 125-32.
____ (1987). Review of Copi's Informal
Logic. IL 9. 50-51.
Griffin, Nicholas (1981a). Charity begins much
earlicr than supposed. ILN 4: I. 6.
( 1981 b). Revicw of Baum Ethical
Arguments for Analysis and Engel Analysing
Informal Fallacies. lLN 3:3, 20-21.
Griffin-Collart, Evclyne (1979). L'argumentation
et la raisonablc dans une philosophie du sense
commun. Revue International de Philmophie
33,202-15.
Griffith, William B. (1975). Symbolic logic and
the appraisal of arguments. TP 1. 13-20.
Groarke. Leo (1982). When two wrongs make a
right. ILN 5:1, 10-13.
and Christopher Tindale (1985).
Intf)rmal Logic: A Prolegomenon to Good
Argument. BristoL IN: Wyndham Hall Press.
_. __ (1986). Critical thinking: How to teach
good reasoning. TP 9. 301-18.
Gronbeck, Bruce E. (1982). On classes of in-
ference and force. In McKerrow 1982. 85-106.
Hample 165
(1989). Spheres of Argument:
Proceedings of the 6th SCAIAFA Conference
of Argumentation. Annadale. VA: Speech
Communication Assoc.
Grootendorst, Rob (1987a). Everyday argumen-
tation from a speech act perspective. In Wenzel
et al. (l987a), 165-75,
_____ (1987b). Some fallacies about fallacies.
In van Eemeren. Grootendorst. et a1. (l987a),
331-42.
Gula, Robert J. (1979). Nonsense: How to Over-
come 1t, New York: Stein and Day.
Gutenberg. Norbert (1987). Argumentation and
dialectical logic. In van Eemeren. Grootendorst
et al. (l987e), 397-403.
Gutteridge, Moira (1987). First, sit down and play
the piano beautifully. IL 9, 81-91.
Haarscher, Guy (1979). La rhetorique de la raison
pratique. Revue International de Philosophie
33, 110-28.
Hallett, Garth]. (1984). Logic f()r the Labyrinth:
A Guide to Critical Thinking. Lanham, MD:
University Press of America.
Halpern, Diane F. (1984). Thought ilnd Know-
ledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking.
Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hamblin. Charles L. (1970). Fallacies. London:
Methuen. Available from Newport News, VA:
Vale Press.
Hample. Dale (1977). The Toulmin model and the
syllogism. JAFA 14. 1-09.
~ ___ (1980). A cognitive view of argument.
JAFA 16. lSI-58.
____ (1982). Dual coding, reasoning and
fallacies. JAFA 19.59-78.
____ (1985). A third perspective on argu-
mentation. P&R 18. 1-22.
____ (1988). Argument: Public and private.
social and cognitive. Argumentiltion and Ad-
voca(.y 25, 13-19.
Hample, Dale and ludith M. DaIJinger (1984).
Argument-as-Procedure and the Art of Con-
troversy. Seattle. WA: Western Speech Com-
munication Association.
(1987). Self-monitoring and the
cognitive editing of arguments. Central SWtcs
Speech Journal 38. 152-65.
166 Hanson
Hanson, Norwood R. (1967). The genetic fallacy
revisited. American Philosophical Q. 4, to 1-13.
Hardwig, John (1988). Relying on experts. In
Govier (l988c), 125-37.
Harman. Gilbert (1984). Logic and reasoning.
Synthese 60, 107-27.
_. ___ (1986). Change in View: Principles of
Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harpine, William D. (1985). Can rhetoric and
dialectic serve the purposes ofiogic" P&R 18.
96-112.
Hayward, Albert (1986). Reconstructing
arguments from editorials. TP 9, 61-70.
Healy, Paul (1987). Critical reasoning and dialec-
tical argument: An extension ofToulmin's ap-
proach. IL 9, 1-12.
Hepp, Maylon H. (1949). Thinking Things
Through: An Introduction to Logic. New York:
Charles Scribner's Sons.
Hinman, Lawrence (1982). The ease for ad
hominem arguments. Australasian J. of
Philosophy 60, 338-45.
Hintikka. Jaakko (1973). Logic, Language-Games
and Information. Oxford: Clarendon.
____ (1982). Game-theoretical semantics:
Insights and prospects. Notre Dame J. of For-
mal Logic 23, 219-41.
____ (1986). Logic of conversation as a logic
of dialogue. In Richard Grandy (cd.).
Philosophical Grounds of Rationality (Oxford:
Oxford University Press).
. ___ (1987a). The fallacy of fallacies. Arg.
l. 211-38.
____ (l987b). The interrogative approach to
inquiry and probabilistic inference. Erkenntnis
26, 429-42.
____ (989). The role of logic in argumen-
tation. Monist 72. 3-24.
___ and Merrill B. Hintikka (1982).
Sherlock Holmes confronts modern logic:
Toward a theory of information-seeking
through questions. In Barth and Martcns (l982),
55-76.
Hitchcock, David (1980). Deductive and inductive:
Types of validity, not types of argument. ILN
2:3.9-10.
Hufford
____ (1981). Deduction. induction and con-
duction. ILN 3:2, 7-15.
____ (1983). Critical Thinking: A Guide to
Evaluating Information. Toronto: Methuen.
___ (1985). Enthymematic arguments. IL
7. 83-97.
____ (1986). Review of Walton's Topical
Relevance in Argumentation. Dialogue 25,
819-21.
____ (1987). Enthymematic arguments. [n
van Eemeren, Grootendorst, et al. (1987a),
289-98.
Hoaglund. John (1983). Argumenrum ad hominem:
Aut bonum aut malum? iLN 4:3, 7-9.
____ (1984). Critical Thinking: An Introduc-
tion to Informal Logic. Newport News, VA:
Vale Press.
___ (ed.) (1985). Conference '85 on Critical
Thinking Newport News. VA: Christopher
Newport College Press.
(1986a). A critical thinker abroad:
Review ofSchoberle's Argumentieren, Bewerten.
Manipulieren. IL 8, 153-59.
___ (I986b). The logic of 'if-then' proposi-
tions.IL 8, 141-50.
___ (l986c). Typing. IL 8, 37-45.
.. _. __ (1989). 'Reasons' and premises. CT
News 7:4, I, 7-8.
Hoffman, Robert (1971). On begging the question
at any time. Analysis 32, 51.
Holland, 1.H., J.K. Holyoak, R. E. Nisbett and
P. Thagard ( 1986). induction: Processes ofIn-
ference, Learning and Discovery. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Hollinger, Robert (1985). Practical reasoning and
hermeneutics. P&R 18. 113-22.
House. Ernest R. (1977). The Logic of Evaluative
Argument. Los Angeles: Center for the Study
of Argumentation.
Hoven, P. J. van den (1987). The external justifica-
tion of a dialectical concensus. In van Eemeren.
Grootendorst et al. (1987c). 364-71.
Huber, Robert B. (1963). Influencing Through
Argument. New York: David McKay.
Hufford, Roger (1965). The logician, the historian,
and rhetorical criticism. JAFA 2, 14-16.
Hurley
Hurley, Patriek J. (1985). A Concise Introduction
to Logic (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadswonh.
1st edition 1982.
Iseminger, Gary (1974). Succesful argument and
rational belief. P&R 7, 47-57.
Jackson, Frank (1984). Petitio and the purpose of
arguing. Pacific Philosophical Q. 65, 26-36.
Jackson, Sally (1985). What can speech acts do for
argumentation theory? In Cox et ai. (1985).
127-38.
____ (1987). Rational and pragmatic aspects
of argument. In van Eemeren, Grootendorst,
et al. (1987a), 217-27.
____ (1989). What can argumentative prac-
tice tell us about argumentative norms? In Maier
(1989). 113-22.
Jackson, Sally and Scott Jacobs (1981). The
collaborative production of proposals in con-
versational argument and persuasion: A study
of disagreement regulation. JAFA 18, 77-90.
Jackson, Sally, Scott Jacobs, Nancy Burrell and
Mike Allen (1986). Characterizing ordinary
arguments: Substantive and methodological
issues. JAFA 23. 42-57.
Jacobs, Scott (1989). Some problems of com-
munication for argumentation theory. lSSA
Newsletter 5, 2-8.
____ (1989). Speech acts and arguments.
Arg. 3, 345-65.
Jacques, Francis (1979). Logique ou rhetorique de
I' argumentation? Revue International de
Philosophic 33, 47-68.
Jacquette, Dale (1989). The hidden logic of slip-
pery slope arguments. P&R 22, 59-70.
Jason, Gary (1984). Is there a case for ad hominem?
Australasian J. of Philosophy 62, 182-85.
____ (1986). Are fallacies common? A look
at two debates. IL 8. 81-92. Also in Govier
(l988c), 20-34.
____ (1987). The nature of the argumentum
ad baculum. Philosophia 17,491-99.
(1988). Hedging as a fallacy of
language.lL 10, 169-75.
____ (1989). Fallacies are common. IL 11,
101-06.
Jensen, 1. Vernon (1981). Argumentation: Reason-
ing in Communication. New York: D. Van
Nostrand.
Johnson ]67
____ (1989). Bibliography on argumentation.
Rhetoric Society Q. 19, 71-81.
Johnson, Baylor (1980). The Bask program. ILN
2:3, 16-18.
Johnson, Fred (1980). Deductively-inductively.
ILN 3: 1, 4-5.
___ (1984). Arguings and argument. IL 6,
26-27.
(1989). Analogical arguings and
explainings. IL II, 153-60.
Johnson, Oliver A. (1967-68). Begging the ques-
tion. Dialogue 6, 135-50.
Johnson, Ralph H. (198Ia). Charity begins at
home. ILN 3:3, 4-9.
___ (198Ib). Reply to Griffin. ILN 4: I, 7.
____ (1981c). The new logic course: The state
of the art in non-formal methods of argument
analysis. TP 4, 123-43.
___ (198Jd). Toulmin's bold experiment:
Part I. ILN 3:2, 16-27.
____ (1981e). Toulmin's bold experiment:
Part II. lLN 3:3, 13-19.
___ (1982). Charity again. ILN 4:2,16-17.
____ (1987a). Logic naturalized: Recovering
a tradition. In van Eemeren, Grootendorst et
al. (1987a), 47-56.
___ (1987b). The blaze of her splendours:
Suggestions about revitalizing fallacy theory.
Arg. 1, 239-53.
(1988a). Critical notice of Gilben
Harman's Change in View: Principles of
Reasoning. CanadianJ. of Philosophy 18,163-78.
(1988b). Poll-ution: Coping with
surveys and polls. In Govier (l988c), 163-77,
____ (1989). Massey on fallacy and infor-
mal logic: A reply. Synthese 80, 407-26.
____ (1990a). Acceptance is not enough: A
critique of Hamblin. P&R 23, 271-87.
____ (l990b). Hamblin on the standard treat-
ment. P&R 23. 153-67.
Johnson, Ralph H. and J. Anthony Blair (1980a).
A bibliography of recent work in informal logic.
In Blair and Johnson (1980), 163-72.
___ (l980b). The recent development of
informal logic. In Blair and Johnson (1980), 3-28.
___ (1983a). A bibliography ofrecent work
in informal logic. lLN 5:3, 3-15.
168 Johnson
Johnson. Ralph H. and J. Anthony Blair (l983b).
Logical Self-Defense (2nd ed.). Toronto:
McGraw-Hili Ryerson. 1st edition 1977.
___ (l985a). Informal Logic: AjournaJ for
teachers of critical thinking. ,,,"'ewsletter on
Teaching Philosophy, 14-16.
___ (1985b). Informal logic: The past five
years 1978-83. American Philosophicil! Q. 22,
181-96.
_. __ (1989). The fallacy approach to criticizing
arguments. In Maimon et al. (1989), 111-23.
Johnstone. Jr, Henry W. (1952). Philosophy and
argumentum ad hominem. J. of Philosophy 49,
489-98.
(1959). Philosophy and Argument.
University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State
University Press.
___ ~ (1970). 'Philosophy and argumentum
ad hominem' revisited. Revue International de
Philosophie 24, 107-116.
(1978). Validity and Rhetoric in
Philosophical Argument: An Outlook in Tmn-
.,ilion. University Park, PA: The Dialogue
Press of Man and World.
____ (1983). Truth, anagnorisis and argu-
ment. P&R 16. 1-15.
___ (1987). Response to Arnold. P&R 20.
129-134.
(1989). Argumentation and formal
logic in philosophy. Arg. 3.5-15.
Jones. Royce (1981). A new classification of
disputes. TP 4. 23-32.
Kahane. Howard (1980). The nature and classification
of fallacies. In Blair and Johnson (1980). 31-39.
_ .. __ ... (1984). John NoIt's inductive reason-
ing test. IL 6, 30.
(1988). Logic and Contemporary
Rhetoric. The Use of Reasoning ill Everyday
Life (5th ed.). Belmont. CA: Wadsworth
Publishing Co. 1st edition 1971.
____ (1989). The proper subject matter for
critical thinking courses. Arg. 3, 141-47.
Kasachkoff. TziJXlrah (1988). Explaining and justi-
IYing.IL 10. 21-30.
Kekes. John (1979). Perennial arguments. Idealistic
Studies 9. 115-30.
Krabbe
Kellennan. Kathy (1980). The concept of evidence:
A critical review. JAFA 16. 159-72.
Kelly. David (1988). The Art of Reasonillg. New
York: W. W. Norton and Co.
Kielkopf, Charles F. (1980). Relevant appeals
to force, pity and popular pieties. ILN 2:2.
2-5.
____ (1984). Forms for ·infomlallogic'. IL
6. 21-25.
Kirby, Brian (1986). A plea for affirming a dis·
junct, IL 8, 133-40.
Kirwan, Christopher (1979). Aristotle and the
so-called fallacy of equivocation. Philosophical
Q. 29. 35-46.
Kleiman, Lowell (1970). Pashman on Freud and
the genetic fallacy. Southern 1. of Philosophy
8, 63-5.
Kluback, William and Mortimer Becker (1979).
The significance of Chaim Perelman's
philosophy of rhetoric. Revue International de
Philosophie 33,31-46.
Klumpp, James F, Bernard L. Brook, James W.
Chesebro and John F. Cragan (1974). Implica-
tions of a systems model of analysis on
argumentation theory. JAFA 11, 1-7.
Kneupper, Charles W. (1978). On argument and
diagrams.1AFA 14. 181-86.
(1979). Paradigms and problems:
Alternative constructivistlinteractionist implica-
tions for argumentation theory. JAFA 15.
220-27.
____ (1980). Rhetoric, argument. and social
reality: A social constructivist view. JAFA 16.
173-81.
____ (1981). Argument: A social construc-
tivist perspective. lAFA 17, 183-89.
Krabbe, Erik C. W. (1982). Theory of argument a-
tion and the dialectical garb of formal logic. In
Barth and Martens (1982), 123-32.
____ (1985). Formal systems of dialogue
rules. Synthese 63. 295-328.
____ (1987). Naess's dichotomy of tenabili-
ty and relevance. In van Eemeren et ai. (1987a),
307-16.
____ (1988). Creative reasoning in formal
discussion. Arg, 2, 483·98.
Krabbe
Krabbe, Erik C. W. (1990). Inconsistent commit-
ments and commitment to inconsistencies. IL
12, 33-42,
Kroy. Moshe (1974). Logic, language and for-
malization. Logique et Analyse 17, 389-444.
Kruger, Arthur N. (1975). The nature of controver-
sial statements. P&R 8, 137-58.
Kytle, Ray (1986). Clear Thinking for Composi-
tion (5th ed.). New York: Random House. 1st
edition 1969.
La Bar, Carol and Ian Wright (1983). Practical
Reasoning: Individual and Social Decision
Making. Vancouver: U. of British Columbia,
Faculty of Education.
____ and Jerrold Coombs (1982). First Step"
in Practical Reasoning. Vancouver: U. of
British Columbia, Faculty of Education.
Langsdorf. Lenore (1986). Is critical thinking a
technique, or a means of enlightenment? IL 8,
1-17.
____ (1987). Reading, writing and reasoning.
IL 9,117-24.
(l988a). Dialogue, distanciation and
engagemcnt: Toward a theory of televisual
communication. IL 10, 151-68.
___ (l988b). Ethical and logical analysis as
human sciences. Human Studies 11,43-63.
___ (l988c). Review of H. Siegel's Educating
Reason. TP II. 164-66.
_____ (1990). On the uses of language in work-
ing and idealized logic. Arg 4, 259-68.
Largeault, 1. (1978). De la difficulte d'expliquer
ce qu'est la logique. Reme de Metaphysique
et de Morale 82, 289-95.
Lavine. T. Z. (1962). Reflections on the genetic
fallacy. Social Research 29, 321-36.
Leddy, Thomas (1986). Is there a fallacy of small
sample? IL 8, 53-56.
Lee. Donald S. (1973). Assumption-seeking as
hypothetic inference. P&R 6. 131-53.
Lehman, Darrin R .. Richard O. Lempert and
Richard E. Nisbett (1988). The effects of
graduate training on reasoning: Formal
discipline and thinking about everyday-life
events. American Psychologi.~t 43, 431-42.
Levi. Don S. (1987). In defense of informal logic.
P&R 20, 227-47.
"~acKinnOIl 169
Lipman, Matthew (1981). Why aren't reasoning
skills being taught? Thinking 3, 45-6.
Little. J. Frederick (1980). Critical Thinking and
Decision Making. Toronto: Butterworth.
____ Leo A. Groarke and Christopher W.
Tindale (1989). Good Reasoning .Matters.
Toronto: McClelland and Stewart,
Lowery, Lawrence F. (1989). Thinking and Learning:
Matching Developmental Stages With
Curriculum and Instruction. Pacific Grove, CA:
Midwest Publications,
Lugenbehl, Dale E. (1985). Classroom logic ter-
minology: Response to Seech. TP 8, 157-60.
Lugg, Andrew (1986). Deep disagreement and
informal logic: No cause tor alann. IL 8, 47-51.
Lumer, Christoph (1988). The disputation: A
special kind of co-operative argumentative
dialogue. Arg. 2,441-64,
Machina, Kenton F. (1985). Induction and deduc-
tion revisited. Nous 19, 571-578.
Mackenzie, Jim (l979), Question begging in non-
cumulative systems, J. of Philosophical Logic
8,117-33.
(1984a). Begging the question in
dialogue, Australasian J. of Philosophy 62,
174-81.
____ (l984b). Confirmation of a conjecture
of Peter of Spain concerning question-begging
arguments, J. of Philosophical Logic 13, 35-45,
__ . ___ (1985). No logic before Friday.
Synthese 63, 329-41.
___ (1988a). Authority. J. of the Philosophy
of Education 22. 57-65.
____ (l988b). Distinguo: The response to
equivocation, Arg. 2, 465-82,
__ .. __ (l988c), Woods on ideals of rationality
in dialogue. Arg, 2,409-17, ..
____ (1989). Reasoning and logic, Synthese
79. 99-117.
Mackenzie, P. T. (1981), Ad hominem and ad
verecundiam. ILN 3:3.9-11.
Mackie, John L. (1967). Fallacies. In Paul
Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 3.
169-79.
MacKinnon, Edward (1985). Basic Reasoning.
Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
170 MacKinnon
MacKinnon, Edward (1986). Practical reasoning
and informal logic. CT News 4:3, 1. 4-6.
Maier, Robert (1987). Cognitive development and
fallacies. In van Eemeren, Grootendorst, et al.
(I 987b). 75-82.
(1989). Norms in Argumentation.
Dordrecht: Foris.
Maimon, Elaine, Barbara Nodine and Finbarr
O'Conner (eds.) (1989). Thinking, Reasoning
and Writing. New York: Longmans.
Makau. Josina M. (1987). Perspectives on
argumentation instruction. In van Eemeren and
Grootendorst et al. (1987b), 376-85.
____ (984). The Supreme Court and reason-
ableness. Quarterly 1. of Speech 70. 379-96.
____ (1990). Reasoning and Communication:
Thinking Critically About Arguments. Bel-
mont, CA: Wadsworth.
Maker. William (1982). Teaching informal logic
as emancipatory activity. ILN 5:1, 17-20.
Malone, Michael (1988). Review of Fisher's The
Logic of Real Arguments. IL 10, 105-09.
Maneli, Mieczyslaw (1979). The new rhetoric and
dialectics. Revue International de Philosophie
33.216-38.
Manktelow. K. 1. and D. E. Over (1987). Reasoning
and rationality. Mind and Language 2, 199-219.
Mann, William C. (1988). Dialogue games: Con-
ventions of human interaction. Arg. 2,511-32.
Manning. Rita C. (I 983a) . A more charitable prin-
ciple of charity. lLN 5:2.20-21.
___ (1983b). Wright's Better Reasoning.
ILN 5:2.25-27.
Manor, Ruth (1982). Pragmatics and the logic of
questions. Philosophica 29, 45-86.
____ (1984). Dialogue representation. Topoi
3,63-74.
Marks, Joel (1988). When is a fallacy not a fallacy?
Metaphijosophy 19, 307-12.
Marlin. Randal (1984). The rhetoric of action
description: Ambiguity in intensional reference.
lL 6. 26-29.
Marshall, Ernest (1987). Formalism, fallacies, and
the teaching of informal logic. In van Eemeren,
Grootendorst et al. (1987b). 386-93.
Massey, Gerald (1975a). Are there any good
arguments that bad arguments are bad?
Philosophy in Context 4. 61-77.
McPeck
Massey, Gerald (l975b). In defense of the
assymetry. Philosophy in Context (Supplemen-
tary) 4, 44-56.
___ (l981a). The fallacy behind fallacies.
Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6, 489-500.
___ (1981b). The pedagogy of logic. TP 4.
303-36.
Maxwell, Edwin A. (1959). Fallacies in Mathematics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
May. John D. (1981). Practical reasoning: Extracting
useful information from partial informants. J.
of Pragmatics 5, 45-59.
(I 986a) . Journalistic sophistry. CT
News 4:4. 1. 5-7.
(1986b). Journalistic sophistry. CT
News 5: 1, 1, 6-7.
____ (1988). Reportage as compound sugges-
tion. lL 10, 113-31.
Mayer. Richard E. and Russell Revlin (1978). On
information processing for research on human
reasoning. In Russell Revlin and Richard E.
Mayer (eds.), Human Reasoning (Washington,
DC: Winston and Sons), 1-33.
McDonald, Daniel (1983). The Language of
Argument (4th ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
McKerrow, Ray E. (1977). Rhetorical validity:
An analysis of three perspectives on the
justification of rhetorical argument. JAFA, 13,
133-41.
(1978). "Method of composition":
Whately's earliest 'rhetoric'. P&R 11,43-58.
___ (ed.) (1982). Explorations in Rhetoric:
Studies in Honor of Douglas Ehninger
Glenview, IL: Scott. Foresman.
M cM urtry, John (1986). The argumentum ad
adversarium. IL 8, 27-36.
___ (1988). The unspeakable: Understanding
the system of fallacy in the media. IL 10,27-36.
McPeck, John E. (1981a). Critical Thinking
and Education. New York: St. Martin's.
____ (l981b). Critical thinking without logic:
Restoring dignity to information. Philosophy of
Education: Proceedings 37. 219-27.
___ (1982). A second look at de Bono's
heuristics for thinking. In William Maxwell
(ed.), Thinking (Philadelphia: Franklin Institute
Press), 163-76.
McPeck
McPeck. John E. (1984a). Stalking beasts but
swattting flies: The leaching of critical think-
ing. Canadian J. of Education 9, 28-44.
____ (1984b). The evaluation of critical think-
ing programs: Dangers and dogmas. IL 6. 9-13.
(1985a). Critical thinking and the
'Trivial Pursuit' theory of knowledge. TP 8,
295-308.
(l985b). Paul's critique of Critical
Thinking and Education. IL 7, 45-54.
(1985c). Response to H. Siegel's
'McPeck, informal logic and the nature of
critical thinking'. Philosophy of Education: Pro-
ceedings 41, 73-77.
____ (l985d). Response to Norris's 'Think-
ing about critical thinking: Philosophers can't
go it alone'. Philosophy of Education: Pro-
ceedings 41, 89-96.
____ (l987). Picture puzzles, red herrings,
and geometry: Reply to R. anon. Philosophy
of Education: Proceedings 43, 303-07.
(1990) Teaching Critical Thinking:
Dialogue and Dialectic. New York: Routledge.
Chapman and Hall.
Measell. James S. (1985). Perelman on analogy.
JAFA 22, 65-71.
Mechanic, Janevive Jean (1988). The Logic of
Decision Making: An Introduction to Critical
Thinking. New York: Lang.
Meehan, Eugene 1. (1988). The Thinking Game.
A Guide to Effective Study. Chatham, NJ:
Chatham House Publishers.
Meiland, Jack W. (1981). College Thinking: How
to Get the Best Out of College. New York:
Mentor-New American.
____ (1989). Argument as inquiry and argu-
ment as persuasion. Arg. 3, 185-96.
Merrill, Kenneth R. (1982). A modest defense of 'bad
old logic'. The New Scholasticism 56, 500-12.
Meyer, Michel (1979). Dialectique, rhetorique,
hermeneutique et questionnement. Revue Inter-
national de Philosophie 33, 145-77.
____ (1982). Argumentation in the light of a
theory of questioning. P&R 15,81-103.
(1986). From Logic to Rhetoric.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
____ (1988a). Questions and Questioning.
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Moore 171
____ (1988b). The rhetorical foundation of
philosophical argumetation. Arg. 2, 255-69.
Michalos, Alex C. (1980). Advenising: Its logic,
ethics and economics. In Blair and Johnson
(1980),93-111.
____ (1986). Improving Your Reasoning (2nd
ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 15t
edition 1970.
Mieville, Denis (1989). Lorsque la logique rencontre
I'argumentation. Arg. 3, 45-57.
Miller, Max (1987). Culture and collective
argumentation. Arg. 1, 127-154.
Miller, Richard B. (1986). Toward an empirical
definition of thinking skills. IL 8, 113-24.
Minkus. Peter A. (1980). Arguments that aren't
arguments. In Blair and Johnson (1980), 69-76.
Minot, Walter S. (1981). A rhetorical view of
fallacies: Ad hominem and ad populum.
Rhetorical Society Q. 11, 222-35.
Missimer, Connie A. (1986). Good Arguments:
An Introduction to Critical Thinking.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
____ (I 989a). Review of Costa and Lowery:
Techniques for Teaching Thinking. IL 11, 119-22.
___ (1989b). Types of evidence. CT News
7:5. 1,4-5.
___ (1990). Perhaps by skill alone. IL 12,
145-57.
Mitroff, Ian (1982). On the structure of dialectical
reasoning in the social and policy sciences.
Theory and Decision 14.331-50.
Moberg, Dale (1982). Apprasinig argumentative
texts: Justificatory and defensive components.
ILN 5:1,20-23.
Moore, Brooke (1983). Critical thinking in California.
TP 6, 321-330.
____ (1984). Critical reflection: Reply to
Oscanyon. TP 7. 247.
____ and Richard Parker (1989). Critical
Thinking: Evaluating Claims in Everyday Life
(2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield
Publishing Co. 1 st edition 1986.
Moore. Kathleen D. (1987). A Field Guide to
Inducti~'e Arguments. Dubuque, IA: Kendall
Hunt Publishing Co.
Moore, W. Edgar, Janet McCann and Hugh
McCann (1985). Creative and Critical Think-
ing (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
1 st edition 1967.
172 Mortensen
Mortensen, C. David and Ray Lynn Anderson
(1970). The limits of logic. JAFA 7, 71-78.
Morton, Adam (1988). Making arguments explicit:
The theoretical interest of practical difficulties.
In Fisher (1988a), 65-77.
Mostowski. Marcin (1983). On empirical status of
logical inferences. Bulletin of the Section of
12. 181-87.
Mowry, David (1980). Informal logic and general
education. ILN 2:2, 9-10.
Munson, Ronald (1976). The Way of Words: An
Informal Logic. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Murnion, William (1986). The logic of learning.
Philosophy Research Archives 12, 267-91.
Myers, C. Mason (1978). Circular explication.
Metaphilosophy 9. 1-13.
Naess, Arne (1966). Communication and Argu-
ment. London: Allen and Unwin,
Narveson. Jan (1980). Puzzle. ILN 1.2: A solu-
tion. ILN 2:3. 11.
Natanson, Maurice and Henry W. Johnstone. Jf.
(eds.) (1965). Philosophy, Rhetoric, and
Argumentation. University Park, PA: The Penn
State University Press.
Nelson, Beatrice Kapp (980). Hierarchy, utility
and fallacy in Bloom's taxonomy. Philosophy
of Education: Proceedings 36, 260-68.
Nelson, John S., Alan Megill and Donald N.
McClosky (eds.) (1987). The Rhetoric of the
Human Sciences: Language and Argument in
Scholarship and Public Affairs. Madison, WI:
Univeristy of Wisconsin Press.
Nickerson, Raymond S., David Perkins and Edward
E. Smith (1985). The Teaching of Thinking.
Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nielsen. Harry A. (1979). A note on the 'surprise
tesC puzzle. ILN 2:1. 6-7.
Nisbett. Richard E. and Lee Ross (1980). Human
inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of
Social Judgement. Englewood Cliffs. NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Nisbett, Richard E., Geoffrey T. Fong, Darfin R.
Lehman and Patricia W. Cheng (1987).
Teaching reasoning. Science 238, 625-31. .
Nolen, Donald M. (1987). A critical theory of
critical thinking. In van Eemercn and Grooten-
dorSI et al. (I 987b), 349-57.
Nolt. John E. (1984a). Informal logic in China.
IL 6, 44-45.
Orr
( 1984b). Infomlal Logic: Possible
Worlds and imagination. New York: McGraw-
Hill Book Co.
~ ___ (I 984c). Possible worlds and imagina-
tion in informal logic. IL 6, 14-17.
____ (1985). More on induction and possi-
ble worlds: Replies to Thomas and Kahane. iL
7. 55-60.
____ (1987). Dilemmas of the inductive!
deductive distinction. In van Eemeren, Grooten-
dorst et al. (I987c), 418-25.
Noorden, Sally van (1979). Rhetorical arguments
in Aristotle and Perelman. Revue International
de Philosophie 33, 178-87.
Norris, Stephen P. (1985). Thinking about critical
thinking: Philosophers can't go it alone.
Philosophy of Education: Proceedings 41, 79-87.
Norris, Stephen P. and Robert H. Ennis (1989).
Evaluating Critical Thinking. Pacific Grove.
CA: Midwest Publications.
Norris, Stephen P. and Ruth King (1984a). Obser-
vation ability: Determining and extending its
presence. IL 6, 3-9.
___ (1984b). The Design ofa Cdtical Think-
ing Test on Appraising Observations. St.
John's: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Norris, Stephen P. and James Ryan (1987).
Designing a test for inductive reasoning. In van
Eemeren, Grootendorst, et al. (l987b),
394-403.
Nosich, Gerald M. (1982). Reasons and Argu-
ments. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
O'Keefe, Daniel J. (1977). Two concepts of argu-
ment. JAFA 13, 121-28.
____ (982). The concepts of argument and
arguing. In Cox and Willard (1982) 3-23.
___ ( 1985). Argument criticism and W illardian
skepticism. JAFA 21, 196-205.
Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie (1979). Les couples
philosophiques: Une nouvelle approche. Revue
International de Philosophie 33, 81-98.
___ and Evelyne Griffin-Collart (1979).
Bibliographie de Chaim Perelman. Revue In-
ternational de Philosophie 33, 325-42.
Oliver, James Willard (1967). Formal fallacies and
other invalid arguments. Mind 76, 463-78.
Orr, Deborah (1989). Just the facts ma'am: Infor-
mal logic, gender and pedagogy. IL II, 1-10.
Os canyon
Oscanyon, Frederick S. (1984). Critical thinking
in California: Response to Brooke Moore. TP
7.241-47.
Palmer, Humphrey (1981). Do circular arguments
beg the question? Philosophy 56, 387-94.
Parker, Douglas H. (1972). Rhetoric, ethics and
manipulation. P&R 5, 69-87.
Parker. Richard A. (1984). Tu quoque arguments:
A rhetorical perspective. JAFA 20, 123-32.
Parks-Clifford, J. E. (1990). Review of Moore and
Parker's Critical Thinking: Evaluating Claims
and Arguments in Everyday Life. IL 12,
113-16.
Pashman, Jon (1970). Is the genetic fallacy a
fallacy? Southern J. of Philosophy 8, 57-62.
___ (1971). Reply to Mr. Kleiman. Southern
J. of Philosophy 9, 93-94.
Passmore, John (1963). Talking Things Over (3rd
ed.). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Paul, Richard W. (1982). Teaching critical think-
ing in the 'strong' sense. ILN 4:2,2-7.
____ (1983). An agenda item for the informal
logic/critical thinking movement. ILN 5:2,
23-24.
(1985a). Background logic, critical
thinking and irrational language games. IL 7,
9-18.
___ (l985b). McPeck's mistakes. IL 7,
35-43.
(1989). Critical thinking in North
America: A new theory of knowledge, learn-
ing and literacy. Arg. 3, 197-235.
___ (1990) Critical Thinking: What Every
Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Chang-
ing World. A.J.A. Binker (ed.) Rohnert Park,
CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral
Critique.
Pecorino, Philip (1980). Exercise in argument con-
struction using pcer evaluation. ILN 2:3, 18.
____ (1985). How does an informal logician
analyse an argument? In Hoaglund (1985),
83-97.
(1987a). Critical thinking and
phiiosophy.IL 9. 141-45.
___ (1987b). Critical thinking bibliography.
APA Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy 87.
____ (l987c). Grading critical thinking. IL
9, 125-29.
Purtill 173
Peppinghaus. Benedikt (1976). Inadmissible
arguments. Logique et Analyse 19, 119-38.
Perelman, Chaim (1963). The Idea ofJustice and
the Problem of Argument, John Petrie (trans.).
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
____ (1979a). La philosophie de pluralisme
et la nouvelle rhetorique. Revue International
de Philosophie 33, 5-17.
___ (1979b). The New Rhetoric and the
Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and Its Ap-
plications. W. Klubach (trans.) Dordrecht:
Reidel Publishing Co.
____ (1980). Justice, Law and Argument:
Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning. Dor-
drecht: Reidell.
___ (1982). The Realm of Rhetoric. William
Kluback (trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University
of Notre Dame Press. '
____ (1989). Rhetorique. Bruxelles: Editions
de l'Universite de Bruxelles.
___ and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969). The
New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.
John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver (trans.).
Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame
Press. First published in 1958.
Perkins. David (1989). Reasoning as it is and could
be: An empirical perspecitve. In D. N. Topping,
D. C. Crowell, V. N. Kobayashi (eds.). Think-
ing Across Cultures (Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates), 175-94.
Petrie. Hugh G. (1969). Does logic have any
relevance to argumentation? JAFA 6, 55-60.
Pinto, Robert C. (1984). Dialectic and the struc-
ture of argument. IL 6, 16-20.
Pirie, Madsen (1985). The Book of Fallacy: A
Training Manual for Intellectual Subversives.
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Pole, Nelson (1981). Part/whole fallacies. ILN 3:3.
11-13.
Pomeroy, Ralph (1982). Rylc on (and tor) informal
logic. ILN 5: I, 23-25.
Porter, Thomas E. (1987). The Literate Mind:
Reading, Writing, Critical Thinking. Dubuque,
IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Prasad, Rajendra (1950). The Jaina conception of
fallacies. Philosophical Quarterly (India) 23.
69-74.
Purtill, Richard L. (1972). Logical Thinking. New
York: Harper and Row.
174 Quine
Quine, W. V. and J. S. Ullian (1978). Thc Web
of Be fief (2nd cd.). New York: Random House.
15t ed ition 1970.
Rancer, Andrew, Robert A. Baukus and Dominic
A. Infante (1985). Relations between argumen-
tativeness and belief structures about arguing.
Communication Education 34, 211-220.
Ray, John W. (1978). Perelman's universal au-
dience. Quarterly J. of Speech 64, 361-75.
Reboul. Olivier (1988). Can there be non-rhetorical
argumentation? P&R 21, 220-33. Trans. by H.
W. Johnstone, Jr.
Reeder, Harry (1984). The nature of critical think-
ing. IL 6, 18-21.
Rees, M. Agnes Haft-Van (1989). Conversation,
relevance, and argumentation. Arg. 3,385-93.
Remland. Manin (1982) The implicit ad hominem
fallacy: Nonverbal displays of status in
argumentative discourse. JAFA 19, 79-86.
Rescher, Nicholas (1976). Plausible Reasoning: An
Introduction to the Theory and Practice of
Plausible Inference. Assen: Van Gorcum.
____ (1977). Dialectics: A ComfOversy-
Oriented Approach to the Theory of Know/edge.
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
____ (1987). How serious a fallacy is incon-
sistency? Arg. \, 303-16.
Resnick, Lauren B. (1987). Education and Learn-
ing to Think. Washington, DC: National
Academy Press.
Resnik, Michael D. (1985). Logic: Normative or
descriptive: The ethics of belief or a branch of
psychology. Philosophy of Science 52, 221-238.
Revlin, Russell and Von Otto Leirer (1978). The
effects of personal biases on syllogistical
reasoning: Rational decision from personalized
representations. In Russell Revlin and Richard
E. Mayer (eds.). Human Reasoning
(Washington DC: Winston and Sons), 51-81.
Ricci. PaulO. (1986). Fundamentals of Critical
Thinking. Lexington, MA: Ginn Press.
Richards, Thomas J. (1980). Thc founh 'R'-
Reasoning. Australian Logic Teachers Journal
4. 1-10.
_ .. __ ._ (1981). Attitudes to reasoning. ILN 3:2,
2-7.
Rieke, Richard D. and Malcolm O. Sillars (1984).
Argumentation and the Decision Making
Process. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 1 st
edition 1975.
Ruchlis
Riepe, Dale (1966). Some reconsiderations of the
arglImentum ad hominem. Darshana Interna-
tional 6, 44-47.
Robinet, A. (1979). Nouvelle rhetorique et infor-
matique: Le pouvoir dialectique. Revue IIller-
national de Philosophic 33, 129-44.
Robinson, Richard (1971a). Arguing from ignor-
ance. Philosophical Quarterly 21, 97-108.
___ (1971b). Begging the question, 1971.
Analysis 31. 113-17.
___ (1981). Begging the question, 1981.
Analysis 41, 65.
Roblin, Ronald (1983). Review of Copi' s Introduc-
tion to Logic, 6th cd. ILN 4:3, 12-13.
Rohatyn, Dennis (1987). When is a fallacy a fallacy?
In van Eemeren, Grootendorst, et al. (l987b),
45-55.
____ (1988). The fallacies of doublespeak.
CT News 6:4, 1, 3-4.
Ross, Gregory and George Semb (1981). Philosophy
can teach critical thinking. TP 4, 1l1-22.
Rossie, Jean-Gerard (1973). Review of Toulmin's
The Uses of Argument. Archiv fur Geschichte
der Philosophie 55, 91-95.
Rothbart. Daniel (1983). Towards a structural
analysis of extended arguments. ILN 5:2.
15-19.
Rottenberg. Annette T. (1985). ElemeIlls of Argu-
ment: A Text and Reader. New York: St. Mar-
tin's Press.
Rowe, William L. (\962). The fallacy of composi-
tion. Mind 71, 87-92.
Rowland. Robert C. (1984a). A response to Ulrich.
JAFA 21. 94-96.
_. __ (1984b). Tabula Rasa: The relevance of
debate to argumentation theory. JAF,4 21,76-88.
____ (1985). On argument evaluation. JAFA
21, 123-32.
___ (1987). On defining argument. P&R 20,
140-59.
Ruby, Lionel (1974). The Art ufMaking Sense:
A Guide to Logical Thinking (3rd ed.). New
York: J. B. Lippincott. 3rd edition revised by
R. E. Yarber. 1st edition 1954.
Ruchlis, Hy (1990) Clear Thinking: A Practical
Introduction (2nd ed.). Buffalo: Prometheus.
1st edition (1962) New York: Harper and Row.
Ruggiero
Ruggiero, Vincent Ryan (1988). The Art of Think-
inl!,: A Guide to Critical and Creative Thought
(2;d ed.). New York: Harper and Row. 1st edi-
tion 1984.
Runkle. Gerald (1981). Good Thinking: An
Introduction to Logic (2nd ed.). New York:
Holt. Rinehart and Winston. I st edition 1978.
Russell. Bertrand (1923). Vagueness. Australasian
J. of Psychology and Philosophy I. 84-92.
Russow, Lilly-Marlene (1989). Principles of
Reasoning. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Ryle. Gilbert (1969). Formal and informal logic.
In Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press), 111-29.
Saksteder, William (1974). The logic of analogy.
P&R 7, 234-52.
. ___ (1979). Analogy: Justification for logic.
P&R 12, 21-40.
Salmon, Merrilee (1989). Introduction to Logic and
Critical Thinking (2nd ed.). New York: Har-
court Brace Jovanovich, 1st edition 1984.
Salmon, Weslcy (1981). In praise of relevance. TP
4,261-75.
___ (1984). Logic (3rd ed.). Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. I st edition 1963.
Sanford. David (1972). Begging the question.
Analysis 32, 197-99.
____ (1977). Thc fallacy of begging the ques-
tion: A reply to Barker. Dialogue 16, 485-98.
(1981). Superfluous information,
epistemic conditions of inference, and begging
the question. Metaphilosophy 12, 145-58.
Schedler, George (1980). The argument from
ignorance. International Logic Review II, 66-71.
Scherer. Donald and Peter Facione (1977). A
pre/post test for introductory logic courses.
Metaphilosophy 8, 342-47.
Schmidt, Michael F. (1985). On anecdotes and
axioms. CT News 4:2, I, 4-5.
____ (l986a). Fallacies: A bibliography in
progress. IL 8, 105-11.
___ (1986b). On classifications offallacies.
IL 8, 57-66.
Schwartz. Thomas (1980). The Art of Logical
Reasoning. New York: Random House.
___ (1981). Logic as a liberal art. TP 4,
231-47.
Siegel 175
____ (1983). Logic and substance: A reply
to Fogelin. ILN 4:3, 5-7.
_____ (1984). Arguing for explanations: Logic
and the special disciplines. IL 6, 10-15.
Scott, Robert L. (1987). Argument as critical art:
Re-forming understanding. Arg. 1,57-71.
Scriven, Michael (1970). Philosophy of education:
Learning theory and teaching machines. 1. of
Philosophy 62, 896-908.
(1976). Reasoning. New York:
McGraw-Hill. First published by Edgepress,
Berkely, CA in 1976.
____ (1980). The philosophical and pragmatic
significance of informal logic. In Blair and
Johnson (1980), 147-60.
_____ (1981) Evaluation Thesaurus. 3rd ed.
Inverness. CA: Edgepress. 1st edition 1977 .
____ (1984). Critical for survival. National
Forum 65, 9-12.
_. ____ (1987a). Critical thinking and the con-
cept of literacy. IL 9. 93-110.
____ (l987b). Fallacies of statistical substitu-
tion. Arg. I, 333-349.
___ (I987c). Probative logic. In van Eemeren,
Grootendorst, et al. (l987a), 7-32.
_______ (l987d). What are we doing') IL 9,52.
Scull. Allen (1985). A note on the range and utility
of the universal audience. JAFA 22. 83-87.
Secor, Marie (1987). How common arc fallacies?
IL 9, 41-48.
Seech, Zachary (1981). RET: An informal method
of evaluating reasoning. TP 4. 145-50.
__ ._ (1987). Logic in Everyday Life:
Practical Reasoning Skills. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Semlak. William D. (1982). Argumentation and
debate: A selected annotated bibliography.
Distributed by SCCA Module-ERIC Clearing-
house on Reading and Communication skills.
Shaw. William H. and L. R. Ashley (1983).
Analogy and inference. Dialogue 22. 415-32.
Shiner, Roger A. (1988). Ethical justification and
case-by-case reasoning. In Douglas Odegard
(cd.). Ethics and Justification (Edmonton: The
Academic Press).
Siegel. Harvcy (1980). Critical thinking as an
educational ideal. Educational Forum 45. 7-23.
176 Siegel
Siegel, Harvey (1983). Psychology, epistemology
and critical thinking. Philosophy of Education:
Proceedings 39, 197-200.
(1985a). Educating reason: Critical
thinking, informal logic and the philosophy of
education. IL 7, 69-81.
____ (l985b). McPeck. informal logic and the
nature of critical thinking. Philosophy of Educa-
tion: Proceedings 41, 61-72.
____ (1987). Skills. attitudes and education
for critical thinking. In van Eemeren. Grooten-
dorst, et al. (l987b), 358-65.
____ (1988). Educating Reason: Rationality,
Critical Thinking and Education. ~ew York:
Routledge.
___ (l989a). Epistemology, critical thinking.
and critical thinking pedagogy. Arg. 3, 127-40.
__ . __ (1989b). The rationality of science,
critical thinking, and science education.
Synthese 80, 9-41.
____ (l989c). Why be rational? On thinking
critically about critical thinking. Philosophy of
Education: Proceedings 45, 392-401.
Simco. Nancy D. and Gene G. James (1976).
Elementary Logic. Encino and Belmont:
Dickenson.
Smiley. Timothy (1983). The schematic fallacy.
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83,
1-18.
Smith. Joseph (1984). Formal logic: A
degenerating research programme in crisis.
Cogito 2, 1-18.
Smook, Roger (1988). Logical and extralogical
constants. IL 10, 195-99.
Snoeyenbos, Milton H. (1980). Proofs and begging
the question. ILN 3: I. 13.
Sorensen, Roy A. (1989). Slipping off the slippery
slope: A reply to Professor lacquette. P&R 22,
195-202.
Spangler, G. A. (1983). Fogelin's Understanding
Arguments. ILN 5:2, 27-30.
~ __ (1984). Reply to Fred lohnson. IL 6,
41-42.
~ ___ (1987). Review of Govier's Practical
Study of Argument. IL 9, 155-60.
Sparkes, A. W. (1966). Begging the question. J.
of the History of Ideas 27. 462-63.
Taulmin
Sproule, 1. Michael (1980). Argument: Language
and Its Influence. New York: McGraw-Hili.
(1986). The roots of American
argumentation theory: A review of landmark
works. 1878-1932. JAFA 23, 110-15,
____ (1987), Ideology and critical thinking:
The historical connection. JAFA 24, 4-15.
Suber, Peter (1990), A case study in ad hominem
arguments: Fichte's Science of Knowledge,
P&R 23. 12-42.
Swartz, Robert 1. and D. N, Perkins (1989).
Teaching Thinking: Issues and Approaches.
Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications,
Taba. Hilda (1979). The problem in developing
critical thinking, Thinking 1. 77-79.
Taylor, William M. (1987). Teaching critical
reading as a way of teaching critical thinking.
IL 9, 111-15.
Thagard, Paul (1982). Fallacies of practical reason-
ing. ILN 5:1. 26-27.
Theron, Stephen (1988). Reality the measure of
logic and not vice-versa. International
Philosophical Q. 28, 185-92.
Thomas, Stephen N. (1984). Degrees of validity
and ratios of conceivable worlds.IL 6.31-34.
____ (1986). Practical Reasoning in Natural
Language (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, ~J:
Prentice-Hall. 15t edition 1973.
Thouless, Robert (1971). Straight and Crooked
Thinking. London: Pan Books.
Tindale, Christopher and lames Gough (1987). The
use of irony in argumentation. P&R 20, 1-17.
Tindale, Christopher and Leo Groarke (1987).
Logic and rhetoric: Groundwork for a syn-
thesis. In van Ecmeren, Grootendorst, et al.
(1987c),274-82.
Tomko, Thomas N. (1979). Informal logic: A
Review. Educational Theory 29, 351-60.
(1981). Evaluation of formal logic
competence. TP 4, 145-50.
____ and Robert H. Ennis (1980). Evaluation
of informal logic competence. In Blair and
lohnson (1980), 113-44.
Toulmin, Stephen (1958). The Uses of Argument.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
___ Richard Rieke and Allan lanik (1984).
An Introduction to Reasoning (2nd ed.). New
York: Macmillan. 1st edition 1979.
Trapp
Trapp, Robert (1981). Special report on argumen-
tation: Introduction. Western J. of Speech Com-
munication 45, 11-17.
___ (1986). The role of disagreement in
interactional argument. JAFA 23, 23-41-
____ (1987). Everyday argumentation from
an interpretive perspective. In Wenzel (l987a),
185-90.
____ ( 1987). On the characteristics of interac-
tional argument: A response to Jackson. Jacobs,
Burrell and Allen. JAFA 24, 63-72.
Trapp, Robert and Nancy Hoff (1985). A model
of serial argument in interpersonal relation-
ships. JAFA 22, I-ll.
Trapp, Robert and Janice Schuetz (1990). Perspec-
tives on Argumelltation, Essays in Honor of
Wayne Brockreide. Prospect Heights. IL:
Waveland Press.
Ulrich, Walter (1984), Debate as dialectic: A
defense of the Tabula Rasa approach to judg-
ing, JAFA 21, 89-93,
____ (1985). In defense of the fallacy. In Cox
etal. (1985),110-126,
(1987), Argumentative validity as a
function of the argumentative forum. In van
Eemeren, Grootendorst, et aI, (1987b), 7-16.
Vasoli, C. (1979). Topica, retorica, e argumenta-
zione nelle "prima filosofia" del Vico. Revue
International de Philosophie 33, 188-201,
Vate, Jr, Dwight van de (l975a). Reasoning and
threatening: A reply to Yoos. P&R 8,177-79.
___ (1975b). The appeal to force. P&R 8,
43-60.
Vedung, Evert (1982). Political Reasoning. Beverly
Hills: Sage Publications.
____ (1983). Sytematic interpretation and the
Principle of Charity. ILN 5:2, 21-22.
Verbiest, Agnes (1989). Confrontation in conver-
sations: The adjacency pair as a tool of the
descriptive component of a pragma-dialectical
analysis. Arg. 3, 395-400.
Wagner, Paul (1987). Informing critical thinkers
about cognitive science. Philosophy of Educa-
tion: Proceedings 43, 179-83.
Walker, Gregg B. and Jeanine DiPaolo Congalton
(1987). Generic argument and argument fields.
JAFA 23, 125-35.
Walton 177
Walter, Bruce N. (1988). Critical Thinking: Con-
sider the Verdict. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-HaiL
Walters, Kerry S. (1989). On world views,
commitment and critical thinking. IL 11,75-89.
Walton, Douglas N. (1977). Mill and De Morgan
on whether the syllogism is a petitio. Interna-
tional Logic Review 8, 57-68.
____ (1980a). Ignoratio elenchi: The Red
Herring Fallacy. ILN 2:3,3-7.
____ (l980b). Petitio principii and argument
analysis. In Blair and Johnson (1980). 41-54.
___ (l980c). Why is the Ad Populum a
fallacy? P&R 13.264-78. Also in Woods and
Walton (1989) 209-20.
____ (l98Ia). The fallacy of many questions.
Logique et Analyse 24, 291-313. Also in
Woods and Walton (1989) 233-51.
___ (l981b). What is logic about? ILN 4: 1. 2-4.
____ (1982). Topical Relevance in Argumen-
tation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
____ (1984). Logical Dialogue-Games and
Fallacies. Lanham, MD: University Press of
America.
____ (1985a). Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic
Study of 'Ad Hominem' Attack. Criticism.
Refutation and Fallacy. Westport, CT: Green-
wood Press.
____ (I985b). New directions in the logic of
dialogue. Synthese 63, 259-74.
____ (1987a). Informal Fal1acies: Towards a
Theory of Argument Criticisms. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
____ (1987b). The ad hominem argument as
an informal fallacy. Arg. 1,317-31.
____ (I987c). What is a fallacy? In van
Eemeren, Grootendorst, et al. (I987a), 323-30.
____ (l988a). Argumentation and fallacies:
The problem in teaching. In Venam Cauchy
(cd.), Philosophy et Culture, 5 (Montreal: Edi-
tions Montmorency), 373-81.
(l988b). Burden of proof. Arg. 2,
233-54.
____ (l988c). General bibliography on the
argumentative structure of dialogue. Arg. 2,
533-34,
178 Walton
Walton, Douglas N, (l989a), Dialogue theory for
critical thinking, Arg. 3. 169-84,
___ (l989b). Informal Logic, A Handbook
for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cam-
bridge University Press.
_____ (1989c), Question-Reply Argumenta-
tion. New York: Greenwood Press.
____ (1989d), Reasoned use of expertise in
argumentation. Arg. 3, 59-73,
____ (1990a). Practical Reasoning: Goal-
Driven, Knowledge-Based. Action-Guiding
Argumentation. Savage. MD: Rowman and
Littlefield.
___ (I 990b), What is reasoning? What is an
argument? 1. of Philosophy 87, 399-419.
and L. M. Batten (1984), Games.
graphs, and circular arguments. Logiquc et
Analysc 27, 133-164.
Warren, Karen 1. (1988), Critical thinking and
feminism. IL 10, 31-44.
Weddle. Perry (1978). Argument: A Guide to
Critical Thinking. New York: McGraw-Hili.
_ .. ___ (1979). Inductive. deductive, ILN2: I. 1-5.
____ (1980), Go<Xl Grief! More on deduction-
induction, ILN 3: I. 10-13,
___ I 1984). McPcck's Critical Thinking and
Education. IL 6. 23-25,
____ (I985a). Fact from opinion, IL 7.
19-26, Also in Govier (l988c), 65-72,
__ . __ (l985b). On theory in informal logic.
IL 7. 119-26.
Weinstein. Mark (1982a), A role for formal logic
in informal logic courses, ILN 4:2. 13-15.
____ (l982b). Musclebuilding for strength in
critical thinking. ILN 5:1, 13-17.
__ . ___ (I 985a), Formal logic revisited: The
Lehman program. CT News 4:2, 1,5-6,
___ (l985b). Philosophy and the general
curriculum: The map of knowledge.
Metaphi/osphy 16, 239-49,
____ (1987). Reason and the theory of argu-
ment. In van Eemeren, Grootendorst, ct al.
(l987c), 372-80.
____ (1988), Reason and critical thinking, IL
10, 1-20,
Weston
____ (1990a). Towards an account of argu-
mentation in science. Arg 4, 269-98.
____ (1990b) Towards a research agenda for
informal logic and critical thinking. IL 121-43.
Weiss, Stephen E, (1976). The sorites fallacy:
What difference does a peanut make'? Synthese
33, 253-72.
Weitzenfeld, Julian (1984). Valid reasoning by
analogy, Philosophy of Science 51, 137-49.
Wellman, Carl (1971). Challenge and Response.
Justification in Ethics. Carbondale. IL: Univer-
sity of Illinois.
Wenzel. Joseph W. (1977). Toward a rationale for
value-centered argument. JAFA 13, 150-58.
___ (1979). lurgen Habermas and the dialec-
tical perspective on argumentation. JAFA 16,
83-94.
_. ____ (1980). Perspectives on argument. In
Jack Rhodes and Sarah Newell (eds.). Pro-
ceedings of the Summer Conference on
Argumentation (Washington, D.C.: Speech
Communication Association). 112-13.
(1982). On fields of argument as
propositional systems. JAFA 18, 204-13.
____ (1985). Toward a normative theory of
argumentation: Van Eemeren and Grooten-
dorst's code of conduct for rational discussions.
In Cox et al. (1985), 139-53.
_. ___ (ed.) (i987a). Argument and Critical
Practices: Proceedings of the Fifth SCA/AFA
Conference on Argumentation, Annandale.
VA: Speech Communication Assoc.
____ (l987b). The rhetorical perspective on
argument. In van Eemeren, Grootendorst, et al.
(l987a), 10\-09.
(l987c). The rhetorical view of
argumentation: Exploring a paradigm. Arg. I,
73-88.
____ (1989). Relevance-and other norms of
argumentation: A rhetorical exploration. In
Maier (1989). 85-95.
Werkmeister. W. H. (1948). An Introduction to
Critical Thinking: A Beginner's Text in Logic.
Lincoln. NE: Johnson.
Weston. Anthony (1982). A pattern for argument
analysis in informal logic. TP 5, 135-39.
___ (1987). A Rulebook for Arguments.
Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
White
White, David (1985), Slippery slope arguments,
Metaphilosophy 16, 206-13,
Willard, Charles A, (1976), On the utility of
descriptive diagrams for the analysis and
criticism of arguments, Communication
Monographs 43, 308-19,
____ (1978a), A reformulation of the concept
of argument: The constructivist/interactionist
foundations of a sociology of argument. JAFA
14, 121-40,
____ (l978b), Argument as non-discursive
symbolism, JAFA 14, 187-93,
_ .. _____ (l979a), The epistemic functions of
argument: Reasoning and decision-making from
a constructi vistlinteractionist point of view, Part
L JAr'll. 15, 169-191.
(l979b), The epistemic functions of
argument: Reasoning and decision-making from
a constructivist/interactionist point of view, Part
2, JAE4 15,211-19,
____ (1981a), Argument fields and theories
of logical types, JAFA 17, 129-45,
(1981 b). The status of the non-
discursiveness thesis, JAFA 17, 190-214,
____ (1983), Argumentation and the Social
Grounds of Knowledge, Tuscaloosa, AL:
University of Alabama Press.
___ .. (1985), Reply to O'Keefe. JAE4 21.
206-14.
(1987). Valuing Dissensus, In van
Eemeren, Grootendorst, et al. (1987a), 145-57,
____ (1989a), A Theory of Argumentation,
Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
____ (1989b). Argument as a social process.
In Maier (1989), 161-77,
_ .. __ (1989c). The creation of publics: Notes
on Goodnight's historical relativity. Argumen-
tation and Advocacy 26, 45-59,
___ (l990a). Authority. IL 12, 11-22.
___ (I 990b). The problem of the public
sphere: Three diagnoses, In Williams et al.
(1990) 135-53.
Williams, David C. and Michael D, Hazen (eds,)
( 1990) Argumentation Theory and the Rhetoric
of Ass em. Tuscallosa, AL: U. of Alabama Press,
Williams, M, E. (1967-68). Begging the question?
Dialogue 6, 567-70.
Wilson, Arnold (1985), Getting into an argument.
IL 7, 63-64.
Woods 179
Wilson, Barbara and Edward S, Inch (1989),
Critical Thinking and Communieation: the Uses
of Reason in Argument. New York: Macmillan.
Wilson. Barrie A. (] 980). The Anatomy of Argument.
Lanham, MD: University Press of America,
Wilson, John (1963). Thinking With Concepts.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Windes, Russell R. and Arthur Hastings (1965).
Argumentation and Advocacy. New York: Ran-
dom House.
Winters, Barbara (1983). Inferring. Philosphical
Studies 44, 201-20.
Wohlrapp, Harald (1987), Toulmin's theory and
the dynamics of argumentation. In van
Eemeren, Grootendorst et ai, (\ 987c), 327-35,
Wolfe, Julian (1986). Inconsistency: A fallacy? IL
8, 151-52,
Woods, John (l980}, What is informal logic') In
Blair and Johmon (1980), 57-68. Also in
Woods and Walton (198'9) 221-32.
____ (\987a). Ad baculum, self-interest and
Pascal's wager. In van Eemeren, Grootendorst.
et al. (I987b), 343-349.
___ ~ (I 987b). Fallacies: Selected supplemen-
tary bibliography, Arg. L 351-53.
___ (l988a). Buttercups, GNP's and quarks:
Are fallacies theoretical entities') IL 10, 67·76,
____ (l988b), Ideals of rationality in
dialogue. Arg. 2, 395-408.
____ (I 988c). Is philosophy progressive?
Arg. 2, 157-74.
____ (1988d). Pragma-dialectics: A radical
departure in fallacy theory. ISSA Newsletter 4,
5-15.
___ (l988e), Rationality ideals and mentality,
Arg. 2,419-24,
____ (1989a). The maladroitness of epistemic
TIT for TAT. 1. of Philosophy 86,324-31.
____ . __ (l989b). The necessity of formalism in
informal logic, Arg, 3, 149-67,
___ . and Brent Hudak (1989), By parity of
reasoning. IL I L 125-39.
Woods, John and Douglas N. Walton (1972), On
fallacies. I, of Critical Analysis 4. 103-1 L Also
in Woods and Walton (1989) 1-10,
____ ( 197 4a), Argumentum ad verecundiam.
P&R 7, 135-53, Also in Woods and Walton
(1989) 11-28.
180 Woods
Woods, John and Douglas N, Walton (1974b).
Informal logic and critical thinking. Education
95, 84-86.
(1975a). Is the syllogism a petitio
principii? The Mill News Letter 10, 13-15.
____ (1975b). Petitio principii. Synthese 31,
107-27. Also in Woods and Walton (1989)
29-45.
___ (l976a). Ad baculum. Grazer Philo-
sophische Studien 2, 133-40. Also in Woods
and Walton (1989) 47-53.
___ (l976b). Ad hominem. Philosophical
Forum 8. 1-20. Also in Woods and Walton
(1989) 55-73.
____ (I 976c). Fallaciousness without invalid-
ity') P&R 9. 52-54.
____ ..... __ (l977a). Ad hominem. contra Gerber.
The Personalist 58, 141-44. Also in Woods and
Walton (1989) 87-91.
(I 977b). Composition and division.
Studia Logica 36, 381-406. Also in Woods and
Walton (1989) 93-119.
____ (l977c). Petitio and relevant many-
premissed arguments. Logique et Analyse 20,
97-110. Also in Woods and Walton (1989)
75-85.
___ (l977d). Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.
Review of Metaphysics 30, 569-93. Also in
Woods and Walton (1989) 121-141.
____ (1977e). Towards a theory of argument.
Metaphilosophy 8, 298-315.
(l978a). Arresting circles in formal
dialogues. J. of Philosophical Logic 7.73-90.
Also in Woods and Walton (1989) 143-59.
____ (l978b). The fallacy of ad ignorantiam.
Dialectica 32, 87-99. Also in Woods and
Walton (1989) 161-73.
___ (l979a). A brief guide to studying and
teaching fallacies. Australian Logic Teachers
Journal 3. 1-3.
(l979b). Equivocation and practical
logic. Ratio 21, 31-43. Also in Woods and
Walton (1989) 195-207.
____ (1979c). What type of argument is an
ad verecundiam? ILN 2: 1,5-6. Also in Woods
and Walton (1989) 191-94.
____ (1981). More on fallaciousness and
invalidity. P&R 14, 168-72.
Yoos
___ (1982a). Argument: The Logic of the
Fallacies. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
___ (l982b). Question-begging and cumu-
lativeness in dialectical games. Nous 16,
585-605. Also in Woods and Walton (1989)
253-272.
____ (l982c). The Petitio: Aristotle's five
ways. Canadian J. of Philosophy 12, 77-100.
(1989). Fal1acies: Selected Papers
1972-82. Dordrecht: Foris.
Wreen, Michael J. (1987a). When no reason is
good reason. In van Eemeren, Grootendorst,
et al. (1987b), 56-64.
____ (l987b). Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa
Claus. IL 9.31-39.
____ (I988a). Admit no force but argument.
IL 10, 89-95.
___ (l988b). May the force be with you.
Arg. 2, 425-40.
---(989). A bolt of fear. P&R 22,131-40.
Wright, Ian and Carol La Bar (eds.) (1986).
Critical Thinking and Social Studies Toronto:
The History of Social Science Teacher.
Wright, Larry (1982). Better Reasoning: Tech-
niques for Handling Argument. Evidence and
Abstraction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and
Winston.
____ (1989). Practical Reasoning. San Diego,
CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Wright, Richard A. (1984). Logical Thinking: An
Integrated Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Wu, Kuand-Ming (1982). On playing with
arguments. Southwest Philosophical Studies 7,
58-67.
Yanal, Robert 1. (1988). Basic Logic. SI. Paul,
MN: West Publishing Co.
Yearly, Stephen (1988). Argumentation, epistem-
ology and the sociology of language. Arg. 2,
351-67.
Yoos, George (1975). A critique of van de Vate's
'The appeal to force'. P&R 8, 172-76.
(1984). Rhetoric, argument and
logic. IL 6, 10-16.
____ (1987). The rhetoric of appeal and the
rhetoric of response. P&R 20, 107-17.
(1988). Rheotric and "doing
philosophy". Arg. 2, 191-207.
Young
Young, Gary (1974). Authority. Canadian J. of
Philosophy 3, 563-83.
Zarefsky, David (1981). Review of Blair and
Johnson's Informal Logic. JAFA 18, 64-67.
___ , Malcolm O. Sillars and Jack Rhodes
(eds.) (1983). Argument in Transition: Pro-
ceedings of the Third Summer Conference on
Argumentation. Annandale, V A: SCA.
Zyskind 181
Ziegelmueller, George W. (1975). Argumentation:
Inquiry and Advocacy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
___ and Jack Rhodes (eds.) (1981). Dimen-
sions of Argument: Proceedings ofehe Second
Summer Conference on Argumentation. An-
nandale, VA: SCA.
Zyskind, Harold (1979). The new rhetoric and formal-
ism. Revue International de Philosophic 33, 18-32.
Index to the Bibliography
Ad hominem and tu quoque arguments:
E Barth, Martins 1977; A Brinton 1985; J Cragan,
Cutbirth 1984; M Finocchiaro 1974; D Gerber
1974; D Gerber 1977; T Govier 1981c; T Govier
1983a; T Govier 1988d; L Hinman 1982; J
Hoaglund 1983; G Jason 1984; H Johnstone, Jr.
1952; H Johnstone, Jr. 1970; P Mackenzie 1981;
W Minot 1981; R Parker 1984; M Remland 1982;
D Riepe 1966; P Suber 1990; D Walton 1985a;
D Walton 1987b; J Woods, Walton 1976b; J
Woods, Walton 1977a.
Ad verecundiam. arguments from authority:
W Benoit 1987; J Cederblom, Paulsen 1988; R
Ennis 1974; J Hardwig 1988; J Mackenzie 1988a;
D Walton 1989d; C Willard 1990a; J Woods,
Walton 1979c; M Wreen 1987b; G Young 1974.
'Ad' fallacies other than ad hominem and
ad verecundiam:
G Jason 1987; C Kie1kopf 1980; J McMurtry 1986;
D Vate, Jr. 1975a; D Vate. Jr. 1975b; D Walton
1980c; J Woods 1987a; J Woods, Walton 1974a;
J Woods, Walton I 976a; M Wreen 1988a; M
Wreen 1988b; M Wreen 1989; G Yoos 1975.
All fallacies other than 'ad' fallacies and
begging the question:
Y Bar-Hillel 1964; A Brinton 1988a; J Broyles
1975; J Cowan 1969; S Engel 1986a; F Fair 1973;
L Feuer 1983; H Gelber 1987; T Goudge 1961;
T Govier 1982a; L Groarke 1982; N Hanson 1967;
D Jacquette 1989; G Jason 1988; C Kirwan 1979;
L Kleiman 1970; T Lavine 1962; T Leddy 1986;
J Mackenzie 1988b; J McMurtry 1988; J Pashman
1970; J Pashman 1971; N Pole 1981; N Rescher
1987; R Robinson 1971a; D Rohatyn 1988: W
Rowe 1962; G Schedler 1980; M Scriven 1987b;
T Smiley 1983; R Sorensen 1989; D Walton 1980a;
D Walton 1981a; S Weiss 1976; D White 1985;
J Wolfe 1986; J Woods, Walton 1977b; J Woods.
Walton 1977d; J Woods, Walton 1978b; J Woods,
Walton 1979b.
Analogical arguments:
E Barker 1989; S Barker 1989; W Brown 1989;
T Govier 1985; T Govier 1989a; F Johnson 1989;
J Measell 1985; W Saksteder 1974; W Saksteder
1979; W Shaw, Ashley 1983; R Shiner 1988; J
Weitzenfeld 1984; J Woods, Hudak 1989.
Argument evaluation:
R Binkley 1981; M Black 1949; B Burleson 1979;
S Campbell 1974; D Fischer 1970; T Govier
1980b; T Govier 1981a; W Grennan 1986; W
Griffith 1975; G Iseminger 1974; R Johnson
1990a; R Johnson, Blair 1989; H Johnstone, Jr.
1983; H Kahane 1984; K Kellerman 1980; A
Kruger 1975; G Massey 1975; G :Massey 1975;
E Maxwell 1959; A Michalos 1980; D Moberg
1982; D O'Keefe 1985; R Rowland 1985; Z Seech
1981; P Thagard 1982; M Wreen 1987a.
Argument interpretation, the principle of
charity:
J Adler 1982; J Berg 1987; P Davson-Galle 1989;
RFogelin 1983; CGauker 1986; TGovier 1981b;
N Griffin 1981a; M Gutteridge 1987; D Hample
1977; D Hample, Dallinger 1987; A Hayward
1986; P Healy 1987; J Hoaglund 1986b; J
Hoaglund 1986c; S Jackson, Jacobs, Burrell, Allen
1986; R Johnson 1981a; R Johnson 1981b; R
Johnson 1981c; R Johnson 1982; C Kneupper
1978; R Manning 1983a: R Marlin 1984; J May
1981; A Morton 1988; P Pecorino 1985; D Rothbart
1983: T Schwartz 1983; C Tindale, Gough 1987:
E Vedung 1983; A Verbiest 1989; A Weston 1982;
C Willard 1976; H Wohlrapp 1987.
Argumentation theory:
J Anderson, Dovre 1968; L Apostel 1971; L
182 Index
Apostel1982; D Apotheloz 1987; C Arnold 1986;
E Barth, Martins 1982; P Benoit 1989; J Blair
1987b; J Braaten 1987; W Brockriede 1972; G Brutian
1984; J Corcoran 1989; V Corgan 1987; R Crable
1976b; F Eemeren 1986; F Eemeren 1987a; F
Eemeren 1987b; F Eemeren 1988; F Eemeren,
Grootendorst 1982a; F Eemeren, Grootendorst
1984; F Eemeren, GroOiendorst 1988a; F Eemeren,
Grootendorst 1989a; F Eemeren, GroOiendorst,
Kruiger 1984; F Eemeren, Grootendorst, Kruiger
1987; F Eemeren, Grootendorst, Blair, Willard
1987a; F Eemeren, Grootendorst, Blair, Willard
1987b; F Eemeren, Grootendorst , Blair, Willard
1987c; D Ehninger 1980; E Feteris 1990; M
Finocchiaro 1987a; S Fuller, Willard 1987;
J Furlong 1987; G Goodnight 1989; T Govier
1987b; D Hample 1988; J Hintikka 1989;
S Jackson 1985; S Jackson 1989; S Jacobs 1989;
S Jacobs 1989; J Klumpp, Brook, Chesebro,
Cragan 1974; C Kneupper 1979; L Langsdorf
1988a; L Langsdorf 1988b; R Maier 1989;
M ManeH 1978; M Meyer 1986; M Meyer 1988a;
D Mieville 1989; M Miller 1987; A Naess 1966;
M Natanson, Johnstone, Jr. 1965; C Perelman
1963; S Toulmin 1958; R Trapp, Schuetz 1990;
E Vedung 1982; M Weinstein 1987; C Wellman
1971; J Wenzel 1979; J Wenzel 1985; C Willard
1981a; C Willard 1981b; C Willard 1983;
C Willard 1987; C Willard 1989a; C Willard
1989b; C Willard 1989c; C Willard 1990b;
J Woods, Walton 1977e; S Yearly 1988.
Arguments: Their nature and their analysis:
R Anderson, Mortensen 1967; L Apostel 1979;
S Bailin 1987; V Balthrop 1980; E Barth 1987;
P Bator 1988; P Benoit 1983; D Bernstein 1990;
J Bickenbach 1982; J Bickenbach 1990; J Blair
1987d; E Blythin 1979; W Brockriede 1975;
W Brockriede 1977; W Brockriede 1985; W
Brown 1987; M Bruner 1983; M Cohen 1977; R
Corliss 1972; E Dayton 1981; F Eemeren,
Grootendorst 1989c; F Eemeren, Kruiger 1987;
F Eemeren, Grootendorst, Meuffels 1989;
D Ehninger 1970; M Finocchiaro 1979a;
M Finocchiaro 1988c; A Fisher 1987; A Fisher
1989; RFogelin 1985; V Follert 1981; J Freeman
1985; E Garver 1987; J Gasser 1987; J Golden,
Makau 1982; A Goldman 1987; T Goode,
Wettersten 1982; R Grootendorst 1987a; D
Hample 1980; D Hample 1985; J Hoaglund 1989;
S Jackson 1987; F Johnson 1984; R Jones 1981;
C Kielkopf 1984; B Kirby 1986; C Kneupper 1981;
A Lugg 1986; J Meiland 1981; J Meiland 1989;
P Minkus 1980; D O'Keefe 1977; D O'Keefe
1982; P Pecorino 1980; A Rancer, Baukus, Infante
1985; J Ray 1978; R Rowland 1987; T Schwartz
1984; R Scott 1987; M Scriven 1987c; A Scult
1985; R Trapp 1986; R Trapp 1987; R Trapp 1987;
R Trapp, Hoff 1985; G Walker, Congalton 1987;
M Weinstein 1990a; J Wenzel 1977; J Wenzel
1980; J Wenzel 1982; C Willard 1978a; C Willard
1978b; C Willard 1979b; C Willard 1985: D
Williams, Hazen 1990; K Wu 1982.
Begging the question, petitio principii,
circular arguments:
J Barker 1976; J Barker 1978; D Basu 1986; J Biro
1977; J Biro 1984; G Colwell 1989; R Hoffman
1971; F Jackson 1984; 0 Johnson 1967-68; J
Mackenzie 1979; J Mackenzie 1984a; J Mackenzie
1984b; C Myers 1978; H Palmer 1981; R Robinson
1971 b; R Robinson 1981; D Sanford 1972; D
Sanford 1977; D Sanford 1981; M Snoeyenbos
1980; A Sparkes 1966; D Walton 1977; D Walton
1980b; D Walton, Batten 1984; M Williams
1967-68; J Woods, Walton 1975a; J Woods,
Walton 1975b; J Woods, Walton 1977c; J Woods,
Walton 1978a; J Woods, Walton 1982b; J Woods,
Walton I 982c.
Bibliographies:
L Bomstad, Weddle 1989; C Champaud, Bassano
1987; R Church 1979; R Church, Buckley 1983;
F Conklin 1968; F Conklin 1970; F Conklin 1971;
R Cureton 1973; R Ennis 1987a; J Jensen 1989;
R Johnson, Blair 1980a; R Johnson, Blair 1983a;
L Olbrechts-Tyteca, Griffin-Collart 1979; P
Pecorino 1987b; M Schmidt 1986a; W Semlak
1982; J Woods 1987b; D Walton 1988c.
Critical thinking:
J Adler 1987c; J Adler 1990b; D Annis, Annis 1979;
LAnnis, Annis 1984; S Bailin 1987; SBailin 1989;
M Battersby 1989; J Blair 1985; J Blair 1986b;
J Blair 1987a; J Blair 1987c; J Blair 1988d; E
d'Angelo 1974; R Ennis 1962; R Ennis 1964; R
Ennis 1979; R Ennis 1980; R Ennis 1981b; R
Ennis 1981c; R Ennis 1985; R Ennis 1987b; R
Ennis 1989a; R Ennis 1989b; P Facione 1984; P
Facione 1990a; M Finocchiaro 1988a; J Freeman
1989; T Govier 1983c; T Govier 1989b; J
Hoaglund 1985; R Johnson 1988b; H Kahane
1989; L Langsdorf 1986; L Langsdorf 1987; J May
1986a; J May 1986b; J May 1988; J McPeck
1981a; J McPeck 1981b; J McPeck 1982; J
McPeck 1984a; J McPeck 1985a; J McPeck 1985b;
J McPeck 1985c; J McPeck 1985d; J McPeck
1987; R Miller 1986; C Missimer 1990; B Nelson
1980; D Nolen 1987; S Norris 1985; R Paul 1982;
R Paul 1983; R Paul 1985a; R Paul 1985b; R Paul
1989; R Paul 1990; P Pecorino 1987a; H Reeder
1984; R Revlin, Leirer 1978; GRoss, Semb 1981;
B Russell 1923; M Scriven 1984; M Scriven
1987 a; H Siegel 1980; H Siegel 1983; H Siegel
1987; H Siegel 1988; H Siegel 1989a; H Siegel
1989b; H Siegel 1989c; J Sproule 1987; H Taba
1979; P Wagner 1987; K Walters 1989; K Warren
1988; P Weddle 1985a; M Weinstein 1982b; M
Weinstein 1988; I Wright, La Bar 1986.
Deduction, conduction, induction:
J Bickenbach 1979; G Englebretsen 1984; S Fohr
1980a; S Fohr 1980b; J Freeman 1983; J Freeman
1984; T Govier 1980c; T Govier 1987a; D
Hitchcock 1980; D Hitchcock 1981; J Holland,
Holyoak, Nisbett, Thagard 1986; F Johnson 1980;
K Machina 1985; J ~olt 1984c; J Nolt 1985; J Nolt
1987; G Spangler 1984; P Weddle 1979; P
Weddle 1980.
Dialogic, dialogue games, the logic of
questions:
E Barth 1985c; E Barth, Krabbe 1982; J Bendegem
1985; J Blair 1986a; J Blair, Johnson 1987a; R
Brown 1970; L Carlson 1983; F Damme 1984; F
Eemeren, Grootendorst 1988b; M Finocchiaro
1988b; N Gutenberg 1987; J Hintikka 1973; J
Hintikka 1982; J Hintikka 1986; J Hintikka 1987b;
J Hintikka, Hintikka 1982; P Hoven 1987; E
Krabbe 1982; E Krabbe 1985; C Lumer 1988; J
Mackenzie 1988c; W Mann 1988; R Manor 1982;
R Manor 1984; M Meyer 1979; M Meyer 1982;
I Mitroff 1982; R Pinto 1984; N Rescher 1977;
A Robinet 1979; W Ulrich 1984; D Walton 1984;
D Walton 1985b; D Walton 1988b; D Walton
1989a; D Walton 1989c; J Woods 1988b.
Fallacy theory; nature of and classification
of fallacies:
C Abate 1979; L Apostel1971; J Biro 1987; J Blair
1988a; J Blair 1990; C Broad 1950; R Carroll
1983; F Cizek 1974; R Cole 1965; J Cox, Willard
1982; F Eemeren, Grootendorst 1987a; F
Eemeren, Grootendorst 1989b; S Engel 1986b; S
Engel 1986c; P Facione 1987; M Finocchiaro
1981; M Finocchiaro 1987b; R Fogelin, Duggan
1987; R George 1983a; I Good 1959; T Govier
1982b; R Grootendorst 1987b; CHamblin 1970;
D Hample 1982; J Hintikka 1987a; G Jason 1986;
G Jason 1989; R Johnson 1987b; R Johnson 1989;
R Johnson 199Ob; H Kahane 1980; J Mackie 1967;
R Maier 1987; J Marks 1988; E Marshall 1987;
G Massey 1981a; J Oliver 1967; R Prasad 1950;
D Rohatyn 1987; R Rowland 1984b; M Schmidt
1986b; M Secor 1987; W Ulrich 1985; D Walton
1987a; J Woods 1988a; J Woods 1988d; J Woods,
Walton 1972; J Woods, Walton 1976c; J Woods,
Bibliography 183
Walton 1981; J Woods, Walton 1982a: J Woods,
Walton 1989.
Formal and informal logic:
B Aune 1986; E Barth 1990; S Doss 1985; S Doss
1989; R Girle 1988; T Govier 1982b; M Kroy
1974; J Largeault 1978; D Levi 1987; K Merrill
1982; H Petrie 1969; R Pomeroy 1982; G Ryle
1969; M Scriven 1980; J Smith 1984; D Walton
1981b; D Walton 1987c: P Weddle 1985b; M
Weinstein 1982a; M Weinstein 1985a; J Woods
1980; J Woods 1989b.
Histories, surveys, reports, state of the art:
E Barth 1985b; J Blair, Johnson 1987b; A Fisher
1986; R Johnson, Blair 1980b; R Johnson, Blair
1985a: R Johnson, Blair 1985b; B Moore 1983:
B Moore 1984; J Nolt 1984a; F Os canyon 1984;
J Sproule 1986; T Tomko 1979; R Trapp 1981.
Inference norms:
J Adler 1989; D Allen 1988; K Bach 1984; E
Krabbe 1987; C Missimer 1989b; S Thomas 1984;
W Ulrich 1987.
Informal logic and critical thinking:
J Blair 1988b; J Blair, Johnson 1989; A Fisher
1988a; W Fisher 1978; W Fisher 1987; W Fisher
1980; L Langsdorf 1990; E MacKinnon 1986; D
Orr 1989; M Scriven 1987d; H Siegel 1985a; H
Siegel 1985b; M Weinstein 1990b; J Woods,
Walton 1974b.
Logic, reasoning and inference:
M Black 1963; LCohen 1982; M Finocchiaro 1979b;
M Finocchiaro 1984; L Goldstein 1988; P Goodwin,
Wenzel 1979; E Griffrn-Collart 1979; B Gronbeck
1982; G Harman 1984; G Harman 1986; R
Johnson 1988a; E Krabbe 1988; J Mackenzie 1989;
K Manktelow, Over 1987; M Mostowski 1983; R
~isbett, Ross 1980; C Perelman 1980; D Perkins
1989; N Rescher 1976; M Resnik 1985;
D Walton 199Oa; D Walton 1990b; B Winters 1983.
Missing, hidden, unexpressed premises;
assumptions, enthymemes:
E Brandon 1986; M Burke 1985; S Carey 1988;
TConley 1984; Ed'Angelo 1974; M Donn 1990;
F Eemeren, Grootendorst 1982b; F Eemeren,
Grootendorst 1983; R Ennis 1981b; R Ennis 1982;
R George 1983b; J Gough, Tindale 1985; D
Goulding 1965; D Hitchcock 1985; D Hitchcock
1987; D Lee 1973.
184 Index
Pedagogy: Teaching and testing:
W Benoit, Follert 1986; A Binker, Charbonneau
1983; R Binkley 1980; J Blair 1984; J Blair 1988c;
E Brandon 1987; A Brinton 1981; D Clemens
1985; A Costa, Lowery 1989; D Couch 1981; P
Covey 1981a; P Covey 1981b; H Crimme11980;
H Crimmel 1981; F Eemeren, Grootendorst 1987b;
R Ennis 1958; R Ennis 1981a; R Ennis 1984; R
Ennis 1987c; J Evra 1985; P Facione 1986; P
Facione 1989; P Facione 1990b; J Follman 1987;
E Garver 1985; L Gibbs 1985; T Govier 1988b;
T Govier 1988e; L Groarke, Tindale 1986; B
Johnson 1980; D Lehman, Lempert, Nisbett 1988;
M Lipman 1981; L Lowery 1989; D Lugenbehl
1985; J Makau 1987; W Maker 1982; G Massev
1981b; J McPeck 1984b; J McPeck 1990; [)
Mowry 1980; R Nickerson, Perkins, Smith 1985;
R Nisbett, Fong, Lehman, Cheng 1987; S Norris,
Ennis 1989; S Norris, King 1984a; S Norris, King
1984b; S Norris, Ryan 1987; P Pecorino 1987c; L
Resnick 1987; T Richards 1980; T Richards 1981; D
Scherer, Facione 1977; T Schwartz 1981; R Swartz,
Perkins 1989; W Taylor 1987; T Tomko 1981; T
Tomko, Ennis 1980; D Walton 1988a; M Weinstein
1985b; A Wilson 1985; J Woods, Walton 1979a.
Relevance:
N Belnap 1981; J Blair 1989; G Bowles 1989a;
G Bowles 1990; E Garver 1978; M Rees 1989;
W Salmon 1981; D Walton 1982; J Wenzel 1989.
The rhetorical dimension:
C Arnold 1987; M Beardsley 1981; G Bouchard
1981; A Brinton 1986; A Brinton 1987; A
Brinton 1988b; R Burke 1984; T Farrell 1977; S
Foss, Foss, Trapp 1985; E Garver 1978; J Golden
1987; G Haarscher 1979; W Harpine 1985; R
Hufford 1965; F Jacques 1979; W Kluback, Becker
1979; C Kneupper 1980; M Maneli 1979; R
McKerrow 1977; R McKerrow 1978; R McKerrow
1982; M Meyer 1988b; J Nelson, Megill,
McClosky 1987; S Noorden 1979; L OIbrechts-
Tyteca 1979; D Parker 1972; C Perelman 1979a;
C Perelman 1979b; C Perelman 1982; C Perelman
1989; C Perelman, 0lbrechts-Tyteca 1969; 0
Rebou11988; C Tindale, Groarke 1987; C Vasoli
1979; J Wenzel 1987b; J Wenzel 1987c; G Yoos
1984; G Yoos 1987; G Yoos 1988; H Zyskind
1979.
HANS V. HANSEN
184 GENEVA STREET
ST. CA THARINES
ONTARIO L2R 4P5 i.J