The Library of Congress View on Its 
Relation to the ALA MARC 
Advisory Committee 

Henriette D. AVRAM: MARC Development Office, Libraq of Congress. 

119 

This paper is a statement of the Library of Congress' 1'ecommendation 
that a MARC advisory committee be appointed within the present struc-
ture of the RTSD jiSAD jRASD Committee on Representation in Ma-
chine-Readable Form of Bibliographic Information (MARBI) and de-
scribes the Library's proposed relation to such a committee. The proposals 
and recommendations suggested were adopted by the MARBI Committee 
dming its deliberations at ALA Midwinter, Janua1'y 1974, and a1'e now in 
effect. 

INTRODUCTION 

During ALA Midwinter, January 1973, the Library of Congress (LC) sug-
gested to the RTSD/ISAD/RASD Committee on Representation in Ma-
chine-Readable Form of Bibliographic Information that a MARC advis-
ory committee be formed to work with the MARC Development Office re-
garding changes made to the various MARC formats. The primary inter-
est of the committee would be the serial and monograph formats, 
though the committee should have interest in and responsibility for re-
viewing changes in any of the MARC formats to insure that the integrity 
and compatibility of MARC content designators are preserved. The 
MARBI Committee decided that it would be the MARC advisory com-
mittee and asked that a paper be prepared proposing how such a com-
mittee would operate in relationship to the MARC Development Office. 

Prior to a discussion of MARC changes, it appears appropriate to make 
certain basic statements regarding MARC changes and the difficulties ex-
perienced by the MARC Development Office in evaluating the significance 
of a change for the MARC subscriber. 

It would be naive to assume, in a dynamic situation, that even in the best 
of all worlds a MARC subscriber would never have to do any reprogram-
ming. Changes in procedures, changes in cataloging, experience in provid-
ing the knowledge for more efficient ways to process information, addi-
tional requirements from users, etc., have always been factors creating the 



120 ] ournal of Library Automation Vol. 7/2 June 197 4 

need to both modify andjor expand an automated system. Programming 
installations always require personnel to maintain ongoing systems. Situa-
tions creating changes locally must exist and, likewise, they also exist at 
LC. 

Staff of the MARC Development Office give serious consideration to ev-
ery proposed MARC change and its impact on the MARC subscribers. 
However, it must be realized that it is not possible to evaluate fully the im-
pact of each change because the significance of a change is directly de-
pendent on the use made of the elements of the record and the program-
ming techniques used by each subscriber. MARC staff cannot possibly 
know the details of use and programming techniques and capabilities at 
every user installation. 

Each MARC subscriber evaluates a change in light of his operational re-
quirements. Since the uses made of the data are varied among users, there 
is rarely a consensus as to the pros and cons of a change. MARC staff are 
aware of the expenses imposed by changes to software and have made an 
attempt to solicit preferences in some cases for one technique over an-
other from MARC subscribers when changes were required. In the case of 
the ISBD implementation, ten replies were received from questions sub-
mitted to the then sixty-two MARC users. 

The remainder of this paper describes what is included in the term 
"change," the various stimuli that initiate changes, and recommendations 
of how LC and the MARC advisory committee should interact in regard 
to changes. 

The appendix summarizes in chart form the addenda to Books: A 
MARC Fo1·mat since the initiation of the MARC service. An examination 
of the chart will reveal that the number and the types of changes have not 
been too significant. 

MARC CHANGES 

The term "change" is used throughout this paper in the broad sense, i.e., 
the term includes additions, modifications, and deletions of content data 
(in both fixed and variable fields) and content designators (tags, indica-
tors, and subfield codes) made to the format as well as additions, modifica-
tions, and deletions made to the tape labels. The concern is with changes 
made to all records where applicable or groups of records but not with the 
correction or updating of individual records as part of the MARC Distri-
bution Service. 

Changes as described above fall into several broad types: 
1. Addition of new fields, indicators, or subfield codes to the format. 
2. Implementation of aheady defined but unused tags, indicators, sub-

field codes, or fixed fields. 
3. Modification of content data of fields (fixed and variable). 
4. Changes in style of content in records, e.g., punctuation. 
5. Cessation in use of existing fields, indicators, and subfield codes. 



Library of Congress View/ AVRAM 121 

The following paragraphs are divided into two sections. Section "a" de-
scribes the stimulus for a change and the rationale for making it. Section 
"b" describes the LC position regarding the change and, where applicable, 
a recommendation to the MARC advisory committee. 

Changes made to MARC records may be divided into the following cate-
gories: 

Category 1: Changes resulting from a change in cataloging rules or sys-
tems. 
a. Cataloging rules or systems fall into two distinct types: those made 

in consultation with ALA (Resources & Technical Services Divi-
sion/Cataloging & Classification Section/Descriptive Cataloging 
Committee), and those made by the Subject Cataloging Division to 
the subject cataloging system without consultation with ALA. 

LC follows AACR. Since the MARC record is the record used 
for LC bibliographical control as well as the source record for the 
LC printed card and LC book catalogs (for those items presently 
within the scope of MARC), cataloging changes (descriptive and 
subject) are necessarily reflected in MARC. If the cataloging 
change is such that the retrospective records can reasonably be 
modified by automated techniques, these records are modified to re-
flect the change. Prior to MARC, this updating could not be provid-
ed to subscribers to LC bibliographic products and is one of the ad-
vantages of a machine-readable service. It has the effect of main-
taining a consistent data base for all MARC users. 

b. Changes made in cataloging rules or systems will be made by the ap-
propriate agencies. Once changes in cataloging rules have been 
made by the ALA (RTSDjCCSjDCC) committee, LC will con-
sult with the MARC advisory committee with respect to their im-
plementation in those cases affecting the MARC format.'~* Wherev-
er possible, depending upon resources available, the number of rec-
ords affected, and the type of change, the retrospective flies will be 
updated and made available in one of two ways: if the number of 
records is small (to be decided by LC), the records will be distribut-
ed as corrections through the normal channels of the MARC Dis-
tribution Service. If the number of records is large, the records will 
be sold by the LC Card Division. 

Category 2: Changes made to satisfy a requirement of the Library of 
Congress. 
a. Since LC uses the MARC records for its own purposes, situations 

do arise in which LC has a requirement for a change. In most cases, 
LC feels that the change would also be beneficial to the users. Un-
der these circumstances LC has carefully evaluated the im-

""Format change is used in this context to mean a change affecting the tags, indicators, 
subfield codes, addition or deletion of fixed fields, or change to the leader. 



122 I oumal of Libmry Automation Vol. 7/2 June 197 4 

plication of the change to the MARC subscribers and, in some 
cases, solicited their preferences and advice. 

b. If LC has a requirement to make a change to MARC, the proposed 
change and the reason for the change will be referred to the 
MARC advisory committee. The MARC advisory committee will 
solicit opinions from MARC users as to whether or not to include 
the change in the MARC Distribution Service, and LC will abide 
by the committee's recommendation. If this decision is not to in-
clude the change, LC will implement the change only in its own 
data base.t 

Category 3: Changes made to satisfy subscribers' requests. 
a. Subscribers sometimes request that a change be made to a MARC 

record. Where possible, within the limitation of LC resources, these 
requests are complied with. LC, when considering such a request, 
has sought the opinion of the MARC subscribers, and if sufficient 
numbers of users were interested in the change, the change was 
implemented. 

b. Changes requested by subscribers will be evaluated by LC, and if 
considered possible to implement, the proposed change will be sub-
mitted by LC to the MARC advisory committee to solicit opinions 
from MARC users. If the committee recommends, LC will imple-
ment the change. 

Catego1·y 4: Changes made to support international standardization. 
a. LC plays a significant role in international activities in the area of 

machine-readable cataloging records. Much of the future expan-
sion of MARC depends upon standards in formats, data content, 
and cataloging. In all these activities, LC firmly supports AACR 
and current MARC formats. 

Occasionally, in order to arrive at complete agreement with agen-
cies in other countries, it becomes necessary for all to compromise. 
However, in all cases LC does not agree to changes in cataloging 
rules until the recommendation has been approved by the appropri-
ate ALA committee. 

b. Changes resulting from international meetings will fall principally 
into two areas: 
1. Cataloging-if the change required is the result of a change in 

cataloging rules and the ALA (RTSDjCCSjDCC) has approved 
the AACR modifications, the MARC change falls into Category 1. 

2. All other changes affecting the format-since LC is the agency 
in the U.S. that will exchange machine-readable bibliographic 
records with other national agencies, LC will consider these 

t An exception to this statement will be those changes to LC practice which must be 
reflected on cards and in the MARC record and which cannot exist in optional form. 
An example of the above would be abolition of the check digit in the LC card number. 



Libmry of Congress Viewj AVRAM 123 

changes an internal LC requirement; therefore, they can be con-
sidered under the proposal described in Category 2. LC will sub-
mit the proposed changes to the MARC advisory committee. 

Category 5: Changes made to expand the MARC program to include 
additional services. 
a. If the MARC service were static, changes to expand the service 

would not be possible. An example of an additional service is the 
Cataloging in Publication data available on MARC tapes. Since 
these cataloging data are available four to six months prior to the 
publication of the item, it was determined to be of value to 
MARC subscribers and'changes were made to the MARC record to 
make these data available in machine-readable form. 

b. If a new service is under consideration at LC that will cause a 
change to MARC records, e.g., Cataloging in Publication, LC will 
submit the proposal to the MARC advisory committee for their ac-
tion as described in Category 2. 

OTHER LC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE 
MARC ADVISORY COMMITTEE 

1. Time fmme fo1' changes. In order to prevent consultation on changes 
from taking an inordinate length of time, LC proposes that the 
MARC advisory committee be given two months to solicit comments 
from MARC users, to arrive at a consensus, and to respond to pro-
posed changes. If there is no response during that time, LC will im-
plement the proposed change. LC will notify the MARC subscribers 
two months prior to including the change in the MARC Distribution 
Service. 

2. Consultation with the MARC advisory committee. The MARC De-
velopment Office will submit the recommendation for change and any 
other information required to evaluate the change to the MARC ad-
visory committee. The MARC advisory committee will be responsible 
for submitting the proposal to the MARC users and notifying the 
MARC Development Office of the committee's recommendation. 

3. Test tapes. The MARC advisory committee, on consultation with the 
MARC Development Office, will consider the requirement for a test 
tape to reflect the change made to the MARC record (the require-
ment for a test tape is dependent on the type of change made). 

APPENDIX A 
Addenda to Books: A MARC Format 

Stimul~ for Change Date Change 

1. Cataloging Rules and 
Cataloging System 
Changes 

1972 U.S./Gt. Brit. changed to 
United States and Great 
Britain. 

Comments 

Change made to facilitate 
machine filing. 



124 Journal of Library Automation Vol. 7/2 June 1974 

APPENDIX A-Continued 

Stimulus for Change Date Change 

1972 ISBD. 

1973 ISBD-additional information. 

Comments 

Cataloging change based on 
an international agreement. 

2. Subscribers Requests 1972 Government Publication Code 

3. Initiated at LC: 
a. Addition or Deletion 

of Fields 

added to Fixed Field. 

1969 Abolishment of 653-Political 
Jurisdiction (Subject) and 
750-Proper Name Not 
Capable of Authorship.' 

These little-used fields proved 
difficult to define and of little 
value. 

1970 Addition of Encoding Level to Implemented for use for 
Leader. RECON records. 

1970 Addition of Geographic Area 
Code field, tag 043. 

1971 Addition of Superintendent of 
Documents field, tag 086. 

This field has been widely 
used by LC and subscriber 
libraries. 

Information added to LC 
catalog cards (and thus to 
MARC records) at the request 
of outside libraries. 

b. Additions of Indicators 1971 Addition of Filing Indicators. 
or Subfields 

Information needed to allow 
LC to ignore initial articles in 
arranging its computer-
produced book catalog. 

c. Addition or change of 
codes or data to 
existing fields 

1972 Addition of "q" subfield to 
fields for conferences entered 
under place. 

1969 Code added to Modified 
Record Indicator in fixed field 
to indicate shortened records. 

1969 Code for phonodiscs added to 
Illustration fixed field. 

1970 Code added to Modified 
Record Indicator in fixed field 
to indicate that the dashed-on 
entry on the original LC card 
was not carried in MARC 
record. 

1971 "Questionable Condition" 
codes deleted from Country 
of Publication code. 

1971 Geographic Area Code. 
Guidelines for implementation 
modified slightly and 23 new 
codes added. 

Subfield needed to enable LC 
to file conferences entered 
under place correctly. 

1971 Microfilm call numbers Description of what such call 
carried in LC call number field. numbers looked like. 

1971 Abolished LC card number 
check digit. 

Numbers available using 
check digit too limited. 



Library of Congress ViewjAVRAM 125 

APPENDIX A-Continued 

Stimulus for Change Date Change Comments 

d. Explanations or 1970 Use of "b" subfield with Subfield and its use inad-
Corrections Topical Subjects (Field 650) vertently omitted from Books: 

and Geographic Subjects A MARC Format. It occurs 
(Field 651). rarely in MARC records. 

1971 Use of "Revision date" as Explanation of what this in-
suffix to LC card number. formation means at LC and 

how subscribers use it. 

1971 Indicators used with Explanation of use of indi-
Romanized title. cators with this field omitted 

from Books: A MARC Format. 

e. Changes to labels 1972 Change to label to reflect new 
computer system at LC. 

4. National and 1970 Standard Book Number (9 
International Agreement digits ) changed to Inter-

national Standard Book 
Number ( 10 digits) to con-
form to an international 
standard. 

1971 Entry Map added to Leader to Adoption of ANSI Z39 Format 
conform to national standard. for Exchange of Bibliographic 

Information Interchange. 

1971 Change to label to conform to 
ANSI standard. 

5. New Services at LC 1969 Changes to label and status To provide for cumulative 
codes for cumulated tapes. quarterly and semiannual 

tapes. 

1971 CIP records-addition of codes 
to Encoding Level and 
Record Status.