International Journal of Analysis and Applications Volume 17, Number 1 (2019), 26-32 URL: https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639 DOI: 10.28924/2291-8639-17-2019-26 ON NONCLASSICAL IMPULSIVE ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH NONLOCAL CONDITIONS S. A. BISHOP∗, M. C. AGARANA AND J. G. OGHONYON Department of Mathematics, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria ∗Corresponding author: sheila.bishop@covenantuniversity.edu.ng Abstract. Results on mild solutions of nonclassical differential equations with impulsive and nonlocal conditions are extended to a case when the nonlocal conditions are necessarily non Lipschitz and non compact. 1. Introduction We study the following quantum stochastic differential equation (QSDE) with impulsive nonlocal condi- tions introduced in [1]; dz(t) = A(t)z(t) + E(t, (z(t))d∧π (t) + F(t,z(t))dAf (t) +G(t,z(t))dA+g (t) + H(t,z(t))dt, almost all t ∈ I,t 6= tk,k = 1, ...,m (1) ∆z(tk) = Jk(z(t − k )),k = 1, ...,m z(t0) = z0 + g(z), t ∈ [0,T] where (i) A is a family of semigroup defined in [1] Received 2018-07-04; accepted 2018-09-12; published 2019-01-04. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 35A24. Key words and phrases. nonclassical ordinary differential equations (NODEs); non-compact; nonlocal conditions; impulse effect; non Lipschitz; Stochastic processes. c©2019 Authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. 26 https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639 https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-17-2019-26 Int. J. Anal. Appl. 17 (1) (2019) 27 (ii) E, F, G, H are stochastic processes. (iii) Jk ∈ C(B̃, B̃),k = 1, 2, ...,m and ∆z(tk) is the difference between z(t+k ) and z(t−k ). (v) g : B̃ → PC(I,sesq(ID⊗IE)) is a nonlocal condition that is not Lipschitz and not compact. (vi) z ∈ B̃ is a stochastic process and η,ξ ∈ ID⊗IE is arbitrary. Problems with nonlocal conditions have been an area of interest, mostly because of the advantage they have over initial value problems. Existence of solution of nonlocal problems for different types of differential equations were extensively discussed in the literature by using various methods (See [1, 2, 3-14] and the references therein). The motivation for this study, is that nonlocal problems occur naturally when modeling physical problems. In [2], impulsive quantum stochastic differential equations (IQSDE) with initial value conditions were studied. The multivalued maps are lower respectively upper semicontinuous. In [1], existence results for Eq.(1) with nonlocal conditions that are completely continuous were established. We showed that the function g which constitute the nonlocal condition is compact and Lipschitz continuous. Several interesting results on nonlocal impulsive differential equations satisfying some Lipschitz and compactness conditions have been established in [6-9]. In this study, existence of solution of Eq. (1) is established with nonlocal conditions that are not necessarily Lipschitz and compact. We adopt the most suitable fixed point method to establish this result. Impulsive QSDEs have found applications in quantum continuous measurements, especially when the mean number of photons up to time ti is momentary giving rise to impulses on the counting stochastic processes associated with the observables x(ti). See [1, 2] and the references therein. 2. Preliminaries The definitions of the following spaces L2loc(B̃)mvs, B̃, PC(I, B̃), PC ′(I, B̃), PC(I,sesq(ID⊗IE)) and PC′(I,sesq(ID⊗IE)) are adopted from [1, 2]. The spaces B̃ and PC(I,sesq(ID⊗IE)) denote the locally convex and Banach spaces respectively. The Hausdorff distance, ρ(A,B) is defined as: ρ(A,B) = max(δ(A,B),δ(B,A)),A,B ∈ clos(C) and d(z,B) = Infy∈B|z −y|, δ(A,B) = Supz∈Ad(z,B) where x ∈ C is as defined in [1] and ρ is a metric. Definition 1. A stochastic process z ∈ PC(I,Ã) is called a solution of Eq. (1) if it satisfies the integral Int. J. Anal. Appl. 17 (1) (2019) 28 equation z(t) = S(t)[z0 + g(z)] + ∫ t 0 S(t−s)(E(s, (z(s))dΛπ(s) + F(s,z(s))dAf (s) +G(s,z(s))dA+g (s) + H(s,z(s))ds) + ∑ 0 0 and M > 0 so that ‖S(t)‖ηξ ≤ M,t ≥ 0 and M ( ‖z0‖ηξ + sup ϕ∈Hh ‖g(ϕ)‖ηξ + K P ηξ(t) sup s,t∈[0,T] ‖P(s,ϕ(s))‖ηξ + sup ϕ∈Zh m∑ k=1 ‖Jk(ϕ(tk))‖ηξ ) ≤ hηξ where Hh := { ϕ ∈ PC([0,T],Ã) : ‖(ϕ(t))‖ηξ ≤ hηξ, t ∈ [0,T] } (H4) g : PC([0,T],Ã) →Ã is continuous and constitute the nonlocal condition. Also g : Hh → bd Let δ depend on hηξ ∈ (0, t1) and g(ϕ) = g(φ), ϕ,φ ∈ Hh where ϕ(s) = φ(s),s ∈ [δ,T] and bd denote a bounded set. Int. J. Anal. Appl. 17 (1) (2019) 29 3. Main Result Theorem 1. Let conditions (H1)-(H4) hold. Then for z0 ∈ B̃, problem (1) has at least a solution. Proof. Let δ ∈ (0, t1), define H(δ) and Hh(δ) as ; H(δ) := PC([δ,T], B̃) for functions in PC([0,T], B̃) on [δ,T] and Hh(δ) := {ϕ ∈ H(δ) : ‖ϕ(t)‖ηξ ≤ hηξ, t ∈ [δ,T]} . Let z ∈ Hh(δ) be fixed. Then define a map Γz on Hh by Γz(ϕ)(t)(η,ξ) = 〈η, [z0 + g(z̃)]ξ〉 + ∫ t 0 S(t−s)P(s, (ϕ(s))(η,ξ)ds + ∑ 0