International Journal of Analysis and Applications
ISSN 2291-8639
Volume 9, Number 2 (2015), 121-128
http://www.etamaths.com

ps-ro FUZZY OPEN(CLOSED) FUNCTIONS AND ps-ro FUZZY

SEMI-HOMEOMORPHISM

PANKAJ CHETTRI∗, SUBODH GURUNG AND KHUSBOO KATWAL

Abstract. The aim of this paper is to introduce and characterize some new

class of functions in a fuzzy topological space termed as ps-ro fuzzy open(closed)

functions, ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen functions and ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism.
The interrelation among these concepts and also their relations with the paral-

lel existing concepts are established. It is also shown with the help of examples

that these newly introduced concepts are independent of the well known ex-
isting allied concepts.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

The concept of fuzzy open (closed) functions were introduced by C.L. Chang [1]
and their characterizations were studied by S.R. Malghan and S.S. Benchalli [9].
In [4], a new idea of fuzzy topology termed as pseudo regular open fuzzy topology
(in short, ps-ro fuzzy topology) was introduced. The members of this topology are
named as ps-ro open fuzzy sets and their complement as ps-ro closed fuzzy sets.
Interms of above fuzzy sets, a new class of functions called ps-ro fuzzy continu-
ous functions were introduced and explored in [5], [6]. In [2], a notion of ps-ro
semiopen(closed)fuzzy sets, ps-ro fuzzy semiopen functions and ps-ro fuzzy semi-
continuous functions were introduced. Also, in [3], a new idea of ps-ro fuzzy irres-
olute function was initiated and studied. The concept of fuzzy pre semiopen and
fuzzy semi-homeomorphism were introduced by Yalvac [10]. In this paper, a new
class of functions called ps-ro fuzzy open(closed) functions are defined and their
different characterizations are studied. Interestingly, it is shown that the concept
of ps-ro fuzzy open (closed) functions are independent of the well known concept of
fuzzy open (closed) functions. Also, introducing a new class of functions called ps-ro
fuzzy pre semiopen function and ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism, their different
properties and interrelations with the existing allied concepts has been established.

To make this paper self content, we state a few known definitions and results
here that we require subsequently.
Let X be a non-empty set and I be the closed interval [0, 1]. A fuzzy set µ on X is
a function on X into I. If f is a fuction from X into a set Y and A, B are fuzzy sets
on X and Y respectively, then 1 −A (called complement of A), f(A) and f−1(B)
are fuzzy sets on X, Y and X respectively, defined by (1−A)(x) = 1−A(x)∀x ∈ X,

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 03E72, 54A40, 54C08.
Key words and phrases. ps-ro open(semiopen) fuzzy set, ps-ro fuzzy open(closed) function,

ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism.

c©2015 Authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all
open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

121



122 CHETTRI, GURUNG AND KATWAL

f(A)(y) =

{
supz∈f−1(y) A(z),whenf

−1(y) 6= ∅
0, otherwise

and f−1(B)(x) = B(f(x)) [11].

A collection τ ⊆ IX is called a fuzzy topology on X if (i) 0, 1 ∈ τ (ii) ∀µ1,µ2, ...,µn ∈
τ ⇒∧n

i=1
µi ∈ τ (iii) µα ∈ τ, ∀ α ∈ Λ (where Λ is an index set) ⇒∨µα ∈ τ. Then,

(X,τ) is called a fts [1]. Let f be a function from a set X into a set Y . Then the
following holds:
(i) f−1(1 −B) = 1 −f−1(B), for any fuzzy set B on Y .
(ii) A1 ≤ A2 ⇒ f(A1) ≤ f(A2), for any fuzzy sets A1 and A2 on X. Also,
B1 ≤ B2 ⇒ f−1(B1) ≤ f−1(B2), for any fuzzy sets B1 and B2 on Y .
(iii) ff−1(B) ≤ B, for any fuzzy set B on Y and the equality holds if f is onto. Also,
f−1f(A) ≥ A, for any fuzzy set A on X, equality holds if f is one-to-one [1]. For a
fuzzy set µ in X, the set µα = {x ∈ X : µ(x) > α} is called the strong α-level set of
X. In a fts (X,τ), the family iα(τ) = {µα : µ ∈ τ} for all α ∈ I1 = [0, 1) forms a
topology on X called strong α-level topology on X [8], [7]. A fuzzy open(closed) set
µ on a fts (X,τ) is said to be pseudo regular open(closed) fuzzy set if the strong α-
level set µα is regular open(closed) in (X,iα(τ)),∀α ∈ I1. The family of all pseudo
regular open fuzzy sets form a fuzzy topology on X called ps-ro fuzzy topology on
X,members of which are called ps-ro open fuzzy sets and their complements as ps-ro
closed fuzzy sets on (X,τ) [4]. A function f from fts (X,τ1) to fts (Y,τ2) is pseudo
fuzzy ro continuous (in short, ps-ro fuzzy continuous) if f−1(U) is ps-ro open fuzzy
set on X for each pseudo regular open fuzzy set U on Y [5]. Equivalently, f is ps-ro
fuzzy continuous if f−1(A) is ps-ro open fuzzy set on X for each ps-ro open fuzzy
set A on Y [6]. A fuzzy set A on a fts (X,τ) is said to be ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set
if there exist a ps-ro open fuzzy set U such that U ≤ A ≤ ps-cl(U), where ps-cl(U)
is ps-closure of U and the complement of A is called ps-ro semiclosed fuzzy set [2].
The fuzzy operators termed as fuzzy ps-closure(interior), ps-semiclosure(interior)
are denoted by ps-cl(ps-int) and ps-scl(ps-sint) respectively. ps-int(ps-sint) of a
fuzzy subset A the union of all ps-ro open (ps-ro semiopen) fuzzy set on X contained
in A and ps-cl(ps-scl) of a fuzzy subset A the intersection of all ps-ro closed (ps-ro
semiclosed) fuzzy set on X containing A [5], [6], [2]. A function f from a fts (X,τ1)
to another fts (Y,τ2) is called ps-ro fuzzy semiopen function [2] if f(A) is ps-ro
semiopen fuzzy set on Y for each ps-ro open fuzzy set A on X. The function f is
called ps-ro fuzzy irresolute [3] if f−1(U) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X for each
ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set U on Y . If a function f be bijective, then f is ps-ro fuzzy
irresolute function iff for every fuzzy set A of X, ps-sint(f(A)) ≤ (ps-sint(A))[3].
For a function f : X → Y , the following are equivalent:
(a)f is ps-ro fuzzy continuous.
(b) Inverse image of each ps-ro open fuzzy sets on Y under f is ps-ro open on X.
(c)For all fuzzy set A on X, f(ps-cl(A)) ≤ ps-cl(f(A)).
(d) For all fuzzy set B on Y , ps-cl(f−1(B)) ≤ f−1(ps-cl(B)) [6].

2. ps-ro fuzzy open and closed functions

Definition 2.1. Let (X,τ1) and (Y,τ2) be two fts. A function f : (X,τ1) → (Y,τ2)
is said to be ps-ro fuzzy open(closed) if f(A) is ps-ro open(closed) fuzzy set on Y
for each ps-ro open(closed) fuzzy set A on X.

Theorem 2.1. If f is ps-ro continuous and ps-ro fuzzy open and A be any ps-ro
semiopen fuzzy set on X then f(A) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y .



ps-ro FUZZY OPEN(CLOSED) FUNCTIONS 123

Proof: Let A be any ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X, there exist ps-ro open fuzzy
set U on X such that U ≤ A ≤ ps-cl(U). So, f(U) ≤ f(A) ≤ f(ps-cl(U)) ≤ ps-
cl(f(U)) and f(U) is ps-ro open fuzzy set. Hence, f(A) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set
on Y .

Example 2.1. Let X = {a,b,c} and Y = {x,y,z}. Let A and B be two fuzzy
sets on X defined by A(a) = 0.1,A(b) = 0.2,A(c) = 0.2 and B(x) = 0.3 ∀x ∈
X. Let C,D and E be fuzzy set on Y defined by C(t) = 0.3 ∀t ∈ Y , D(x) =
0.3,D(y) = 0.3,D(z) = 0.4 and E(t) = 0.4 ∀t ∈ Y . Clearly, τ1 = {0, 1,A,B}
and τ2 = {0, 1,C,D,E} are fuzzy topologies on X and Y respectively. Clearly, for
0.1 ≤ α < 0.2, A is not pseudo regular open fuzzy set on (X,τ1). Therefore, ps-ro
fuzzy topology on X is {0, 1,B}. Again, D is not pseudo regular open fuzzy set
for 0.3 ≤ α < 0.4 on (Y,τ2). So, ps-ro fuzzy topology on Y is {0, 1,C,E}. Define
a function f from (X,τ1) to (Y,τ2) by f(a) = x,f(b) = y and f(c) = y. B is ps-ro
open fuzzy set on Y and f(B)(t) = 0.3 = C(t) ∀ t ∈ Y . Therefore, f(B) is ps-ro
open fuzzy set on Y . Also, F(0) = 0,f(1) = 1. Hence, f is ps-ro fuzzy open.
Now, f(A)(x) = 0.1,f(A)(y) = 0.2,f(A)(z) = 0. Clearly, f(A) is not open fuzzy
set on Y . Hence, f is not fuzzy open function. Again, here f is ps-ro fuzzy closed
as f(1 − B)(t) = 0.7 = (1 − C)(t), ∀t ∈ Y is ps-ro closed fuzzy set on Y but f
is not fuzzy closed function since f(1 − A)(t) = 0.9, 0.8 and 0 for t = x,y and z
respectively, is not fuzzy closed set on Y .

Remark 2.1. Let f be fuzzy open (closed) from a fts (X,τ1) to a fts (Y,τ2)
and A be a open (closed) fuzzy set on X. Then, f(A) is fuzzy open (closed) on
Y which is not necessarily ps-ro open (closed) fuzzy set on Y , for an example in
Example( 2.1), A is fuzzy open but not ps-ro fuzzy opnen on X. Hence, a fuzzy
open (closed) function may not be ps-ro fuzzy open (closed). In the view of this
and Example ( 2.1) we conclude that ps-ro fuzzy open (closed) functions and fuzzy
open (closed) functions do not imply each other.

Theorem 2.2. Let f be a function from a fts (X,τ1) to a fts (Y,τ2). Then the
following statements are equivalent:
(a)f is ps-ro fuzzy open.
(b)f(ps-int(A)) ≤ ps-int(f(A)), for each fuzzy set A on X.
(c)f−1(ps-cl(B)) ≤ ps-cl(f−1(B)), for each fuzzy set B on Y .
(d)ps-int(f−1(B)) ≤ f−1(ps-int(B)), for each fuzzy set B on Y .
Proof: (a) ⇒ (b) Let f be ps-ro fuzzy open function. Let A be any fuzzy set on
X. f(ps-int(A)) is ps-ro open fuzzy set on Y . Now, f(ps-int(A)) = ps-int(f(ps-
int(A))) ≤ ps-int(f(A)).
(b) ⇒ (a) Let A be a ps-ro open fuzzy set on X. Then A = ps-int(A). So,
f(A) = f(ps-int(A)) ≤ ps-int(f(A)) ≤ f(A). So, f(A) = ps-int(f(A)), proving
f(A) is ps-ro open fuzzy set on Y . Thus, f is ps-ro fuzzy open.
(b) ⇒ (c) Let B be any fuzzy sets on Y . Let A = f−1(1−B) be a fuzzy set on X. We
have f(ps-int(A)) ≤ ps-int(f(A)) ≤ ps-int(1 − B). Hence, ps-int(f−1(1 − B)) ≤
f−1(ps-int(1 − B)). Then, f−1(ps-cl(B)) = 1 − f−1(ps-int(1 − B)) ≤ 1 − ps-
int(f−1(1−B)) = ps-cl(1−f−1(1−B)) = ps-cl(f−1(B)). So, f−1(ps-cl(B)) ≤ ps-
cl(f−1(B))
(c) ⇒ (d) Let B be any fuzzy set on Y and C = 1 − B. Then, C is also fuzzy
set on Y . We have f−1(ps-cl(C)) ≤ ps-cl(f−1(C)). So, ps-int(f−1(B)) = 1 −ps-
cl(f−1(C)) ≤ 1 − f−1(ps-cl(C)) = f−1(1 − ps-cl(C)) = f−1(ps-int(1 − C)) =



124 CHETTRI, GURUNG AND KATWAL

f−1(ps-int(B)). Hence, ps-int(f−1(B)) ≤ f−1(ps-int(B)).
(d) ⇒ (b) Let A be any fuzzy set on X and let B = f(A). Then we have ps-
int(A) ≤ ps-int(f−1f(A)) = ps-int(f−1(B)) ≤ f−1(ps-int(B)). So, f(ps-int(A)) ≤
f(f−1(ps-int(B))) ≤ ps-int(B) = ps-int(f(A)). Hence, f(ps-int(A)) ≤ ps-int(f(A)).

Corollary 2.1. If f : (X,τ1) → (Y,τ2) is a ps-ro fuzzy open and ps-ro fuzzy
continuous then f−1(ps-cl(B)) = ps-cl(f−1(B)), for each fuzzy set B on Y .
Proof: Straightforward and hence omitted.

Theorem 2.3. Let f be a function from a fts (X,τ1) to a fts (Y,τ2). Then f
is ps-ro fuzzy closed (open) iff for each fuzzy set A on Y and for any ps-ro open
(closed) fuzzy set B on X such that f−1(A) ≤ B, there is a ps-ro open(closed)
fuzzy set C on Y such that A ≤ C and f−1(C) ≤ B.
Proof: Let f be ps-ro fuzzy closed(open). Let A be any fuzzy set on Y and
let B be a ps-ro open(closed) fuzzy set on X such that f−1(A) ≤ B. Let C =
1 − f(1 − B). Then C is a ps-ro open(closed) fuzzy set on X, since f is ps-ro
fuzzy closed(open) and 1 − B is ps-ro closed(open) fuzzy set on X, f(1 − B) is
ps-ro closed(open) fuzzy set on Y . Hence, 1 −B ≤ 1 −f−1(A) = f−1(1 −A). So,
f(1 − B) ≤ f(f−1(1 − A)) ≤ 1 − A. Hence, A ≤ 1 − f(1 − B) = C. Further,
f−1(C) = f−1(1 −f(1 −B)) = 1 −f−1(f(1 −B)) ≤ 1 − (1 −B) = B. Conversely,
let f satisfies the given condition. Let B be a ps-ro closed(open) fuzzy set on X.
Then, A = 1 − B is ps-ro open(closed) fuzzy set on X. So, f−1(1 − f(B)) =
1−f−1(f(B)) ≤ 1−B = A. By hypothesis, there is a ps-ro open(closed) fuzzy set
C on Y such that 1 −f(B) ≤ C and f−1(C) ≤ A = 1 −B. Hence, 1 −C ≤ f(B).
Also, B ≤ 1 −f−1(C) = f−1(1 −C). So, f(B) ≤ f(f−1(1 −C)) ≤ 1 −C. Thus,
we have f(B) = 1 −C, which is a ps-ro closed(open) fuzzy set on Y . Hence, f is
ps-ro fuzzy closed(open).

Theorem 2.4. Let f be a function from a fts (X,τ1) to a fts (Y,τ2). Then f is
ps-ro fuzzy closed iff for each fuzzy set A on X, ps-cl(f(A)) ≤ f(ps-cl(A)).
Proof: Let f be ps-ro fuzzy closed and A be any fuzzy set on X. Since ps-cl(A)
is ps-ro closed fuzzy set on X and f is ps-ro fuzzy closed, f(ps-cl(A)) is ps-ro
closed fuzzy set on Y . As, A ≤ ps-cl(A), f(A) ≤ f(ps-cl(A)). So, ps-cl(f(A)) ≤ ps-
cl(f(ps-cl(A))) = f(ps-cl(A)). Conversely, let A be any ps-ro closed fuzzy set on
X. Then f(A) = f(ps-cl(A)) ≥ ps-cl(f(A)). As, f(A) ≤ ps-cl(f(A)), f(A) = ps-
cl(f(A)), i.e. f(A) is ps-ro closed fuzzy set on Y . Hence, f is ps-ro fuzzy closed.

Theorem 2.5. For a bijective function f from a fts (X,τ1) to a fts (Y,τ2), the
following are equivalent.
(a)f−1 : Y → X is ps-ro fuzzy continuous.
(b) f is ps-ro fuzzy open.
(c) f is ps-ro fuzzy closed.
Proof: (a) ⇒ (b) Let f−1 be ps-ro fuzzy continuous. Let U be a ps-ro open fuzzy
set on X. Since, f−1 is ps-ro fuzzy continuous, (f−1)−1(U) = f(U) is ps-ro open
fuzzy set on Y . Hence, f is ps-ro fuzzy open.
(b) ⇒ (c) Let f be bijective and ps-ro fuzzy open. Let V be a ps-ro closed fuzzy set
on X. Then, 1 −V = A is ps-ro open fuzzy set on X. Since f is ps-ro fuzzy open
and bijective, f(A) = f(1−V ) = 1−f(V ) is ps-ro open fuzzy set on Y . Therefore,
f(V ) is ps-ro closed fuzzy set on Y . Hence, f is ps-ro fuzzy closed.
(c) ⇒ (a) Let f be ps-ro fuzzy closed and bijective. Let V be a ps-ro closed fuzzy



ps-ro FUZZY OPEN(CLOSED) FUNCTIONS 125

set on X. Then f(V ) is ps-ro closed fuzzy set on Y . But f(V ) = (f−1)−1(V ) and
hence f−1 is ps-ro fuzzy continuous.

3. ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism

Definition 3.1. Let (X,τ1) and (Y,τ2) be two fts and f : (X,τ1) → (Y,τ2). Then
f is said to be
(i) ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen function if f(A) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y , for
each ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set A on X.
(ii) ps-ro fuzzy homeomorphism if f is bijective, ps-ro fuzzy continuous and ps-ro
fuzzy open function.
(iii) ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism if f is bijective, ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen
and ps-ro fuzzy irresolute.

Theorem 3.1. Let (X,τ1) and (Y,τ2) be two fts. If f : (X,τ1) → (Y,τ2) is ps-ro
fuzzy continuous and ps-ro fuzzy open, then f is ps-ro fuzzy irresolute.
Proof: Let f be ps-ro fuzzy continuous and ps-ro fuzzy open function. Let U be
a ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y . Then ∃ ps-ro open fuzzy set V on Y such that
V ≤ U ≤ ps-cl(V ). Now, f−1(V ) is ps-ro open fuzzy on X. Hence, f−1(V ) ≤
f−1(U) ≤ f−1(ps-cl(V )). f is ps-ro fuzzy open and V is fuzzy set on Y , f−1(ps-
cl(V )) ≤ ps-cl(f−1(V )). So, f−1(V ) ≤ f−1(U) ≤ ps-cl(f−1(V )). Thus, f−1(U) is
ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X and hence f is ps-ro fuzzy irresolute.

Theorem 3.2. Let (X,τ1) and (Y,τ2) be two fts. If f : (X,τ1) → (Y,τ2) is ps-ro
fuzzy continuous and ps-ro fuzzy open, then f is ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen.
Proof: Let f be ps-ro fuzzy continuous and ps-ro fuzzy open function. Let A be
a ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X. Then ∃ ps-ro open fuzzy set V on X such that
V ≤ A ≤ ps-cl(V ). Now, since f is ps-ro fuzzy continuous and V is a fuzzy set on
X, f(ps-cl(V )) ≤ ps-cl(f(V )). Hence f(V ) ≤ f(A) ≤ f(ps-cl(V )) ≤ ps-cl(f(V )).
Also, f(V ) is ps-ro open fuzzy set on Y . So, f(A) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on
Y . Thus, f is ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen function.

Remark 3.1. From Theorem( 3.1) and ( 3.2) it follows that ps-ro fuzzy homeo-
morphism implies ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism. However, the converse is not
true follows from the example below:

Example 3.1. Let X = {a,b,c} and Y = {x,y,z}. Let A and B be two fuzzy
sets on X defined by A(a) = 0.2,A(b) = 0.2,A(c) = 0.3 and B(x) = 0.2 ∀x ∈ X.
Let C,D and E be fuzzy set on Y defined by C(x) = 0.2,C(y) = 0.3,C(z) =
0.3, D(x) = 0.4,D(y) = 0.4,D(z) = 0.5 and E(t) = 0.3 ∀t ∈ Y . Clearly,
τ1 = {0, 1,A,B} and τ2 = {0, 1,C,D,E} are fuzzy topologies on X and Y re-
spectively. In the corresponding topological space (X,iα(τ1)), ∀α ∈ I1 = [0, 1),

the open sets are φ,X,Aα and Bα, where Aα =



X, for α < 0.2

{c}, for 0.2 ≤ α < 0.3
φ, for α ≥ 0.3

and

Bα =

{
X, for α < 0.2

φ, for α ≥ 0.2
For 0.2 ≤ α < 0.3, the closed sets on (X,iα(τ1)) are φ,X and X −{c}. Therefore,
int(cl(Aα)) = X. So, Aα is not regular open on (X,iα(τ1)) for 0.2 ≤ α < 0.3.
Thus, A is not pseudo regular open fuzzy set on (X,τ1). Clearly, B

α is regular



126 CHETTRI, GURUNG AND KATWAL

open on (X,iα(τ1)), ∀α ∈ I1. Hence B is pseudo regular open fuzzy set on (X,τ1).
Therefore, ps-ro fuzzy topology on X is {0, 1,B}. Similarly, it can be seen that
C and D are not pseudo regular open fuzzy set on (Y,τ2) and thus, ps-ro fuzzy
topology on Y is {0, 1,E}. Define a function f from the fts (X,τ1) to the fts
(Y,τ2) by f(a) = x,f(b) = y and f(c) = y. Then, f

−1(0) = 0,f−1(1) = 1 and
f−1(E)(t) = 0.3 ∀t ∈ X. Since f−1(E) is not ps-ro open fuzzy set on X, f is not
ps-ro fuzzy continuous. Now, ps-cl(E) = 1 − E where, (1 − E)(t) = 0.7 ∀t ∈ Y .
So, E ≤ D ≤ ps-cl(E). Thus, D is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y . We have,
f−1(D)(t) = 0.4 ∀t ∈ X and ps-cl(B) = 1 −B where, (1 −B)(t) = 0.8 ∀t ∈ X. So,
B ≤ f−1(D) ≤ ps-cl(B). So, f−1(D) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X. Again, E
is ps-ro open and hence ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y . f−1(E) is ps-ro semiopen
fuzzy set on X, as B ≤ f−1(E) ≤ ps-cl(B). Hence, f−1(U) is ps-ro semiopen
fuzzy set on X, for every ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set U on Y . Thus, f is ps-ro fuzzy
irresolute function.

Theorem 3.3. Let (X,τ1), (Y,τ2) and (Z,τ3) be three fts and f : (X,τ1) → (Y,τ2),
g : (Y,τ2) → (Z,τ3). Then the following statements are valid:
(a) If f and g are ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen functions then g ◦f is so.
(b) If f is ps-ro fuzzy semiopen function and g is ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen function
then g ◦f is a ps-ro fuzzy semiopen function.
Proof:(a) Let U be ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X. Since, f and g are ps-ro fuzzy
pre semiopen functions, f(U) and hence g(f(U)) are ps-ro semiopen fuzzy sets on
Y and Z respectively. Hence, (g ◦f)(U) = g(f(U)) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on
Z for each ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set U on X. Thus, g ◦f is ps-ro fuzzy semiopen
function.
(b) Let U be a ps-ro open fuzzy set on X. Since, f and g are both ps-ro fuzzy
semiopen functions, g(f(U)) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Z. Thus, g◦f is ps-ro
fuzzy semiopen function.

Theorem 3.4. Let a function f from a fts (X,τ1) to a fts (Y,τ2) be bijective. f
is ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism iff f and f−1 are both ps-ro fuzzy irresolute
functions and ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen functions.
Proof: Let f be ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism. Now, since f is bijective, f−1

exist. Let f−1 = g. As, f is ps-ro fuzzy irresolute, for each ps-ro semiopen fuzzy
set A on Y , f−1(A) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X. But, f−1 = g, so, g(A) is
ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X, for each ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set A on Y . Thus,
g is ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen. Again, f is ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen. Therefore,
for each ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set B on X, f(B) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y .
But, f−1 = g, so, f = g−1 and g−1(B) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y , for each
ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set B on X. Hence, g is ps-ro fuzzy irresolute. Conversely,
straightforward.

Theorem 3.5. A bijective function f from a fts (X,τ1) to a fts (Y,τ2) is ps-
ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism iff for each fuzzy set A on X, f(ps-scl(A)) = ps-
scl(f(A)).
Proof: Let f be ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism. Then, f is ps-ro fuzzy irresolute.
So, for each fuzzy set A on X, f(ps-scl(A)) ≤ ps-scl(f(A)). Again, since f is
ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism, f−1 is ps-ro fuzzy irresolute. As, ps-scl(A)
is ps-ro semiclosed fuzzy set on X, (f−1)−1(ps-scl(A)) = f(ps-scl(A)) is ps-ro



ps-ro FUZZY OPEN(CLOSED) FUNCTIONS 127

semiclosed fuzzy set on Y . Now, A ≤ ps-scl(A). So, f(A) ≤ f(ps-scl(A)), ps-
scl(f(A)) ≤ f(ps-scl(A)). Hence, f(ps-scl(A)) = ps-scl(f(A)). Conversely, let f
be bijective and f(ps-scl(A)) = ps-scl(f(A)), for each fuzzy set A on X. Then,
clearly f(ps-scl(A)) ≤ ps-scl(f(A)). Hence, f is ps-ro fuzzy irresolute function.
Let A be any ps-ro semiclosed fuzzy set on X. Then B = 1 −A is ps-ro semiopen
fuzzy set on X. Now, A = ps-scl(A). So, f(A) = f(ps-scl(A)) = ps-scl(f(A)).
1 − f(A) = 1 − ps-scl(f(A)) So, f(1 − A) = ps-sint(1 − f(A))(as f is bijective,
f(1 − A) = 1 − f(A)). f(B) = ps-sint(f(1 − A)) = ps-sint(f(B)). This implies
that f(B) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y . Hence, f is ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen
function. Therefore, f is ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism.

Corollary 3.1. Let f : (X,τ1) → (Y,τ2) be bijective. f is a ps-ro fuzzy semi-
homeomorphism iff for each fuzzy set B on Y , f−1(ps-scl(B)) = ps-scl(f−1(B)).
Proof: Since, f is a ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism, f−1 is also so.

Theorem 3.6. Let a function f from a fts (X,τ1) to a fts (Y,τ2) be bijective. f is
ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism iff for each fuzzy set A on X, f(ps-sint(A)) = ps-
sint(f(A)).
Proof: Let f be ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism. Then, f is bijective and
both f and f−1 are ps-ro fuzzy irresolute. So, for each fuzzy set A on X, ps-
sint(f(A)) ≤ f(ps-sint(A)). ps-sint(A) being ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X,
(f−1)−1(ps-sint(A)) = f(ps-sint(A)) is ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y . Now,
ps-sint(A) ≤ A, f(ps-sint(A)) ≤ f(A). So, f(ps-sint(A)) ≤ ps-sint(f(A)). Hence,
f(ps-sint(A)) = ps-sint(f(A)). Conversely, let f be bijective and f(ps-sint(A)) =
ps-sint(f(A)), for each fuzzy set A on X. Then, clearly ps-sint(f(A)) ≤ f(ps-
sint(A)). Also, f is bijective. Hence, f is ps-ro fuzzy irresolute function. Now, let
B be a ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on X. Then, by given condition we have f(ps-
sint(B)) = ps-sint(f(B)). So, f(B) = ps-sint(f(B)). This implies that f(B) is
ps-ro semiopen fuzzy set on Y . Hence, f is ps-ro fuzzy pre semiopen function.
Therefore, f is ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism.

Corollary 3.2. Let f : (X,τ1) → (Y,τ2) be bijective. f is a ps-ro fuzzy semi-
homeomorphism iff for each fuzzy set B on Y , f−1(ps-sint(B)) = ps-sint(f−1(B)).
Proof: Since, f is a ps-ro fuzzy semi-homeomorphism, f−1 is also so.

References

[1] Chang, C. L., Fuzzy topological spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl.,24(1968), 182-190.

[2] Chettri, P., Gurung, S. and Halder, S., On ps-ro Semiopen Fuzzy Set and ps-ro Fuzzy
Semicontinuous, Semiopen functions, Tbilisi Mathematical Journal., 7(1)(2014) 87-97.

[3] Chettri, P., Katwal, K. and Gurung, S., On ps-ro fuzzy irresolute functions, Pre Print.

[4] Deb Ray, A. and Chettri, P., On pseudo δ-open fuzzy sets and pseudo fuzzy δ-continuous func-
tions, International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences., 5(29)(2010), 1403-

1411.

[5] Deb Ray, A and Chettri, P., Fuzzy pseudo nearly compact spaces and ps-ro continuous
functions, The Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics., 19(3) (2011), 737-746.

[6] Deb Ray, A. and Chettri, P., Further on fuzzy pseudo near compactness and ps-ro fuzzy
continuous functions, Pre Print.

[7] Kohli, J. K. and Prasannan, A. R., Starplus-Compactness and Starplus-Compact Open Fuzzy

Topologies on Function Spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 254(2001), 87-100.

[8] Lowen, R., Fuzzy Topological Spaces and Fuzzy Compactness, J. Math. Anal. Appl.,
56(1976), 621-633.

[9] Malghan, S. R. and Benchalli, S.S., Open Maps, Closed Maps and Local Compactness in
Fuzzy Topological Spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 99(1984), 338-349.



128 CHETTRI, GURUNG AND KATWAL

[10] Yalvac,T.H., Semi-interior and Semi-closure of a Fuzzy Set, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 132(1988),
356-364.

[11] Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control., 8(1965), 338-353.

Department of Mathematics, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Majitar, Rang-

poo, Sikkim, Pin - 737136, India

∗Corresponding author