International Journal of Applied Sciences in Tourism and Events ISSN: 2580-5592, Vol 4, No 2, 2020, pp https://doi.org/ 86 Destination Marketing to Improve Domestic Tourists’ Return Intention Filda Rahmiati1*, Andrean Winata2 Management Study Program, President University, Indonesia1,2 filda.rahmiati@president.ac.id1*, winataandrean15@gmail.com2 Article History Received on July, 31st 2020 Revised on December, 2nd 2020 Accepted on December, 28th 2020 Abstract Purpose: This study aims to analyze tourist return intention through destination attribute (attraction, accessibility, and amenities), promotion, and destination image mediated by tourist satisfaction. Research methods: The study used 410 respondents who were domestic tourists who had visited Borobudur Temple using purposive sampling. The Partial Least Square- Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) is used to test hypotheses. Results and discussions: All hypotheses are accepted, that the attributes of the destination (attraction, accessibility, and amenities), promotion, and destination image significantly influence on tourist return intention mediated by tourist satisfaction. Conclusion: It is necessary to improve the quality of destination attributes at Borobudur Temple, promoting not only international tourists but also domestic tourists. Keywords: Destination attributes, destination image, promotion, tourist return intention INTRODUCTION The tourism sector is currently one of the largest and fastest growing sectors in the global economy (Mahbubani, 2013). In fact, the competitiveness of the tourism sector especially in Indonesia continues to increase (BPS RI, 2018). The number of trips made by domestic tourists during 2018 reached 303 million trips, an increase of 12.37 percent compared to 2017 trips. This increase is considered a result of relatively improved economy and easier accessibility to tourist destinations throughout Indonesia (BPS RI, 2018). However, despite the increasing number of domestic tourists visiting domestic destinations in Indonesia, domestic tourists prefer to go abroad. By 2019 there had been a record breaking of 10 million domestic tourists who go abroad (Patriella, 2019). Supported by Azril Azahari's statement, Chairperson of the Indonesian Tourism Intellectuals Association (ICPI), the trend of increasing domestic tourist arrivals abroad might be influenced by the rising airline prices for domestic routes, so domestic tourists preferred to go abroad with relatively affordable airplane price (Bahar, 2019). Specifically, this study will focus on one of the destinations of domestic tourists, Borobudur Temple. It shows that most domestic tourists visit Borobudur Temple only once https://doi.org/ 87 (Pranowo, 2019). This might also be caused by the low satisfaction of domestic tourists in visiting Borobudur Temple, because satisfied customers will usually be willing to make another visit in the future. In line with the statement of Kotler & Keller (2012) that one way to retain customers is to create customer satisfaction, which in the scope of tourism is tourist satisfaction. As stated in the Annual Report of PT TWC Borobudur, Prambanan and Ratu Boko 2018, that the main obstacle in achieving the targeted number of tourists is the lack of innovation in tourism objects. In fact, the success of developing tourist destinations is to maximize the destination attributes of tourism through 3A's (Attraction, Accessibility, Amenities) (Yahya, 2019). Attraction is an attractive factor for tourist destinations that can invite tourists to visit (Pantiyasa, et al., 2018). Added, the Marketing Director of PT TWC Borobudur, Prambanan and Ratu Boko, Siahaan (2017) mentioned about accessibility factor. Supported by the statement of the Governor of Central Java, Pranowo (2018), one of the causes of the lack of facilities in supporting tourists who attend the event held at Borobudur Temple in terms of accessibility. According to Setyanto & Pangestuti (2019), accessibility requirements are the availability of public transportation, easy access where destinations must be easily found and reached and road conditions along the road to tourist destinations. Finally, amenity is a supporting element in tourism activities that allows tourists to enjoy tourist visits and provide comfort during their visit (Suharto, 2016). In addition, lack of promotion is a factor that causes Borobudur Temple to be visited less by tourists (Pitana, 2016). With the promotion available, potential tourists can easily see, compare, and choose the destination they want to visit (Lai & Vinh, 2012), the impact can increase awareness of potential tourists to visit the destination being promoted (Melania & Ellyawati, 2018). Besides being a cultural tourism destination, Borobudur Temple also attracts domestic tourists for the sanctity of the temple, which is a special influence factor for domestic tourists to visit Borobudur Temple. However, for tourists who have visited the temple, the sanctity of Borobudur Temple is no longer a special factor that distinguishes Borobudur from other tourist destinations (Hermawan, et al., 2016). Therefore, it is important that a tourist attraction has a destination image that can distinguish it from other destinations (Ksouri, et.al., 2015). Moreover, the destination image is very important in influencing tourist decisions in choosing a destination to visit (Zhang, Xu, Leung, & Cai, 2016) can also attract visitors for a repeat visit (Khansa & Farida, 2016). This is important because if tourists can build a positive destination image in their minds, then they will most likely visit the destination again (Stylos, et al., 2017). A pleasant experience in visiting a destination that exceeds their expectations will lead to tourist satisfaction (Sangpikul, 2018) and can make tourists return to visit (Wibowo, et al., 2016; Zhang, et al., 2017) further emphasizes the importance the experience of tourists in generating the intention of visiting again. In addition, the intention of tourists to re-visit is not only influenced by their experiences at the destination, but also by promotional efforts such as the spread of news about tourist attractions to others (Wu, et al., 2018). Considering the importance of what was mentioned above, this study aims to examine the influence of destination attributes (attraction, accessibility, and amenities), promotions, and destination images through tourist satisfaction on return intention of domestic tourists visiting Borobudur Temple. The framework in this study can be seen in Figure 1. 88 Figure 1: Research Framework Source: adaptation from Rajaratnam, et al., 2015; Allameh, et al., 2015; Hanif, et al., 2016 RESEARCH METHODS The methodology used by this research is quantitative methods. Analysis of statistical or numerical data collected through questionnaires by analyzing existing statistical data and using computerized techniques. In this study the population will use domestic tourists who have visited Borobudur Temple in the last two years. The sampling technique used in this study is purposive sampling. According to Sarwono (2015) and Hair et al., (2014) the minimum sample size is 10 times the largest number of formative indicators used to measure 1 latent variable or 10 times the largest number of structural paths aimed at certain latent variables in the structural model. So, the minimum respondents for this study are 70 respondents. In collecting data, this study received 410 questionnaires which were returned and used for analysis. This study uses a Likert Scale to measure questions. According to Oh & Kim (2017), a good Likert scale for the tourism industry is 7 (seven) points, thus this study uses 7-point Likert scale. A software of Smart Partial Least Square (SMART-PLS) from Ringle, et al., (2015) used in this study to analyze data and to test hypotheses. PLS-SEM is used to assess complex models consisting of mediation and moderation variables (Hair, et al., 2014; Sarwono, 2015). Furthermore, this software is also used by several tourism and hospitality journals (Mohaidin, Wei and Ali Murshid, 2017; Rajaratnam, Nair, Sharif and Munikrishnan, 2015). Design of the questionnaire in this study are listed in Table 1. Table 1: Questionnaire Design Latent Variable Statement (indicator) Destination Attributes Attractions Borobudur temple has beautiful natural scenery (AT1) Borobudur has an interesting history (AT2) Borobudur has an interesting cultural features (AT3) Accessibility There are many public transportation options to reach Borobudur Temple (AC1)). Road conditions to Borobudur Temple are good (paved, smooth, etc.) (AC2). Access to Borobudur Temple is relatively easy (AC3). The time needed to reach Borobudur Temple is short (AC4). 89 Amenities It is very easy to find a tour guide at Borobudur Temple (AM1). It's easy to find handicraft / souvenir shops in Borobudur Temple (AM2). Public toilets in Borobudur Temple are clean and comfortable (AM3). It's easy to find a hotel / homestay in the Borobudur Temple area (AM4). There are various places to eat / restaurants in Borobudur Temple (AM5). The price and portion of food in the restaurant at Borobudur Temple according to my preference (AM6). Promotion I got information about Borobudur Temple from the Borobudur Park website and social media (PR1). It's easy to find information about Borobudur Temple online (PR2). I often see Borobudur Temple advertisements on TV, Banners, Social Media, etc. (PR3). Destination Image My visit to Borobudur Temple created a good impression (DI1). I felt comfortable during my visit to Borobudur Temple (DI2). The experience of my visit to Borobudur Temple was in line with my expectations (DI3). Tourist Satisfaction I am satisfied with the scenery, history and cultural features of Borobudur Temple (TS1). I am satisfied with the accessibility of Borobudur Temple (transportation, road, easy access, time) (TS2). I am satisfied with the Borobudur Temple facilities (TS3). I am satisfied with the promotion efforts of Borobudur Temple (TS4). My decision to visit Borobudur Temple is worth my time and effort (TS5). In general, I am satisfied with my decision to visit Borobudur Temple (TS6). Tourist Return Intention I will definitely re-visit Borobudur Temple (RI1). I will re-visit Borobudur Temple if it offers new things for me to experience (RI2). I will prioritize Borobudur Temple compared to other cultural tourism destinations (RI3). I would recommend Borobudur Temple to friends, relatives, family and others (RI4). I have the desire to invite others to visit Borobudur Temple (RI5). In analyzing the data in SMART-PLS, there are two steps must be considered, outer model and inner model. According to Sarwono (2015) the outer model is measured by connecting all manifest variables (indicators) with their latent variables using the measurement models of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and reliability (Table 2). While, the measurement of inner model called the structural model aims to show and explain the relationship between each latent variable in the research model. Measurement models in PLS- SEM evaluated using the coefficient of determination, the path coefficient and the goodness of fit to see the value of R2value of t statistics, and Q2. The hypothesis can be accepted if the statistical t value is greater than 1.96 and the P value is less than 0.05 or 5% for each pathway. Table 2: Parameter Measurement Model Validity and Reliability Test Parameters Rule of Thumb Convergent Validity Loading Factor Factor>0.708 Average Variance Extracted (AVE) Extracted>0.50 Discriminant validity Heterotrait-Monotrait(HTMT) <0.90 Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) ≤ 5 Reliability Cronbach Alpha > 0.70 Composite Reliability > 0.70 90 RESULT AND DISCUSSIONS The results of this study the majority of respondents came from West Java and DKI Jakarta, female between the ages of 21-25 years old. In terms of employment, the majority of respondents are students and employees. According to Hair, et al., (2019), the loading factor should be above 0.708 recommended, however, there are two constructs (AM2 and RI2) that have loading factor value of less than 0.708, then are removed from the model. Based on parameters on the outer model to assess convergent validity, discriminant validity, and reliability, the results found that all parameters met the requirements (see Table 3 and Table 4). Table 3: Validity and Reliability Result Measurements Outer Loadings AVE VIF Cronbach Alpha CR Final items (Initial items) AC1 0.797 0.644 1.653 0.815 0.878 4 (4) AC2 0.817 1.797 AC3 0.816 1.854 AC4 0.779 1.592 AM1 0.714 0.600 1.442 0.833 0.882 5 (6) AM3 0.802 1.783 AM4 0.797 1.772 AM5 0.766 1.751 AM6 0.790 1.859 AT1 0.807 0.642 1.384 0.722 0.843 3 (3) AT2 0.792 1.398 AT3 0.804 1.494 DI1 0.901 0.819 2.608 0.890 0.932 3 (3) DI2 0.911 2.762 DI3 0.903 2.465 PR1 0.793 0.633 1.469 0.711 0.838 3 (3) PR2 0.786 1.287 PR3 0.809 1.493 RI1 0.856 0.757 2.304 0.892 0.925 4 (5) RI3 0.827 1.99 RI4 0.902 3.076 RI5 0.892 3.007 TS1 0.775 0.647 1.868 0.889 0.916 6 (6) TS2 0.751 1.954 TS3 0.701 1.817 TS4 0.861 2.695 TS5 0.862 3.178 TS6 0.861 3.155 Table 4: HTMT Result Construct AC AM AT DI PR RI TS AC AM 0.835 AT 0.541 0.531 DI 0.557 0.613 0.656 PR 0.655 0.781 0.594 0.539 RI 0.425 0.565 0.699 0.704 0.634 TS 0.752 0.762 0.821 0.869 0.754 0.752 91 Then this research continues on the inner model to answer the hypothesis shown in Table 5. In the results of the inner model, there are eleven hypotheses and all of them are accepted in this study with a t value greater than 1.96 and a P value (sig) less than 0.05 for every path. R2 of tourist satisfaction was 0.451 meaning that tourist satisfaction can be explained by the exogenous latent variables (attractions, accessibility, amenities, promotion, and destinations image) as for 45.1%. Meanwhile, the R2 for the return intention to visit was 0.778 meaning that return intention to visit can be explained by the exogenous latent variables (tourist satisfaction) as much as 77.8% and the remaining 22.2% is explained by other variables outside of this study. Value of Q2 is 0.878 (> 0) meaning that attraction, accessibility, amenities, promotions, and destination image accounted for 87.8% which explains the effect on the intention to revisit through tourist satisfaction. While the remaining 12.2% is explained by other variables outside this study. In addition, the results of this study have a large predictive relevance, because the Q2 value is above 0.50. Table 5: Results of Hypotheses Hypotheses Relations t Sig Results H1a Attractions->Tourist Satisfaction 7.393 0.000 Received H2a Accessibility ->Tourist Satisfaction 4.622 0.000 Received H3a Amenities ->Tourist Satisfaction 2,590 0,010 Received H4a Promotion->Tourist Satisfaction 4,433 0,000 Received H5a Destination Image ->Tourists Satisfaction 11.497 0.000 Received H1b Attraction->Tourists Satisfaction ->Tourist Return Intention 7,050 0,000 Accepted H2b Accessibility ->Tourist Satisfaction ->Tourist Return Intention 4.707 0.000 Received H3b Amenities ->Tourist Satisfaction ->Tourist Return Intention 2,561 0,011 Received H4b Promotions ->Tourist Satisfaction ->Tourist Return Intention 4,111 0,000 Received H5b Destination Image ->Tourist Satisfaction ->Tourist Return Intention 9,067 0,000 Received H6 Tourist Satisfaction ->Tourist Return Intention 18,159 0,000 Received The analysis results for destination attributes are seen from Hypothesis 1,2,3 which are all accepted. In terms of attractions, Reitsamer & Brunner-Sperdin (2016) has the same results also a study from Guntoro & Hui (2013) where attraction significantly influences the return intention. For accessibility result, Setyanto & Pangestuti (2019) put forward similar result, also Rajaratnam, et al. (2015) and Chin, et al. (2018) also found that accessibility mediated by tourist satisfaction significantly influenced the intention of tourist return intention. For amenities, the result of this study in harmony with Darsono (2013) and Dilrukshi, et al. (2019) revealed that amenities had a significant influence on return intention with a very large effect. Hypothesis 4 result shows that promotion has a significant influence on the satisfaction of domestic tourists in visiting the Borobudur Temple. Similar results were also present by Magatef (2015) and Ovita, et al. (2019) mentioned promotion has the most significant influence mediated by satisfaction with return intention. The result of Hypothesis 5 testing shows that destination image has a significant influence on the satisfaction of domestic tourist tourists visiting Borobudur Temple in line with research by Allameh, et al. (2015) also Zhang, et al. (2017) using the mediation variable of tourist satisfaction confirms that there is a positive and significant influence of the destination's image on the return intention which is mediated by an impressive tourism experience. Hypothesis 6 results show that tourist satisfaction has a significant influence on the return intention of domestic tourists in visiting the Borobudur Temple. This is supported by previous studies from Bagus & Utama (2015) and Singh & Singh (2019) which provide empirical evidence that tourist satisfaction is a strong factor in influencing tourists' desire to 92 return due to increased levels of satisfaction, returning consistency and willingness to recommend to other people. CONCLUSION This study concludes that destination attributes (attractions, accessibility, and amenities), promotion, and destination image have an influence on tourist satisfaction in Borobudur Temple. Further, through tourist satisfaction has an influence as a mediator to the tourist return intention of domestic tourists at Borobudur Temple. This implies the fact that domestic tourists are satisfied and willing to return because of their good experience with the scenery, history and cultural features of Borobudur Temple. Added, domestic tourists are satisfied and willing to return because they found Borobudur Temple has a variety of public transportation services, good road conditions, easy access, and the short time needed to reach the destination. In terms of amenities, domestic tourists are satisfied and want to return because the availability and quality of facilities at Borobudur Temple are able to give a good impression so they are satisfied and want to visit again. The promotion of Borobudur Temple that provides information and expectations to domestic tourists will be followed by an increase in tourist satisfaction, which will attract them to visit again. Finally, the destination image mediated by tourist satisfaction has a significant influence on the return intention of domestic tourists to Borobudur Temple. This implies the fact that cognitive and affective images during the visit of domestic tourists to Borobudur Temple affect the level of satisfaction and return intention to this destination. According to the results of this study, there are a number of recommendations given. For the Indonesian government and PT TWC Borobudur as the Borobudur Temple developer should pay more attention to improving the quality of attractions, accessibility, and amenities at Borobudur Temple, conducting promotions that will not only attract international tourists but also domestic tourists. It is also important to provide innovation at Borobudur Temple, because domestic tourists will be more likely to make repeated visits when there are new things for them to experience. For the next research it is necessary to analyze other factors which not examined in this study and are expected to get more information in determining important factors that influence tourist satisfaction and return intention to visit Borobudur Temple which later can also be implemented in research to other tourist destinations. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors would like to thank the Department of Research and Community Development of President University for the support given in the form of research funding assistance that supports this research well. REFERENCES Allameh, S., Khazaei, J. P., Jaberi, A., Salehzadeh, R., & Asadi, H. (2015). Factors Influencing Sport Tourists’ Revisit Intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 27 No. 2, 191-207. Bagus, I. G., & Utama, R. (2015). Hubungan Motivasi Perjalanan Dan Kepuasan Wisatawan Mancanegara Lanjut Usia Berwisata Di Bali. Jurnal Kepariwisataan, Volume 15, No. 2. Bahar, A. (2019, January 27). Orang Indonesia Semakin Gemar Liburan Ke Luar Negeri. Retrieved from Beritagar.Id: https://beritagar.id/artikel/piknik/orang-indonesia-lebih- suka-liburan-ke-luar-negeri BPS RI. (2018). Statistik Wisatawan Nusantara 2018. Statistik Wisatawan Nusantara 2018 (P. 47). Jakarta: BPS RI. Chin, C. H., Law, F. Y., Lo, M. C., & Ramayah, T. (2018). The Impact of Accessibility Quality and Accommodation Quality on Tourists' Satisfaction and Revisit Intention to Rural Tourism Destination in Sarawak. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal Vol. 10, No. 2, 115-127. 93 Darsono, R. (2013). Pengaruh Kualitas Daya Tarik Wisata Terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Wisatawan Waduk Jatiluhur Kabupaten Purwakarta. Jurnal Nasional Pariwisata, 05(01), 14-22. Dilrukshi, K. J., Tennakoon, T., & Nawarathna, A. (2019). Role of Destination Attributes on Domestic Tourists’ Revisit Intention Towards Wetland Parks of Sri Lanka. International Research Conference of Uwu-2019. Guntoro, B., & Hui, T. K. (2013). Travel Satisfaction and Revisit Intention of Chinese Visitors: The Case of Singapore. Advances in Hospitality and Leisure (Advances in Hospitality and Leisure, Vol. 9), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 29-47. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Inc. Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, Vol. 31 No. 1, 2-24. Hermawan, B., Salim, U., Rohman, F., & Rahayu, M. (2016). Borobudur Temple As Buddhist Pilgrimage Destination in Indonesia: An Analysis of Factors That Affect Visit Intention. Journal of International Buddhist Studies Vol.7 No.2, 98-110. Khansa, V. R., & Farida, N. (2016). Pengaruh Harga Dan Citra Destinasi Terhadap Niat Berkunjung Kembali Melalui Kepuasan (Studi Pada Wisatawan Domestik Kebun Raya Bogor). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro, Vol 5, No. 4. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management: 14th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Ksouri, R., Ayoun, S., Storai, C., & Abdellatif, T. (2015). The Importance of The Image of a Destination in The Choice and Intention of Revisiting: The Case of Island of Djerba. Ssrn Electronic Journal. Kusumawati, A., Hanif, A., & Mawardi, M. K. (2016). Pengaruh Citra Destinasi Terhadap Kepuasan Wisatawan Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Loyalitas Wisatawan (Studi Pada Wisatawan Nusantara Yang Berkunjung Ke Kota Batu). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (Jab)|Vol. 38 No. 1. Lai, W., & Vinh, N. (2012). A Study of Analyzing the Selection of Promotion Activities and Destination Attributes in Tourism Industry in Vietnam - From the Perspective of Tourism Industrial Service Network (Tisn). International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 6(2), 264-270. Magatef, S. G. (2015). The Impact of Tourism Marketing Mix Elements on The Satisfaction of Inbound Tourists to Jordan. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 6, No. 7, 41-58. Mahbubani, K. (2013). Top 10 Treads Of 2014. Retrieved from World Economic Forum (Wef): Retrieved on October 05, 2019, http://reports.weforum.org/outlook-14/view/top-ten- trends-category-page/%208-the-expanding-middle-class-in- asia/?doing_wp_cron=1570288647.5302329063415527343750 Melania, K., & Ellyawati, J. (2018). The Role of Online Promotion and Its Effect on Destination Loyalty. Kinerja Vol. 22, No.2, 126-141. Mohaidin, Z., Wei, K.T., Ali Murshid, M. 2017. Factors influencing the tourists’ intention to select sustainable tourism destination: a case study of Penang, Malaysia. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 3(4), 442-465. Oh, H., & Kim, K. (2017). Customer Satisfaction, Service Quality, And Customer Value: Years 2000-2015. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(1), 2– 29. Ovita, N. V., Suryawardani, O., & Agung, I. D. (2019). Perception of Marketing Mix on Consumer Satisfaction and The Relations with Intention to Revisit in Mangsi Coffee. Journal of Agribusiness and Agritourism, Vol. 8(2), 175-184. Pantiyasa, I. W., Pradana, G. Y., & Nale, O. B. (2018). Tourists Perception About Tourist Attraction of Waterfall in The Village of Senaru District of Bayan North Lombok. Universal Journal of Management 6(5), 155-164. Patriella, Y. (2019, January 20). Orang Indonesia Makin Doyan Ke Luar Negeri, Pertanda Baik Atau Buruk? Retrieved from Bisnis.Com: 94 https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20190120/12/880466/orang-indonesia-makin-doyan- ke-luar-negeri-pertanda-baik-atau-buruk Pitana, I. G. (2016, May 21). Mengapa Jumlah Turis Ke Candi Borobudur Kalah Dengan Angkor Wat? Retrieved from National Geographic: https://nationalgeographic.grid.id/read/13305316/mengapa-jumlah-turis-ke-candi- borobudur-kalah-dengan-angkor-wat?page=all Pranowo, G. (2019, July 15). Pagu Anggaran 2020, Rp6,5 Triliun Dialokasikan Ke Pengembangan Pariwisata. Retrieved from Bisnis.Com: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20190715/12/1124490/pagu-anggaran-2020-rp65- triliun-dialokasikan-ke-pengembangan-pariwisata ke-luar-negeri-defisit-neraca-jasa- pun-bengkak Rajaratnam, S., Nair, V., Sharif, S.P., Munikrishnan, U.T. 2015. Destination quality and tourists’ behavioural intentions: rural tourist destination in Malaysia. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 7(5), 463-472. Reitsamer, B. F., & Brunner-Sperdin, A. (2016). Tourist Destination Perception and Well- Being. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 23(1), 55–72. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from http://smartpls.com. Sangpikul, A. (2018). The Effects of Travel Experience Dimensions on Tourist Satisfaction and Destination Loyalty: The Case of An Island Destination. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Vol. 12 No. 1, 106-126. Sarwono, J. (2015). Membuat Skripsi, Tesis, Dan Disertasi Dengan Partial Least Square Sem (PLS-SEM). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi. Setyanto, I., & Pangestuti, E. (2019). Pengaruh Komponen Destinasi Wisata (4A) Terhadap Kepuasan Pengunjung Pantai Gemah Tulungagung. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (Jab)|Vol. 72 No. 1. Siahaan, R. (2017, July 25). Mengapa Jumlah Wisman Di Candi Borobudur Kalah Jauh Dengan Angkor Wat? Retrieved from Kompas.Com: https://travel.kompas.com/read/2017/07/25/090300427/mengapa-jumlah-wisman-di- candi-borobudur-kalah-jauh-dengan-angkor-wat- Singh, R., & Singh, J. (2019). Destination Attributes to Measure Tourist Revisit Intention: A Scale Development. Global Business Review, 20(2), 549–572. Stylos, N., Bellou, V., Andronikidis, A., & Vassiliadis, C. A. (2017). Linking the Dots Among Destination Images, Place Attachment, And Revisit Intentions: A Study Among British And Russian Tourists. Tourism Management, 60, 15–29. Suharto. (2016). Studi Tentang Keamanan Dan Keselamatan Pengunjung Dan Hubungannya Dengan Citra Destinasi (Studi Kasus Gembira Loka Zoo). Jurnal Media Wisata, 14(1), 287–304. Wibowo, S. F., Sazali, A., & Rivai, A. K. (2016). The Influence of Destination Image and Tourist Satisfaction Toward Revisit Intention of Setu Babakan Betawi Cultural Wu, H.-C., Li, M.-Y., & Li, T. (2018). A Study of Experiential Quality, Experiential Value, Experiential Satisfaction, Theme Park Image, And Revisit Intention. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, Vol. 42, No. 1, 26-73. Yahya, A. (2019, August 30). Siaran Pers: Menpar Ungkapkan Tiga Kunci Sukses Datangkan Wisman Ke Diy Dan Jateng. Retrieved from Kementerian Pariwisata, Republik Indonesia: http://www.kemenpar.go.id/post/siaran-pers-menpar-ungkapkan-tiga- kunci-sukses-datangkan-wisman-ke-diy-dan-jateng Zhang, H. M., Xu, F. F., Leung, H. H., & Cai, L. P. (2016). The Influence of Destination-Country Image on Prospective Tourists' Visit Intention: Testing Three Competing Models. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 21(7), 811–835. Zhang, H., Wu, Y., & Buhalis, D. (2017). A Model of Perceived Image, Memorable Tourism Experiences and Revisit Intention. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, Vol. 8, 326-336. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20190715/12/1124490/pagu-anggaran-2020-rp65-triliun-dialokasikan-ke-pengembangan-pariwisata https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20190715/12/1124490/pagu-anggaran-2020-rp65-triliun-dialokasikan-ke-pengembangan-pariwisata http://smartpls.com/ http://www.kemenpar.go.id/post/siaran-pers-menpar-ungkapkan-tiga-kunci-sukses-datangkan-wisman-ke-diy-dan-jateng http://www.kemenpar.go.id/post/siaran-pers-menpar-ungkapkan-tiga-kunci-sukses-datangkan-wisman-ke-diy-dan-jateng