Int. J. Aquat. Biol. (2019) 7(2): 95-99 ISSN: 2322-5270; P-ISSN: 2383-0956 Journal homepage: www.ij-aquaticbiology.com © 2019 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Original Article Effect of Chlorella vulgaris as a biofertilizer on germination of tomato and cucumber seeds Odgerel Bumandalai*,1Rentsenkhand Tserennadmid Microbial Synthesis Laboratory, Institute of General and Experimental Biology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Mongolia. s Article history: Received 27 February 2019 Accepted 16 April 2019 Available online 2 5 April 2019 Keywords: Biofertilizer Germination Algae Crop Abstract: Although inorganic fertilizers are known to raise environmental and health problems, the current agricultural practices are heavily dependent on the application of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. In this study, we examined the effect of Chlorella vulgaris strain on germination of tomato and cucumber seeds. Seeds were germinated in culture medium containing algal strain and grown for 3, 6, 9 and 12 days to study its effect on growth parameters. As results, C. vulgaris suspension increased the seed growth compared to those of the control (sterilized culture medium) of seed germination. The best treatments were 0.17 and 0.25 g/L of algal suspension for the root and shoot lengths of tomato and cucumber seeds, respectively. Introduction As the global food demand increases, agriculture sectors have been increasingly using chemical fertilizer. Inorganic fertilizers are rich in chemical substances, such as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The excess uses of chemical fertilizers in agriculture are costly and also have various harmful effects on both living organisms and environment (Santos et al., 2012). For instance, residual chemicals reach to water bodies through rainwater and cause eutrophication in water bodies. It can also reduce water-holding capacity, soil fertility and disparity in soil nutrients. Moreover, groundwater contamination could lead to gastric cancer goiter, metabolic disorder, birth malformations, hypertension and livestock poisoning (Khandare, 2013; Youssef and Eissa, 2014). In this regard, organic fertilizers and biofertilizers have become alternative sources. Biofertilizers are eco-friendly, cost effective and renewable source of plant nutrients to supplement and replace the chemical fertilizers for sustainable agriculture (Raja, 2013). Biofertilizers contain various microorganisms that provide all kinds of micro and macro-elements via nitrogen fixation, phosphate and *Correspondence: Odgerel Bumandalai DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/ijab.v7i2.582 E-mail: odgerelb@mas.ac.mn potassium solubilization or mineralization, release of plant growth promoting substances, production of antibiotics and biodegradation of organic matter in the soil (Goel et al., 1999; Sinha et al. 2010). When biofertilizers are used continuously for many years, parental inoculums become sufficient for further multiplication (Youssef and Eissa 2014), hence they participate in nutrient cycling and benefit crop productivity (Singh et al., 2011). Main benefits of biofertilizers are (1) cheap source of nutrients, (2) suppliers of microelements, (3) suppliers of organic matter, (4) counteracting negative impact of chemical fertilizers, (5) secretion of growth hormone (Gaur, 2010), (6) no adverse effects to ecosystem and (7) longer shelf life (Sahoo et al., 2014). The main microorganisms used in biofertilizers are Azotobacter, Azospirillium, cyanobacteria, Azolla, phosphate solubilizing microorganisms, mycorrhizae, Sinorhizobium and plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (Hegde et al., 1999; Youssef and Eissa 2014). Algal biomass contains macronutrients as well as micronutrients, growth regulators, polyamines, natural enzymes, carbohydrates, proteins, amino acids, and vitamins implemented for improving 96 Bumandalai and Tserennadmid / Effect of Chlorella vulgaris as a biofertilizer on tomato and cucumber vegetative growth (Abd El Moniem and Abd-Allah, 2008; El-Fouly et al., 1992; Mahmoud and Amara, 2000; Shaaban and Mobarak, 2000). In addition, algal biomass increases the yield due to the presence of vitamins, auxins and gibberellins. The algal varieties tested as biofertilizers primarily belong to the branch of blue-green algae (Cyanophyta) and green algae (Chlorophyta). It has been shown in many studies that green algae can (1) add organic matter, (2) synthesize and liberate amino acids, vitamins and auxins, (3) reduce oxidizable matter content of the soil, (4) provide oxygen to the submerged rhizosphere, (5) improve salinity and buffer the pH, (6) solubilize phosphate, and (7) increase the fertilizer use efficiency of crop plants (Faheed and Abd-El Fattah, 2008; Abd El Moniem and Abd-Allah, 2008; Bileva, 2013; Dubey and Dubey, 2010; Grzesik and Romanowska- Duda, 2015; Vig et al., 2012). The aim of this work was to study the effect of Chlorella vulgaris strain on germination of tomato and cucumber seeds and to determine any potential application of C. vulgaris microalga as a biofertilizer to improve the yield quality and productivity. Materials and Methods Plant material: The experimental plants were seeds of tomato and cucumber. These seeds were purchased from retailer store under Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Light Industry, Mongolia in 2017 and kept at -4°C under dark condition until the experiment. Algal culture: Microalga strain was obtained from the Culture Collection of Microalgae at Institute of General and Experimental Biology and cultivated using standard medium 04. The final pH of the medium was 6.8, after being autoclaved. The culture was grown with a light intensity of 8 Klux provided by cool white fluorescent lamps and a temperature of 25±2°C under illumination regime of 8:16 light and dark cycle for a week. Filtered air was let to bubble in the culture vessels to provide aeration and agitation. Effect of culture media after growth of algal strain on seed germination. Algal suspensions were collected at 3d, 6th, 9th and 12th days and examined for both cell count and dry biomass yield. Determination of cell number and biomass content of alga. Growth of C. vulgaris strain was measured in terms of cell number and dry weight biomass. Cell concentrations were counted using a hemocytometer. Data were given as cell per mL. The determination of dry biomass yield was performed using Vladimirova’s method (Sirenko, 1975). The culture suspensions were mixed well prior to the sampling. 5 mL of samples were collected in weighing bottles thrice weekly. The bottles were dried at 105°C oven until the weight of the bottles become constant. The dry biomass yield was determined using following formula: DW (g/L) = (a – b)/Y × 200 Where a is total weight of weighing bottle containing dried biomass (g), b=weight of the weighing bottle (g) and Y=sample volume taken (mL). The data were given as mg/g algae mass. Treatment of tomato and cucumber seeds. Seeds were surface sterilized with 30% sodium hypochlorite for 8 min, then rinsed with distilled water several times before germination. The seeds of tomato and cucumber were placed in petri dishes containing 3 mL of sterilized culture medium as a control. 2 ml of algal suspension was collected after growing the algal strain for 3, 6, 9 and 12 days, and added to each petri dish containing tomato and cucumber seeds. Petri dishes were maintained in thermostat at temperature of 18±2°C under the light regime of 8:16 light and dark for a week. At the end of the experiment, lengths of shoots and roots per plant were determined. Statistical analysis. All experimental analyses were performed in triplicate and the mean values were calculated. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and Student’s t-test and F-test were used to assess differences between means. Results Growth parameters (cell counts and dry biomass yield) of alga. The growth of algal strain was followed after 12 days. The cell counts and dry weight were recorded at 3, 6, 9, and 12 days. As shown in Table 1, the dry biomass yields were 0.06, 0.12, 0.17 and 0.25 g/L at day 3, 6, 9 and 12, respectively. Meanwhile, the 97 Int. J. Aquat. Biol. (2019) 7(2): 95-99 cell counts were 26.6, 50.1, 77.2 and 109.8 million cell/mL in respective algal suspensions. Seed germination and seedling growth of tomato and cucumber seeds: The results of growth parameters obtained for the germination of tomato and cucumber seeds subjected to culture media after growth of Chlorella strain for 3, 6, 9, and 12 days treatments are given in Figures 1 and 2. The lengths of shoot and root of tomato were highest at day 9, which were 17.4 and 44.6 mm, respectively (Fig. 1). As compared to the control, the growths of roots gradually increased by 29.1, 52.8, 100% at days 3, 6 and 9, respectively. However, the length of root was 40% shorter than that of control at day 12. The lengths of shoot at days 6 and 12 were close to that of control. The lengths of shoots at day 3 and 9 were higher than that of control by 43.3 and 87.9%, respectively. The lengths of cucumber shoot and root were 2.1 and 2.4 times longer than that of control at day 12, Table 1. Concentrations of algal suspension used in this experiment. Days 3 6 9 12 Dry biomass (g/L) 0.06 0.12 0.17 0.25 Cell counts (cells/ml) 26.6*106 50.1*106 77.2*106 109.8*106 Figure 1. Effect of culture medium containing Chlorella grown for 3, 6, 9 and 12 days on growth parameters of seed germination of tomato. Figure 2. Effect of culture medium containing Chlorella grown for 3, 6, 9 and 12 days on growth parameters of seed germination of cucumber. 98 Bumandalai and Tserennadmid / Effect of Chlorella vulgaris as a biofertilizer on tomato and cucumber which were 21.6 and 55 mm, respectively (Fig. 2). The lengths of shoot were close to that of control at day 3, 6, and 9. The length of root was close to that of control at day 3. However, the lengths of roots were 41.5 and 80.8% higher than the control at days 6 and 9. Discussions Tomato and cucumber are considered as the most important and common vegetable plants in many countries. Many studies have been conducted on tomato to develop bio-stimulants, which can improve lateral and longitudinal root formation, roots nutrient uptake, increasing total volume and vigor of the root system. Among them, Chlorella microalga was also tested for the tomato bio-stimulant. In our study, the result showed the significant growth of shoot and root in tomato plant. The similar results were also observed in other researchers’ studies. The application of C. vulgaris was tested on tomato plant, which showed strong stimulating effect on plant growth while inhibiting the development of Meloidogyne arenaria nematode parasite (Choleva et al., 2005). It was also observed in Garcia-Senin’s (2013) study that the use of irrigation water with C. pyrenoidosa and Chlorella sp. cultures favored the production of tomato plants with special attention in poor soils. Author also concluded that their results could lead to a lower environmental impact and a cost-effective tomato crop production. Moreover, several ocean algae extracts were tested on tomato seedlings and their results also showed the enhanced seed germination, plant growth, and germination rate (Hernández-Herrera et al., 2014; Shariatmadari et al., 2011). The similar phenomenon was also observed in cucumber plant. The results showed the growth of root in cucumber plant was increasing as the concentration of microalgal suspension increases. In the study of Abd Elhafiz et al. (2015), Chlorella sp. cultures were shown to enhance the germination of cucumber seeds. Conclusion It can be concluded that C. vulgaris suspension can enhance the germinations of tomato and cucumber seeds. Algal suspensions of 0.17 and 0.25 g/L can improve the root and shoot lengths of tomato and cucumber seeds, respectively. Acknowledgements We thank Mr. Ghorbanzade, Ghane and Darand for sampling. References Faheed A.F., Abd-El Fattah Z. (2008). Effect of Chlorella vulgaris as bio-fertilizer on growth parameters and metabolic aspects of lettuce plant. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences, 4(1965): 165-69. Abd El Moniem E.A., Abd-Allah A.S.E. (2008). Effect of green alga cells extract as foliar spray on vegetative growth, yield and berries quality of superior grapevines. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 4(4): 427-33. Choleva T., Bileva Y., Tzvetkov Barakov P. (2005). Preliminary study of the green algae Chlorella (Chlorella vulgaris) for control on the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne arenaria) in Tomato plants and ectoparasite Xiphinema indexin Grape Seedlings. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 70(4): 915-26. Bileva T. (2013). Influence of green algae Chlorella vulgaris on infested with xiphinema index grape seedlings. Journal of Earth Science and Climatic Change, 04(02): 2-4. Dubey A., Dubey D. (2010). Evaluation of cost effective organic fertilizers. http://orgprints.org/id/eprint/17043. El-Fouly M.M., Abdalla F.E., Shaaban M.M. (1992). Multipurpose large scale production of microalgae biomass in Egypt. Proceedings of the 1st Egyptian Etalian Symposium on Biotechnology 21–23: 305-14. Abd Elhafiz A., Abd Elhafiz A., Gaur S.S., Hamdany N., Osman M., Lakshmi T.V.R. (2015). Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorella pyrenoidosa live cells appear to be promising sustainable biofertilizer to grow rice, lettuce, cucumber and eggplant in the UAE Soils. Recent Research in Science and Technology, 7: 14-21. Garcia-Senin S. (2013). Microalgae bio-stimulating effect on traditional tomato agriculture. Botanica Marina, 34: 469-473. Gaur V. (2010). Biofertilizer - necessity for sustainability. Journal of Advanced Development, 1: 7-8. Goel A.K., Laura R.D.S., Pathak D.V., Goel A. (1999). Use of biofertilizers: potential, constraints and future 99 Int. J. Aquat. Biol. (2019) 7(2): 95-99 strategies. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 17: 1-8. Grzesik M., Romanowska-Duda Z. (2015). Ability of cyanobacteria and green algae to improve metabolic activity and development of willow plants. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24(3): 1003-12. Hegde D.M., Dwivedi B.S., Babu S.N.S. (1999). Bio- fertilizers for cereal production in India. Industrial Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 69: 73-83. Hernández-Herrera R.M., Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F., Ruiz- López M.A., Norrie J. (2014). Effect of liquid seaweed extracts on growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum Lycopersicum L.). Journal of Applied Phycology, 26(1): 619-628. Khandare H.W. (2013). Scenario of nitrate contamination in groundwater: its causes and prevention introduction. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 5(4): 1921-26. Mahmoud H.A.F., Amara M.A.T. (2000). Response of tomato to biological and mineral fertilizers under calcareous soil conditions. Bulletin of Factorial Agriculture, (51): 151-74. Raja N. (2013). Biopesticides and biofertilizers: ecofriendly sources for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Biofertilizers and Biopesticides, 04(01): 1-2. Sahoo R.K., Ansari M.W., Dangar T.K., Mohanty S., Tuteja N. (2014). Phenotypic and molecular characterisation of efficient nitrogen-fixing Azotobacter strains from rice fields for crop improvement. Protoplasma, 251(3): 511-23. Santos V.B., Araújo A.S., Leite L.F.C., Nunes L.L., Melo W.J. (2012). Soil mirobial biomass and organic matter fractions during transition from conventional to organic farming systems. Geoderma, 170: 227-31. Shaaban M.M., Mobarak Z.A. (2000). Effect of some green plant material as soil additives on soil nutrient availability, growth, yield and yield components of faba bean plants. Journal of Agricultural Science, (25): 2005- 16. Shariatmadari Z., Riahi H., Shokravi S. (2011). Study of soil blue-green algae and their effect on seed germination and plant growth of vegetable crops. Rostaniha, 12(2): 101-10. Singh J.S., Pandey V.C., Singh D.P. (2011). Efficient soil microorganisms: a new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 140(3-4): 339-53. Sinha R.K., Dalsukh Valani D., Chauhan K., Agarwal S. (2010). Embarking on a second green revolution for sustainable Agriculture by vermiculture biotechnology using earthworms: reviving the dreams of Sir Charles Darwin. Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Sustainable Development, 2: 113-28. Sirenko L.A. (1975). Nazvanie: Metody fiziologo- biokhimicheskogo issledovaniya vodorosley v gidrobiologicheskoy praktike. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. Vig R., Dobos A., Molnar K., Nagy J. (2012). The efficiency of natural foliar fertilizers. Idojaras, 116(1): 53-64. Youssef M.M.A., Eissa M.F.M. (2014). Biofertilizers and their role in management of plant parasitic nematodes: A review. Journal of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Research, 5(1): 1-6.