TX_1~AT/TX_2~AT International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues ISSN: 2146-4138 available at http: www.econjournals.com International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2021, 11(6), 24-31. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues | Vol 11 • Issue 6 • 202124 Production and Sales Risks in the Manufacturing Sector: The Role of Electricity Supply, Inflation and Fuel Price Volatility Thomas Habanabakize1, Zandri Dickason-Koekemoer2* 1School of Economic Sciences, TRADE Research Entity, North-West University, South Africa, 2TRADE Research Director, North-West University, South Africa. *Email: zandri.dickason@nwu.ac.za Received: 13 August 2021 Accepted: 15 October 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.12509 ABSTRACT The manufacturing sector occupies a critical position in the South African economy. However, in recent decades this sector experienced significant instability due to challenges within macroeconomic indicators. The sector’s challenges include the issue of electricity distribution, growing inflation rate and commodities price instability. This study aims to assess the effects of electricity supply, inflation and fuel prices on food and beverage production and sales in the manufacturing sector. To this end, the study applied different econometric approaches such as Johansen test for cointegration, vector error correction model (VECM) and Granger causality test on a monthly time series data ranging between January 2002 and December 2019. The study findings suggested the existence of a joint long-run relationship between electricity distribution, inflation rate, fuel price and production and sales of both food and beverage within the manufacturing sector. The result also indicated that both electricity supply and inflation highly impact the production of food and beverage sales compared to the effect of petrol price. Granger causality results have shown that inflation rate can serve in predicting short term production and sales of food and beverage in the South African manufacturing sector. Given the aforementioned findings, the study suggested that to increase production and sales of food and beverage in the manufacturing sector, policymakers should reduce tax on imported fuel. This would assist in lowering petrol prices that may have a repercussion on the inflation rate. Additionally, besides the government support towards electricity production in the Eskom, more effort and resources (financial) would also be allocated to generate and improve other sources of energy such as solar, wind, gas and biogas. Keywords: Inflation, Eskom, Electricity, Fuel price, Manufacturing, South Africa JEL Classifications: L60, E31, L11 1. INTRODUCTION Since the Second World War, the world experiences a significant increase in fuel prices that creates constraints in the production and sales of various products. A high price of fuel and other forms of energy impact negatively on the global economy in both developed and developing countries (Cunado and Perez de Gracia 2005). In addition, fuel remains indispensable energy whose price oscillation influences most economic sectors (Katircioglu et al., 2015). From World War II till nowadays, the fuel price experiences drastic instability especially since the 2008 financial crisis. In December 2008, the price of the Brent crude oil $40 per barrel and increased to $126 in 2012. However, this price drastically dropped to $30.5 per barrel in January 2016, risen again to $81 per barrel in 2018, and fall below $ 20 per barrel in April 2020 (Macrotrends, 2018; The Economic Times, 2020). As a fuel importer, South Africa economy is severely affected by this fuel price fluctuation were between 2017 and 2018, the fuel prices increased by more than 21 percent (SAPIA, 2018). As consequence, the country experienced a high inflation rate and low growth of below. Despite the strong measures established by the South African Reserve Bank that include inflation targeting in 2002, the country continues to experience a growing inflation rate which negatively This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http:////doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.12509 Habanabakize and Dickason-Koekemoer: Production and Sales Risks in the Manufacturing Sector: The Role of Electricity Supply, Inflation and Fuel Price Volatility International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues | Vol 11 • Issue 6 • 2021 25 impacts both consumers and producers (Khoza et al., 2016). High inflation increases the cost of production on the producers’ side and causes a reduction in consumers’ purchasing power (Fedderke and Liu, 2018). Nonetheless Owing to the increase of interest rate proposed by the monetary policy committee (MPC) in 2018, the South African inflation rate responded by declining from 5.09 percent to 4.06 percent. However, it was expected to rise again due to the increase in both fuel price and domestic electricity tariffs (Industrial development corporation (IDC), 2019). Besides the role played by fuel price in the global economy, and particularly in South Africa, an uninterrupted and secured electricity supply is essential to economic activities. However, due to population growth and the rapid speed of industrialisation, electricity demand outstrips its supply. Thus, the shortage in supply and load shading (Umar and Kunda-Wamuwi, 2019). The high electricity demand has put South Africa’s public electricity provider (Eskom) in a position where to reduce the imbalance between demand and supply of electricity it has touch its reserves (Khobai et al., 2017). This leads to low supply commonly known as load-shedding. As most commercial and industrial sectors such manufacturing sector are energy and electricity reliant, their activities are mostly affected by load-shedding (Adebola, 2011). Additionally, electrical energy is considered as a core input to industrial production (Isaksson, 2016). Owing to this phenomenon of high fuel prices, high inflation, low electricity supply and their risk towards production and sales in the manufacturing sector; this paper investigates the role and magnitude of production of food and beverage and sales risks owing to fuel price, inflation rate and electricity volatilities within the South African manufacturing sector. The core objective is to indicate to which extent production and sales of manufactured food and beverage are affected by shocks in fuel price, inflation and electricity supply. Additionally, it is important to highlight that the current paper is conducted based on production and consumer theories. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. General Review To maximise their profit and improve their revenues, firms have to produce and sell their products. The production process includes the use of both fixed and variables input factors. Thus, the aggregate outputs and sales depend on the availability of factors of production (inputs) associated with production cost and risk management. The production theory suggests that lower cost of inputs leads to more outputs and sales, whilst the high cost of input causes a decline in output volume, increases selling and lessens the total sales (Gans et al., 2011; Sickles and Zelenyuk, 2019). Consequently, the firm’s output volume and total sales are more likely to depend on input costs, ceteris paribus. The manufacturing sector deserves specific attention compared to other economic sectors as it remains one of the core drivers for the South African economy (Bhorat et al., 2018). This sector is known to have the largest economic and employment multipliers in South Africa (Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (DTI, 2014). Several studies were established to determine the role of the manufacturing section on the South African GDP and employment. The study of Awolusi (2016) and Tsoku et al. (2017) found a significant share of the manufacturing sector towards economic growth. Additionally, the study of Muzindutsi (2014) and McCamel (2018) revealed that the manufacturing sector plays an important role in creating jobs in South Africa. Irrespective of the contribution of the manufacturing sector towards employment and economic growth, this sector has been experiencing challenges in recent decades. Since the 2000’s the South African manufacturing sector is experiencing a stagnant performance (Bhorat et al., 2016) and a large number of manufacturing companies are experiencing economic challenges. These challenges result from, among others, a low level of domestic demand, poor supply of electricity from ESKOM and import penetration that leaves the South African manufacturing sector less competitive even within the domestic markets. Due to the abovementioned constraints, the manufacturing sector accounted for a decline in its total production. Hence, by the end of 2019, the South African manufacturing sect registered 10.6 percent loss of its annual income and experienced a decline in total production (South African market insights, 2020). Table 1 displays changes in the volume of food and beverage produced between August 2019 and January 2020. The subsequent paragraphs discussed the linkage between electricity supply, inflation, fuel price and production and sales in the manufacturing sector. 2.2. Electricity Supply and Production Nexus The seventh UN millennium sustainable development goal is access to sustainable, affordable and reliable energy for both social and economic activities (United Nations, 2015). Although there exist varieties of energies that are useful in the modern economies, Attigah and Mayer-Tasch (2016) assert that electricity supply remains the indispensable form of energy needed within the industrial production process as it can assist in mass production and economy of scales attainment. Therefore, electrical energy is considered one of the major inputs towards industrial production and an unreliable supply of electricity disrupts and impedes the Table 1: Volume of food and beverage manufacturing production (Base: 2015=100) Food and beverages Weights Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Meat, fish, fruit, etc. 6.69 104.1 102.8 114.1 112.0 106.7 92.5 Dairy products 2.15 118.4 120.5 127.7 117.6 119.0 109.0 Grain mill products 3.37 97.6 99.0 106.1 106.9 95.3 90.9 Other food products 8.14 135.4 127.4 137.2 131.5 100.7 93.3 Beverages 6.29 107.5 107.7 120.5 146.1 137.2 94.5 Total 26.64 114.8 112.4 122.8 125.8 111.6 94.3 Statistics South Africa (StatsSA) (2020) Habanabakize and Dickason-Koekemoer: Production and Sales Risks in the Manufacturing Sector: The Role of Electricity Supply, Inflation and Fuel Price Volatility International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues | Vol 11 • Issue 6 • 202126 production process (Isaksson, 2016). The relationship between electricity supply and industrial production and sales was assessed by various researchers and their findings suggested the existence of a linear and positive relationship between electricity supply and industry’s output (Abokyi et al., 2018; Akinlo, 2008; Mawejje and Mawejje, 2016; Khobai, 2013). A country’s economic growth and industrial production in most developing countries are dependent on the availability and affordability of electricity. Electricity is not important only for production but also for the conservation and transportation of products (Umar and Kunda-Wamuwi, 2019). Despite the role of electricity in enhancing production and economic growth, the South African industrial sector has been undergoing severe shocks owing to the shortage of electricity supply (Fedderke, 2014) which reduced the South African industries competitiveness. This energy shortage is the major cause of the high cost of production and high price of products. The issue of electricity supply is far from being solved as Eskom issued a warning stipulation that due to high and growing electricity demand the electricity deficiency will remain a challenge until 2021 (Ateba et al., 2019). Owing to the inefficient electricity South African economy and industry lost billions and this is still to happen (Oxford, 2015). Although the cost of electricity may have an indirect effect on some of the food manufacturing industry by passing on the cost to customers, the purchasing power of later is directly affected resulting in low demand for matured food and beverages (Deutsche Securities, 2010). Electricity is the most demanded form of energy in South Africa. The significance of the role played by electrical energy within the South Africa economy and particularly in the manufacturing sector, Figure 1 indicates that in 2017, electricity counted 83 percent of the aggregate demand for energy within the commercial and public services sector. 2.3. The Fuel Price, Manicuring Food and Beverages Nexus Apart from electricity, fuel is another type of energy that plays a significant role in most countries economies and particular in manufacturing food and beverage. Fuel is also considered as an input during the production and selling of the manufactured food and beverages (Green and Zhang, 2013). The earlier studies evaluated the effect of fuel prices on food prices. Analysing the asymmetric impacts of oil prices on food prices, Meyer et al. (2018) found a linear relationship between fuel price and food price in developing countries. Following the law of demand, the high is the price of goods or services, the lower quantity demanded (Heakal, 2015). Therefore, a rise in fuel price increases the cost of production resulting in a high price for both food and beverages. The high cost of manufacturing food and beverages is expected to reduce industries production and increase the selling price. On the customer’s side, a high price for goods and services implies less consumption (Ncanywa and Mgwangqa, 2018; Simionescu et al., 2017). Consequently, the manufacturing sector is seriously affected by fuel price volatility as South Africa is a net petroleum products importer (Kabini, 2019). 2.4. Production, Sales and Inflation Nexus As highlighted in the demand theory and the previous section, the quantity of food and beverages produced and sold, depends on consumers’ demand and purchasing power. The high is the consumer’s purchasing power, the more quantity is demand and the high is the quantity produced and sold. However, inflation is one of the major factors that impede consumers’ purchasing power (Bagus et al., 2014). An increase in the inflation rate leads to a decline in productivity and aggregate production. Different studies were conducted to analyse the impact of high inflation on manufacturing production. The study of Bans-Akutey et al. (2016) analysed the impact of inflation on the Ghanaian manufacturing sector and findings revealed that inflation growth results in low productivity levels. A similar study was done in Nigeria and the result indicated that an inverse relationship exists between manufacturing output and inflation levels (Amaefule, 2019). Contrary to these studies findings that suggested a negative relationship between manufacturing output and inflation, the study of Ojeyinka and Adegboye (2017) found a positive cointegration between inflation and manufacturing output. In the South African context, inflation fluctuation remains a crucial issue for policymakers and the country’s economy. Despite the South African Reserve Bank introduced inflation targeting introduced in 2000 to fluctuate between 3% and 6%, the reality indicated that between 2000 and 2020 inflation rate has been above 3% and closer to 6% between 2000 and 2020 as the average annual inflation in 2020 is expected to be 5.4% (Madito and Odhiambo, 2018; South African Reserve Bank [SARB], 2019). This fluctuation is expected to have a significant impact on the production and sales of food and beverage in the manufacturing sector. The magnitude of this effect is determined by the study analysis presented after the methodology section. 2.5. Production and Sales Risks in the Manufacturing Sector The aforementioned variables are some of the various determinants of production and sales in the manufacturing sector. The overall business activities in South Africa’s manufacturing sector rely on electricity supply. Shortage and/or interruption of electricity may result in low production, low sales and reduction in profitability (Trace, 2020). Additionally, long term electricity cuts may ruin some perishables goods creating losses to the industry. Fuel price shocks is another economic variable that put the manufacturing sector’s production and sales at risk. Fuel is the engine of Source: DoE Energy Balances, 2017 Figure 1: Energy demand in the commerce and public services sector, 2015 Habanabakize and Dickason-Koekemoer: Production and Sales Risks in the Manufacturing Sector: The Role of Electricity Supply, Inflation and Fuel Price Volatility International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues | Vol 11 • Issue 6 • 2021 27 input procurement and output distribution. The high price of transportation causes an increase in both production cost and selling price. Following, the law of demand and supply, high price leads to fewer sales resulting in low revenue and profitability of firms with the sector. The latter can also result from a high inflation rate. The lower is the purchasing power of money, the smaller is the quantity of the product demanded and sold (Chakauya et al., 2009; Gale, 1995. Therefore, shocks in electricity supply, commodities price (especially fuel) and inflation rate are the major cause of production and sales risks in the manufacturing sector. 3. DATA, MODEL SPECIFICATION AND METHODOLOGY 3.1. Data The study is quantitative and it is built upon monthly time series data for the period starting from January 2002 to December 2019. The study variables include petrol price, consumer price index (CPI), electricity supply (Stats SA), and production and sales of food and beverages. The entirety of the data was sourced from Quantec Easy Data website. The dependent variable, production and sales of food and beverages, is measured in millions of Rand, the electricity is measured in terms of Gigawatt-hours, inflation rate (CPI) is calculated as a percentage change in the South African GDP deflator (CPI) index Dec 2016 = 100, and the petrol price is measured in terms of cents per litre. For the sake of conformity and standardisation, all variables were transformed into a natural logarithm. 3.2. Model Specification To assess the effect of electricity supply, inflation and fuel price increase on food and beverage production and sales in the manufacturing sector, the following model was specified: LSALESt = δ0+δ1 LCPIt+δ2 LCPIt+δ3 LELECt+δ4 LPETPt+μt (1) Where δ0 and δi are the constant and coefficients respectively, L denotes the natural logarithm, t represents the time factor and μ denotes the white noise. Additionally, LSALES represents total production and sales, LCPI is inflation, LELEC denotes electricity supply and LPETP represents the petrol price. 3.3. Methodology Generally, time-series data is characterised by a non-stationarity aspect. However, if nonstationary data is analysed, the obtained results are more often considered to be spurious. In such cases, the regression outcomes give the impression of being statistically significant, while in reality, variables are serially correlated rather than being cointegrated (Harris and Sollis, 2003:32). Any study based on spurious regression makes erroneous inferences and this can lead to inappropriate policies. Spurious regression is evaded by firstly conducting unit root and stationarity test, before cointegration analysis. 3.3.1. Unit root tests The literature provides several procedures that are useful in testing for unit root and stationarity of time series. These procedures and approaches include Dickey-Fuller (DF) test, Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test, Kahn and Ogaki test, Leyborne- McCabetest test, Phillips-Perron (PP) test, as well as, the Kwiatkowski, Phillips, Schmidt and Shin (KPSS) test. Owing to their simplicity and general nature, ADF and PP are the most popular unit root tests employed by empirical studies (Harris and Sollis, 2003:42). This study employed also the ADF test estimated as follows: 1 1 1 2 2 1 1ˆt t t t v t v ty y y y y uρ ρ ρ− − − − − +∆ ∆ ∆= + + + ∆+ + (2) 1 2ˆWhere ( ) 1vρ ρ ρ ρ= + + − 3.3.2. The Johansen-Juselius cointegration approach The literature represents several approaches and procedures useful to test the presence of cointegration between two or more variables. The presence of cointegration among variables implies the existence long-run relationship among the underlined variables. In other words, the existence of, at least, one cointegrating vector in the model suggests the existence of the long-run relationship. Due to its popularity, the Johansen test for cointegration which includes both Trace and Max-Eigen statistics was selected for this study. Using the unrestricted vector autoregression (VAR), the vector zt is expressed as follows: zt = A1 zt–1+… Ak zt–k+ut (3) Where zt denotes (n ×1) vector of series (variables); A1 denotes (n × n) parameters’ matrix and ut denotes the residuals or (n ×1) innovations vector. Since the zt comprises of (n) endogenous variables, each variable presented in the model is regressed firstly on its lagged values and then on other variables in the model. Under the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) form, the VAR model is estimated as: ∆zt = Γ1 zt–1+… Γk–1 ∆zt–k+1+Πzt–k+ut (4) Where Γi = – (I–A1–…–Ai; (i = 1,…k–1) and Π = –(I–A1–…–Ak) According to Harris and Sollis (2003) both Γi and Π (in equation 4) denotes short-run and long-run adjustments towards changes in vector zt respectively. The vector represents a matrix of long-run coefficients and it expressed as a multiplier of two (n × r) vectors, (α) and (β), and these coefficients indicate the speed of adjustment towards long-run equilibrium and a long run coefficient matrix respectively. While analysing the relationship between variables г determine the number of cointegration in the model. If Π = 0, that is (r=0), this implies no cointegration among variables. Inversely, all variables are stationary if Π possesses a full rank, that is(r = n). Generally, Π represents a reduced rank. In other words, r ≤(n–1) implies the existence of г cointegration vectors. In the current study, cointegration is assessed using both Maximum Eigenvalue and Trace statistics. However, the unit root tests preceded the cointegration analysis. 4. EMPIRICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1. Unit Root Tests The unit root test was used to determine the integration order for the underlined variables. Table 2 represents the results from the ADF tests. All variables in Table 2 are stationary after the first Habanabakize and Dickason-Koekemoer: Production and Sales Risks in the Manufacturing Sector: The Role of Electricity Supply, Inflation and Fuel Price Volatility International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues | Vol 11 • Issue 6 • 202128 difference. Therefore, the Johansen test for cointegration is a suitable model to determine the long-run relationship. 4.2. Lag Period Selection In order to establish the accurate results from VECM, it is important to determine the optimum number of lags that should be included in the model. To this end, the study employed the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Schwartz Criterion (SC), Hannam-Quinn Criterion (HQC) and Final Prediction Error (FPE). As representing in Table 3, the number of lags selected for this study is 2. All lag criteria reach the same conclusion that the optimum number of lags is two periods. 4.3. Stability Test Additional to the selection the optimum number of lags to be included in the model is determined, it is also indispensable to ensure that the study model satisfies the stability condition. The result reported in Table 4 infers that all inverse roots of characteristic polynomial remain within the unit circle. Therefore, the vector error correction (VECM) is stable. Before VECM establishment, it is essential to perform a cointegration test to ensure that a long-run relationship exists among variables. Given that all variables are I (1), the cointegration was tested using the Johansen procedures. 4.4. Co-integration Results Following the Johansen test for cointegration, Eigenvalue and Trace statistics were used to determine the long-run relationship among variables. The results from the test are exhibited in Table 5. Both Trace and Eigenvalue statistics reveal the presence of long-run relationships among variables and at most two cointegrating vectors. The presence of cointegration suggests, ipso facto, the specification of the vector error correction model (VECM) which is discussed further in the section after long-run relationships equilibrium. 4.5. Long-run equilibrium Relationships Equation 5 below exhibits the long-run relationship for cointegrating vectors with their t-statistics provided in parentheses. L S A L E S = 2 . 9 6 3 6 0 2 + 1 . 6 4 8 0 9 3 L C P I + 0 . 7 3 5 2 8 8 [T-stat] [–13.5543] [4.13205] [0.43259] LELECT–0.032261 LPETP (5) The individual coefficients represented in Equation 5 suggest a positive relationship between inflation, electricity supply and production and sales of food and beverages in South Africa. These results indicate that a 1 percent increased in the inflation rate would cause production and sales of food and beverages to increase approximately by 1.65 percent while a 1 percent increase in electricity supply would enhance the production and sales level by approximately 0.73 percent. In contrast, an increase of a 1 percent in the petrol price would cause production and sales of food and beverages to decline by 0.032 percent. Considering the magnitude impact of the explanatory variables on the dependent variables, it can be inferred that the consumer price index (CPI) impact more on production and sales of food and beverages compared to other underlined variables. 4.6. Vector Error Correction and Short-run Dynamics Having established the cointegration among variables, the next step is to estimate the short-run dynamics of production and sales of food and beverages resulting from consumer price index (CPI), electricity supply, and petrol price fluctuations. These short term dynamics are presented in Table 6. Before discussing short-run results, it is important to have a close look at the error terms results. In determining whether the model is explosive or not, the rule of thumb suggests consideration of both sign and significant levels of the error correction term. The model is not explosive (adjusted towards long-run equilibrium) if the error term is negative and statistically significant. The sales equation is the only one that meets the aforementioned criteria. Meaning that the short term shocks in the model are adjusted for long-run equilibrium. Considering the short term coefficients, the electricity supply is the only variable that Table 3: Lag selection Lag LogL LR FPE AIC SC HQ 0 656.2524 NA 2.65e-08 –6.095817 –6.03290 –6.070393 1 1869.352 2369.511 3.66e-13 –17.28366 –16.96908 –17.15654 2 1962.866 179.1630* 1.78e-13* –18.0081* –17.4418* –17.77928* *Denotes lag order selected by the criterion Table 2: ADF unit root results Variables Level 1st Difference Without trend With trend Without trend With trend LCPI 0.9569 0.7136 0.0000** 0.0000** LELEC 0.5904 0.7593 0.0003** 0.0001** LPETP 0.6394 0.1614 0.0000** 0.0000** LSALES 0.8980 0.0825 0.0032** 0.0177** ** Denotes the rejection of null hypothesis at 5 percent level Table 4: Roots of the characteristic polynomial Root Modulus 0.999853 0.999853 0.875234 0.875234 0.680516–0.146417i 0.696089 0.680516+0.146417i 0.696089 –0.356791–0.137397i 0.382332 –0.356791+0.137397i 0.382332 0.364773–0.100597i 0.378390 0.364773+0.100597i 0.378390 Habanabakize and Dickason-Koekemoer: Production and Sales Risks in the Manufacturing Sector: The Role of Electricity Supply, Inflation and Fuel Price Volatility International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues | Vol 11 • Issue 6 • 2021 29 possesses a significant effect on short term production and sales of food and beverages. Changes in CPI and petrol price are not statistically significant to influence short term production and sales of food and beverages. 4.7. Pairwise Granger Causality Granger causality tests is another approach that is used to determine the short-run relationship between two or more variables. It can further be useful in predicting the behaviour of Table 6: Results of error correction terms and short-run dynamics Error Correction D (LSALES) D (LCPI) D (LELECT) D (LPETP) ECM –0.624696 0.018088 0.028946 –0.086428 S.E (0.08560) (0.00406) (0.04400) (0.04814) T-start. [–7.29753]** [4.45262]** [0.65789] [–1.79539] D (LNSALES(-1)) –0.055307 –0.012522 0.040451 0.037071 S.E (0.07542) (0.00358) (0.03877) (0.04241) T-start. [–0.73330] [–3.49870] [1.04348] [ 0.87403] D (LNSALES(–2)) –0.104377 –0.017348 –0.145839 –0.014712 S.E (0.06660) (0.00316) (0.03423) (0.03745) T-start. [–1.56721] [–5.48907]** [–4.26039]** [–0.39283] D (LNCPI(–1)) 1.328864 0.375424 0.613904 1.146031 S.E (1.48761) (0.07059) (0.76460) (0.83655) T-start. [0.89329] [5.31813] [0.80291] [1.36995] D (LNCPI(–2)) 2.172390 0.103461 –1.165734 –0.133883 S.E (1.48379) (0.07041) (0.76264) (0.83440) T-start. [1.46408] [1.46937] [–1.52855] [–0.16045] D (LNELECT(–1)) –0.524832 0.016523 –0.404227 0.116348 S.E (0.16311) (0.00774) (0.08384) (0.09172) T-start. [–3.21765]** [2.13471]** [–4.82167]** [1.26845] D (LNELECT(–2)) –0.115084 0.015118 0.174518 –0.023681 S.E (0.14831) (0.00704) (0.07623) (0.08340) T-start. [–0.77595] [2.14797]** [2.28935]** [–0.28394] D (LNPETP(–1)) 0.074622 0.004783 0.163463 0.407144 S.E (0.12679) (0.00602) (0.06517) (0.07130) T-start. [0.58854] [0.79495] [2.50830]** [5.71019]** D (LNPETP(–2)) –0.136238 –0.015000 0.097745 –0.354116 S.E (0.12548) (0.00595) (0.06449) (0.07056) T-start. [–1.08575] [–2.51911]** [1.51559] [–5.01851]** Constant –0.005494 0.002414 0.001483 0.001968 S.E (0.00816) (0.00039) (0.00420) (0.00459) T-start. [–0.67298] [6.23185]** [0.35352] [0.42869] **Denotes the significance of t-values at 5 percent level Table 7: Pairwise Granger causality results Null hypothesis F-Statistic Prob. Causality direction LCPI does not Granger Cause LSALES 26.4966 6.E-11** Unidirectional LSALES does not Granger Cause LCPI 1.12645 0.3261 LELECT does not Granger Cause LSALES 2.93990 0.0551 Unidirectional LSALES does not Granger Cause LELECT 8.12742 0.0004** LPETP does not Granger Cause LSALES 12.2631 9.E-06** Unidirectional LSALES does not Granger Cause LPETP 1.37552 0.2550 LELECT does not Granger Cause LCPI 2.73951 0.0669 No causality LCPI does not Granger Cause LELECT 2.71314 0.0687 LPETP does not Granger Cause LCPI 0.81965 0.4420 Unidirectional LCPI does not Granger Cause LPETP 7.70634 0.0006** LPETP does not Granger Cause LELECT 9.83252 8.E-05** Unidirectional LELECT does not Granger Cause LPETP 2.87747 0.0585 **Denotes the significance of t-values at 5 percent level t-values at 5 percent level Table 5: Johansen cointegration test results H0 H1 Trace Maximum Eigenvalue Trace Statistic t-critical value P-value Max-Eigen Statistic t-critical value P-value r = 0 r > 0 119.0994 47.85613 0.000** 66.36082 27.58434 0.000** r ≤ 1 r > 1 52.73854 29.79707 0.000** 34.45673 21.13162 0.000** r ≤ 2 r > 2 18.28181 15.49471 0.018** 18.04025 14.26460 0.012** r ≤ 3 r > 3 0.241558 3.841466 0.6231 0.241558 3.841466 0.6231 r denotes the number of cointegrating vectors under the H0 of no cointegration. **, *Suggests the rejection of the H0 of no cointegration at the 1% and 5% level of significance respectively Habanabakize and Dickason-Koekemoer: Production and Sales Risks in the Manufacturing Sector: The Role of Electricity Supply, Inflation and Fuel Price Volatility International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues | Vol 11 • Issue 6 • 202130 one variable (y) based on past information of another variable (x). Results in Table 7 suggest that all three explanatory variables namely LCPI, LELECT and LPETP can be used to predict the short term behaviour of production and sales of food and beverages. However, it is a one-way relationship, as the LSALES does not Ganger cause any of the independent variables. These results imply that the explanatory variables’ behaviour impacts the dependent variable, not vice versa. 4.8. Results of Diagnostic Tests Stability and residual test were conducted to assess if the employed model met the econometric assumptions. Results in Table 8 show that none of the null hypotheses is rejected. This confirms that none of the econometric assumptions was violated by the employed VECM. Additionally, the plotted CUSAM result in Figure 2 suggests that the study model is stable. 5. CONCLUSION Production and sales of food and beverages are major factors that sustain economic growth and social wellbeing. It also contributes to manufacturing employing capacity. However, the quantity of food and beverages produced and sold in the manufacturing sector depends on some other economic factors. These factors include purchasing power which depends on inflation level, interest rates, fuel price and production and supply of electricity. This study aimed to assess the impact of electricity supply, inflation rate and fuel price increase on food and beverage production and sales in the South African manufacturing sector. Based on production theories and empirical analysis, the study employed a cointegration test, causality test and error correction model to establish the responsiveness production and sales of food and beverage towards changes in electricity supply, fuel price and inflation. The Johansen test for cointegration findings revealed that a long-run relationship exists between the underlined variables. It was found that major changes in production and sales of food and beverage are caused by the inflation rate and electricity supply. Although the fuel price negatively impacts on production and sales of food and beverages, its effect is manageable compared to the shocks caused by insufficient electricity supply and high inflation rate. The overall conclusion is that electricity supply level, fuel price and inflation rate play a major role in improving production and sales of food and beverage in the manufacturing sector. Considering the effect of the inflation rate on the production and sales of food and beverage, the South African policymakers should create a conducive environment that strengthens the country’s currency and reduces the inflation rate. This would include wage, interest rate and money supply control. Additionally, food and beverage production industries should increase their investments into other sources of energy such as wind and solar energy rather than relying on electricity supplied by Eskom. REFERENCES Abokyi, E., Appiah-Konadu, P., Sikayena, I., Oteng-Abayie, E. (2018), Consumption of electricity and industrial growth in the Case of Ghana. Journal of Energy, 2018, 1-11. Adebola, S. (2011), Electricity consumption and economic growth: Trivariate investigation in Botswana with capital formation. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 1(2), 32-46. Akinlo, A. (2008), Energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from 11 Sub-Saharan African countries. Energy Economy, 30(5), 2391-2400. Amaefule, J.N. (2019), National domestic savings, inflation, exchange rate and manufacturing sector in Nigeria. EuroEconomica, 2(38), 314-323. Ateba, B.B., Prinsloo, J.J., Gawlik, R. (2019), The significance of electricity supply sustainability to industrial growth in South Africa. Energy Reports, 5, 1324-1338. Attigah, B., Mayer-Tasch, L. (2016), Productive Use of Energy: The Impact of Electricity Access on Economic Development: A Literature Review. Available from: https://www.produse.org/imglib/downloads/ produse_study/produse%20study_literature%20review.pdf [Last accessed on 2016 Jul 01]. Awolusi, O.D. (2016), Mining Sector and Economic Growth in Southern African Economies: A Panel Data Analysis. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal. Bagus, P., Howden, D., Gabriel, A. (2014), Causes and consequences of inflation. Business and Society Review, 119(4), 497-517. Figure 2: CUsum test results Table 8: Results of diagnostic tests Test Null hypothesis P-value Decision Ramsey RESET Test The model is correctly specified H0 Not rejected Jarque-Bera (JB) Residual are multivariate normal 0.1105 H0 Not rejected LM Test No serial correlation 0.4883 H0 Not rejected White No heteroscedasticity 0.3541 H0 Not rejected Habanabakize and Dickason-Koekemoer: Production and Sales Risks in the Manufacturing Sector: The Role of Electricity Supply, Inflation and Fuel Price Volatility International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues | Vol 11 • Issue 6 • 2021 31 Bans-Akutey, M., Yaw Deh, I., Mohammed, F. (2016), What is the Effect of Inflation on Manufacturing Sector Productivity in Ghana? MPRA Paper No. 75145. Germany: University Library of Munich. Bhorat, H., Caetano, T., Jourdan, B., Kanbur, R., Rooney, C., Stanwix, B., Woolard, I. (2016), Investigating the Feasibility of a National Minimum Wage for South Africa’. Development Policy Research Unit Working Paper No. 201601. Cape Town: Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town. Bhorat, H., Rooney, C., Steenkamp, F. (2018), Understanding and characterizing the services sector in South Africa. Industries without Smokestacks, 275, 1-78. Chakauya, E., Beyene, G., Chikwamba, R.K. (2009), Food production needs fuel too: Perspectives on the impact of biofuels in Southern Africa. South African Journal of Science, 105(5), 174-181. Cunado, J., de Gracia, F.P. (2005), Oil prices, economic activity and inflation: Evidence for some Asian countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 45(1), 65-83. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). (2014), Industrial Policy Action Plan: IPAP 2014/15-2016/17. Pretoria, South Africa: The Department of Trade and Industry. Fedderke, J., Liu, Y. (2018), Inflation in South Africa: An assessment of alternative inflation models. South African Journal of Economics, 86(2), 197-230. Gale, D. (1955), The law of supply and demand. Mathematica Scandinavica, 3, 155-169. Gans, J., King, S., Mankiw, N.G. (2011), Principles of Microeconomics. United States: Cengage Learning. Green, G., Zhang, P. (2013), The Future Role of Energy in Manufacturing. Future of Manufacturing Project: Evidence Paper 11. London: Government Office for Science. Harris, R., Sollis, R. (2003), Applied Time Series Modelling and Forecasting. West Sussex: John Wileys & Sons Ltd. Heakal, R. (2015), Economics Basics: Supply and Demand. Available from: https://www.marion.ca.uky.edu/files/economics_basics.pdf [Last accesses on 2020 Jul 01]. IDC. (2019), Economic Trends: Key Trends in the South African Economy, Department of Research and Information. United States: IDC. Isaksson, A. (2016), Energy Infrastructure and Industrial Development. United Nations Industrial Development Organization Research and Statistics Branch Working Paper No. 12. Available from: https:// www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media/publications/research_and_ statistics/branch_publications/research_and_policy/files/working_ papers/2009/wp%2012%20energy%20infrastructure%20and%20 industrial%20development [Last accessed on 2016 Jun 29]. Kabini, L. (2019), Petroleum Products Import and Export. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Energy. Katircioglu, S.T., Sertoglu, K., Candemir, M., Mercan, M. (2015), Oil price movements and macroeconomic performance: Evidence from twenty-six OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 257-270. Khobai, H. (2013), The Relationship between Electricity Supply, Power Outages and Economic Growth in South Africa, Doctoral Dissertation, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University. Khobai, H., Mugano, G., Roux, L. (2017), Exploring the Nexus of Electricity Supply and Economic Growth in South Africa, ESRA Working Paper No. 656. Cape Town: Economic Research South Africa. Khoza, K., Thebe, R., Phiri, A. (2016), Nonlinear Impact of Inflation on Economic Growth in South Africa: A Smooth Transition Regression (STR) Analysis. Macrotrends. (2018), Brent Crude Oil Prices. Available from: https:// www.macrotrends.net/2480/brent-crudeoil-prices-10-year-daily- chart [Last accessed of 2018 Oct 15]. Madito, O., Odhiambo, N.M. (2018), The main determinants of inflation in South Africa: An empirical investigation. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 9(2), 212-232. McCamel, R.T. (2018), The Impact of Manufacturing and its Sub-Sectors on GDP and Employment in South Africa: A Time-Series Analysis, Master’s Dissertation. Vanderbijlpark: North-West University. Muzindutsi, P.F. (2014), Manufacturing production and non-agricultural employment rate in South Africa: Time series analysis. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 6(10), 779-786. Ncanywa, T., Mgwangqa, N. (2018), The impact of a fuel levy on economic growth in South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 29(1), 41-49. Ojeyinka, T.A., Adegboye, A.A. (2017), Trade liberalization and economic performance in Nigeria: Evidence from agricultural and manufacturing sectors. African Journal of Economic Review, 5(3), 1-14. Oxford, T. (2015), Turn down for watts. In: Weitz, U., editor. Transformer 06(Q4): Dark Days Ahead: Load-Shedding and the South African Economy. Johannesburg: Jovan Regasek. SAPIA. (2018), Fuel Price History in South Africa. Available from: http://www.sapia.org.za/overview/old-fuelprices [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 05]. Sickles, R., Zelenyuk, V. (2019), Measurement of Productivity and Efficiency: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Simionescu, M., Albu, L.L., Szeles, M.R., Bilan, Y. (2017), The impact of biofuels utilisation in transport on the sustainable development in the European Union. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23(4), 667-686. South African Market Insights. (2020), South Africa’s Manufacturing Industry. Available from: https://www.southafricanmi.com/ south-africas-manufacturing-industry.html# [Last accessed on 2020 Jun 25]. Statistics South Africa (StatsSA). (2020), Manufacturing: Production and Sales. Statistical Release P3041.2. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa. The Economic Times. (2020), Crude Oil Prices Set for Deeper Fall in 2020, Even as Lockdowns Ease: Poll. Available from: https://www. economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/commodities/news/crude- oil-prices-set-for-deeper-fall-in-2020-even-as-lockdowns-ease-poll/ articleshow/75471425.cms Trace, S. (2020), South Africa’s Crippling Electricity Problem. Available from: https://www.opml.co.uk/blog/south-africa-s-crippling- electricity-problem [Last accessed 2021 Aug 02]. Tsoku, J.T., Mosikari, T.J., Xaba, D., Modise, T. (2017), An analysis of the relationship between manufacturing growth and economic growth in South Africa: A co-integration approach. International Journal of Social Behavioural Educational Economic Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(2), 414-419. Umar, B.B., Kunda-Wamuwi, C.F. (2019), Socio-economic effects of load shedding on poor urban households and small business enterprises in Lusaka, Zambia. Energy and Environment Research, 9(2), 20. Umar, B.B., Kunda-Wamuwi, C.F. (2019), Socio-economic effects of load shedding on poor urban households and small business enterprises in Lusaka, Zambia. Energy and Environment Research, 9(2), 20-29. United Nations. (2015), United Nations Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 2015: Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available from: https://www. un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=a/res/70/1&lang=e [Last accessed on 2017 Sep 26].