International Journal of Energetica (IJECA)  

https://www.ijeca.info   

ISSN: 2543-3717 Volume 2. Issue 2. 2017                                                                                                           Page 29-37    

   

IJECA-ISSN: 2543-3717. December 2017                                                                                                                Page 29 

  

 

A parabolic trough solar collector as a solar system for heating water: 

a study based on numerical simulation 
 

 

Mokhtar Ghodbane
1
, Boussad Boumeddane 

1 

 
1
 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saâd DAHLAB, Blida 1, ALGERIA 

ghodbanemokhtar39@yahoo.com    

 

Abstract – This paper is an optical and thermal study of a small model of a parabolic trough 
solar collector (CTP), which will be used to heat tap water, in the winter, at Guemar location, (El-

Oued, Algeria). A mathematical model was presented based on the energy balance equation 

applied to the absorber tube; this model was solved by the finite difference method. A computer 

program based on MATLAB was developed to solve the problem. The results show that the 

thermal efficiency of the concentrator can attend a high value of more than 61%, while the fluid 

outlet temperature can reach 343 K. 

Keywords: Solar thermal, parabolic trough collector, outlet temperature, Tap water, numerical 
analysis. 

Received: 09/10/2017 – Accepted: 25/12/2017 

 

I. Introduction 

The oldest and the greatest source of energy in the 

universe is the sun, where an average of 1367 (W/m²) 

reached the edge external of the terrestrial atmosphere 

according to the world radiometric center of Davos 

(Switzerland) [1]. 

The global solar radiation is the sum of both direct and 

diffuse components [2-16]. Algeria has one of the highest 

solar radiation in Africa.  The sunshine duration on 

almost all of the national territory exceeds 2000 hours 

annually and can reach 3900 hours in the Highlands and 

Sahara [17].  

 

 

 

This study deals with the exploitation of solar energy 

to produce hot water using parabolic trough concentrator 

(PTC) in Guemar region, where the table (1) shows the 

meteorological data of this city. In previous studies, we 

have studied several models of this system in different 

regions in Algeria, where the results were very 

encouraging [2-11]. 

 

 

 

 

Table  1. The meteorological data of the city of Guemar. 

Month 

Global 

Radiation 

(kWh/m²) 

Diffuse 

Radiation 

(kWh/m²) 

Beam 

Radiation 

(kWh/m²) 

Monthly average 

of ambient 

temperature 

(°C) 

Monthly average 

of dew point 

(°C) 

Monthly average 

of wind  

speed 

(m/s) 

1 114 19 211 10,6 4 2,1 

2 125 28 184 12,9 3,1 2,5 

3 170 48 197 17,8 4,6 3,3 

4 207 54 225 21,6 7,1 4 

5 234 69 237 26,8 9,6 4,1 

6 236 70 228 31,3 11,4 3,6 

7 248 66 242 34,7 13,3 3,4 

8 219 67 217 33,8 14,6 3,1 

9 176 55 187 28,8 15 3 

10 144 45 179 23,8 12,7 2,2 

11 117 21 200 16,1 7,3 2 

12 100 21 187 11,7 5,1 2,3 

 

For the PTC solar concentrator, it gives us a 

temperature of fluid that can be used both in industrial 

and domestic applications, with a medium- to high range 

of [80-160 ° C] [2-6, 9, 11]. According to the size and 

position of the PTC collector, this system can obtain a 

steam temperature exceeding 1500 °C, according to 

mailto:ghodbanemokhtar39@yahoo.com


M. Ghodbane et al. 

IJECA-ISSN: 2543-3717. December 2017                                                                                                                Page 30 
 

studies cited in the scientific literature [3-6, 9, 11, 18]. 

So, the PTC systems are the most currently used 

technology by the most powerful solar power plants in 

the world, we quote in this context that the solar plant at 

Kramer Junction in California represents a total installed 

capacity of 354 MW [19]. This kind of solar field is 

made up of parallel alignments of long half-cylindrical 

mirrors, oriented North-South axis that revolved around 

the latter to follow the path of the Sun. The Sun's rays are 

concentrated on a horizontal tube, where circulates a heat 

transfer fluid. 

As we said earlier, this study focuses on the 

conversion of solar energy to thermal energy by using a 

parabolic trough solar concentrator in a troubled day of 

the winter (Low-temperature weather with some wind). 

Tap water was used as the heat transfer fluid. Our aim in 

this study is to characterize the optical and thermal 

efficiencies of our PTC model based on the geographic 

parameters and climatic conditions in Guemar location, 

(El-Oued, Algeria). Figure 1 shows the scheme of the 

approved water heating system using TRNSYS 16. 

 
Figure 1. Illustrative diagram of the water heater system.  

 

 

In order to solve to problem, this study will begin with 

an optical efficiency analysis using SolTrace software. In 

the second step, a mathematical model has been 

established with Matlab to calculate the thermal 

efficiency, the fluid outlet temperature, the receiver’s 

surface temperature, the glass temperature and the 

coefficient of thermal losses. 

II. Optical simulation 

The optical modeling was performed using the 

SolTrace; the code is developed by the National Renewable 
Energy Laboratory (USA)  [20]. The optical system of the 
concentrator is composed of the reflecting surface and 

absorber tube. The reflecting surface was modeled as a 

single mirror of parabolic section. Table (2) shows the 

geometric parameters of the PTC concentrator and the 

optical parameters are shown in Table (3). 

 

Table  2. Geometrical parameters of the PTC collector. 

 

geometric characteristic Value (mm) 

Receiver tube number 1 

Absorber  length (LA) 12270 

outer diameter of the absorber (DA,ext) 22 

Inner diameter of the absorber (DA,int) 20 

outer diameter of the glass (DV,ext) 26 

inner diameter of the glass (DV,int) 23,5 

mirror length (L) 12270 

mirror width (l) 1100 

 

The absorbent tube dimensions mentioned in the 

previous table are the dimensions of a linear Fresnel 

receiver that was previously manufactured by H. Chabahi 

et al., (2011) [21], but the length of the absorbent tube 

here was different. 



M. Ghodbane et al. 

IJECA-ISSN: 2543-3717. December 2017                                                                                                                Page 31 
 

For the optical simulation, it was assumed that the 

reflection coefficient, the absorptivity, and transmissivity 

are uniform over the entire reflecting surface. It was 

considered that the solar tracking is very accurate and 

therefore the concentrator opening is constantly 

perpendicular to the rays from the solar disc.  

 
Table  3. Optical parameters of the collector. 

 

parameter Value 

optical overall average error (σoptical) 03 mrad 

mirror reflection coefficient (ρm) 0,92 

Transmissivity of the glass 0,945 

Absorption coefficient of the absorber (α) 0,94 

The emissivity of the absorber tube (εA) 0,12 

 

There are several models for the simulation of global 

direct and diffuse solar irradiance, expressed by semi-

empirical approaches. 

For the PTC concentrators, the absorbed solar energy 

depends on the beam radiation (DNI) [3-6, 9, 11]. Figure 

2 reflects the change in the solar radiation during the day 

of 05 December 2016 according to the semi-empirical 

model of PERRIN DE BRICHAMBAUT, where M. 

Ghodbane et al., (2016), had created a numerical 

simulation based on programming using MATLAB for 

the calculation of solar radiation (direct, diffuse and 

global) [8]. For this model, the different components of 

the solar radiation vary according to the height of the 

sun, the angle of incidence, the weather condition and the 

state of visibility of the atmosphere.  

Any application of solar energy in a given site requires 

a complete and detailed knowledge of the sunshine of the 

site. This is possible if the data are available over a 

sufficient period. However, in the majority of cases, there 

are no local measurements of solar radiation, and some 

approximate methods must be used to predict the 

characteristics of solar irradiation. 

The total quantity of radiation calculated for a 

particular location or area was entered as global 

radiation. The calculation radiation (direct, diffuse and 

global) was repeated for each entity location or for all 

locations of the topographic surface and generates 

sunshine maps for an entire geographical area. 

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0

100

200

300

400

500

600

time (hour]

s
o
la

r 
ra

d
ia

ti
o
n
 [

W
/m

2
]

 

 

Global radiation

Direct radiation

Diffuser radiation

 
Figure 2. Solar radiation evaluation in Guemar area. 

 

Virtually, it was in the regions for which we had the 

least solar radiation measurements that the projects of 

implantation of the solar energy systems for water 

pumping, desalination, or the decentralized electric 

power supply are the most important and the most 

demanding. Direct radiation (DNI) is solar radiation 

reaching the earth's surface directly from the sun. It 

depends on the thickness of the atmosphere that the solar 

radiation must cross, as well as the inclination of the rays 

relative to the ground. The PYRHELIOMETER is the 

instrument for measuring the intensity of direct radiation. 

The PYRHELIOMETER must be equipped with a device 

to direct it permanently towards the sun. Through Figure 

2, it was noticeable that the maximum radiation value is 

the true solar noon, which can reach 585 (W/m²), despite 

the bad weather on this day, the amount of solar radiation 

was considered. 

Figure 3 illustrates the captured solar energy by the 

collector, as presented in SolTrace. We tried to show the 

importance and effectiveness of parabolic trough 

collector in the field of solar concentrate. 

 

 
 

Figure 3. Schema parabolic trough concentrator as it appears in 

SolTrace. 

 

III. Thermal simulation 

This section treats the thermal analysis and numerical 

modeling of a PTC concentrator. This modeling was used 

to predict the change in the outlet temperature of the heat 

transfer fluid (water) versus the beam radiation. The 

thermal exchanges are between the heat transfer fluid, the 

absorber tube and the glass tube. The temperature 

modeling was based on the energy balances characterized 

by the differential equations of the three temperatures: TF 

(for the fluid), TV (for glass tube) and TA (for the 

absorber tube), these equations will vary depending on 



M. Ghodbane et al. 

IJECA-ISSN: 2543-3717. December 2017                                                                                                                Page 32 
 

two parameters, namely the time (t) and the length (x) of 

the absorber tube. In calculating the energy balances, we 

have assume that [9, 13]: 

 The heat transfer fluid is incompressible; 

 The parabolic shape is symmetrical; 

 The ambient temperature around the concentrator is 
uniform; 

 The shadow effect of the absorber tube on the mirror 
is negligible; 

 The solar flux at the absorber is uniformly 
distributed; 

 The glass is considered opaque to infrared radiation; 

 The exchanges by conduction in the absorber and the 
glass are negligible. 

III.1. Energy balance for the fluid 

The energy balance for the heat transfer fluid that 

circulates in the absorber tube was expressed by the 

following relationship [2, 5, 7, 10, 11]: 

 

X

(X,t)T
..Q.Cρq

t

(X,t)T
..A.Cρ

F
vFFu

F
A,FF











     

int

 (1) 

 

The initial conditions and the boundary conditions of 

equation (1) are [2, 5, 10, 11]: 

 

(0)T=(t)T=t)(X,T

 (t)T=(t)T=t)(0,T

ambinitialF,F

ambentryF,F
 (2) 

qu is the heat flow transmitted to the fluid [W]; it was 

given by the following relationship [3, 10, 14]: 

)T(T.Ahq
FAA,Fu


int

 (3) 

III.2. Energy balance for the absorber tube 

The energy balance for the absorber was given by the 

following equation [2, 5, 7, 10, 11]: 

 

 

 

 
Figure 4. Thermal balance on a surface element of the parabolic 

cylindrical concentrator [3].  

 

 

(X,t)(X,t)-qq(t)q

t

(X,t)T
..A.Cρ

uexitabsorbed

A
AAA








    

 (4)

 

 

The initial conditions for the equation (4) are [5, 10, 

11]: 

 

)((t)=T(X,t)=TT
ambA,initialA

0
  (5) 

III.3. Energy balance of the glass 

Similarly, the energy balance for the glass was given 

by [2, 5, 7, 10, 11]: 

(X,t)(X,t)-qq

t

(X,t)T
..A.Cρ

ext

V
VV V

int
                 






 (6) 

 

The initial condition of equation (6) is [5, 10, 11]: 

)((t)=T(X,t)=TT
ambV,initialV

0  (7) 

 

To solve this problem, we chose the finite difference 

method. A calculation program Matlab was established, 

after the discretization of non-linear equations that 

allowed us to obtain a set of numerical results. 

 

The thermal power emitted by the sun and received by 

the concentrator is therefore [5, 10, 11, 22]: 

 

.DNI.KA=q
camcmabsorbed

..  (8) 

 

Where Kcam is Angle of incidence correction factor 

modified,  is the intercept factor. 

We can express the optical efficiency ( optη ) of the 

concentrator [5, 10, 11, 15]: 

 

camopt
K=η ..α.ρ

m
  (9) 

 

The thermal efficiency ( η ) was calculated as follows [2, 



M. Ghodbane et al. 

IJECA-ISSN: 2543-3717. December 2017                                                                                                                Page 33 
 

5, 10, 11, 15]: 

 

C

ambAAL
opt

ADNI

)T.(T.AU
ηη




  (10) 

III.4. The coefficient of thermal losses 

The coefficient of thermal losses (UL) was expressed 

as [2, 5, 7, 10, 11]: 

 

 
























































































































VVA,ext

A,A

AA

ambAambA

vA,ext

A,

ambA

L

ε

f

εD

DT
εε

)T).(TTσ(T

hD

D

f

TT
C

U

1

450
104.0

1

1

int

1

22

1

int

25.0

1
 

(11) 

 

Where the factor (f) takes into account the loss ratio 

resulting from the wind, it can be obtained by the 

following equation [5, 10, 11]: 

 

 

  27300325.0exp                  

3.161.1
9.04.0

int





A

-

vA

-

A,

T

 h εDf
 (12) 

 

C1 was given by the following empirical expression 

[5, 10, 11]: 

 
251

6.06.0

int

int

2

1

1

5.096.045.1
,

A,extA,

A,

A

DD
D

ε
C


















  

(13) 

The term (hv) is the wind convection coefficient, it can 

be obtained by the following equation (according 

McAdams (1954)) [5, 10, 11, 15, 23]: 

 

Wv
Wh 8.37.5   (14) 

IV. Results and discussion 

The PTC concentrators can offer an opportunity to 

sunny countries such as Algeria for investment and 

construction of solar central. 

The right choice of the studied site is very important 

because each site is characterized by its direct 

illumination, the ambient temperature, the speed of the 

wind, the latitude, and the elevation compared to the 

level of the sea, which play a significant role on the 

profitability of the solar concentrator. These factors were 

quite apparent in the results obtained where the energy 

production vary when moving the solar collector in 

different sites. We selected Guemar city to conduct this 

study, it is located at an altitude of 62 meters with a 

latitude and longitude of 33°29'24'' N north and 

06°47'50'' East respectively. PTC concentrator had 

headed south. We chose tap water as the working fluid 

with a flow rate of 0.015 [kg/s]. 

The absorber was the seat of the thermal conversion 

(from concentrated solar radiation into high temperature 

heat sensitive). On wall of the absorber tube, the thermal 

energy acquired from the sun has propagated by direct 

contact of the particles without appreciable displacement 

of the latter. Figures 5a and 5b reflect the average 

intensities contours of heat flux on the absorber surface 

based on the direct solar radiation (DNI). 

a) DNI= 1000 [W/m²] 

 

b) DNI= 500 [W/m²] 

 
 

Figure 5. Flux intensity contour at the absorber tube [W/m²]. 

 

This assessment can approach the actual values of 

thermal flow influencing absorbers with a reflectivity of 

the mirrors equal to 92% and real illumination values. 

The main objective of the optical characterization have 

known the concentration of solar power on the surface 

absorber tube, and the evolution of the maximum value 

of thermal flow depending on the incidence angle of 

solar radiation. 

Figures 6a and 6b illustrate the average heat flow 

distributions. We observe a good distribution of heat flux 



M. Ghodbane et al. 

IJECA-ISSN: 2543-3717. December 2017                                                                                                                Page 34 
 

at the surface level of the absorber. We can say that our 

concentrator has a good overall optical behavior. Thus, 

we can conclude that the average distributions of heat 

flux provided the software ray tracing issues 

representative of real flux distributions by the parabolic 

trough concentrator. 

a) DNI= 1000 [W/m²] 

 
 

b) DNI= 500 [W/m²] 

 
 

Figure 6. Flux intensity distribution at the absorber tube [W/m²]. 

 

Now we turn to the thermal analysis, the finite 

difference method was chosen to solve the non-linear 

equations of thermal balance. A calculation program 

using Matlab was developed after the discretization of 

the linear equations, which allowed us to obtain a set of 

numerical results, thus we will be able to know the 

performance of the concentrator. Figure 7 shows the 

evolution of optical performance versus time during the 

day of the study, while Figure 8 shows the evolution of 

thermal performance versus time for the same day. 

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0.4

0.45

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

time [hour]

O
p
ti
c
a
l 
e
ff

ic
ie

n
c
y

time [hour]
 

Figure 7. Evolution of optical efficiency. 
 

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0.4

0.45

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

time [hour]

T
h
e
rm

a
l 
e
ff

ic
ie

n
c
y

time [hour]
 

Figure 8. Thermal efficiency evolution versus the time. 

 

It is noted that the thermal performance was equal to 

60.61% at 12:00, after this time, the thermal efficiency 

decreases with the decreasing of solar radiation 

resources.  

The receiver must absorb as much concentrated solar 

flux as possible, and convert it into thermal energy; this 

heat is transferred to water. The difference in temperature 

between the two faces (internal and external) of the 

absorber tube generates the creation of a heat flow. 

Figure 9 represents the variations of the absorber tube 

temperature, the fluid temperature and the glass 

temperature, where the wind speed (Ww) during the day 

was equal to 4.5 [m/s] and the water temperature inside 

the absorbent tube was equal to 9°C. 

At the beginning of the day (at 08:00am), the 

temperature of the absorber tube was equal to the 

ambient temperature (TA = Tamb = 292K), after one 

hour of heating this temperature increases according to 

the direct solar radiation concentrated to the absorber, it 

reaches 302 k. It continues to increase where its value 

becomes stationary. In this case, the absorber is in a state 



M. Ghodbane et al. 

IJECA-ISSN: 2543-3717. December 2017                                                                                                                Page 35 
 

of equilibrium, that is to say that all the surfaces of the 

absorber are at the same temperature, this state of 

equilibrium was very difficult to establish because of the 

influence of the wind. The maximum of the ambient 

temperature was reached between 12:00 and 14:00 hours, 

when the illumination is important.  

The absorber tube is heated by concentrated direct 

solar radiation; this radiant energy absorbed by the 

absorber was converted into heat energy, which is 

transferred by convection to the water inside the receiver, 

which increases its temperature. 

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
280

290

300

310

320

330

340

350

360

time [hour]

te
m

p
e
ra

tu
re

 [
K

]

 

 

T
f
luide

T
a
bsorber tube

T
g
lass tube

- The temperature of the water

at the absorber tube inlet = 9 ° C.

-The wind speed during the day

is 4.5 m / s

 
 

Figure 9. Evolution of the temperatures (TA, TF and TV). 

 

The heat transfer between the absorber tube and the 

water comes from the macroscopic movement of the 

water. According to figure 9, it is certain that the 

absorber tube temperature (TA), the water temperature 

(TF) and the glass temperature (TV) were directly related 

to the experimental conditions of weather conditions. 

The results in figure 9 show the rapid heating of water 

by solar irradiation during the day. It is noted that the 

temperature of the absorber (TA) is close to (TF) which it 

has the maximum value at 14:55, we recorded an 

absorber temperature equal to 353 (K), and this is a sign 

of a good thermal insulation and low heat loss between 

the absorber tube and the surrounding air. The selective 

surfaces are taking advantage of different wavelengths of 

incident solar radiation, so the selectivity of the surface 

will result in a maximum absorption in the solar and 

infrared spectrum minimum. Therefore, the absorber tube 

has a high absorptivity for visible solar radiation and low 

emissivity for the long‘s wavelength infrared radiation 

due to the selective coating of the absorber. This coating 

can retain the greater part of the incident solar energy on 

the surface of the absorber and lose very little amount of 

heat radiation in the wavelength when the absorbent 

surface becomes hot. 

The decrease of the absorber tube surface results in an 

increase in the concentration, therefore the performances 

are higher. For a test day with a constant volumetric 

flow, the temperature depends mainly on the qabsorbed (t), 

which is based on optical parameters, geometric of the 

concentrator and direct radiation received by the 

collector. 

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

time [hour]

th
e
 p

o
w

e
r 

a
b
s
o
rb

e
d
 [

W
]

 
Figure 10. Evolution of the power absorbed. 

 

The inside of the absorber absorbs infrared radiation, 

which undergoes a temperature increase (TA) 

(greenhouse effect). Therefore, the temperature of the 

outer side is lower and close to the ambient medium 

subjected mainly to the wind speed, which creates 

convection to the outer side of the absorber, that is why 

the information about the meteorological data, including 

wind speed and ambient temperature are important 

parameters. The useful power absorbed by the receiver is 

used to heat the water inside the receiver and increases its 

temperature to a temperature of 353 k at 14:55. 

In nature, there are three modes of heat transfer, 

thermal transfer by conduction, by convection (natural 

and / or forced) and by radiation. From these three modes 

of transfer results three types of thermal losses: thermal 

losses by conduction, by convection and finally by 

radiation. For the PTC solar concentrator, the heat losses 

are important because the temperature of the absorber 

tube is high. Moreover, these concentrators require 

regular maintenance to maintain the optical quality of the 

mirrors subjected to dust and corrosion of the 

environment. Figure 11 shows the variation in the 

coefficient of thermal losses as a function of the 

difference in temperature between the absorber tube and 

the ambient temperature (TA-Tamb). In general, the heat 

loss coefficients depend on the insulation quality of PTC 

collector. 

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
3.250

3.375

3.500

3.625

3.750

3.875

4.000

4.125

4.250

4.375

4.500

4.625

4.750

4.875

5.000

th
e
rm

o
l 
lo

s
s
e
s
 c

o
ff
e
c
ie

n
t 
[W

/m
².

K
]

(T
A
-T

amb
) [°C]

Equation

y = Intercept + B1*x^1 + B2*x^2

Weight No Weighting

Residual Sum 
of Squares

3.23177E-28

Adj. R-Square 1

Value Standard Error

Intercept 3.4719 1.28987E-15

B1 0.0281 4.41468E-17

B2 -1E-4 3.02289E-19

 
Figure 11. Evaluation of thermal losses coefficient. 



M. Ghodbane et al. 

IJECA-ISSN: 2543-3717. December 2017                                                                                                                Page 36 
 

 
It can be seen from figure 11 that the coefficients of 

global heat losses (UL) increase slightly with increasing 

temperature. Thus, the coefficient of overall losses varies 

proportionally with the difference in temperature 

between the receiver tube and the ambient temperature 

(TA-Tamb), and this is due to the amount of heat absorbed 

by the absorber. UL increases with the increase of (TA-

Tamb), it varies from 3.4 to 5 W / m².K where 0° C < (TA-

Tamb) <70 ° C. Therefore, we see that the coefficient of 

losses varies in a slightly slow way; this is due to the 

range of operating temperature that is not high, and also 

to the good thermal insulation of the receiver. 

Generally, the climatic conditions vary from season to 

another (intensity of solar radiation and the ambient 

temperature) affect the productivity of hot water. 

Through our study on linear concentrator [3-6, 10, 11], 

we can conclude that the results are very encouraging to 

exploit and build fields of linear concentrators in all 

regions of the country (north, south, east and west). 

V. Conclusion  

This work is a numerical study of a parabolic trough 

concentrator (PTC) in a volatile day in the winter (Low 

air temperature with some wind). Tap water was used as 

heat transfer fluid. The study was based on the numerical 

analysis of the energy balance equations of the absorbent 

tube, the water and the glass envelope surrounding the 

absorbent tube. According to this numerical solution, we 

can control the absorber temperature, the fluid outlet 

temperature and the glass temperature. The thermal 

efficiency of device exceeds 61%, where the fluid 

temperature at outlet of the absorber tube is equal to 344 

[K]. The results are very encouraging for the 

development of this type of solar concentrator in the 

country.  

References 

[1] P. Bessemoulin and J. Oliviéri, "Le rayonnement 

solaire et sa composante ultraviolette," La 

Météorologie, vol. 8, no. 31, 2000, pp. 42-59. 

[2] M. Ghodbane, B. Boumeddane, and N. Said, 

"Design and experimental study of a solar system 

for heating water utilizing a linear Fresnel 

reflector," Journal of Fundamental and Applied 

Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 804-825. 

http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v8i3.8, 01/09/2016 

2016. 

[3] M. Ghodbane, B. Boumeddane, and N. Said, "A 

linear Fresnel reflector as a solar system for heating 

water: theoretical and experimental study," Case 

Studies in Thermal Engineering, vol. 8, no. C, pp. 

176-186. 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2016.06.006, 2016. 

[4] M. GHodbane, B. Boumeddane, and S. Largot, 

"Simulation numérique d’un concentrateur 

cylindro-parabolique en El Oued, Algérie," 

International Journal of Scientific Research & 

Engineering Technology (IJSET), vol. 3, no. 2, 

2015, pp. 68-74. 

[5] M. Ghodbane, B. Boumeddane, and S. Largot, 

"Etude optique et thermique d’un concentrateur 

cylindro-parabolique en site d’Alger, Algérie," in 

IXth International Congress on Renewable Energy 

and the Environment, Djerba, Tunisie, 18-20 March 

2015. 

[6] M. Ghodbane, B. Boumeddane, S. Largot, and H. 

Berkane, "Modélisation d'un cycle de réfrigération 

solaire à éjecteur couplée à un concentrateur 

cylindro-parabolique," in International Conférence 

en Clean Cooling Technologies in the ME NA 

Regions (ICT3_MENA'2015) Bou Smail, W. 

Tipaza, 5-6 October 2015. 

[7] M. Ghodbane and B. Boumeddane, "Optical 

modeling and thermal behavior of a parabolic 

through solar collector in the Algerian Sahara " 

AMSE JOURNALS-AMSE IIETA publication-

2017-Series: Modelling B, vol. 86, no. 2,  2017, pp. 

406-426. 

[8] M. Ghodbane and B. Boumeddane, "Estimating 

solar radiation according to semi empirical 

approach of PERRIN DE BRICHAMBAUT: 

application on several areas with different climate 

in Algeria," International Journal of Energetica, vol. 

1, no. 1, 2016, pp. 20-29. 

[9] M. Ghodbane and B. Boumeddane, "Numerical 

simulation of a solar-driven ejector refrigeration 

cycle coupled to a parabolic trough concentrator," 

International Journal of Chemical and Petroleum 

Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1-12. 

[10] M. Ghodbane and B. Boumeddane, "A numerical 

analysis of the energy behavior of a parabolic 

trough concentrator," Journal of Fundamental and 

Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, 2016, pp. 671-691. 

[11] M. Ghodbane and B. Boumeddane, "Numerical 

modeling of a parabolic trough  solar collector at 

Bouzaréah, Algeria," international Journal of 

Chemical and Petroleum Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, 

2015, pp. 11-25. 

[12] Z. Sen, "Flat plate collectors," in Solar Energy 

Fundamentals and Modeling Techniques: 

Atmosphere, Environment, Climate Change and 

Renewable Energy: Springer, 2008, pp. 246-249. 

[13] A. Rabl, Active solar collectors and their 

applications. New York Oxford, Oxford University 

Press, 1985. 

[14] S. A. Kalogirou, Solar Energy Engineering: 

Processes and Systems, 1st ed. Academic Press, 

2009. 

[15] D. Y. Goswami, F. Kreith, and J. F. Kreider, "Off-

Normal Incidence Effects," in Principles of solar 

engineering2nd ed.: Taylor & Francis, 1999, p. 139. 



M. Ghodbane et al. 

IJECA-ISSN: 2543-3717. December 2017                                                                                                                Page 37 
 

[16] D. Y. Goswami and F. Kreith, "Solar energy 

resources," in Energy conversion, T. F. group, Ed.: 

CRC Press, 2007, Chapter 5, pp. 1-9. 

[17] M. Ghodbane, N. Moummi, B. Boumeddane, S. 

Largot, and H. Berkane, "Study and numerical 

simulation of solar system for air heating," Journal 

of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, 

pp. 41-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v8i1.3, 

2016. 

[18] J. R. Vaillant, Utilisation et promesse de l’énergie 

solaire. 1978. 

[19] J. Kramer. (2015). Kramer junction (californie) : la 

plus grande centrale solaire thermique du monde. 

Available: http://www.eco-conscient.com/art-53-

centrale-solaire-thermique-de-kramer-junction-

californie.html 

[20] T. Wendelin, A. Dobos, and A. Lewandowski, 

"SolTrace: A Ray-Tracing Code for Complex Solar 

Optical Systems," Technical Report October 2013, 

Available: http://www.osti.gov/bridge. 

[21] H. Chabahi, B. Boumeddane, and N. Said, 

"Dimensionnement et expérimentation d’un 

concentrateur linéaire a miroirs de fresnel," thesis of 

a state engineer in mechanical engineering, 

Mechanical Departement, Saad Dahlab University, 

Blida 1, Algeria, 2011. 

[22] S. Bonnet, M. Alphilippe, and P. Stouffs, 

"Conversion thermodynamique de l'énergie solaire 

dans des installations de faible ou de moyenne 

puissance:  Réflexion sur choix du meilleur degré 

de concentration," in Revue d'énergie renouvelable: 

11
ème

 journée internationales de thermique, 2003, 

pp. 73-80. 

[23] J. A. Duffie and W. A. Beckman, Solar Engineering 

of Thermal Processes, 4th ed. Wiley, 2013. 

 

Nomenclatures 

 

.

V  
Volume flow rate (m

3
/s)  


 Intercept factor 

AA Absorber area (m²) 

Ac Collector aperture area (m²). 

CA Specific heat of the absorber (J/kg k). 

CF Specific heat of the fluid (J/kg k). 

Cp Thermal capacity (J/kg k).  

DA,ext External diameter of the absorber (m). 

DA,int Internal diameter of the absorber (m). 

DV,ext External diameter of the glass tube (m). 

DV,int 
Internal diameter of the glass (the 

transparent envelope) (m). 

hv 
Coefficient of transfer by convection of 

the wind (W/m².K). 

Kcam 
Angle of incidence correction factor 

modified 

qabsorbed 
Heat absorbed in the absorber tube 

(W/m²). 

qexte 

Heat quantity lost to the outside 

(convection + conduction) between the 

glass and ambient (W/m²). 

qint 
Internal heat (convection + conduction) 

between the glass and ambient (W/m²). 

qu 
Heat exchanged by convection between 

the absorber and the fluid (W/m²). 

Se 
The effective area of a sensor reflector 

(m²).  

Ww Wind velocity (m/s). 

TA Temperature of the absorber (K). 

Tamb Ambient temperature (K). 

TF Fluid temperature (K). 

TV Temperature of the glass (K). 

UL 
Overall coefficient of heat loss 

(W/m².K). 

εA Emissivity of the absorber tube 

εV 
Emissivity of the casing transparent 

glass 

ρA Density of the absorber (kg/m
3
). 

ρF Fluid density (kg/m
3
). 

σ Stefan-Boltzmann constant (W/m
2
.K

4
).