Proceeding of Veterinary and Animal Science Days 2017, 6th- 8th June, Milan, Italy HAF © 2013 Vol. IV, No. 1s ISSN: 2283-3927 l Keywords Tumor microenvironment, Mouse models, Histology, Immunohistochemistry, Digital image analysis CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Lucia Minoli lucia.minoli@unimi.it JOURNAL HOME PAGE riviste.unimi.it/index.php/haf Tumor microenvironment in experimental models of human cancer: morphological investigational approaches Lucia Minoli1,2* , Eugenio Scanziani1,2 1University of Milan, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Italy 2Fondazione Filarete, Mouse and Animal Pathology Laboratory (MAPLab), Milan, Itlay Abstract Tumor microenvironment (TME) is defined as the non-tumoral part of tumors. It is composed of different cell populations and structures (such as tumor-associated vasculature, immune- inflammatory cells, fibroblasts). TME could either promote or antagonize tumor growth and has a great potential as target for novel therapeutic strategies (Hanahan and Coussens, 2012). Along with several methods (i.e. molecular assays), morphological techniques allow to evaluate the components of TME in the setting of their action. The aim of this work was to define valuable morphological approaches useful to investigate the TME. Histological and immunohistochemical techniques, along with digital image analysis, were tested on experimental mouse models (both xenograft and genetically engineered mice) of four human tumors (ovarian cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), colon adenocarcinoma, thyroid carcinoma). Concerning the vascular compartment, CD31 immunostaining and double-immunofluorescence with CD31 and α-SMA (pericytes marker) allowed to respectively quantify vessels and evaluate their maturation degree. Immunohistochemical detection of previously administrated Pimonidazole, revealed variable extended areas of hypoxia in a consistent pattern between frozen and formalin- fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Concerning the stromal component, anti-human MHC I and species-specific markers for Vimentin demonstrated the host-derivation of stroma in xenotumors, while Sirius Red histochemical staining allowed the quantification of desmoplasia in models of PDAC. Concerning immune-inflammatory cells, an immunohistochemical panel with CD3 (T-lymphocytes), B220 (B-lymphocytes), MPO (neutrophils) and Iba-1 (macrophages), showed high reliability in characterizing the tumoral infiltrate. Moreover, the application of markers specific for different macrophage subsets confirmed the higher prevalence of M2 (Arginase I positive) on M1 (iNOS positive) macrophages. YM1 demonstrated low performance in detecting the M2 population (Fig. 1). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en Proceeding of Veterinary and Animal Science Days 2017, 6th- 8th June, Milan, Italy HAF © 2013 Vol. IV, No. 1s ISSN: 2283-3927 Due to the microenvironmental heterogeneity which influence tumor development and behavior, a sole quantification is unreliable for characterizing the TME. Considering that, morphological techniques proved to be a valuable approach, allowing the evaluation of spatial distribution and mutual interaction between the different elements. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thanks Dr. Giavazzi (IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy), Dr. Alessandra Capuano (Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano (PN), Italy), Dr. Greco (IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy) and their teams. Fig.1: Mouse, subcutaneous xenograft of thyroid carcinoma, same area, 200x. Hematoxylin&Eosin (A). Immunohistochemistry for Iba-1 (B) revealed a macrophage infiltrate, which turn out to be also Arginase I positive (C), demonstrating the prevalent M2 polarization of tumor-associated macrophages. Conversely, immunohistochemistry for iNOS (D) show the absence of M1-polarized macrophages. References Hanahan, D. and Coussens, L. M., 2012. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 21, 309-322 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en