245 International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 03 No. 04 October’19 Case report: High unprotective anti-HBs antibodies level among vaccinated students in a tertiary teaching hospital in north-eastern Malaysia Murnihayati Hassan1,2, Zeehaida Mohamed1, Nabilah Ismail1, Habsah Hasan1, Zakuan Zainy Deris1,3*. Abstract Introduction: Universal hepatitis B vaccination to all newborns have been implemented in Malaysia, since 1989, with nationwide coverage of 96.26%. In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of anti-HBs and HBsAg among selected undergraduate students who presumably had completed hepatitis B vaccination during their early childhoods. Methods: Results of hepatitis B screening were obtained retrospectively from 239 newly enrolled undergraduate students at Health Campus, UniversitiSains Malaysia, in 2018. Serum samples were previously tested for the presence of anti-HBs and HBsAg using chemiluminescence immunoassay. Epidemiological data, anti-HBs and HBsAg were analysed using a descriptive statistical method. Results: Anti-HBs was undetected in 82.2 % (n = 194/236) of the tested students. None of these students had detectable HBsAg. Conclusion: This study showed anti-HBs level weaned after almost two decades of vaccination. Therefore, an alternative new testing algorithm such as the administration booster dose of hepatitis B vaccination can be considered in order to ensure that the new students are protected against potential exposure to hepatitis B during their clinical practices. Keywords: seroprevalence, student, anti-HBs, HBsAg, memory persistence. Correspondence to: Zakuan Zainy Deris, Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, UniversitiSains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia. E-mail : zakuan@usm.my 1. Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia 2. Department of Pathology, Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II, 15150 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia 3. Infection control and Epidemiology Unit, Hospital UniversitiSains Malaysia, 16150 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 03 No. 04 October’19 Page : 245-248 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31344/ijhhs.v3i4.111 Introduction Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is an oncogenic virus that causes acute hepatitis and chronic complications, such as chronic hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. In 2015 alone, it was estimated that 887 000 people succumbed to the long-term complications of HBV infection. In most circumstances, HBV infection is effectively preventable by vaccination with highly immunogenic HBV surface antigen (HBsAg). This vaccine is typically administered via intramuscular injection, usually at the anterolateral thigh muscle, in three doses (10 g intramuscular (IM) dose), during birth, followed by at 1 month and 6 months of age 1. In Malaysia, HBV vaccination is compulsory and included in the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI) since 1989 2. Subsequently, the coverage of HBV vaccination rate in this country improved, and was reported as high as 96.29%, with the effectiveness rate of up to 98% of the immune- competent population 3,4. Despite the effectiveness of the HBV vaccination program, hepatitis B infection remains as a major occupational health hazard among the healthcare personnel5. As such, majority academic and healthcare institutions employ mandatory screening of HBV infection and anti-HBs antibody level among the prospective students upon admission. This preventative measure is undertaken to reduce the risk of students with undetectable protective anti- HBs of contracting hepatitis B infection from the International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 03 No. 04 October’19 246 reactive patients and vice versa6. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to assess the level of anti-HBs antibody among newly enrolled-undergraduate students in the year 2018 at Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia. These students are presumed to have completed all three doses of hepatitis B vaccination, during their early childhood. In addition, the prevalence of HBsAg among those students and the effectiveness of screening for anti-HBs were also evaluated. Methodology This is a retrospective study involving analysis of serum results of 236 undergraduate students who were enrolled at Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia for the year 2018. All studentswere presumed to have received complete hepatitis B vaccination during infancy. Their samples were screened for the presence of anti-HBs antibody and HBsAg using Elecsys HBs antigen II and Elecsys Anti-HBs II chemiluminescenceassays on Roche Cobas e 601 analyser. The limit of detection and limit of quantification of HBsAg were 2.0 IU/L and 1.5 million IU/L respectively. Adequate serological protection is defined as an anti-HBs antibody level of≥ 10IU/L. All serum with reactive HBsAg and anti-HBs were retested using the same analyser. Only samples repeatedly reactive HBsAg were reported as HBsAg reactive. Epidemiological data and serology results were analysed for descriptive statistics using SPSS Statistical software. Result As shown in Table 1, the age distributions of the 239 students were between 18 and 25 years old (Median: 19 years old). Of all, 78% were female and most were of the Malay ethnicity. In terms of HBsAg reactivity, none of the tested samples was positive. Noticeably, the vast majority of the students did not have a protective level of anti- HBs antibodies (82.2%, n = 194/236). Of those with a protective level of anti-HBs antibodies, the mean antibody titre was 99.1 IU/L (Range: (11.1 – 1000.0). All serum with reactive anti-HBs yield consistent results when retested. Discussion In this study, a low number of new students had a protective anti-HBs antibody level. This scenario of weaning of anti-HBs level occurs after ~two decades of HBV vaccination and is consistent with findings from a similar Taiwanese group which evaluated their college students who received HBV vaccine during infancy 7. Theoretically, the production of anti-HBs peaks after 1 – 2 month of the primary vaccination, and can last for approximately 10 – 31 years8. Therefore, a distant anti-HBs result cannot readily distinguish between a responder and a non-responder. According to the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a non-responder is defined as an individual with an anti-HBs level of 10 IU/L, after completion of two HBV vaccination doses6. Meanwhile, lifetime persistence of anti-HBs level at a concentration of ≥10 IU/L may be not necessary for protection because of the memory persistence that confers effective protection against infection as well as against disease (i.e. acute hepatitis, prolonged viremia, carriership, and chronic infection). Such immune response can be re-activated even though the vaccinated individuals have weaning or undetectable anti-HBs titres8. CDC does not recommend routine serological anti-HBs test- Table 1. Epidemiological distribution and serological prevalence among newly enrolled students (n = 236) Parameters Number (% or range) Age average Median 19 (18 – 25) < 18 years 0(0.0) 18-20 years 224 (94.9) 21-23 years 7 ( 3.0) >23 years 5 (2.1) Gender Male 52 (22.0) Female 184 (78.0) Race Malay 201 (85.2) Chinese 15 (6.3) Indian 14 (5.9) Others 6 ( 2.5) HBsAglevel Negative 236 (100.0) Positive 0 ( 0.0) Anti-HBsantibody titres Nonprotective level (< 10IU/L) 194 (82.2) Protective level ( ≥10 IU/L) 42 (17.8) Range of detectable level of anti-HBs Mean 99.1 (11.1 – 1000.0) 247 International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 03 No. 04 October’19 ing for newly recruited healthcare practitioners (HCP)1. Nevertheless, upon enrolment, the new recruits should provide written and dated records of HBV vaccination with documented post vaccination anti-HBs antibody titre of ≥10 IU/L 1. For a fully vaccinated group with nonprotective anti-HBs titres, a challenge dose of HBV vaccine may be administered to determine the presence of vaccine-induced immunologic memory through the generation of an anamnestic response1. An immunologic response (anti-HBs) of ≥10 IU/L following a challenge dose is considered protected, regardless of the subsequent titre (i.e. declines of anti-HBs)6. Meanwhile, the unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated group should receive complete doses of HBV retested for a serological response after 1 – 2 months of vaccination 1. Post-vaccination testing is useful as Lu et al. (2008) found that 28.7% of subjects who had received a complete series of HBV vaccine failed to mount an adequate anamnestic response. Moreover, the team also reported that a proportion of these subjects(27.2%) lost the hepatitis B vaccine conferred protective memory response, as evident by the lack of HBsAg-specific IFN-gamma or IL- 5-secreting PBMCs7. Similarly, a local study in Malaysia by Othman et al. (2018) involving 352 completely HBV-vaccinated individuals reported that only 27.6% had a protective level of anti-HBs titre9. Meanwhile, the remaining subjects had a nonprotective level of anti-HBs and been given abooster dose of hepatitis B vaccine. Of the latter group, 208 students (59.1%) mounted an adequate anamnestic response, while the rest of the subjects were given acomplete a series of hepatitis B vaccine. Two students (0.6%) weredetermined as non-responder9. These reports reflect the necessity of booster dose in order to mount adequate memory response in a high-risk group such as the HCP, medical students and volunteers. Moreover, this strategy is more valuable than conducting a generalized distant anti-HBs testing in fully vaccinated group6-7. To date, CDC reaffirmed that booster dose is not necessary for the immunocompetent individuals with a protective level of anti-HBs antibodies1. However, a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine remains as an important strategy that is employed as a screening tool for evaluating memory persistence due to the lack of documentation of post-vaccination baseline of anti-HBs titre among the subjects2,9,10. Furthermore, a booster dose after almost twenty years of vaccination can benefit certain occupation groups of fully vaccinated individuals that had loss vaccine-conferred memory persistence. Thus, this study allows the institution to identify this special group which is indicated to complete the second series of hepatitis B vaccination before deem as non-responders1. Conclusion Weaning of anti-HBs level in fully vaccinated individuals is evident after two decades of HBV vaccination. Academic institutions or healthcare providers should employ a more comprehensive strategy to determine the level of immunity against HBV infections among the fully vaccinated students/healthcare worker. Furthermore, such institutions should consider a booster vaccination strategy to demonstrate vaccine-conferred memory persistence, instead of continuing the traditional routine screening policy of anti-HBs titres for all students. Acknowledgements We thank the staffs at the Medical Microbiology & Parasitology Laboratory of UniversitiSains Malaysia for the direct and indirect contribution, especially to Mr Muhammad Amiruddin Abdullah. The authors would like to thank the Director of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia for the permission to access medical data and permission to publish this paper. Conflict of interests : None declared. Ethics Statement The institutional Human Research Ethics Committee indicated this report is exempted from ethical review. Authors’ Contributions: Conception and Design: MHH, NI, ZZD Analysis and interpretation of the data: MHH, ZM Drafting of the article: MHH Critical Revision of the article for important intellectual content: ZM, ZZD, HH Final approval of the article: All authors International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 03 No. 04 October’19 248 References: 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Immunization of Health-Care Personnel Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2011. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/cme/conted.html. [cited 2019 Feb 11] 2. Raihan R. Hepatitis in Malaysia: Past, Present, and Future. Euroasian Journal of Hepato- Gastroenterology 2016;6 (1):52–5 3. Raihan R, Mohamed R, Radzi Abu Hassan M, Md Said R. Chronic Viral Hepatitis in Malaysia: Where are we now? Euroasian Journal of Hepato- Gastroenterology 2017;7(1):65–7 4. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Appendix B: Immunization Management Issues. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2005. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/ mmwrhtml/rr5416a3.htm [cited 2019 Feb 11] 5. Goniewicz M, Włoszczak-Szubzda A, Niemcewicz M, Witt M, Marciniak-Niemcewicz A, Jarosz MJ. Injuries caused by sharp instruments among healthcare workers--international and Polish perspectives. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 2012;19 (3):523–7 6. Schillie S, Murphy T V, Sawyer M, Ly K, Hughes E, Jiles R, et al. CDC guidance for evaluating health- care personnel for hepatitis B virus protection and for administering postexposure management. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2013. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/24352112[cited 2019 Feb 11] 7. Lu C, Ni Y, Chiang B, Chen P, Chang M, Chang L, et al. Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to a Hepatitis B Vaccine Booster 15–18 Years after Neonatal Immunization. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008;197 (10):1419–26 8. Leuridan E, Van Damme P. Hepatitis B and the Need for a Booster Dose. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2011;53(1):68–75 9. Othman SN, Zainol Rashid Z, Abdul Wahab A, Abdul Samat MN, Ding CH, Ali UK, et al. Hepatitis B seroepidemiology and booster vaccination in pre- clinical medical students in a Malaysian university. Malaysian Journalof Pathology 2018;40 (3):295-302 10. Yang S, Tian G, Cui Y, Ding C, Deng M, Yu C, et al. Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults. Scientific Reports 2016; 27251 (6): 1-12